Texas Nodal © 2005 - 2006 Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs Process Settlement and Data Aggregation Working.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Automation and Improvements to Default Uplift Methodology (summary/white paper of a draft NPRR)
Advertisements

Concerns with RUC Capacity Short Charge and Energy Trades.
1 Appeal to ERCOT Board Regarding Use of Fuel Oil Index Price (FOIP) Larry Gurley TXU Wholesale June 19, 2007.
RCWG Update to WMS April 9, VCMRR-VC for Cancellation of RUC Committed Resources Paragraph (3) of Nodal Protocol Section regarding Cancellation.
Zonal ADR Resettlement & Data Retention ERCOT CSWG 04/20/2015.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Split Generation Resources (SGRs) (Also known as Jointly Owned.
RCWG Update to WMS July 8, VCMRR008 - Alignment with NPRR700, Utilizing Actual Fuel Cost in Startup Offer Caps NPRR700 approved at May 2015 WMS.
1 Generator Telemetry and Market Prices WebEx Training July 28 th, 2015.
1 Nodal Stabilization Market Call December 28, 2010.
ERCOT RMR Deployment and Cost Proposals By: Matt Mereness and Ino Gonzalez.
NPRRs NPRR680 Allow QSEs to Self-Arrange AS Quantities Greater Than Their AS Obligation. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) proposes to allow.
July 30, 2015 TAC Meeting Update to COPS Michelle Trenary August 12, 2015.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes January 28, 2009 WMS Meeting.
Settlement of Mothballed RMR Resources for System Capacity November 15, 2011 RDTF Meeting Ino González ERCOT November 14, 2011.
Report to TAC February In Brief Chair and Vice-Chair for 2009 Chair and Vice-Chair for 2009 Working Group Reports Working Group Reports QMWG QMWG.
Guidelines for Verification of Resource Specific Fuel Adders RCWG Paul Vinson.
January 14, New logic and invoices used in January 2015 when closing out December 2014 New Bill Determinants: CRRBAFA- CRR Balancing Account Fund.
Mitigated Offer Cap Presented to: NATF Date: September 29, 2009 By: Mark Patterson, Manager Market Operations Support (ERCOT) 1September 29 NATF Meeting.
Presentation to WMS Regarding PRR 731- Fuel Oil Index Price (FOIP) Larry Gurley July 18, 2007.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee March 4, 2010.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs Process TPTF Meeting Nov 28, 2007 Ino Gonzalez.
E x p e r i e n c e C o m m i t m e n t SM ERCOT Nodal – Fuel Cost Analysis Verifiable Cost Working Group October 6, 2008.
Report to TAC December In Brief Working Group Reports Working Group Reports DSWG DSWG CMWG CMWG MCWG MCWG QMWG QMWG VCWG VCWG Task Forces Task Forces.
QMWG – Feb. 26, 2014 Discussion topic: NPRR585 Clarification of Administrative Pricing Requirements for Self-Committed Combined Cycle Combustion Turbines.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Sandy Morris November 3, 2011.
RCWG Update to WMS May 6, Real-Time Mitigation During Exceptional Fuel Events Option 3 – Increase MOC’s during Cold Weather Events When ERCOT.
Quick Start Resource – Payment for Start-Up at less than LSL Current NPRR language: ( 8) If a QSGR comes On-Line as a result of a Base Point less than.
Nodal ATF 1 Nodal Advisory Task Force Update for TAC November 4 th, 2010.
1 Cutover Market Call November 29, :00 AM.
RCWG Update to WMS July 11, Alternatives to Address Negative Prices At its June meeting, WMS directed RCWG to bring back something to vote on. RCWG.
7 August, 2006 TPTF MMS Issues Review Brandon Whittle Lead, Real-Time Market Operations.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Enterprise Data Warehouse Section 8 – Performance Monitoring.
QMWG Update to WMS S. Looney December 3, Assignments from WMS ERCOT Market Operations Report – Two SASMs in October, no AS insufficiency – Two unique.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Verifiable Costs Process WMS Meeting May 15, 2007 Ino.
NPRRs 663NPRR Ancillary Service Insufficiency Actions. This Nodal Protocol Revision Request (NPRR) specifies the actions ERCOT will take to ensure sufficient.
9/17/2012 CSWG CSWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT. 2 Settlements Project & Operational Updates February 27, 2012 NPRR 347: Combined Daily Invoice –Still on track.
COMMUNICATIONS AND SETTLEMENTS WORKING GROUP (CSWG) October 2015 Update to COPS.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Settlement Invoices Business Requirements Settlements and.
TPTF Verifiable Cost Sub-group Summary Final Report 3/xx/2008 Jim Galvin- TPTF VC Sub-group Chair.
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) update to RMS Kathy Scott January 3, 2013Technical Advisory Committee 1.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Report to ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee December 5, 2002.
TPTF Verifiable Cost Sub-group Summary Report to TPTF 1/21/2008 Jim Galvin- TPTF VC Sub-group Chair.
August 27, 2015 Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Update to RMS Kathy Scott September 1, 2015 TAC Update to RMS1.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Load Frequency Control (LFC) Business Requirements Energy.
Report to TAC July In Brief Working Group Reports Working Group Reports CMWG CMWG DSWG DSWG MCWG MCWG MWG MWG QMWG QMWG VCWG VCWG Task Forces Task.
WMS Meeting, October 10, RCWG Continuing Efforts  NPRR 747 Price Correction No consensus on this issue  RCWG needs additional guidance on the.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Nodal Dispute Management System Business Requirements ERCOT.
“Managing the Integration of Energy Storage Technologies” Kenneth Ragsdale ERCOT.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee October 1, 2009.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 High-Level Overview of draft NPRR implementing PUCT Rule Posting Requirements January 8,
1/07/2014 QMWG – RUC and AS update QMWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Market Analysis.
Market Operating Level Agreement (OLA) Discussion Betty Day 8 December 2009 Nodal Advisory Task Force.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs for Nodal WMS Meeting.
1 TAC Report to the ERCOT Board November 14, 2006.
December 2010 Wholesale Market Subcommittee Report to Technical Advisory Committee.
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee September 3, 2009.
NPRR 649 Board Appeal Koch Ag & Energy Solutions February 9,
Reliability Deployments Task Force Update WMS Meeting WMS Chair created task force with the directive that the task force will address real-time.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Reliability Unit Commitment (RUC) Settlements Business Requirements.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Market Management System Update on TPTF Comments on MMS Clarification Notes May 21,
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
Reliability-Must-Run (RMR) Cost Evaluation and Settlement Basis Ino González ERCOT RMR Workshop May 24, 2016.
Congestion Management Work Group 2008 Overview CMWG Marguerite Wagner, Reliant Energy Inc.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal EDS4 - Approach 11/28/2007.
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Energy & Market Management System EMS/MMS Projects Requirement Documents November.
Reliability Must Run Resources for Summer Slide 2 RMR for Summer 2011 RMR Contracts for Mothballed Units ERCOT has signed RMR Agreements with two.
Texas Nodal Program ERCOT Readiness & Transition (ERT) Supplemental Information TPTF January 12, 2009 Kevin Frankeny.
ERCOT Market Education Market Role in Emergency Operations OTS 2016.
Cutover Market Call November 29, :30 PM
General Overview Of Resource Costs
Presentation transcript:

