Precision Management beyond Fertilizer Application Hailin Zhang.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Reducing the Environmental Risks of Pest Management Joseph K. Bagdon Pest Management Specialist NRCS National Water & Climate Center Amherst, Massachusetts.
Advertisements

Antony Lenehan.  Site and soil  Effluent quality and quantity  Application systems- above ground or below ground  Crop/vegetation selection and.
Phosphorus and Potassium CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Phosphorus Index for Oregon and Washington Steve Campbell USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Portland, Oregon Dan Sullivan Oregon State University.
Phosphorus Indices: an Understanding of Upper Mississippi Strategies John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences University of Missouri.
Phosphorus Index Based Management Douglas Beegle Dept. of Crop and Soil Sciences Penn State University
©2003 Institute of Water Research, all rights reserved Water Quality Modeling for Ecological Services under Cropping and Grazing Systems Da Ouyang Jon.
2013 KY NRCS (590) Nutrient Management Standard Highlights: NRCS 590 is now only required for producers applying to receive NRCS financial or technical.
Developing Modeling Tools in Support of Nutrient Reduction Policies Randy Mentz Adam Freihoefer, Trip Hook, & Theresa Nelson Water Quality Modeling Technical.
REMM: Riparian Ecosystem Management Model USDA-Agricultural Research Service University of Georgia California State University – Chico USDA-Natural Resources.
Nutrient Management Natural Resources Conservation Service.
St. Albans Bay Landscape Modeling Stakeholder Working Group Meeting 4 Phosphorus Dynamics Scenario Development St. Albans Town Hall November 9, 2005.
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
Agricultural BMPs An Educator’s Guide. What are Agricultural BMPs? Best Management Practices An approach to help farmers reduce or eliminate agricultural.
Watershed Impacts Bob Broz - University of Missouri Roberta Dow - Michigan State University Eleanor Burkett - University of Minnesota.
Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Measuring the Environmental Benefits of Conservation Managing the Agricultural Landscape for Environmental.
Iowa P-Index Relationship to Feedlots Steve Brinkman CCA Nutrient Management Specialist USDA / NRCS
Additional Questions, Resources, and Moving Forward Science questions raised in the development of a science assessment Effect of Conservation Tillage.
SPONSOR of 4R Nutrient Stewardship Program. The Nature Conservancy Teaming with the Florida agriculture industry to increase farmer profitability and.
Water Pollution. Watershed A watershed is an area of land from which all the water drains to the same location, such as a stream, pond, lake, river, wetland.
P Index Development and Implementation The Iowa Experience Antonio Mallarino Iowa State University.
Nutrient Management Planning Alan Sutton Department of Animal Sciences.
Using the Missouri P index John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences Commercial Agriculture Program University of Missouri.
My Field has High Soil Test P. Now what? John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences Commercial Agriculture Program University of Missouri.
Logo Certified Nutrient Management Planning7-1 Module 7: Manure Utilization By Hailin Zhang.
Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Model Input
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
Nonpoint Source Pollution Reductions – Estimating a Tradable Commodity Allen R. Dedrick Associate Deputy Administrator Natural Resources & Sustainable.
AGRICULTURE and POLLUTION. Nitrogen and Agriculture The nitrogen cycle: Atmospheric deposition, Biological fixation, Fertilisers, Animal manures Nitrogen.
Rao Mylavarapu Soil & Water Science Department, IFAS University of Florida.
Potential of Using Precision Agricultural Practices for P Fertilizer Management.
Introduction Agriculture is a large contributor of non-point source pollution to surface water. Field surface application of manure as a soil amendment.
