Connect2Complete Theory of Change Development for Colleges and State Offices November 10, 2011 OMG Center for Collaborative Learning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LAO PDR Summary Findings from NOSPA Mission and Possible Next Steps.
Advertisements

1 Mid-Term Review of The Illinois Commitment Assessment of Achievements, Challenges, and Stakeholder Opinions Illinois Board of Higher Education April.
Implications for Think Tanks Need to be able to: –Understand the political context –Do credible research –Communicate effectively –Work with others Need.
Scaling-Up Early Childhood Intervention Literacy Learning Practices Maurice McInerney, Ph.D. American Institutes for Research Presentation prepared for.
Making Opportunity Affordable Grant
Leading the Way : Access. Success. Impact. Board of Governors Summit August 9, 2013.
Sustainability Planning Pat Simmons Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.
© 2006 The Finance Project Sustainability Planning: Keys to Success.
Determining Your Program’s Health and Financial Impact Using EPA’s Value Proposition Brenda Doroski, Director Center for Asthma and Schools U.S. Environmental.
Deanne Gannaway Facilitating Change in Higher Education Practices.
EVALUATION FINDINGS AND STATE SUCCESS STORIES AUGUST 30, CDC Field Triage Decision Scheme Implementation Project.
Measuring for Success NCHER Legislative Conference Sophie Walker September 26, 2013.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Building a Connected Infrastructure for Youth Success from Cradle to Career Nevada’s 2010 Dropout Prevention Summit Highlights and Accomplishments Since.
Knowledge Networking: How Networks Influence Policy By Aly Z. Ramji.
NRCOI March 5th Conference Call
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing PSU AS CATALYST FOR EDUCATIONAL GROWTH Imagining the Creation of an Intellectually Rich and.
Intellectual Property and Bilateral Trade Agreements Moving towards effective participation.
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for higher education institutions (HEIs) wishing to explore their entrepreneurial and innovative potential.
Impact Measurement and You Understanding Impact Measurement, Practical Tools, Key Questions.
Building Public Health / Clinical Health Information Exchanges: The Minnesota Experience Marty LaVenture, MPH, PhD Director, Center for Health Informatics.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Community Based Research and PolicyOptions Exploring the Possibilities of CBR and PolicyOptions at our Bonner Service Sites.
Sustainability Planning Framework and Process. © 2006 The Finance Project About The Finance Project  TFP is a specialized non-profit research, technical.
© 2012 The Finance Project Finding Funding and Planning for Sustainability of Community Tennis Programs May 5, Community Development Workshop.
Stages of Commitment to Change: Leading Institutional Engagement Lorilee R. Sandmann, University of Georgia Jeri Childers, Virginia Tech National Outreach.
Connect2Complete Program Theory of Change 1/26/12 OMG Center for Collaborative Learning.
Public Policy and Regulation Robert Shearer, Director Health Human Resource Strategies Division Health Canada.
INCREASING STUDENT SUCCESS: USING DATA TO SUPPORT BEST PRACTICES.
Planning for Sustainability National Child Traumatic Stress Network All Network Meeting February 6, 2007.
WHO–ITU National eHealth Strategy Toolkit An effective approach to national Strategy Development and Implementation Clayton Hamilton WHO Regional Office.
Engagement as Strategy: Leading by Convening in the SSIP Part 2 8 th Annual Capacity Building Institute May, 2014 Joanne Cashman, IDEA Partnership Mariola.
What is the best purpose for VECF? What outcomes do we anticipate and want? How can these best be achieved, measured and communicated? What is our relationship.
Summary of the U.S. Task Force on United Way’s Economic Model & Growth.
Texas Science Technology Engineering and Math (T-STEM) Initiative Robin Gelinas—Texas Education Agency Director of Policy Initiatives.
Institutional Change and Sustainability: Lessons Learned from MSPs Nancy Shapiro & Jennifer Frank CASHÉ KMD Project University System of Maryland January.
