Meson Production at Low Proton Beam Energy (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies May 9, 2013 15/9/113.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comparison of Particle Production between MARS and FLUKA (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Aug. 8, /8/13.
Advertisements

Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Simulation of Neutrino Factory beam and quasielastic scattering off electrons in the near detector Yordan Karadzhov University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”
NuFact July 2009 Jim Strait, Nikolai Mokhov, Sergei Striganov Fermilab Comparisons between MARS and HARP data* * Title as given by organizers.
Ultra Peripheral Collisions at RHIC Coherent Coupling Coherent Coupling to both nuclei: photon~Z 2, Pomeron~A 4/3 Small transverse momentum p t ~ 2h 
Magnetic Configuration of the Muon Collider/ Neutrino Factory Target System Hisham Kamal Sayed, *1 H.G Kirk, 1 K.T. McDonald 2 1 Brookhaven National Laboratory,
6/30/20091 Meson Production with Different Directional Incident Proton Beam X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg, BNL.
MARS15 Simulations of the MERIT Mercury Target Experiment Fermilab March 18, Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider Collaboration meeting Sergei.
Meson Production at 8 GeV for IDS120h X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies, Dec. 27, 2011.
Meson Production Comparison between Hg and Ga at 8 GeV X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies, Oct. 04, 2011.
Meson Production Comparison between HG and GA at 8 GeV (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies, Oct. 18, 2011.
Particle Production of a Carbon/Mercury Target System for the Intensity Frontier X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Spring.
Pion yield studies for proton drive beams of 2-8 GeV kinetic energy for stopped muon and low-energy muon decay experiments Sergei Striganov Fermilab Workshop.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy A Pion Production and Capture System for a 4 MW Target Station X. Ding, D.
Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.
Energy Deposition of 4-MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Meeting, Feb. 9, 2010.
MC/NF TARGET SHIELDING STUDIES. NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS (10/29/2010)‏ 1.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Meson Production Efficiencies IDS Target Meeting CERN December 17, 2008.
1 Meson Production Simulations X. Ding, D. B. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg BNL N u F a c t th International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Superbeams.
SHIELDING STUDIES FOR THE MUON COLLIDER TARGET NICHOLAS SOUCHLAS BNL Nov 30, 2010 ‏ 1.
Optimization of Target Parameters for a Tungsten Target (Half Density) at 8GeV X. Ding Target Studies Nov. 2, 2010.
Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Mar. 9, 2010 (Update of talk on Feb. 9, 2010)
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target System Update IDS-NF Plenary Meeting Arlington, VA October 18, 2011.
1 Muon Yield Comparisons for Different ICOOL Versions and Lattices X. Ding Front End, Nov. 23, 2010.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.
1 Comparison of Power Depositions X. Ding, D. B. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg, BNL Collaboration Meeting July 2, 2010.
Proton Position Tracking X. Ding, UCLA Aug. 11, 2009.
Comparison of Power Deposition in SC1 Coil Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Jun. 29, 2010.
Power Deposition in SC1 Coil Xiaoping Ding UCLA Target Studies Apr. 20, 2010.
Operated by Brookhaven Science Associates for the U.S. Department of Energy Optimized Parameters for a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los.
Solid Target Options NuFACT’00 S. Childress Solid Target Options The choice of a primary beam target for the neutrino factory, with beam power of
G EANT 4 energy loss of protons, electrons and magnetic monopole M. Vladymyrov.
Meson Productions for Target System with GA/HG Jet and IDS120h Configuration X. Ding (Presenter), D. Cline, UCLA H. Kirk, J.S. Berg, BNL Muon Accelerator.
1 Front End – present status David Neuffer March 31, 2015.
Hadronic Models Problems, Progress and Plans Gunter Folger Geant4 Workshop, Lisbon 2006.
Omega meson in nucleus, experimental study K. Ozawa (Univ. of Tokyo)
Shifting the Position of Focal Point of Proton Beam Relative to Intersection Point with Fixed Emittance for IDS120h Configuration X. Ding, UCLA Target.
1 Energy Deposition of 4MW Beam Power in a Mercury Jet Target X. Ding, D. B. Cline UCLA H. Kirk, J. S. Berg BNL The International Design Study for the.
2. RUTHERFORD BACKSCATTERING SPECTROMETRY Basic Principles.
IDS120h GEOMETRY WITH MODIFIED Hg POOL VESSEL. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING (P12 'POINT') WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS. BP#1(STST/W), SH#1, BeWindow,SC#8.
Particle Production at 3 GeV (update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Sept. 23, /23/13.
Radiation damage calculation in PHITS
Gallium as a Possible Target Material for a Muon Collider or Neutrino Factory X. Ding, D. Cline, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA J.S. Berg, H.G. Kirk,
Charged Kaon Production Yield Studies with Stretcher Sergei Striganov Fermilab Future of Kaon Physics at Fermilab August 21, Fermilab.
Studies on pion/muon capture at MOMENT Nikos Vassilopoulos IHEP, CAS August 11, 2015.
Particle Production of Carbon Target with 20Tto2T5m Configuration at 6.75 GeV (Updated) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies April 3, /3/14.
EURISOL – Task 11 meeting 2007S. Chabod 1 OUR CONTRIBUTION INSIDE EURISOL TASK 11 OPTIMIZATION OF IN-TARGET NUCLEI YIELDS Target parameters: material (Al.
Beam Dump for Carbon Target with IDS120h Configuration at 6.75 GeV (Updated) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Jan. 24, /24/14.
Particle Production with Carbon Target and IDS120j Configuration at 3 GeV (update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies Nov. 14, /14/13.
Kinetic Energy Spectra of pi +, pi -, mu +, mu - and sum of all from the 20to4T5m Configuration X. Ding Front End Meeting June 23,
Meson Production of Carbon Target at 3 GeV X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies 17/18/13.
Carbon Target Design and Optimization for an Intense Muon Source X. Ding, UCLA H.G. Kirk, BNL K.T. McDonald, Princeton Univ MAP Winter Collaboration.
Search for the  + in photoproduction experiments at CLAS APS spring meeting (Dallas) April 22, 2006 Ken Hicks (Ohio University) for the CLAS Collaboration.
IDS120j WITH AND WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS PION AND MUON STUDIES WITHIN TAPER REGION, III ( 20 cm GAPS BETWEEN CRYOSTATS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (9/4/2012)
IDS120i GEOMETRY. SIMULATIONS FOR 60%W+40%He SHIELDING WITH STST SHIELDING VESSELS. Hg vs. Ga DEPOSITED POWER DISTRIBUTION. (using Ding's optimized parameters)
G.R.White: F.O.N. T. From Ground Motion studies by A.Seryi et al. (SLAC) ‘Fast’ motion (> few Hz) dominated by cultural noise Concern for structures.
1 Front End – gas-filled cavities David Neuffer May 19, 2015.
Optimized Target Parameters and Meson Production by IDS120h with Focused Gaussian Beam and Fixed Emittance (Update) X. Ding, UCLA AAG June 27, /27/12.
NuMI Flux, Leonidas Aliaga William & Mary July 25, 2012 Current Uncertainties And Future Plans International Workshop on Neutrino Factories, Super Beams.
Induced-activity experiment:
X. Ding, UCLA MAP Spring 2014 Meeting May 2014 Fermilab
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS: NEW Hg MODULE
Charles F. Maguire Vanderbilt University
Inter-comparison of Particle production (2)
Report to Delta Review: Hadronic Validation
Guidance for hands-on exercise Neutron target
Meson Production Efficiencies
Beam Dump Experiments with Photon and Electron Beams
The np -> d p0 reaction measured with g11 data
Presentation transcript:

