Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University 1 Database System Modeling Data in the Organization October 31, 2009 Software Park, Bangkok Thailand.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Entity-Relationship (ER) Modeling
Advertisements

4 1 Chapter 4 Entity Relationship (ER) Modeling Database Systems: Design, Implementation, and Management, Sixth Edition, Rob and Coronel.
Systems Development Life Cycle
Chapter 2 Modeling Data in the Organization
Data Modeling is an Analysis Activity
1 © Prentice Hall, 2002 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization Modern Database Management 6 th Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer, Mary B. Prescott, Fred.
Entity Relationship Model
© 2002 by Prentice Hall 1 David M. Kroenke Database Processing Eighth Edition Chapter 3 The Entity- Relationship Model.
Entity-Relation Modeling Hun Myoung Park, Ph.D., Public Management and Policy Analysis Program Graduate School of International Relations International.
Database Design & Mapping
System Analysis - Data Modeling
Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization
Conceptual Data Modeling, E-R Diagrams. Outline  Purpose and importance of conceptual data modeling  Entity-Relationship Model Entity  Attributes Relationships.
DATABASE APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT SAK 3408
Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Management, 5 th Edition, Rob & Coronel 1 Data Models: Degrees of Data Abstraction l Modified ANSI/SPARC Framework.
Chapter 2: Modeling Data in the Organization
CHAPTER 2: MODELING DATA IN THE ORGANIZATION © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Modern Database Management 11 th Edition Jeffrey.
Chapter 3 © 2005 by Prentice Hall 1 Objectives Definition of terms Definition of terms Importance of data modeling Importance of data modeling Write good.
© 2007 by Prentice Hall (Hoffer, Prescott & McFadden) 1 Entity Relationship Diagrams (ERDs)
1 © Prentice Hall, 2002 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization Modern Database Management 7th Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer, Mary B. Prescott, Fred R.
1 © Prentice Hall, 2002 CMIS564: E/R Modeling Dr. Bordoloi Based on Chapter 3; Modern Database Management 6 th Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer, Mary B. Prescott,
1 © Prentice Hall, 2002 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization Modern Database Management 6 th Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer, Mary B. Prescott, Fred.
3.1 CSIS 3310 Chapter 3 The Entity-Relationship Model Conceptual Data Modeling.
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 2: Modeling Data in the Organization Modern Database Management 10 th Edition Jeffrey.
Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization
Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization
Chapter 2: Modeling Data in the Organization
MIS 385/MBA 664 Systems Implementation with DBMS/ Database Management Dave Salisbury ( )
Conceptual Data Modeling, Entity Relationship Diagrams
4 1 Chapter 4 Entity Relationship (ER) Modeling Database Systems: Design, Implementation, and Management, Sixth Edition, Rob and Coronel.
DATABASEMODELSDATABASEMODELS  A database model ◦ defines the logical design of data. ◦ Describes the relationships between different parts of data.
Chapter 2 © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall CHAPTER 2: MODELING DATA IN THE ORGANIZATION Modern Database Management 11 th Edition.
CHAPTER 2: MODELING DATA IN THE ORGANIZATION © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Modern Database Management 11 th Edition Jeffrey.
© 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 2: Modeling Data in the Organization.
CHAPTER 2: MODELING DATA IN THE ORGANIZATION © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Modern Database Management 11 th Edition Jeffrey.
© Pearson Education Limited, Chapter 7 Entity-Relationship modeling Transparencies.
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Modeling Data in the Organization Chapters 3 + 4: Modern Database Management 9 th Edition.
3 & 4 1 Chapters 3 and 4 Drawing ERDs October 16, 2006 Week 3.
Chapter 2 © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter 2: Modeling Data in the Organization Modern Database Management 11 th Edition.
1 © Prentice Hall, 2002 Chapter 5: Logical Database Design and the Relational Model Modern Database Management 6 th Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer, Mary B.
Carnegie Mellon University © Robert T. Monroe Management Information Systems Data Modeling Management Information Systems Robert.
CHAPTER 2: MODELING DATA IN THE ORGANIZATION © 2013 Pearson Education 1 Modern Database Management 11 th Edition, International Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer,
Databases Illuminated Chapter 3 The Entity Relationship Model.
MIS 385/MBA 664 Systems Implementation with DBMS/ Database Management
The Entity-Relationship Model, P. I R. Nakatsu. Data Modeling A data model is the relatively simple representation, usually graphic, of the structure.
Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization. Business Rules Statements that define or constrain some aspect of the business Assert business structure.
Copyright © 2016 Pearson Education, Inc. Modern Database Management 12 th Edition Jeff Hoffer, Ramesh Venkataraman, Heikki Topi CHAPTER 2: MODELING DATA.
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization Modern Database Management 9 th Edition Jeffrey.
Copyright 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Modern Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer Joey F. George Joseph S. Valacich Chapter 10 Structuring.
Chapter 2: Modeling Data in the Organization
Chapter 3 1 Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization.
IS 4420 Database Fundamentals Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization Leon Chen.
© 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall 1 Lecture 3: Modeling Data in the Organization Modern Database Management 9 th Edition Jeffrey.
Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization
Modeling data in the Organization
Business System Development
Modelling Data in Organisation Entity-Relationship Model
Chapter 2: Modeling Data in the Organization
Overview of Entity‐Relationship Model
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, and Management Tenth Edition
Chapter 2: Modeling Data in the Organization
CHAPTER 4: LOGICAL DATABASE DESIGN AND THE RELATIONAL MODEL
Database Concepts Database Analysis
Review of Week 1 Database DBMS File systems vs. database systems
Chapter 3: Modeling Data in the Organization
ER MODELING Instructor: SAMIA ARSHAD
Presentation transcript:

Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University 1 Database System Modeling Data in the Organization October 31, 2009 Software Park, Bangkok Thailand Pree Thiengburanathum College of Arts and Media

2 Objectives Definition of terms Definition of terms Importance of data modeling Importance of data modeling Write good names and definitions for entities, relationships, and attributes Write good names and definitions for entities, relationships, and attributes Distinguish unary, binary, and ternary relationships Distinguish unary, binary, and ternary relationships Model different types of attributes, entities, relationships, and cardinalities Model different types of attributes, entities, relationships, and cardinalities Draw E-R diagrams for common business situations Draw E-R diagrams for common business situations Convert many-to-many relationships to associative entities Convert many-to-many relationships to associative entities Model time-dependent data using time stamps Model time-dependent data using time stamps Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

3 Business Rules Statements that define or constrain some aspect of the business Statements that define or constrain some aspect of the business Assert business structure Assert business structure Control/influence business behavior Control/influence business behavior Expressed in terms familiar to end users Expressed in terms familiar to end users Automated through DBMS software Automated through DBMS software Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

4 A Good Business Rule is: Declarative–what, not how Declarative–what, not how Precise–clear, agreed-upon meaning Precise–clear, agreed-upon meaning Atomic–one statement Atomic–one statement Consistent–internally and externally Consistent–internally and externally Expressible–structured, natural language Expressible–structured, natural language Distinct–non-redundant Distinct–non-redundant Business-oriented–understood by business people Business-oriented–understood by business people Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

5 A Good Data Name is: Related to business, not technical, characteristics Related to business, not technical, characteristics Meaningful and self-documenting Meaningful and self-documenting Unique Unique Readable Readable Composed of words from an approved list Composed of words from an approved list Repeatable Repeatable Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

6 Data Definitions Explanation of a term or fact Explanation of a term or fact – Term–word or phrase with specific meaning – Fact–association between two or more terms Guidelines for good data definition Guidelines for good data definition – Gathered in conjunction with systems requirements – Accompanied by diagrams – Iteratively created and refined – Achieved by consensus Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

7 E-R Model Constructs Entities: Entities: – Entity instance–person, place, object, event, concept (often corresponds to a row in a table) – Entity Type–collection of entities (often corresponds to a table) Relationships: Relationships: – Relationship instance–link between entities (corresponds to primary key- foreign key equivalencies in related tables) – Relationship type–category of relationship…link between entity types Attribute– property or characteristic of an entity or relationship type (often corresponds to a field in a table) Attribute– property or characteristic of an entity or relationship type (often corresponds to a field in a table) Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

8 Sample E-R Diagram (Figure 3-1) Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

9 Relationship degrees specify number of entity types involved Entity symbols A special entity that is also a relationship Relationship symbols Relationship cardinalities specify how many of each entity type is allowed Attribute symbols Basic E-R notation (Figure 3-2) Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

10 What Should an Entity Be? SHOULD BE: SHOULD BE: – An object that will have many instances in the database – An object that will be composed of multiple attributes – An object that we are trying to model SHOULD NOT BE: SHOULD NOT BE: – A user of the database system – An output of the database system (e.g., a report) Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

11 Inappropriate entities Systemuser System output Figure 3-4 Example of inappropriate entities Appropriate entities Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

12 Attributes Attribute–property or characteristic of an entity or relationahip type Attribute–property or characteristic of an entity or relationahip type Classifications of attributes: Classifications of attributes: – Required versus Optional Attributes – Simple versus Composite Attribute – Single-Valued versus Multivalued Attribute – Stored versus Derived Attributes – Identifier Attributes Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

13 Identifiers (Keys) Identifier (Key)–An attribute (or combination of attributes) that uniquely identifies individual instances of an entity type Identifier (Key)–An attribute (or combination of attributes) that uniquely identifies individual instances of an entity type Simple versus Composite Identifier Simple versus Composite Identifier Candidate Identifier–an attribute that could be a key…satisfies the requirements for being an identifier Candidate Identifier–an attribute that could be a key…satisfies the requirements for being an identifier Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

14 Characteristics of Identifiers Will not change in value Will not change in value Will not be null Will not be null No intelligent identifiers (e.g., containing locations or people that might change) No intelligent identifiers (e.g., containing locations or people that might change) Substitute new, simple keys for long, composite keys Substitute new, simple keys for long, composite keys Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

