Ohio’s Alternate Assessments for Students with Disabilities 2003-04 Thomas Lather Office for Exceptional Children (614)466-2650

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

NCAAAI CHANGES Sheila Garner Brown North Carolina State University
Within the 1%, a second, larger group of students with significant cognitive disabilities can be expected to attain academic.
A Guided Tour of the 1% Exception Process From Documentation to Approval.
State-wide Assessment Update for What Does TNs Alternate Assessment Program Look Like Now? Alternate Assessment General Assessment Alternate.
Participation in Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
ALTERNATE PERFORMANCE BASED ASSESSMENT The Rubric for End of Course Assessments
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
NCSC- National Center and State Collaborative Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities.
Alternative Maryland School Assessment (Alt-MSA)
National Center on Educational Outcomes N C E O What the heck does proficiency mean for students with significant cognitive disabilities? Nancy Arnold,
Large Scale Assessment Conference June 22, 2004 Sue Rigney U.S. Department of Education Assessments Shall Provide for… Participation of all students Reasonable.
Who Are The “2% Students” …eligible to be judged as proficient based on modified grade-level academic achievement standards? Naomi Zigmond University of.
2004 CCSSO Large-scale Conference Peasley, Deeter, Quenemoen Measurement Purgatory or Best Practice? Alternate Assessment for Students with Significant.
Accountability, accommodations and alternate assessment.
Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Created from “Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Online at:
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress in the General Curriculum Through Universal Design for Learning and Inclusion Each Power Point presentation can be viewed as.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
Alternate Assessment Changes. 9/14/20152 Important Information that You Need to Know The new Alternate Assessment will be a test given to students.
Testing Students with Disabilities Office of Assessment Update Suzanne Swaffield Anne Mruz November
Accessing the General Curriculum. A look back… “in 1970, U.S. schools educated only one in five children with disabilities, and many states had laws excluding.
National Center on Educational Outcomes Fall, 2004 Alternate assessment, gaps, and other challenges! A view of current practices from the technical assistance.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
Including Quality Assurance Within The Theory of Action Presented to: CCSSO 2012 National Conference on Student Assessment June 27, 2012.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
SLOs for Students on GAA January 17, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
Administrator Update January Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 1997 –Students with disabilities must participate in statewide assessment.
The 1% Rule: Alternate Assessment Participation November 20, 2007.
IDEA and NCLB Standards-Based Accountability Sue Rigney, U.S. Department of Education OSEP 2006 Project Directors’ Conference.
Fall 2010 Mathematics Standards of Learning Assessment Update - 1 -
PSSA-M January 19, 2012 LEA meeting January 19, 2012 LEA meeting.
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
How Do Students with Disabilities Participate in the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program? September 28, 2011.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR)
Exceptional Lives: Special Education in Today’s Schools, 6e ISBN: © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 2 Ensuring Progress.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
How Do Students with Disabilities Participate in the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program? September 29, 2010.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
State Practices for Ensuring Meaningful ELL Participation in State Content Assessments Charlene Rivera and Lynn Shafer Willner GW-CEEE National Conference.
Alternate Proficiency Assessment Erin Lichtenwalner.
NEW Oregon IEP: Identifying Changes and Useful Tools Laura Petschauer November 13, 2015.
How Do Students with Disabilities Participate in the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program? December 9, 2009.
Assessing Very Low-Achieving Children with Disabilities Using Large Scale Assessments Sue Rigney, U.S. Department of Education OSEP 2006 Project Directors’
1 NCEXTEND1 Alternate Assessment with Alternate Achievement Standards Conference on Exceptional Children November 17-18, 2008 NCDPI Division of Accountability.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
IEP Training for Kansas Schools Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Short-Term Objectives and Benchmarks.
Policy and Practice Implications for Secondary and Postsecondary Education and Employment for Youth With Disabilities September 18 and 19, 2003 Washington,
The Standards-based IEP Process: What You Need to Know Standards-Based IEP State-Directed Project - January 2011.
Spring 2012 Ohio’s Academic Content Standards - Extended for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities Increasing grade-level standard accessibility.
“ IT IS PROOF NOT TRUTH” THE IEP IS THE PROOF Dr. Jodi Roseman Director of Special Education School District of Springfield Township.
Colorado Accommodation Manual Part I Section I Guidance Section II Five-Step Process Welcome! Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services.
Educational Benefit Review (EBR) October Educational Benefit Review (EBR) Purpose Determine if the student’s IEP is reasonably calculated for the.
Serving Students with Disabilities in Indiana
Ensuring the Success of Every Student Sue Zake, Ph.D. ∙ February, 4, 2016.
State Testing for SPED Students: (Georgia Alternative Assessment vs. Regular State Testing with Accommodations)
Breakout Discussion: Every Student Succeeds Act - Scott Norton Council of Chief State School Officers.
Closing the Educational Gap for Students with Disabilities Kristina Makousky.
American Institutes for Research
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
WA-AIM 1% Participation Cap
Chapter 8 (key issues for Special Education)
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module Two: Developing the Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLOP)
Standards-based Individualized Education Program (IEP) Module One: Introduction SBIEP Module one: Introduction - The standards-based reform movement has.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Ohio’s Alternate Assessments for Students with Disabilities Thomas Lather Office for Exceptional Children (614)

