LOCAL ENSEMBLE KALMAN FILTER (LETKF) ANALYSIS OF LOOP CURRENT & EDDY IN THE GULF OF MEXICO Fanghua Xu 1, Leo Oey 1, Yasumasa Miyazawa 2, Peter Hamilton.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Data Assimilation NCEO Data-assimilation training days 5-7 July 2010 Peter Jan van Leeuwen Data Assimilation Research Center (DARC) University.
Advertisements

OSE meeting GODAE, Toulouse 4-5 June 2009 Interest of assimilating future Sea Surface Salinity measurements.
American Seas NCOM Assessments and Graphics for JUNE 2010 Frank Bub – NAVOCEANO (16 FEB 11) File: AMSEAS_GOM_NCOM_Evals_all_16FEB11.ppt June coverage –
Assimilation of Sea Surface Temperature into a Northwest Pacific Ocean Model using an Ensemble Kalman Filter B.-J. Choi Kunsan National University, Korea.
Initialization Issues of Coupled Ocean-atmosphere Prediction System Climate and Environment System Research Center Seoul National University, Korea In-Sik.
5/22/201563rd Interdepartmental Hurricane Conference, March 2-5, 2009, St. Petersburg, FL Experiments of Hurricane Initialization with Airborne Doppler.
Jidong Gao and David Stensrud Some OSSEs on Assimilation of Radar Data with a Hybrid 3DVAR/EnKF Method.
Comparison of 4 Hindcast/Nowcast Results for 2010 Using PROFS (Princeton Regional Ocean Forecast System) # F.-H. Xu & L.-Y. Oey* Princeton University *
Medspiration user meeting, dec 4-6 Use of Medspiration and GHRSST data in the Northern Seas Jacob L. Høyer & Søren Andersen Center for Ocean and Ice, Danish.
Evaluation of the Simulated Ocean Response to Hurricane Ivan in Comparison to High-Quality Ocean Observations George Halliwell, Nick Shay Rosenstiel School.
Toward a Real Time Mesoscale Ensemble Kalman Filter Gregory J. Hakim Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington Collaborators: Ryan Torn (UW)
Assimilating Sounding, Surface and Profiler Observations with a WRF-based EnKF for An MCV Case during BAMEX Zhiyong Meng & Fuqing Zhang Texas A&M University.
ASSIMILATION of RADAR DATA at CONVECTIVE SCALES with the EnKF: PERFECT-MODEL EXPERIMENTS USING WRF / DART Altuğ Aksoy National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Brian Ancell, Cliff Mass, Gregory J. Hakim University of Washington
Advanced data assimilation methods- EKF and EnKF Hong Li and Eugenia Kalnay University of Maryland July 2006.
1 Evaluation of Ocean Components in HWRF-HYCOM Model for Hurricane Prediction Hyun-Sook Kim and Carlos J. Lozano Marine Modeling and Analysis Branch, EMC.
A comparison of hybrid ensemble transform Kalman filter(ETKF)-3DVAR and ensemble square root filter (EnSRF) analysis schemes Xuguang Wang NOAA/ESRL/PSD,
Model engine: mpi-Princeton Ocean Model – 3D currents, T/S, SSH, turbulence KE (TKE) & length w/wave- breaking and Stokes drift TKE production; wave- enhanced.
Comparison of hybrid ensemble/4D- Var and 4D-Var within the NAVDAS- AR data assimilation framework The 6th EnKF Workshop May 18th-22nd1 Presenter: David.
The Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research A partnership between CSIRO and the Bureau of Meteorology Oscar Alves, Yonghong Yin, Robin Wedd,
Ensemble-variational sea ice data assimilation Anna Shlyaeva, Mark Buehner, Alain Caya, Data Assimilation and Satellite Meteorology Research Jean-Francois.
EnKF Overview and Theory
JERICO KICK OFF MEETINGPARIS – Maison de la recherche - 24 & 25 May 2011 WP9: New Methods to Assess the Impact of Coastal Observing Systems Presented by.
Computational Issues: An EnKF Perspective Jeff Whitaker NOAA Earth System Research Lab ENIAC 1948“Roadrunner” 2008.
V Gorin and M Tsyrulnikov Can model error be perceived from routine observations?
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss High-resolution data assimilation in COSMO: Status and.
MPO 674 Lecture 20 3/26/15. 3d-Var vs 4d-Var.
Potential benefits from data assimilation of carbon observations for modellers and observers - prerequisites and current state J. Segschneider, Max-Planck-Institute.
IWMO-2010, May 24 Fanghua Xu and Leo Oey Princeton University
Sea Ice Modelling and Data Assimilation at CIS Tom Carrieres.
Vaisala/University of Washington Real-observation Experiments Vaisala/University of Washington Real-observation Experiments Clifford Mass, Gregory Hakim,
Demonstrations of GODAE Impact - Boundary Conditions for a Regional Model and Web Hit Statistics Presented by Harley Hurlburt Naval Research Laboratory.
Potential Benefits of Multiple-Doppler Radar Data to Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting: Assimilation of Simulated Data Using WRF-3DVAR System Soichiro.
Potential impact of HF radar and gliders on ocean forecast system Peter Oke June 2009 CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research.