Planning Process for CNMPs Vicki S. Anderson Resource Conservationist Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Integrating Forages into Multi-Functional Landscapes: Enhanced Soil Health and Ecosystem Service Opportunities Douglas L. Karlen USDA-ARS Presented at.
Nutrient Management Planning Canada-Manitoba Farm Stewardship Program Steve Sager, P.Ag. Soil Resource Specialist Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada-PFRA.
Land Treatment and the Conservation Planning Process CNMP Core Curriculum Section 3 — Land Treatment Practices.
2 -1 Lesson 2 Whole Farm Nutrient Planning By Rick Koelsch, University of Nebraska.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
SFS Best Practices Presentation Key “Best Practice” Drivers for the Crop Sector 1.Reduce Nutrient, Sediment and Herbicide Runoff 1.Riparian buffer strips,
Nebraska CNMP Program 1 Rick Koelsch University of Nebraska Tools for Integrating Feed Program into NMP or CNMP.
Review of Scenario Builder BMP crediting Christopher F. Brosch University of Maryland Extension Chesapeake Bay Program Office
MODELING THE IMPACT OF IRRIGATION ON NUTRIENT EXPORT FROM AGRICULTURAL FIELDS IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES W. Lee Ellenburg Graduate Research Assistant.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan Scott Sturgul Nutrient & Pest Management Program Soil & Water Management Farm & Industry Short Course Feb. 16,
Field Specific Decisions: N vs P CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Summary of the Nitrogen and Carbon Cycle on Georgia’s Pasture-Based Dairies N.S. Hill, Professor Dept. Crop and Soil Sci., UGA, Athens.
Lecture 2. Agricultural Pollution Control in the Baltic Sea with Special Emphasis on Manure Management Prepared by Assoc. Prof. Philip Chiverton, SLU and.
Planning Certainty A challenge for Investment April 2014 Tom Chesson – CEO Australian national Irrigators Council Murray Smith – Principal Engineer, Agriculture.
October 12, 2015 Iowa State University Indrajeet Chaubey Purdue University Water Quality.
Conesus Lake – Agricultural Implications. Mandatory on all CAFO sized farms, over 1000 animal units Voluntary on dairy/livestock farms with
The Effect of Compost Application and Plowing on Phosphorus Runoff Charles S. Wortmann Department of Agronomy and Horticulture Nutrient Management for.
Nutrient Issues Review of Nutrient Management Issues Addressed by EPA NODA for Proposed CAFO Regulations.
POLLUTION MANAGEMENT 5.4 Eutrophication. Assessment Statements  Outline the processes of eutrophication.  Evaluate the impacts of eutrophication.
National Assessment for Cropland. Analytical Approach Sampling and modeling approach based on a subset of NRI sample points. Farmer survey conducted to.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan The How, Where, When, and Why.
Nutrient Management Planning CNMP Core Curriculum Section 4 – Nutrient Management.
Nutrient Management Summary CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Manure Management and Water Quality By Jeff Lorimor, Iowa State University, Ames 32-1.
P Index Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Training Course December 15, 2005 Isaac Wolford, West Virginia NRCS State Agronomist.
Let’s Begin! Writing Manure Management Plans!. Manure Management Manual DEP Manure Management Manual can be divided into 3 Parts: Part I Requirements/Guidelines.
Lessons learnt from the dairying Accounting for Nutrients project Warwick Dougherty.
Nutrient Management Planning for CAFO & AFO Fundamentals Nutrient Management Training Dec. 16 &17, 2009 Tom Basden WVU Extension Service.
Integrated Nutrient Management (Nutrient Management Plan ) A Series of Lecture By Mr. Allah Dad Khan.
Andrew Lyon and Daniel Storm Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering
NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT POLICY NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE
Chapter 15 Organic Amendments.
Precision Nutrient Management: Grid-Sampling Basis
Sustainable Agriculture
Overview of Climate Impact Assessment Framework and Implementation
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan
Nutrient Management Planning
Presentation transcript:

Precision Management beyond Fertilizer Application Hailin Zhang

Outline l Animal manure management l Feed, forage and pasture l Carbon sequestration and credits

Whole Farm Nutrient Planning

Soil Test Phosphorus 1 5 / / / / / / / / x x x 6 / 4 x 7 x x 3 x / 2 x STP or no application STP Select a Field to Apply Manure

Nutrient Balance Farm Boundary Inputs Feed Animals Irrigation Water Fertilizer Legume N Managed Outputs Meat & Milk Crops Manure Losses or Soil Storage Nutrient Balance

Variable Manure Application

Eutrophication Impacts: l Requires More Treatment for Drinking Water Supply l Decreases Recreational Value l Declined Aesthetic Quality D. Storm 0.02ppm

P Source Transport Critical Source Area Critical source areas for P loss from a watershed occur where areas of high soil P and transport potential coincide---Sharpley, et al., 1999

Sharpley et al., 1998

S max vs. Clay & OC

Sharpley et al., 1998

Assessing Site Vulnerability to P Loss Saturated areas where surface runoff can occur High soil P, no runoff High soil P and runoff Surface runoff, low soil P 34-13

Locations of Soil Samples Collected

Rainfall Simulator and wooden boxes

Management Strategies l Manipulation of Animal Diets u Adjust the amount of P supplement u Increase P availability in feed l Manure Management u Base application rates on P needs u Explore alternative uses l Soil P Management u Minimize P transport u Remove P with crop

USDA-NRCS P Management Strategies l Soil test P for agronomic use: P requirements of the crop l P threshold approach: establish critical soil test P levels l P risk index approach: integrates P source and transport characteristics of a field

What is a P Loss Index l The Phosphorus Loss Index is a field based planning tool that integrates soil properties, hydrology and agricultural management practices to assess the risk of P movement from soil to water

Decisions based on Agronomic Soil Test P alone may inadequately address P related environmental problems. A more comprehensive approach is needed for evaluating specific soils, landscapes, and management system for potential loss of P to water bodies.

The P Index consists two 4 by 5 matrix. The following are examples of those matrix recommended by the National P Working Group. Some states chose to use different weighing factors or add more components to them.

Example of P Source Factors None (0) Low (1) Med. (2) High (4) V. High (8) STP (1.0)N/ALowMediumOptimumExcessive Inorg. P Rate (0.75) None< >65 Inorg. P Method (0.5) None>2 inches Incorp.Incorp >3 Mo. Surface Org. P Rate (1.0) None< >65 Org. P method (0.5) None>2 inches IncorpIncorp >3 mo. Surface

Example of P Transport Factors None (0) Low (1) Medium (2) High (4) V. High (8) Soil Erosion (1.5) N/A<5 t/a5-10 t/a10-15 t/a>15 t/a Irrigation Erosion (1.5) N/A Infreq. Well drain Mod. Irri. Slope<5% Freq. Irri. 2- 5% slope >Freq. Irri. >5% slope Runoff Class (0.5) N/AV. Low or Low MediumHighExcessive Dist. To Water (1.0) >1000 ft <30

Interpretation of the P Loss Index P IndexGeneral Vulnerability to P Loss <8Low potential for P loss Medium potential for P loss 15 – 32High potential for P loss >32Very High potential and adverse impact on waters Manure application rate is limited by PI, BMPs may be required if PI is high

Factors Considered for P Risk Index under development in Oklahoma l Source factors u Soil test P level, manure, fertilizers u Rate and method of P application l Transport factors u Monthly runoff volume, delivery ratio, P enrichment ratio l BMPs u Distance to water bodies, cattle exclusion, alternative watering sources u Buffer strips, riparian establishment and restoration u Soil and/or amendments l Receiving water body sensitivity? u TMDL or state water quality standard

Soil Test P > 120? No Yes Level 1: Field-scale P Risk Index (PRI) Go To Level 2 Management Based on PRI Apply at Agronomic rate based on Crop N requirement Agronomic benefits from N and P

How does spatial variability influence soil test P and crop response?

Level 2: Field-scale Background P Loss Without P Additions BMP Credits Sediment P Field Loading Soil Erosion Soil P Status Delivery Efficiency Soluble P Field Loading Annual Rainfall Surface Runoff Land Use Soil Properties Soil P Status Greater Than Acceptable Loading? Yes Greater Than Acceptable Loading? Yes No No P Additions Go To Level 3 Adjust Total P Loading Total P Loss in Surface Runoff Additional BMPs Available? Yes No

Level 3: Field-scale P Loss With P Additions Level 2 Background Total P Loss N Based Poultry Litter Application Greater Than Acceptable Loading? Yes No Greater Than Acceptable Loading? YesNo Acceptable Risk BMP Credits Adjust Total P Loading Adjust Total P Loading Reduce Litter Application

Vegetative Filter Strips l Reduces Surface Runoff l Increases Infiltration of Runoff and Nutrients l Promotes Sediment Deposition and Filtering l Provides Uptake of Nutrients by Plants

Buffer Strip Length (ft) l Total Phosphorus u Soluble Phosphorus Phosphorus Concentration In Runoff (ppm)

Management Pasture Efficiently

Forage nitrate is variable

How to measure C precisely?