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs Process Settlement and Data Aggregation Working Group Meeting October 12 and 15, 2007 ERCOT

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 2 Verifiable Cost Manual Presentation Objectives:  Describe how Verifiable Costs will be used in the Nodal Market  Provide background of how the Verifiable Cost process was developed  Describe what is included in the Verifiable Cost Manual  Describe what is not yet included in the Verifiable Cost Manual  Describe costs included in the Verifiable Cost Manual that are not specifically provided for in the Nodal Protocols  Bring attention to issues requiring clarification or additional discussion  Review the Verifiable Cost Manual  Address Market Participants’ questions and concerns

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 3 Purpose of Verifiable Costs ZonalNodal Actual Cost Recovery  Corrects initial payments that were based on generic costs Offer Capping / Price Mitigation Actual Cost Recovery – limited situations

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 4 Purpose of Verifiable Costs in Nodal Offer Cap/Price Mitigation:  DAM  Start Up Offer Cap  Minimum Energy Offer Cap  NOT used to cap Energy Offer Curve - SWCAP  RUC  Start Up Offer Cap  Minimum Energy Offer Cap  Start Up Offer Proxy (if no DAM offer was submitted and resource selected for RUC)  Minimum Energy Offer Proxy (if no offer submitted and resource selected for RUC)  Real-Time  Energy Offer Curve Mitigation  Mitigated Offer Cap

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 5 Purpose of Verifiable Costs in Nodal Actual Cost Recovery: Strategy for Nodal Design of Verifiable Costs:  A couple of situations mentioned in Nodal Protocols which imply actual cost recovery  RUC-Committed resources which have forced outages  Learn from Zonal frustration  Work through issues and towards consensus  Document in detail

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 6 Verifiable Cost Manual Background: 1. Why did ERCOT develop the Manual?  Comply with the Nodal Protocols which require that ERCOT develop a process for submitting Verifiable Costs  Establish rules for submitting Verifiable Costs

