National Center for Research Resources NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH T r a n s l a t I n g r e s e a r c h f r o m b a s i c d i s c o v e r y t o i m.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 REVIEWER ORIENTATION TO ENHANCED PEER REVIEW April

Advertisements

NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 5 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.

The NIH Peer Review Process

How your NIH grant application is evaluated and scored Larry Gerace, Ph.D. June 1, 2011.

How Your Application Is Reviewed Robert Elliott, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)

ENHANCING PEER REVIEW What Reviewers Need to Know Now Slides Accompanying Video of Dr. Alan Willard, March

NIH Grant Proposal Preparation: R01, R21, R03, K and F Applications.

Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.

The New NIH Review System: Reviewer’s perspective Liz Madigan, FPB School of Nursing.

How Your Application Is Reviewed Vonda Smith, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)

1 Teaching Excellence Network Citations Workshop Associate Professor Catherine Sinclair (Academic Coordinator, ALTC Initiatives) Associate Professor Janne.

PRESENTER: DR. ROBERT KLESGES PROFESSOR OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AND MEMBER, DEPARTMENT OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND.

November 13, 2009 NIH PROPOSAL SUBMISSIONS: 2010 REVISONS.

Cheryl A. Kitt PHD Deputy Director CSR October 30, 2009 Center for Scientific Review and National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human.

NIH Regional Seminars 2014 Sally A. Amero, Ph.D.Dana Plude, Ph.D. NIH Review Policy OfficerBiobehavioral and Behavioral Processes IRG National Institutes.

1 Major changes Get ready! Changes coming to Review Meetings Considering Potential FY2010 funding and beyond: New 1-9 Scoring System Scoring of Individual.

Presented by the Office of Research and Grants (ORG)

How to Improve your Grant Proposal Assessment, revisions, etc. Thomas S. Buchanan.

NIH OBSSR Summer Institute July 2012 National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Overview of the NIH Peer Review Process.

The NIH Peer Review Process Sally A. Amero, Ph.D. NIH Review Policy Officer Office of Extramural Research 2010 NIH Regional Seminars.

Enhancing Peer Review at NIH University of Central Florida Grant Day Workshop October 26, 2009 Anne K. Krey Division of Scientific Review.

The NIH Peer Review Process

Navigating the Grant Submission Process Anita L. Harrison Associate Director of Administration Hollings Cancer Center March 26, 2015.

NIH – CSR and ICs. The Academic Gerontocracy Response to the Crisis Early investigator status: first real grant application. K awards, R13s etc don’t.

NIH Review Procedures Betsy Myers Hospital for Special Surgery.

The Center for Symptom Management The NIH review process Kathryn Lee, RN, PhD April 3, 2009 MDP.

CSR Peer Review of NIH HIV/AIDS Grant Applications NIH Grantsmanship Workshop Diana Finzi, Ph.D. Chief, Pathogenesis and Basic Research Program Division.

Academic Research Enhancement Award (AREA) Program Erica Brown, PhD Director, NIH AREA Program National Institutes of Health 1.

NIH Challenge Grants in Health and Science Research RFA OD

NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 5 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.

Presubmission Proposal Reviews at the College of Nursing (CON) Nancy T. Artinian, PhD, RN, FAAN Associate Dean for Research and Professor.

NIH Peer Review Process – Grant Renewal

Summary of NIH Enhancing Peer Review Implementation Changes to NIH Proposals due on or after January 25, 2010 Slide Content Provided by Dr. Michael Sesma,

Three Faces of a Critique Oral presentation critique Critique of an academic paper Critique of a building.

NIH Submission Cycle. Choosing a Study Section Ask Program Officer for advice Review rosters: – sp

Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.

Analysis of Overall Impact Scoring Trends within AHRQ Peer Review Study Sections Gabrielle Quiggle, MPH; Rebecca Trocki, MSHAI; Kishena Wadhwani, PhD,

Changes is NIH Review Process and Grant Application Forms Shirley M. Moore Professor of Nursing and Associate Dean for Research Frances Payne Bolton School.