Archived Information Dissemination Strategies for a Hub and Spokes Model Mentoring Institution with Adaptors Based on presentation notes by Laurie Schreiner,
Using Intermediary Organizations to Gain Access to Quality Internships Presented by: Deanna Hanson, California Director, NAF.
Formative Evaluation of UNGEI Findings and Selected Recommendations Presentation to UNGEI GAC 14 February 2012.
Call to Community: Building Connections that Make a Difference for Students with Disabilities CA Community Meeting April 28, 2008.
CONNECTICUT HEALTH FOUNDATION: Update on Evaluation Planning for the Strategic Plan.
Presentation Title Capacity Building Programme on the Economics of Adaptation Supporting National/Sub-National Adaptation Planning and Action Economics.
The Future of CSL in Canada Synthesis of participant responses to key questions.
8 TH -11 TH NOVEMBER, 2010 UN Complex, Nairobi, Kenya MEETING OUTCOMES David Smith, Manager PEI Africa.
ROLE OF INFORMATION IN MANAGING EDUCATION Ensuring appropriate and relevant information is available when needed.
The shift to programs in the LAC region. What is a program? A program is a coherent set of initiatives by CARE and our allies that involves a long-term.
NSF IGERT proposals Yang Zhao Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wayne State University.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Overview of the Ready by 21™ Quality Counts Initiative.
MHC at its Best MHC at its Best.
Success is what counts. Achieving the Dream: Supporting Community College Student Success Richard Kazis Jobs for the Future Arkansas Legislative Task Force.
Boston | Geneva | Mumbai | San Francisco | Seattle | Washington FSG.ORG Building Backbone Organizations for Collective Impact October 24, 2012.
1 CollegeKeys Compact: An Action Plan to Remove Barriers to College Access for Students from Low-Income Backgrounds Massachusetts Association of Student.
Shaping a Health Statistics Vision for the 21 st Century 2002 NCHS Data Users Conference 16 July 2002 Daniel J. Friedman, PhD Massachusetts Department.
HEInnovate A self-assessment tool for Higher Education Institutions
The PHEA Educational Technology Initiative. Project Partners PHEA Foundations – Ford, Carnegie, Kresge, MacArthur South African Institute for Distance.
1 Discovery Contributions to Recent EC Policy Results– The View from State-Level Grantees and Stakeholders Prepared by the Center for Assessment & Policy.
Statistics for Transparency, Accountability, and Results: The Busan Action Plan for Statistics PARIS21 & The World BankMeeting on the Busan Action Plan.
PATHWAYS TO ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY Terry Grobe Jobs for the Future | November 16, 2015 OPPORTUNITY WORKS: HOW BACK ON TRACK PATHWAYS CAN REENGAGE STUDENTS.
Why Community-University Partnerships? Partnerships Enhance quality of life in the region Increase relevance of academic programs Add public purposes to.
Sustainability Planning Framework and Process Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24, 2015 ©
ELEMENTS OF STRATEGY FOR ACHIEVING SOCIAL PROTECTION FLOOR Global Network, Cape Town 7 December 2012 BY AFRICAN LABOUR RESEARCH NETWORK (ALRN)
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Creating Innovation through International collaboration Melanie Relton & Helen Kidd, British Council 7 April 2013, Qatar.
Dissemination in Canada CICAD Guidelines for School-based Prevention of Substance Abuse VII Meeting of the Expert Group on Demand Reduction September 13,
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
CAREER PATHWAYS THE NEW WAY OF DOING BUSINESS. Agenda for our Discussion Today we’ll discuss: Career Pathways Systems and Programs Where we’ve been and.
Florita Montgomery West Virginia University Extension Allison Nichols West Virginia University Extension Teresa McCoy University of Maryland Extension.
HRSA Early Childhood Comprehensive Systems (ECCS) Impact 2016 Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) Barbara Hamilton, Project Officer Division.
The Project Outputs and Activities.
Presentation transcript:

Connect2Complete Theory of Change Development for Colleges and State Offices November 10, 2011 OMG Center for Collaborative Learning

2 Begin to develop college- and state-level theories of change, including: Local context: Challenges and opportunities Key Strategies: Outcomes, indicators, and activities Assumptions: Our best thinking about why and how the initiative will be successful Goal for today’s session

CAN BE:  A planning tool Maps a strategy Forces partners to consider why and how  A communication tool Helps multiple partners develop a common understanding of the big ideas  An evaluation tool Provides a map for checking progress Helps identify areas of partner responsibility 3 IS NOT:  A workplan  A static document  A punitive checklist of outcomes A Theory of Change

Elements of a Theory of Change Context Define and understand the local political, economic, and social environment within which we will conduct our work Interim Outcomes Describe the immediate changes we hope to see among students, colleges, and states Long-term Outcomes Describe the long- term changes we hope to see among students, colleges, and states Strategies to Drive Change Describe the overarching strategies and key activities that we will undertake to achieve student, college, and state-wide outcomes Strategic Focus The overall approach to conducting our work: The elevator speech “We do x in order to change y and z.” ASSUMPTIONS 4

Engage State Offices for Support, Network Building and Program Expansion Manage state learning community; support implementing colleges, including through relevant advocacy support; advise national office; prepare for broader implementation by identifying and leveraging funding and communicating to Compact network about C2C; disseminate findings. Partner with Strong Community Colleges Design and implement pilot programs that marry vision and local context; track program and use data for continual improvement; repurpose existing public and private funds or secure new ones to institutionalize programs; commit to ongoing learning community participation, best practice dissemination, and work towards a collaborative state agenda. KEY STRATEGIES INTERIM OUTCOMES Institutionalized C2C programs at community colleges (pilot sites and non-pilot institutions) that are achieving student and system level outcomes such as increased student persistence and more coordinated student supports. Increased C2C and community college presence within the Compact network and nationally. Campus Compact seen as expert on building community engagement in college settings, peer-to-peer impact models. Leveraged funds to support the C2C agenda. Increased student completion, policy and practice changes at C2C institutions, increased non-pilot campus adoption - implementing program (scaling and institutionalization), state and federal agenda and emerging policy and practice changes in support of community engagement, peer to peer mentoring, and retention on college campuses. LONG-TERM OUTCOMES Develop National Learning Community and Make the Case for Scale to a Broad Audience Serve in an advisory role to state and community college partners; package lessons learned, finance approach and research findings; codify and disseminate model broadly; build political will to influence policy and practice changes; secure funding for scale and sustainability. Connect2Complete pilot initiative: Theory of Change in Brief 5

6 Opportunities  The current administration, the funding community, and the business community are focusing on college completions as paramount to the future of our country and our economy.  Since 2008, community college enrollment has increased 15 percent; there may be urgency and readiness for initiatives to tackle some of the college’s pressing needs.  There is currently national attention being paid to developmental education and more knowledge about the challenges related to it; the timing may be ripe to pilot an initiative with this target population.  There may be community reinvestment funding available for initiatives that can link to twenty first century workforce skill development. Challenges  Budget cuts at the state and federal levels have led to a constrained resource environment at many of the country’s community colleges.  In the face of low resources, community colleges are dealing with numerous competing demands and there is concern of “being spread too thin.”  At many institutions of higher education, including community colleges, the systems that impact students are not integrated with one another.  There are pending federal policy changes, including within the Corporation for National & Community Service, that may impact the ability of the C2C students and peer advocates to use federal funding and other in-kind supports to support their educational trajectory. National Context: Connect2Complete Theory of Change

Engage State Offices for Support, Network Building and Program Expansion Manage state learning community; support implementing colleges, including through relevant advocacy support; advise national office; prepare for broader implementation by identifying and leveraging funding and communicating to Compact network about C2C; disseminate findings. Partner with Strong Community Colleges Design and implement pilot programs that marry vision and local context; track program and use data for continual improvement; repurpose existing public and private funds or secure new ones to institutionalize programs; commit to ongoing learning community participation, best practice dissemination, and work towards a collaborative state agenda. KEY STRATEGIES INTERIM OUTCOMES Institutionalized C2C programs at community colleges (pilot sites and non-pilot institutions) that are achieving student and system level outcomes such as increased student persistence and more coordinated student supports. Increased C2C and community college presence within the Compact network and nationally. Campus Compact seen as expert on building community engagement in college settings, peer-to-peer impact models. Leveraged funds to support the C2C agenda. Increased student completion, policy and practice changes at C2C institutions, increased non-pilot campus adoption - implementing program (scaling and institutionalization), state and federal agenda and emerging policy and practice changes in support of community engagement, peer to peer mentoring, and retention on college campuses. LONG-TERM OUTCOMES Develop National Learning Community and Make the Case for Scale to a Broad Audience Serve in an advisory role to state and community college partners; package lessons learned, finance approach and research findings; codify and disseminate model broadly; build political will to influence policy and practice changes; secure funding for scale and sustainability. Connect2Complete pilot initiative: Theory of Change in Brief 7