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 7 Verifiable Cost Manual Background: 2. What inputs were used by ERCOT to develop the Manual?  Nodal Protocols  Discussions with Market Participants  Input from ERCOT’s Independent Market Monitor  Input from PUCT staff  Discussion with PJM and CA ISO staff  Research and market reports

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 8 Verifiable Cost Manual Manual: 3. What is included in the Manual? Section 1: An Introduction to Verifiable Costs Section 2: General Rules of Verifiable Costs Section 3: Verifiable Startup and Shutdown Costs Section 4: Verifiable Minimum Energy Costs Section 5: Mitigated Offers and Verifiable Costs Section 6: Verifiable Heat Rates Section 7: Forced Outages of a RUC-Committed Resource Section 8: Recovery of SPS Actuation Costs Section 9: Delayed Outage Costs Section 10: Operating and Maintenance Cost Guidelines Section 11: Timelines Applicable to the Submission and Review of Verifiable Costs Section 12: Timeline for Rescinding Approval of Verifiable Costs Section 13: Appealing Rejected Verifiable Costs Appendix 1A: Methodology for Determining Maintenance Costs of Nuclear and Fossil Steam Units Appendix 1B: Methodology for Determining Maintenance the Costs of CT and CCP Units Appendix 2: Typical Variable O&M Values Appendix 3: Operating and Maintenance Cost Categories Appendix 4: Generic, Non-Fuel O&M Costs

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 9 Verifiable Cost Manual Manual: 4. What is not included in the Manual?  Processes and rules for appealing ERCOT’s rejection of a Verifiable Cost submission  Detailed information about any systems, interfaces, and templates that ERCOT and market participants will use to communicate Verifiable Cost information

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 10 Verifiable Cost Manual Manual: 5.What costs are included in the Manual but are not specified within the Protocols?  Shutdown costs  Recovery of SPS Actuation costs  Delayed outage costs

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 11 Verifiable Cost Manual Questions: 6.Issues that require additional clarification (keep these in mind; they will be discussed at the time their associated sections in the Manual are presented)  Should the additional fuel costs incurred while ramping up from breaker close to LSL be accounted for (e.g., by increasing startup fuel consumption)?  Should the decreased fuel costs incurred while ramping down from LSL to breaker open be accounted for (e.g., by reducing startup fuel consumption)?  Should shutdown costs be paid? If so, should they be paid in all circumstances and without regard to when a commitment terminates?  How should ERCOT address the possibility that RUC instructions will will be canceled prior to breaker close?

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Verifiable Cost Manual 6. Issues that require additional clarification (cont.)  Should ERCOT pay for a resource’s actual fuel costs when they exceed FIP/FOP? Should such price disparities be addressed upfront through the use of a multiplier/buffer in SUO cap and MEO cap calculations (as is done when calculating Mitigated Offer Caps)?  Should ERCOT calculate a clawback charge when a resource’s actual fuel cost is less than FIP/FOP?  Should Verifiable Costs become effective on the day they are submitted (applied retroactively in resettlement)?  Should Verifiable Costs for startup and minimum energy be individually approved?  If a RUC committed resource alters its fuel type of fuel consumption ratios, should any associated changes to fuel costs be accounted for in resettlement?

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 13 Verifiable Cost Manual 6. Issues that require additional clarification (cont.)  What dispute process should be available to QSEs wanting to appeal ERCOT’s rejection of their Verifiable Costs? What rules should govern this process?  Is it appropriate to apply the logic of RUC-decommitments to SPS actuation events? Specifically: 1. Should cost recovery be capped at startup costs? 2. Should recovery be unavailable to resources that planned to be offline during the operating day? 3. Would it be more appropriate to allow recovery of all costs incurred as a direct result of the SPS actuation and then uplift those costs on the basis of Load Ratio Share?

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 14 Verifiable Cost Manual Format of Presentation: 7. This presentation is intended to proceed as follows:  Sections of the Verifiable Cost Manual will be reviewed one at a time and in order.  Time permitting, there will be a general discussion at the end of this presentation. This time will be used to address any remaining concerns and to answer questions that concern any area of the Manual.  Please feel free to interrupt the presentation if you cannot hear or do not understand something.

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 15 Verifiable Cost Manual Review: 8. Next steps needed to complete the Manual:  Review the entire Manual with SDAWG October 12 and 15, 2007  Agree on answers to remaining questions October 16- October 31, 2007  Create an Excel Template to submit Verifiable Costs November 2007  Review updated Manual and Template with SDAWG November 2007  Review updated Manual and Template with COPS December 2007  Submit Manual to WMS for approval January 2008

Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 16 Verifiable Cost Manual Review: 9. Proposed timeline for completing the Manual: MonthReview Group OctoberSDAWG NovemberSDAWG DecemberCOPS JanuaryWMS FebruaryWMS/TAC - approve