E. Todesco ENERGY OF THE LHC AFTER LONG SHUTDOWN 1 (2013-2014) C. Lorin, E. Todesco and M. Bajko CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E. Todesco DIPOLES FOR HIGH ENERGY LHC E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Acknowledgements: B. Bordini, L. Bottura, G. De Rijk, L. Evans, P. Fessia, J.
Advertisements

February 2009 Summary of Chamonix 09 Steve Myers.
New HV test specification for the LHC N. Catalan for the EI section.
MQXF state of work and analysis of HQ experimental current decays with the QLASA model used for MQXF Vittorio Marinozzi 10/28/
1 / 19 M. Gateau CERN – Geneva – CH 14th International Magnetic Measurement Workshop September 2005, Geneva, Switzerland.
E. Todesco PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues F. Cerutti, S. Fartoukh,
Expected Quench Levels of the Machine without Beam: Starting at 7 TeV ? P. Pugnat CERN, Geneva, Switzerland LHC Project Workshop Chamonix XV, Tuesday 24.
IV–3 Energy of Magnetic Field Main Topics Transformers Energy of Magnetic Field Energy Density of Magnetic Field An RC Circuit.
Beam-induced Quench Tests of LHC Magnets Beam-induced Quench Tests of LHC Magnets, B.Dehning 1 B. Auchmann, T. Baer, M. Bednarek, G. Bellodi, C. Bracco,
Quench-based magnet sorting at the MEB presented by L. Bottura Workshop on Beam generated heat deposition and quench levels for LHC magnets March 3 rd,
E. Todesco FIELD MODEL AT 7 TEV N. Aquilina, E. Todesco CERN, Geneva, Switzerland On behalf of the FiDeL team CERN, 17 th June.
A. Siemko and N. Catalan Lasheras Insulation vacuum and beam vacuum overpressure release – V. Parma Bus bar joints stability and protection – A. Verweij.
Workshop 12/04/2006AT/MTM SM18 Test Facility A. Siemko "Workshop on Test Facilities and measurement equipment needed for the LHC exploitation"
1 Second LHC Splice Review Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement possible QC tool for consolidated splices H. Thiesen 28 November 2011 K. Brodzinski,
LHC diodes: Status report (for information)
E. Todesco PROTECTION IN MAGNET DESIGN E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With help from B. Auchmann, L. Bottura, H. Felice, J. Fleiter, T. Salmi, M.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
F. Savary Question 1 A. Magnet design criteria for the prototype and production magnet to be tested before the installation into the tunnel.
E. Todesco EXPERIENCE WITH FIELD MODELING IN THE LHC E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Thanks to the FiDeL team CERN, Space charge th April 2013.
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
T. LeCompte Argonne National Laboratory Evolution of the Run Plan.
BCWG - 16/11/20102 Content WHY do we need a HW Commissioning campaign? WHAT are we going to do? HOW are we going to do it? ElQA QPS Powering Tests Planning.
Eric Prebys/LARP 2/17/2016.  CERN has taken unprecedented steps to control information about this event, including altering the electronic LHC log to.
Chamonix 2006, B.Dehning 1 Commissioning of Beam Loss Monitors B. Dehning CERN AB/BDI.
E. Todesco PROTECTION FOR QXF E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland QXF protection meeting 28 th October 2013.
J.P. Koutchouk, L. Rossi, E. Todesco A phase-one LHC luminosity upgrade based on Nb-Ti J.P. Koutchouk, L. Rossi, E. Todesco Magnets, Cryostats and Superconductors.
Faster ramp rates in main LHC magnets Attilio Milanese 7 Oct Thanks to M. Bajko, L. Bottura, P. Fessia, M. Modena, E. Todesco, D. Tommasini, A. Verweij,