Diego E. Rincon-Limas. Ph.D. GMS 6096: Introduction to NIH Grant Writing for Biomedical Sciences University of Florida Departments of Neurology and Neuroscience.

Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Amanda Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal.

How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University

Restructured NIH Applications One Year Later:

An Insider’s Look at a Study Section Meeting: Perspectives from CSR Monica Basco, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer Coordinator, Early Career Reviewer Program.

National Center for Research Resources NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH T r a n s l a t I n g r e s e a r c h f r o m b a s i c d i s c o v e r y t o i m.

National Center for Research Resources NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH T r a n s l a t I n g r e s e a r c h f r o m b a s i c d i s c o v e r y t o i m.

Peer Review and Grant Mechanisms at NIH What is Changing? May 2016 Richard Nakamura, Ph.D., Director Center for Scientific Review.

A Reviewer’s Perspective on G20 Grants Lyndon J. Goodly DVM, MS, DACLAM May 2016–ACLAM Forum.

NIH R03 Program Review Ning Jackie Zhang, MD, PhD, MPH College of Health and Public Affairs 04/17/2013.

NIH Scoring Process. NIH Review Categories 1.Significance How important is the research? 2. Investigator Is the team comprised of experts in the area?

Overview of CSR and NIH Peer Review

Understanding NIH Peer Review

NATA Foundation Student Grants Process

Presenter: dr. Robert Klesges Professor of Preventive Medicine

Supplement S7 Supplier Selection.

NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process

NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi

NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi

Changing Response to AHRQ’s Funding Opportunity Announcements (FOAs)

Grant Writing Information Session

The NIH Peer Review Process

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009 (787 billion) Impact on Research presented by: NJMS Research Office March 16th 2009.

The NIH Peer Review Process

How to Write a Successful NIH Career Development Award (K Award)

Rick McGee, PhD and Bill Lowe, MD Faculty Affairs and NUCATS

Decision Making Template.

Successful Application

Study Section Overview – The Process and What You Should Know

NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process

CLINICAL TRIAL METHODOLOGY COURSE 2019 WEBINAR SERIES

Presentation transcript:

National Center for Research Resources NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH T r a n s l a t I n g r e s e a r c h f r o m b a s i c d i s c o v e r y t o i m p r o v e d p a t I e n t c a r e ARRA C06 and G20 Reviews Web Seminar on G20 and C06 Request for Applications (RFAs) March 16, 2009 Barbara J. Nelson, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer Office of Review National Center for Research Resources

NCRR Scoring  Reviewers will use the new NIH scoring scale for all applications.  This scale will apply to the overall impact/priority score and individual review criteria.  The scoring range is 1 – 9, not 1 – 5.  Applications will be scored using whole numbers only, no decimals.

NCRR 1 – 9 Scoring Scale ImpactScoreDescriptorStrengths/Weaknesses High Impact 1Exceptional 2Outstanding 3Excellent Moderate Impact 4Very Good 5Good 6Satisfactory Low Impact 7Fair 8Marginal 9Poor Strengths Weaknesses

NCRR Review Criteria: Scoring Individual Criteria The individual critiques #1 – 5 receive numerical scores using the new 1 – 9 scoring scale: 1.Significance and Need 2.Project Management and Institutional Commitment 3.Design Considerations Engineering Criteria Architectural Criteria Line Drawings Timeline 4.Equipment 5.Environment

NCRR Additional Review Criteria  Biohazards may be a factor in the determination of the overall impact score, but will not receive a separate, criterion score.

NCRR Impact/Priority Score  Final score for the application  Assessment for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the institution  Application score range will be 10 – 90, calculated as an average of all reviewer scores multiplied by 10  The impact/priority score is not an average of the individual criterion scores

NCRR Face Page of Summary Statement: Terminology Change New Term: IMPACT/PRIORITY SCORE

NCRR More Information  ARRA RFA and FAQ URLs CO6 RFA: FAQs: G20 RFA: FAQs:  NIH Enhancing Peer Review Web site  NCRR-specific questions Barbara Nelson, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer, Office of Review