Meson Production at Low Proton Beam Energy (Update) X. Ding, UCLA Target Studies May 9, /9/113

Introduction Recent interest in neutrino factory staging scenarios with a 3 GeV proton beam; Meson Production at low proton beam energy (below 4 GeV) seems higher for Ga than Hg from our previous simulation. (1) X. Ding et al., pdf (2) J. Back et al., 16_021001_13.pdf 5/9/1132

Introduction (Cont’d) Projects (Project X et al.) to be run at 3 GeV proton beam will be very interested in the possible reality of such “higher” points. Considerable effort has to be taken to assess our confidence on this “hot topic” of excess of Ga over Hg for proton beam below 4GeV. 5/9/1133

Review of our simulations X. Ding et al., IPAC12/MOPPC044.pdf MARS15 (2010) MARS15 (2012) 5/9/1134

Review of our simulations (Cont’d) 5/9/1135 2GeV Proton Beam: Hg jet: mu+, 1809 mu-, 2547 Ga Jet: mu+, 2589 mu-, GeV Proton Beam: Hg jet: mu+, 2625 mu-, 4150 Ga Jet: mu+, 3582 mu-, 3927 At 2 and 3 GeV, we see more mu+ for Ga than Hg jet, but almost same mu- for both Ga and Hg.

Review of J. Back’s simulation using FLUKA Plot is of average of  + and  - 5/9/1136 (1)Yields are a factor of ~1.5 below MARS15; (2) Meson Production below 4 GeV also shows higher for Ga than Hg; (3) No significant drop in production when proton beam KE decreases under 5 GeV.

Future Work We plan to study the production of the forward beam onto a “Disk” target at 2, 3 and 4 GeV and compare the difference between Ga and Hg. We need to compare the analysis code between John and us for the meson counting. Repeat optimization at low KE is necessary but difficult due to high deflection in the SC field. We maybe can’t find a peak for the crossing angle of beam/jet as a function of beam KE and so on. High statistics is also required. 5/9/1137

MARS vs. FLUKA Same setting (Study2, 8GeV, 18m, 1.25T); Same parameter: 0.5 (negYield+posYield); Mars15(2007)/ pppGeV, MARS15(2009)/ pppGeV, MARS15(2012)/ pppGeV; FLUKA/0.013 pppGeV; Factor of 1.4 (~1.5 in slide 6) for MARS vs. FLUKA 5/9/1138

Running speed of MARS15 (2012) ENRG E0 EM EPSTAM EMCHR EMNEU EMIGA EMIEL E0: The incident particle kinetic energy EM: The hadron threshold energy (Default: GeV) EPSTAM: The star production threshold kinetic energy (Default:0.03 GeV) EMCHR: The threshold energy applied collectively to muons, heavy ions and charged hadrons (Default: GeV) EMNEU: The threshold energy for neutrons (Default:10 -4 GeV) EMIGA: The threshold energy for γ (Default:10 -4 GeV) EMIEL: The threshold energy for e ± (Default: 5*10 -4 GeV) “ENRG 8.0” results in slow speed in m1512 (fast in m1510) “ENRG ” gave about the same production as “ENRG 8.0” with ~ 1/10 the running time. 5/9/1139

Preliminary Comparison 5/9/11310 Target: Cylinder shape; Radius of 7.5 cm (large); Thickness: C 86 cm HG 30 cm GA 48 cm Interaction Nuclear Length C/42.9 cm; HG/14.58 cm; GA/23.92 cm Proton Beam: zero radius and launched at the disk center of frontend of disk