E. Todesco MAGNET (RE)Training E. Todesco Magnets, Superconductors and Cryostats Group Technology Department, CERN LHC risk review, 5 th March 2009 Acknowledgements:
E. Todesco CAN WE IMPROVE THE MAGNETIC CYCLE/MODEL AND THEIR EFFECTS? E. Todesco For the FiDeL team: C. Alabau Pons, L. Bottura, M. Buzio, L. Deniau, L.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
P. P. Granieri 1,2, M. Breschi 3, M. Casali 3, L. Bottura 1 1 CERN, Geneva, CH 2 EPFL-LPAP, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, CH 3 University.
Tune: Decay at Injection and Snapback Michaela Schaumann In cooperation with: Mariusz Juchno, Matteo Solfaroli Camillocci, Jorg Wennigner.
E. Todesco THE LHC MAGNETIC MODEL AT 6.5 TEV E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland With contributions from N. Aquilina, L. Bottura, R. De Maria, L. Deniau,
HQ02A2 TEST RESULTS November 7, 2013 FERMILAB. HQ02 test at Fermilab 2  First HQ quadrupole with coils (#15-17, #20) of the optimized design o Only coil.
Expected field quality in LHC magnets E. Todesco AT-MAS With contributions of S. Fartoukh, M. Giovannozzi, A. Lombardi, F. Schmidt (beam dynamics) N. Catalan-Lasheras,
MQXFS1 Test Results G. Chlachidze, J. DiMarco, S. Izquierdo-Bermudez, E. Ravaioli, S. Stoynev, T. Strauss et al. Joint LARP CM26/Hi-Lumi Meeting SLAC May.
The Large Hadron Collider The 19 th Sep 2008 incident [R. Alemany] [CERN AB/OP] [Engineer In Charge of LHC] NIKHEF Seminar ( )
E. Todesco QUENCH BEHAVIOUR TEAM ACTIVITIES E. Todesco for the QBT CERN, Geneva Switzerland CERN, 7 th January 2016 MSC Technical Meeting.
Quench behavior of the main dipole magnets in the LHC By Gerard Willering, TE-MSC On behalf of the MP3-CCC team Acknowledgements TE-MSC, MP3, BE-OP, TE-MPE,
E. Todesco RETRAINING AND DETRAINING IN THE LHC E. Todesco Magnets, Superconductors and Cryostats Group Technology Department, CERN LHC Machine Advisory.
Ranko Ostojic AT/MEL 1.Beam heat loads 2.Magnet design issues related to heat loads.
SOME MORE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF TRAINING DATA
11T Magnet Test Plan Guram Chlachidze
Model magnet test results at FNAL
FiDeL: the model to predict the magnetic state of the LHC
LHC Hardware Commissionning
E. Todesco for the QBT CERN, Geneva Switzerland
ANALYSIS OF THE PRODUCTION DATA AFTER THERMAL CYCLE SECOND PART
MMI^2T limits for magnets, what are they and how where they developed
STATISTICAL SUMMARY AND INTERPRETATION OF THE TRAINING CAMPAIGNS
LHC Dipole Diode Insulation Consolidation Review (I) INTRODUCTION
Optimization of Triplet Field Quality in Collision
Powering the LHC Magnets
Field model deliverables for sector test and commissioning: when and what? The implementation of an accurate magnetic model will be vital for efficient.
QUENCH BEHAVIOUR TEAM ACTIVITIES
Circuits description and requirements - Closed Session-
DESIGN OPTIONS IN THE T RANGE
3 issues identified in review
POSSIBLE SCENARIOS FOR TRAINING
SEMI-ANALYTIC APPROACHES TO MAGNET DESIGN
Magnet Circuit performance at 6
HIGH LUMINOSITY LHC: MAGNETS
LHC OPERATION AND SUPPORT
REVIEW OF ESTIMATES OF RANDOM COMPONENTS IN THE INNER TRIPLET
HL LHC WP3 (magnets) TASK 2 ADVANCEMENT
Andrzej Siemko (CERN) and Marco Zanetti (MIT)
PROPOSAL OF APERTURE FOR THE INNER TRIPLET
Long term behavior of MQXFS1
Other arguments to train two sectors to 7 TeV
Electrical measurements and diagnostics
Presentation transcript:

E. Todesco ENERGY OF THE LHC AFTER LONG SHUTDOWN 1 ( ) C. Lorin, E. Todesco and M. Bajko CERN, Geneva Switzerland With relevant inputs from colleagues L. Bottura, F. Bordry, G. d’Angelo, G. De Rijk, P. Fessia, K. Foraz, E. Nowak, A. Siemko, J. P. Tock, D. Tommasini, A. Verweij Measurements at SM18 of 3-4 magnets G. Dib, G. Deferne Production data of training at SM18 V. Chohan, the SM18 team and the Indian collaboration Chamonix, 8 th February 2011

E. Todesco Energy of the LHC after long shut-down - 2 CONTENTS Estimates to reach TeV Magnets measured during production Magnets (mainly of 5-6) training during hardware commissioning Magnets tested in (from 3-4 incident) Models for 7 TeV Risks related to quench heater weakness Strategy

E. Todesco Energy of the LHC after long shut-down - 3 ESTIMATES TO REACH TeV: 1 - SCALING OF PRODUCTION DATA First approach: take the measurements after thermal cycle, compute the quench probability and apply to the LHC [P. Pugnat, A. Siemko, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 17 (2007) 1091.] About 10% sampling (119 magnets tested out of 1232) «After a TC performed on ∼ 11.5 % of MB […] ∼ 25 % of MB required at least one training quench to reach the nominal field equal to 8.33 T […] the number of quenches that may occur during the first powering cycles up to nominal field is around 330» Probably biased? According to the specification, magnets which had «bad performance» in virgin state went under a test after thermal cycle Estimate lowered to 200 total quenches to account for this effect, thus giving 25 quenches/sector

E. Todesco Energy of the LHC after long shut-down - 4 ESTIMATES TO REACH TeV: 1 - SCALING OF PRODUCTION DATA Simplest approach: take the measurements after thermal cycle, compute the quench probability and apply to the LHC [P. Pugnat, A. Siemko, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 17 (2007) 1091.] Second analysis performed at the end of the production [E. Todesco et al., Chamonix 2009, C. Lorin, E. Todesco, CERN ATS Report ] Large spread induced by the inclusion/exclusion of bad cases Need of training to get to 6.5 TeV

E. Todesco Energy of the LHC after long shut-down - 5 ESTIMATES TO REACH TeV: 2 - MONTECARLO OF PRODUCTION DATA Take the data before thermal cycle, use the correlations in performance before and after thermal cycle with a MonteCarlo [B. Bellesia, N. Catalan Lasheras, E. Todesco, Chamonix 2009] Contrary to previous scaling, we also use data in virgin conditions Similar result, but first evidence of a weakness of Firm3 present in the production data

E. Todesco Energy of the LHC after long shut-down - 6 ESTIMATES TO REACH TeV: 3 - TRAINING IN THE TUNNEL IN 2008 Hardware commissioning data in 2008 (training in the LHC) All sectors reached 5 TeV, seven reached 5.5 TeV Two sectors trained up to 6 TeV with few quenches Sector 5-6 pushed up to 6.6 TeV with  30 quenches Surprise: nearly all quenches from Firm3 magnets Scaling of these data More pessimistic w.r.t production data – sign of degradation

E. Todesco Energy of the LHC after long shut-down - 7 ESTIMATES TO REACH TeV: 4 - INCIDENT MAGNETS TESTED IN magnets measured, coming from 3-4 incident Low sampling (15 from Firm1 – 11 from Firm2 – 6 from Firm3) Could be biased if the magnets suffered from incident «For these magnets, coils have not been touched, at most the electrical connections were cured» [P. Fessia] Unfortunately, only 6 from Firm3 Scaling of these data Consistent with production data

E. Todesco Energy of the LHC after long shut-down - 8 CONTENTS Estimates to reach TeV Magnets measured during production Magnets (mainly of 5-6) training during hardware commissioning Magnets tested in (spares and refugees from 3-4) Models for 7 TeV Risks related to quench heater weakness Strategy

E. Todesco Energy of the LHC after long shut-down - 9 MODELS FOR 7 TEV: QUENCH «CREEP» A log fit was proposed for fitting training data in the tunnel Is the same type of log t dependence is used for creep (Also used for flux creep in Tevatron data of chromaticity decay) Not physical in the limit t   900 to 1300 quenches to reach 7 TeV A. Verweij, Chamonix 2009 CERN ATS (2009) 25

E. Todesco Energy of the LHC after long shut-down - 10 MODELS FOR 7 TEV: SLIP-STICK MODEL Slip-stick model gives a functional equation for training Equilibrium between superconductor margin and energy dissipated by friction [P. P. Granieri, C. Lorin, E. Todesco, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 21 (2011) 3555] eφeφ x y ezez O FφFφ FrFr FφFφ FrFr x ΔxΔx