15 Figure 3-7 A composite attribute An attribute broken into component parts Figure 3-8 Entity with multivalued attribute (Skill) and derived attribute (Years_Employed) Multivalued an employee can have more than one skill Derived from date employed and current date Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

16 Figure 3-9 Simple and composite identifier attributes The identifier is boldfaced and underlined Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

17 Figure 3-19 Simple example of time-stamping This attribute that is both multivalued and composite Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

18 More on Relationships Relationship Types vs. Relationship Instances Relationship Types vs. Relationship Instances – The relationship type is modeled as lines between entity types…the instance is between specific entity instances Relationships can have attributes Relationships can have attributes – These describe features pertaining to the association between the entities in the relationship Two entities can have more than one type of relationship between them (multiple relationships) Two entities can have more than one type of relationship between them (multiple relationships) Associative Entity–combination of relationship and entity Associative Entity–combination of relationship and entity Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

19 Figure 3-10 Relationship types and instances a) Relationship type b) Relationship instances Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

20 Degree of Relationships Degree of a relationship is the number of entity types that participate in it Degree of a relationship is the number of entity types that participate in it – Unary Relationship – Binary Relationship – Ternary Relationship Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

21 Degree of relationships – from Figure 3-2 Entities of two different types related to each other Entities of three different types related to each other One entity related to another of the same entity type Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

22 Cardinality of Relationships One-to-One One-to-One – Each entity in the relationship will have exactly one related entity One-to-Many One-to-Many – An entity on one side of the relationship can have many related entities, but an entity on the other side will have a maximum of one related entity Many-to-Many Many-to-Many – Entities on both sides of the relationship can have many related entities on the other side Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

23 Cardinality Constraints Cardinality Constraints - the number of instances of one entity that can or must be associated with each instance of another entity Cardinality Constraints - the number of instances of one entity that can or must be associated with each instance of another entity Minimum Cardinality Minimum Cardinality – If zero, then optional – If one or more, then mandatory Maximum Cardinality Maximum Cardinality – The maximum number Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

24 Figure 3-12 Examples of relationships of different degrees a) Unary relationships Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

25 Figure 3-12 Examples of relationships of different degrees (cont.) b) Binary relationships Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

26 Figure 3-12 Examples of relationships of different degrees (cont.) c) Ternary relationship Note: a relationship can have attributes of its own Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

27 Figure 3-17 Examples of cardinality constraints a) Mandatory cardinalities A patient must have recorded at least one history, and can have many A patient history is recorded for one and only one patient Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

28 Figure 3-17 Examples of cardinality constraints (cont.) b) One optional, one mandatory An employee can be assigned to any number of projects, or may not be assigned to any at all A project must be assigned to at least one employee, and may be assigned to many Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

29 Figure 3-17 Examples of cardinality constraints (cont.) a) Optional cardinalities A person is is married to at most one other person, or may not be married at all Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

30 Entities can be related to one another in more than one way Figure 3-21 Examples of multiple relationships a) Employees and departments Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

31 Figure 3-21 Examples of multiple relationships (cont.) b) Professors and courses (fixed lower limit constraint) Here, min cardinality constraint is 2 Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

32 Figure 3-15a and 3-15b Multivalued attributes can be represented as relationships simple composite Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

33 Strong vs. Weak Entities, and Identifying Relationships Strong entities Strong entities – exist independently of other types of entities – has its own unique identifier – identifier underlined with single-line Weak entity Weak entity – dependent on a strong entity (identifying owner)…cannot exist on its own – does not have a unique identifier (only a partial identifier) – Partial identifier underlined with double-line – Entity box has double line Identifying relationship Identifying relationship – links strong entities to weak entities Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

34 Strong entity Weak entity Identifying relationship

35 Associative Entities An entity –has attributes An entity –has attributes A relationship –links entities together A relationship –links entities together When should a relationship with attributes instead be an associative entity ? When should a relationship with attributes instead be an associative entity ? – All relationships for the associative entity should be many – The associative entity could have meaning independent of the other entities – The associative entity preferably has a unique identifier, and should also have other attributes – The associative entity may participate in other relationships other than the entities of the associated relationship – Ternary relationships should be converted to associative entities Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

36 Figure 3-11a A binary relationship with an attribute Here, the date completed attribute pertains specifically to the employee’s completion of a course…it is an attribute of the relationship Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

37 Figure 3-11b An associative entity (CERTIFICATE) Associative entity is like a relationship with an attribute, but it is also considered to be an entity in its own right. Note that the many-to-many cardinality between entities in Figure 3-11a has been replaced by two one-to-many relationships with the associative entity. Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

38 Figure 3-13c An associative entity – bill of materials structure This could just be a relationship with attributes…it’s a judgment call Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

39 Figure 3-18 Ternary relationship as an associative entity Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University

40 Microsoft Visio Notation for Pine Valley Furniture E-R diagram Different modeling software tools may have different notation for the same constructs Pree Thiengburanathum, CAMT, Chiang Mai University