Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byOsborn Jackson Modified over 8 years ago
1
ND Community Call Salmon Community April 16, 2014
2
2 Agenda Roll Call Video Discussion: “Juvenile Hall School” At-Risk Programming Recent TA Requests Resource Walk-Thru: NDTAC Program Highlights Recent and Upcoming Events
3
3 Video Discussion “Juvenile Hall School” (2010)Juvenile Hall School Reactions? Do you include classroom observations when conducting subgrantee monitoring visits? Why or why not? If yes, what have been some of your observations? Do you use a protocol or checklist when observing a classroom? What kinds of things do you look for? How does the quality of teaching vary within and across your facilities? Do you feel you are in a position to influence the quality of instruction in your role as ND Coordinator? Why or why not? Do you feel you are in a position to influence the quality of instructional materials used in facilities in your role as ND Coordinator? Why or why not?
4
4 At Risk Programming State Number of At-Risk Programs AK1 DE DC0 HI ID8 IA0 ME0 MT5 NV2 NH4 NM8 PR RI0 SD2 UT VT0 WY10 Are these numbers correct for your state? What kind of programming are you funding? How well are your at-risk programs performing? Any challenging programs? Any success stories? Any lessons learned?
5
5 Recent TA Request REQUEST: Should we anticipate any CSPR changes for SY 2013-14? RESPONSE: NDTAC recommends collecting the same data to support program evaluation but there will be minor reporting changes: File specification C135 is being eliminated. States will not have to report the number of students who tested below grade level upon entry. The number of long-term students will be collected as a straight number. States will not have to report the sum of students with complete pre-post test data, a pre-test only, a posttest only, or no test data at all in file specifications C119 and C127. For more information view the file specifications updatesfile specifications updates
6
6 Recent TA Request Request: Is the non-regulatory guidance authoritative? Response: Yes, no, maybe so… Developed by ED Describes and exemplifies TIPD requirements in further detail than the statute Does not impose any new requirements beyond those in the ESEA and other applicable Federal statutes and regulations States are encouraged to consider the Guidance in developing their own guidelines and standards; however, you are free to develop alternative approaches that meet applicable Federal statutory and regulatory requirements Federal monitors often consult and reference the Guidance
7
7 Resource Walk-Thrus Neglected or Delinquent Program Highlights Neglected or Delinquent Program Highlights Education Advocate Program Washington State Education Advocate Program Transition and Reentry Programs Washoe County, Nevada Transition and Reentry Programs Northern Virginia Juvenile Detention Center Alexandria, Virginia Northern Virginia Juvenile Detention Center
8
8 Recent and Upcoming Events Interagency Juvenile Reentry Committee Meeting which will be held (April 21) 2:00-2:10: Brief introductions in the room and on the phone 2:10-2:20: AIR and ED Welcome 2:20-2:25: Approve notes from March meeting 2:25-2:45: Follow up from March meeting and discussion of inter-agency collective impact (Ricco) 2:45-3:05: OJJDP plans for juvenile reentry and requests for interagency support (Kellie) 3:05-3:15: Agency/organization updates 3:15-3:25: Juvenile Reentry snapshot for June FIRC meeting—revisions due by 4/30 3:25-3:30: Wrap-up and adjournment SSD Webinar Series Event: Guiding Principle #3, Equity & Continuous Improvement (April 29) SSD Webinar Series Event: Guiding Principle #3, Equity & Continuous Improvement
9
9 Upcoming Salmon Community Calls Wednesday, July 16, 2014, 2 – 3PM ET
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.