E. Todesco Energy of the LHC after long shut-down - 11 MODELS FOR 7 TEV: SLIP-STICK MODEL The slip-stick model gives a functional equation for training This model shown that asymptotic behaviour reached exponentially One parameter is freed to have a better fit of initial part of virgin data And extrapolation is taken on 5-6 data (2008 training in the tunnel) This gives an estimate of  110 quenches per octant for 7 TeV (as lower limit of from log fit)

E. Todesco Energy of the LHC after long shut-down - 12 LOG VERSUS EXP Both a log fit and an exp fit work … isn’t it strange ? It may happen over certain range I show it for chroma decay which has similar exp fit The double exp fit is used today in FiDeL for keeping chroma constant at LHC injection Double exp used to fit chroma decay at injection The same data in log scale !

E. Todesco Energy of the LHC after long shut-down - 13 SUMMARY OF ESTIMATES Final comparison of different estimates

E. Todesco Energy of the LHC after long shut-down - 14 SUMMARY OF ESTIMATES Large error associated to the estimates For scaling up to 6.5 TeV, low sampling For 7 TeV the model and the extrapolation, adding to the sampling We have to guess an average probability of quenching It could look like a binomial … but it is not I am still convinced the error is proportional to the 1/  n Discretization errors are already large 0 quenches could mean 0.5 quenches per magnet … this would give 50 quenches to get to 6.5 TeV in 3-4 magnets

E. Todesco Energy of the LHC after long shut-down - 15 SUMMARY OF ESTIMATES Final comparison (zoom of previous data) Different models give an idea of the associated errors

E. Todesco Energy of the LHC after long shut-down - 16 CONTENTS Estimates to reach TeV Magnets measured during production Magnets (mainly of 5-6) training during hardware commissioning Magnets tested in (spares and refugees from 3-4) Models for 7 TeV Risks related to quench heater weakness Strategy

E. Todesco Energy of the LHC after long shut-down - 17 RISKS 7 dipoles from Firm2 have non conformity in the quench heaters [from J. P. Tock] 3 at the level of the IFS, no need of disassembly – just a warm up 4 inside the magnet, they will be replaced in 2013 shutdown In 2010, about 100 magnet quenches at current 2 kA and 6 kA [from A. Siemko, this Chamonix] Plus, since 2008, quench heaters have been fired ~6000 times in the tunnel at 0 A [from E. Nowak] Firing per magnet ranging from 3 to 17, average 5 Now voltage reduced from 900 V to 200 V during hardware commissioning During a magnet training quench, on average 4 magnets quench [from A. Verwej] So, if we make 100 training quenches we have 400 quench heater firing, still well in the shadow

E. Todesco Energy of the LHC after long shut-down - 18 CONTENTS Estimates to reach TeV Magnets measured during production Magnets (mainly of 5-6) training during hardware commissioning Magnets tested in (spares and refugees from 3-4) Models for 7 TeV Risks related to quench heater weakness Strategy

E. Todesco Energy of the LHC after long shut-down - 19 STRATEGY Push the four initial sectors to 6.5 TeV (Nov Mar 2014) See if our estimates are valid:  50 quenches expected in four sectors Fix 6.5 TeV as LHC energy and push the other four sectors there  If more quenches are needed, fix 6.25 TeV as LHC energy and push there the other four sectors (  10 quenches expected in four sectors) Best guess of shutdown schedule [K. Foraz]

E. Todesco Energy of the LHC after long shut-down - 20 CONCLUSIONS Magnets coming from 3-4 do not show degradation of performance Our best estimates to train the LHC (with large errors)  30 quenches to reach 6.25 TeV  100 quenches to reach 6.5 TeV Two quenches/day  2 to 5 days of training per sector With 100 quenches one expects 400 quench heater firings The plan Try to reach 6.5 TeV in four sectors in March 2014 Based on that experience, we decide if to go at 6.5 TeV or step back to 6.25 TeV in March 2014 This still leaves three months for MonteCarlo

E. Todesco Energy of the LHC after long shut-down - 21 Back-up Quadrupoles performance: SM18: MQ as good as Firm1 MB 2008 hardware commissioning: « During HWC they show no need of retraining, reaching nominal with a few quenches » ]