What are Alternate Assessments? A state wide assessment process that is designed for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities who are unable to participate in regular assessment. –Ensures that all students can participate in the assessment systems.

Alternate Assessments Basic Assumption: –The vast majority of students with disabilities should be able to participate in the regular State assessment with appropriate and allowable accommodations, if needed. –A “small number” of students should participate in alternate assessment. (US DOE Non-Regulatory Draft Guidance, March 10, 2003 at

What are Alternate Assessments Must be aligned with the State’s content and student achievement standards. Must report student achievement in the same way as the State’s regular assessment. –i.e.,advanced, proficient, basic Must serve the same purpose as the assessment for which it is an alternate –i.e., Reading, Math

What are Alternate Assessments Ohio’s Standards based Alternate Assessment is for students with the most severe disabilities. The Alternate Assessment consists of a Collection of Evidence (COE) of a student’s achievement of Ohio’s Academic Content Standards. –The collection of evidence documents access to grade level content but reflects an alternate level of achievement. Alternate assessment is a “snapshot” of achievement during a window of time

Ohio’s Alternate Assessment for Students with Disabilities Collection of Evidence scored across four domains Performance Support/Independence Complexity/Context Settings and Interactions Evidence is scored independently according to professionally accepted standards

Alternate Assessments Proposed Federal Policy for purpose of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) –Use of alternate achievement standards at state and LEA levels may not exceed 1% of tested population with maximum positive impact for AYP (USDOE Proposed Rules, Federal Register, March 20, 2003 (Vol. 68, No. 54, pp )

Alternate Assessments 1% proposed cap does not limit the number of the students who can participate in Alternate Assessment. The proposed cap provides that only 1% of those students who participate in an Alternate Assessment, and scored proficient and above, will be counted towards AYP.

Alternate Assessments Which students should take an Alternate Assessment? IEP team determination –Decision based on individual needs of the student, NOT the category of the disability –Follow Ohio Guidelines for Participation in Alternate Assessment

Ohio Guidelines for Participation in Alternate Assessment: Criteria to Assist IEP Teams Appropriate for students with severe disabilities –In most cases, this means students with cognitive disabilities –However, this is NOT exclusive of other disability conditions

Ohio Guidelines for Participation in Alternate Assessment: Criteria to Assist IEP Teams Severe limitations documented in evaluation team report Instruction chiefly focused on acquisition of essential life skills –Generally not appropriate for students engaged in general curriculum without significant modification. –Appropriate for students who require the highest level of individualized instruction

Ohio Guidelines for Participation in Alternate Assessment: Criteria to Assist IEP Teams If alternate assessment is appropriate for a student, that student would participate in alternate assessment “across the board” (i.e., in all tested subject areas) Determination should be reviewed annually

Transitions in Ohio’s alternate assessments for students with disabilities, Existing “IEP” based Alternate Assessments –Grade 4 Citizenship, Science, and Writing –Grade 6 Citizenship, Science, and Writing –Grade 9 Reading, Mathematics Citizenship, Science, and Writing (if needed) New “Standards-based Alternate Assessment (“collection of evidence”) –Grade 3 Reading –Grade 4 Reading/Mathematics –Grade 6 Reading/Mathematics –Grade 10 (OGT) Reading/Mathematics

Alternate Assessment/EMIS Student Testing Record –“Subject” Test Type Select ALT – Alternate Assessment –“Subject” type of accommodation Select NO

Alternate Assessment/EMIS Since the Standards Based Alternate Assessment will be scored, and the score reported to the Department, the results of the IEP-Based Alternate Assessment will need to be reported as followed: –AAA Advanced –BBB Proficient –CCC Basic –DDD Below Basic

Alternate Assessment Additional information regarding Alternate Assessment can be located on the web-pages for the Offices of Exception Children and Curriculum and Assessment.