Initial conditions for N-body simulations Hans A. Winther ITA, University of Oslo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lagrangian Perturbation Theory : 3 rd order solutions for general dark energy models Seokcheon Lee ( ) Korea Institute for Advanced Study ( ) Feb. 12 th.
Advertisements

Report 5 Grid. Problem # 8 Grid A plastic grid covers the open end of a cylindrical vessel containing water. The grid is covered and the vessel is turned.
Particle acceleration in a turbulent electric field produced by 3D reconnection Marco Onofri University of Thessaloniki.
Statistical Estimation and Sampling Distributions
Preheating after N-flation Shinsuke Kawai (Helsinki Institute of Physics, University of Helsinki) PRD77(2008) [arXiv:0803:0321] with D. Battefeld.
Simulating the joint evolution of quasars, galaxies and their large-scale distribution Springel et al., 2005 Presented by Eve LoCastro October 1, 2009.
Wave-mechanics and the adhesion approximation Chris Short School of Physics and Astronomy The University of Nottingham UK.
Incorporating Solvent Effects Into Molecular Dynamics: Potentials of Mean Force (PMF) and Stochastic Dynamics Eva ZurekSection 6.8 of M.M.
Non-linear matter power spectrum to 1% accuracy between dynamical dark energy models Matt Francis University of Sydney Geraint Lewis (University of Sydney)
Cosmological Structure Formation A Short Course
Christian Wagner - September Potsdam Nonlinear Power Spectrum Emulator Christian Wagner in collaboration with Katrin Heitmann, Salman Habib,
Press-Schechter Formalism: Structure Formation by Self-Similar Condensation Jean P. Walker Based on Press & Schechter’s 1974 Paper.
Introducing Some Basic Concepts Linear Theories of Waves (Vanishingly) small perturbations Particle orbits are not affected by waves. Dispersion.
Some standard univariate probability distributions
Dark Matter and Galaxy Formation (Section 3: Galaxy Data vs. Simulations) Joel R. Primack 2009, eprint arXiv: Presented by: Michael Solway.
The Galaxy Formation Paradigm Paradigm R. Giovanelli Astro620/Spring ‘07 Remember to mention.pdf file.
Angular clustering and halo occupation properties of COSMOS galaxies Cristiano Porciani.
14 December 2006 Dark Matter Haloes in the Cosmic Web Cristiano Porciani (ETH Zurich) with OLIVER HAHN, Marcella Carollo, Avishai Dekel.
The Erdös-Rényi models
The Theory/Observation connection lecture 3 the (non-linear) growth of structure Will Percival The University of Portsmouth.
Yoshiharu Tanaka (YITP) Gradient expansion approach to nonlinear superhorizon perturbations Finnish-Japanese Workshop on Particle Helsinki,
Impact of Early Dark Energy on non-linear structure formation Margherita Grossi MPA, Garching Volker Springel Advisor : Volker Springel 3rd Biennial Leopoldina.
Different physical properties contribute to the density and temperature perturbation growth. In addition to the mutual gravity of the dark matter and baryons,
Black hole production in preheating Teruaki Suyama (Kyoto University) Takahiro Tanaka (Kyoto University) Bruce Bassett (ICG, University of Portsmouth)
MATTEO VIEL STRUCTURE FORMATION INAF and INFN Trieste SISSA - 28, th February/ 3 rd March 2011.
Galaxy bias with Gaussian/non- Gaussian initial condition: a pedagogical introduction Donghui Jeong Texas Cosmology Center The University of Texas at Austin.
Conservation of the non-linear curvature perturbation in generic single-field inflation Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics Atsushi Naruko In Collaboration.
Cosmological Reconstruction via Wave Mechanics Peter Coles School of Physics & Astronomy University of Nottingham.
Resimulating objects selected from the database Simulation infrastructure Natural to use simulations in the database to select objects for further study.
Dark energy fluctuations and structure formation Rogério Rosenfeld Instituto de Física Teórica/UNESP I Workshop "Challenges of New Physics in Space" Campos.
Robust cosmological constraints from SDSS-III/BOSS galaxy clustering Chia-Hsun Chuang (Albert) IFT- CSIC/UAM, Spain.
Academic Training Lectures Rocky Kolb Fermilab, University of Chicago, & CERN Cosmology and the origin of structure Rocky I : The universe observed Rocky.