Engage State Affiliates for Support, Network Building and Program Expansion Manage state learning community; support implementing colleges, including through relevant advocacy support; advise national office; prepare for broader implementation by identifying and leveraging funding and communicating to Compact network about C2C; disseminate findings. Partner with Strong Community Colleges Design and implement pilot programs that marry vision and local context; track program and use data for continual improvement; repurpose existing public and private funds or secure new ones to institutionalize programs; commit to ongoing learning community participation, best practice dissemination, and work towards a collaborative state agenda. KEY STRATEGIES INTERIM OUTCOMES Institutionalized C2C programs at community colleges (pilot sites and non-pilot institutions) that are achieving student and system level outcomes such as increased student persistence and more coordinated student supports. Increased C2C and community college presence within the Compact network and nationally. Campus Compact seen as expert on building community engagement in college settings, peer-to-peer impact models. Leveraged funds to support the C2C agenda. Increased student completion, policy and practice changes at C2C institutions, increased non-pilot campus adoption - implementing program (scaling and institutionalization), state and federal agenda and emerging policy and practice changes in support of community engagement, peer to peer mentoring, and retention on college campuses. LONG-TERM OUTCOMES Develop National Learning Community and Make the Case for Scale to a Broad Audience Serve in an advisory role to state and community college partners; package lessons learned, finance approach and research findings; codify and disseminate model broadly; build political will to influence policy and practice changes; secure funding for scale and sustainability. What are community colleges expected to accomplish? 8

Engage State Offices for Support, Network Building and Program Expansion Manage state learning community; support implementing colleges, including through relevant advocacy support; advise national office; prepare for broader implementation by identifying and leveraging funding and communicating to Compact network about C2C; disseminate findings. Partner with Strong Community Colleges Design and implement pilot programs that marry vision and local context; track program and use data for continual improvement; repurpose existing public and private funds or secure new ones to institutionalize programs; commit to ongoing learning community participation, best practice dissemination, and work towards a collaborative state agenda. KEY STRATEGIES INTERIM OUTCOMES Institutionalized C2C programs at community colleges (pilot sites and non-pilot institutions) that are achieving student and system level outcomes such as increased student persistence and more coordinated student supports. Increased C2C and community college presence within the Compact network and nationally. Campus Compact seen as expert on building community engagement in college settings, peer-to-peer impact models. Leveraged funds to support the C2C agenda. Increased student completion, policy and practice changes at C2C institutions, increased non-pilot campus adoption - implementing program (scaling and institutionalization), state and federal agenda and emerging policy and practice changes in support of community engagement, peer to peer mentoring, and retention on college campuses. LONG-TERM OUTCOMES Develop National Learning Community and Make the Case for Scale to a Broad Audience Serve in an advisory role to state and community college partners; package lessons learned, finance approach and research findings; codify and disseminate model broadly; build political will to influence policy and practice changes; secure funding for scale and sustainability. What are state offices expected to accomplish? 9

10 Assumptions about the student population and program design  C2C students need personal guidance and individualized support over multiple semesters to meet their educational goals.  C2C students & peer advocates have the necessary capacities and willingness to participate in this program.  The more students are engaged in their college system and in community pursuits, the more likely they are to persist.  Peers want to engage with peers.  Community engagement opportunities will create a sense of community among students and increase academic persistence.  Large pockets of existing public dollars can be leveraged and repurposed if C2C achieves success and is replicable for rapid prototype development. Assumptions about network building and program expansion  State offices are local experts that can help shape policies related to their community colleges; they are important partners necessary for scale.  Organizing CCs in state clusters will build a stronger state agenda, link CCs to additional resources, and allow for a stronger evaluation as factors external to the grant will be considered.  Learning communities will be effective ways to share learning across CCs and increase likelihood of scaling.  State offices will need to create the right environment and policy setting to adopt this practice more widely. Sample Assumptions: Connect2Complete Theory of Change