2. INCREASED EQUALIZATION Property Tax Relief Enhanced Opportunity for Students + =

3. The Problem … State funding has not kept pace with increasing costs and rising inflation School districts rely on school levies to maintain basic educational opportunities. ▫ This equates to higher local property taxes Local school levies are not equal ▫ Taxpayers pay more or less for the same school levy dollars depending on where they live 2

4. The stability of a republican form of government depends mainly upon the intelligence of the people, it is the duty of the legislature to establish a general and uniform system of public schools. The legislature shall make such provisions by taxation or otherwise as will secure a thorough and efficient system of public schools throughout the state. Minnesota Constitution Article XIII, Section 1 Education Funding IS a State Constitutional Mandate 3

5. History of the Basic Formula School Year Actual Basic Formula Allowance Dollar Increase "Perceived " Percent Change * Roll-ins and Adjustments Actual New Dollar Increase "Real" Percent Change in Formula 1991-92$3,050 1992-93$3,050$00.0% $00.0% 1993-94$3,050$00.0% $00.0% 1994-95$3,150$1003.3%$100$00.0% 1995-96$3,205$551.7% $551.7% 1996-97$3,505$3009.4%$300$00.0% 1997-98$3,581$762.2% $762.1% 1998-99$3,530$792.2%$130-$51-1.4% 1999-00$3,740$2105.9%$43$1674.5% 2000-01$3,964$2246.0%$67$1183.0% 2001-02$4,068$1042.6% $1042.6% 2002-03$4,601$53313.1%$429$1182.6% 2003-04$4,601$00.0% $00.0% 2004-05$4,601$00.0% $00.0% 2005-06$4,783$1844.0% $1844.0% 2006-07$4,974$1914.0% $1914.0% 2007-08$5,074$992.0% $992.0% 2008-09$5,124$491.0% $491.0% 2009-10$5,124$00.0% $00.0% 2010-11$5,124$00.0% $00.0% 2011-12$5,174$501.0% $501.0% 2012-13$5,224$501.0% $501.0% 2013-14$5,302$781.5% $781.5% 2014-15$5,831$52910.0%$424$105 2.0% 2015-16$5,948$1172.0% $117 2.0% Perceived Average 3.0% Real average 1.4% Real Inflation 3.0%

6. The Basic Formula Has Not Kept Up With Inflation The basic formula provides the majority of the funding that districts receive from the state 5 80% of our state general education funding comes from the basic formula.

7. Yet while funding lagged - mandates increased... Teacher Development and Evaluation No Child Left Behind Special Education Mandates Proficiency Testing GRAD Standards Transportation English Language Learning Health and Safety Mandates Physical Education HIV/AIDS Sex Education Drug/Alcohol Abuse Education Bus Safety Title 1 Programs

8. Special Education Requirements The “Individuals with Disabilities Education Act” (IDEA) 1975 brought over 1 million children who were previously kept at home or in institutions into the public school system. Neither the Federal Government or the State has ever paid the excess cost of providing mandated services to our special education children.

9. Special Education Cross-Subsidy (unfunded cost)

10. Districts rely on voter-approved school levies School levy revenue is primarily generated by local property taxes The state allows school districts to raise an additional $2,294 per pupil for general education revenue through several voter-approved or board–approved levies. The cost to the taxpayer “per levy dollar” is based on the individual property wealth of each district, which varies greatly across the state ▫ Without significant commercial and industrial property to broaden the tax base, taxpayers in mostly residential school districts can pay two or three time more for the same amount of revenue for their schools than taxpayers in high wealth districts. 9

11. Opportunity Gap - Annual cost to residential taxpayer for a $2,294 per pupil levy per $100,000 assessed value: Where do you live? Hopkins$172 West St. Paul$219 Bloomington$230 Minneapolis$239 Eden Prairie$244 Stillwater$255 Inver Grove Heights$349 North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale$358 St. Paul$390 Hastings$393 Mahtomedi$409 Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan$433 South Washington County$443 South St. Paul$541

12. Equalization is for Students and Taxpayers The intent of equalization was to make the cost of a school levy dollar uniform across the state so ALL districts have the same ability to raise school levy revenue for their students It's a "match" of state aid to provide tax relief for citizens in low property wealth districts Calculation of the state aid/local levy split: The equalization factor has not been adjusted to keep up with inflation. % Levy = District’s referendum market value per student $476,000 (equalizing factor) 11

13. The Erosion of Equalization South St. Paul Public Schools Note: In 2013, equalization was increased for the first $300 per pupil of a district’s levy. The rest of the district’s levy is equalized using the same equalizing factor set in 1993, which continues to erode as the graph shows.

14. Annual cost to residential taxpayer for a $2,294 per pupil levy per $100,000 assessed value IF equalization : Increased Equalization Equals Taxpayer Fairness + Enhanced Opportunity for Students Hopkins$172 West St. Paul$172 Bloomington$172 Minneapolis$172 Eden Prairie$172 Stillwater$172 Inver Grove Heights$172 North St. Paul-Maplewood-Oakdale$172 St. Paul$172 Hastings$172 Mahtomedi$172 Rosemount-Apple Valley-Eagan$172 South Washington County$172 South St. Paul$172

15. What can you do? Email or call your state legislators and share your concerns. Receive SEE’s electronic legislative updates and action alerts. ▫ Sign up online, www.schoolsforequity.org For more information, go to www.schoolsforequity.org www.schoolsforequity.org All public school children must have equal access to a high quality education regardless of where they live in Minnesota! 14