The I nverse R egional O cean M odeling S ystem Development and Application to Variational Data Assimilation of Coastal Mesoscale Eddies. Di Lorenzo, E.
11 Background Error Daryl T. Kleist* National Monsoon Mission Scoping Workshop IITM, Pune, India April 2011.
Assimilating AIRNOW Ozone Observations into CMAQ Model to Improve Ozone Forecasts Tianfeng Chai 1, Rohit Mathur 2, David Wong 2, Daiwen Kang 1, Hsin-mu.
Data assimilation and forecasting the weather (!) Eugenia Kalnay and many friends University of Maryland.
Multivariate Data Assimilation of Carbon Cycle Using Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter 1 Ji-Sun Kang, 1 Eugenia Kalnay, 2 Junjie Liu, 2 Inez Fung,
Enhancing predictability of the Loop Current variability using Gulf of Mexico Hycom Matthieu Le Hénaff (1) Villy Kourafalou (1) Ashwanth Srinivasan (1)
Ensemble-based Assimilation of HF-Radar Surface Currents in a West Florida Shelf ROMS Nested into HYCOM and filtering of spurious surface gravity waves.
The OR-WA coastal ocean forecast system Initial hindcast assimilation tests 1 Goals for the COMT project: -DA in presence of the Columbia River -Develop.
Deutscher Wetterdienst Vertical localization issues in LETKF Breogan Gomez, Andreas Rhodin, Hendrik Reich.
Earth Systems Coupling Advanced Algorithms Worldwide Nested Applications High Performance Computing Forecast Systems User Community Advanced Data Assimilation.
Hindcast Simulations of Hydrodynamics in the Northern Gulf of Mexico Using the FVCOM Model Zizang Yang 1, Eugene Wei 1, Aijun Zhang 2, Richard Patchen.
Weak Constraint 4DVAR in the R egional O cean M odeling S ystem ( ROMS ): Development and application for a baroclinic coastal upwelling system Di Lorenzo,
Use ensemble error covariance information in GRAPES 3DVAR Jiandong GONG, Ruichun WANG NWP center of CMA Oct 27, 2015.
Preliminary results from assimilation of GPS radio occultation data in WRF using an ensemble filter H. Liu, J. Anderson, B. Kuo, C. Snyder, A. Caya IMAGe.
Ocean Syntheses David Behringer NOAA/NCEP NOAA Ocean Climate Observation 8th Annual PI Meeting June 25-27, 2012 Silver Spring, Maryland.
Prepared by Dusanka Zupanski and …… Maximum Likelihood Ensemble Filter: application to carbon problems.
Current modification gridinfo.f90Add new subroutine: getgridinfo_reg --- calculate the pressure in each sigma level and the virture temperature gridio.f90Add.
The I nverse R egional O cean M odeling S ystem Development and Application to Variational Data Assimilation of Coastal Mesoscale Eddies. Di Lorenzo, E.
2007/3/19 MRI, Tsukuba Recent developments of the local ensemble transform Kalman filter (LETKF) at JMA Takemasa Miyoshi (NPD/JMA) Collaborators: Shozo.
Speaker I Organism I adresse mail WP9: NEW METHODS TO ASSESS THE IMPACT OF COASTAL OBSERVING SYSTEMS Presented by Srdjan Dobricic on.
1 A multi-scale three-dimensional variational data assimilation scheme Zhijin Li,, Yi Chao (JPL) James C. McWilliams (UCLA), Kayo Ide (UMD) The 8th International.
The application of ensemble Kalman filter in adaptive observation and information content estimation studies Junjie Liu and Eugenia Kalnay July 13th, 2007.
ENSEMBLE KALMAN FILTER IN THE PRESENCE OF MODEL ERRORS Hong Li Eugenia Kalnay.
G. Panteleev, P.Stabeno, V.Luchin, D.Nechaev,N.Nezlin, M.Ikeda. Estimates of the summer transport of the Kamchatka Current a variational inverse of hydrographic.
The SCM Experiments at ECMWF Gisela Seuffert and Pedro Viterbo European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts ELDAS Progress Meeting 12./
Demonstration and Comparison of Sequential Approaches for Altimeter Data Assimilation in HYCOM A. Srinivasan, E. P. Chassignet, O. M. Smedstad, C. Thacker,
Korea Institute of Atmospheric Prediction Systems (KIAPS) ( 재 ) 한국형수치예보모델개발사업단 LETKF 앙상블 자료동화 시스템 테스트베드 구축 및 활용방안 Implementation and application of LETKF.
RTOFS Monitoring and Evaluation Metrics Avichal Mehra MMAB/EMC/NCEP/NWS.
© Crown copyright Met Office Mismatching Perturbations at the Lateral Boundaries in Limited-Area Ensemble Forecasting Jean-François Caron … or why limited-area.
ECMWF/EUMETSAT NWP-SAF Satellite data assimilation Training Course Mar 2016.
Travis Sluka Acknowledgements: Eugenia Kalnay, Steve Penny, Takemasa Miyoshi S TRONGLY C OUPLED E N KF D ATA A SSIMILATION IN C OUPLED O CEAN -A TMOSPHERE.
Bruce Cornuelle, Josh Willis, Dean Roemmich
H.L. Tanaka and K. Kondo University of Tsukuba
Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter for ROMS in Indian Ocean
Vertical localization issues in LETKF
Y. Xue1, C. Wen1, X. Yang2 , D. Behringer1, A. Kumar1,
Presentation transcript:

LOCAL ENSEMBLE KALMAN FILTER (LETKF) ANALYSIS OF LOOP CURRENT & EDDY IN THE GULF OF MEXICO Fanghua Xu 1, Leo Oey 1, Yasumasa Miyazawa 2, Peter Hamilton 3 IWMO, : Princeton University 2: JAMSTEC 3: SAIC

mpiPOM-LETKF gues/restart.ncLETKF anal/restart.nc mean/ sprd/ ensfcst(mpiPOM) obs SSHA SST T&S U&V +2d Observation increments/innovations

LETKF runnumobs data used 012SSHA (>500m)+MCSST+parm_infl (42%) 013SSHA (>500m)+MCSST+parm_infl (10.5%) 014SSHA(>500m) +MCSST+LC(uv, err = 0.05 m/s) 015SSHA(>500m)+MCSST +parm_infl (21%) 016SSHA(>500m) +MCSST+LC(uv, err = 0.1 m/s) OISSHA(>500m)+MCSST 90-day Experiments (2010/04/22 – 2010/07/21) LETKF parameters Horizontal localization scale7 (number of grids,1/3 degree) vertical localization scale (m)2000 Covariance inflation parameter (%)21 (10.5, 42) Observation error of SSHA (m)0.2 (0.1 & 0.05) Observation error of T ( 0 C)1.0 ( ) Time interval of LETKF (day)2 ensemble members20

LETKF015 Positions of the observation data assimilated in GOM, red: satellite SST; blue: AVISO SSHA Mooring locations near the Loop currents, red: measurements from ~80m to ~3000m Blue: measurements in deep (about 3000m) Loop Currents mooring locations

Model results are compared with 1. Satellite Sea Surface height (SSH); AVISO NRT map data ( 2. Loop Currents mooring data; (Dr. Peter Hamilton) 3. ADCP data. (

Comparison between model and AVISO SSH Color: model SSH; white line: AVISO SSH=0 line OI LETKF015

OI for the first 30 days OI for the entire 90 days 015 for the first 30 days 015 for the entire 90 days Blue: mooring; red: model -100m

OI for the first 30 days015 for the first 30 days -500m OI for the entire 90 days015 for the entire 90 days Blue: mooring; red: model

run V. Corrskillmean Std R. Rθuv spd ratio αm-αoαm-αo OI o o o o o o o o o o o o days Vector Corr Coef (R) & Angles averaged over 4 moorings as a function of depth

runRθ skillmean std ratio uv m-o OI o o o o o o o o o o 0.92 Comparison between model & d moorings (54 days) Vector Corr Coef (R) & Angles ( θ ) at d moorings

OI 015 Blue: mooring; red: model Comparison of model and mooring D over 54 days

LETKF comparison with 3 ADCPs ~ OI012

Summary  The LETKF data assimilation results are in good agreement with the observation data, including satellite SSH, ADCPs, and moorings.  LETKF data assimilation improves model simulation significantly, compared with the traditional OI assimilation results;  The Loop current and its eddies are well represented, especially in mid water depth.

Principles X b : background field Y o : observed variable H : the observation operator that performs the necessary interpolation and transformation from model variables to observation space H(X b ): background or first guess of observations W: weights determined by the estimated statistical error covariance of the forecast and the observations. X a : analysis Observation increments/innovations SCM, OI, 3D-Var, and KF…

OI

Corr. & RMS error of model with satellite SSHA (h>500m) in GOM

runRθskillmeanstd ratio uv m-o OI o o o o o o o o o runRθskillmeanstd ratio uv m-o OI o o o o o o o o5o o o m 100m Model comparison with ADCP in the northern Gulf

LETKF$runnumstatusobs data used 001C(90 days)SSHA only (msla) 002C (30days)SSHA+MCSST 003C(90 days)SSHA+T(ship) 004C(90 days)SSHA+TS(ship) 005C(90days)SSHA(>500m)+MCSST 006C(90 days)SSHA trackdata(>500m) 007C(90 days)SSHA trackdata(>500m)+MCSST 008C(90 days)SSHA trackdata(>500m)+MCSST+TS(ship) 009C(90days)SSHA (msla, >500m)+MCSST+TS(ship) 012C(90 days)SSHA (>500m)+MCSST+parm_infl (42%)