Probing the Reheating with Astrophysical Observations Jérôme Martin Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris (IAP) 1 [In collaboration with K. Jedamzik & M. Lemoine,
Yugo Abe (Shinshu University) July 10, 2015 In collaboration with T. Inami (NTU), Y. Kawamura (Shinshu U), Y. Koyama (NCTS) YA, T. Inami,
A particle-gridless hybrid methods for incompressible flows
Clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Bob Nichol (ICG, Portsmouth) Many SDSS Colleagues.
The Theory/Observation connection lecture 2 perturbations Will Percival The University of Portsmouth.
The Fate of the Universe
10 December, 2008 CIMCA2008 (Vienna) 1 Statistical Inferences by Gaussian Markov Random Fields on Complex Networks Kazuyuki Tanaka, Takafumi Usui, Muneki.
Session 3, Unit 5 Dispersion Modeling. The Box Model Description and assumption Box model For line source with line strength of Q L Example.
General Relativity Physics Honours 2008 A/Prof. Geraint F. Lewis Rm 560, A29 Lecture Notes 10.
InflationInflation Andrei Linde Lecture 2. Inflation as a theory of a harmonic oscillator Eternal Inflation.
How accurately do N body simulations reproduce the clustering of CDM? Michael Joyce LPNHE, Université Paris VI Work in collaboration with: T. Baertschiger.
Probing cosmic structure formation in the wavelet representation Li-Zhi Fang University of Arizona IPAM, November 10, 2004.
Chapter 5 Sampling Distributions. The Concept of Sampling Distributions Parameter – numerical descriptive measure of a population. It is usually unknown.
Cosmology and Dark Matter III: The Formation of Galaxies Jerry Sellwood.
Black Hole Universe -BH in an expanding box- Yoo, Chulmoon ( YITP) Hiroyuki Abe (Osaka City Univ.) Ken-ichi Nakao (Osaka City Univ.) Yohsuke Takamori (Osaka.
Dark Energy in the Early Universe Joel Weller arXiv:gr-qc/
Quantum Noises and the Large Scale Structure Wo-Lung Lee Physics Department, National Taiwan Normal University Physics Department, National Taiwan Normal.
V.M. Sliusar, V.I. Zhdanov Astronomical Observatory, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Observatorna str., 3, Kiev Ukraine
CMB, lensing, and non-Gaussianities
Feasibility of detecting dark energy using bispectrum Yipeng Jing Shanghai Astronomical Observatory Hong Guo and YPJ, in preparation.
Dominic Galliano Supervisors: Rob Crittenden & Kazuya Koyama UK Cosmo, Tuesday 13 September 2011.
CSE 872 Dr. Charles B. Owen Advanced Computer Graphics1 Water Computational Fluid Dynamics Volumes Lagrangian vs. Eulerian modelling Navier-Stokes equations.
Cosmology in Eddington- inspired Born-Infeld gravity Hyeong-Chan Kim Korea National University of Transportation 19 Feb 2013 The Ocean Suites Jeju, Asia.
MEASUREING BIAS FROM UNBIASED OBSERVABLE SEOKCHEON LEE (KIAS) The 50 th Workshop on Gravitation and Numerical INJE Univ.
The HORIZON Quintessential Simulations A.Füzfa 1,2, J.-M. Alimi 2, V. Boucher 3, F. Roy 2 1 Chargé de recherches F.N.R.S., University of Namur, Belgium.
Spherical Collapse and the Mass Function – Chameleon Dark Energy Stephen Appleby, APCTP-TUS dark energy workshop 5 th June, 2014 M. Kopp, S.A.A, I. Achitouv,
Some bonus cosmological applications of BigBOSS ZHANG, Pengjie Shanghai Astronomical Observatory BigBOSS collaboration meeting, Paris, 2012 Refer to related.
3D Matter and Halo density fields with Standard Perturbation Theory and local bias Nina Roth BCTP Workshop Bad Honnef October 4 th 2010.
2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey ¼ M galaxies 2003
Testing Primordial non-Gaussianities in CMB Anisotropies
Outline Part II. Structure Formation: Dark Matter
Recent status of dark energy and beyond
Quantum Spacetime and Cosmic Inflation
Shintaro Nakamura (Tokyo University of Science)
Outline Part II. Structure Formation: Dark Matter
Complexity in cosmic structures
The impact of non-linear evolution of the cosmological matter power spectrum on the measurement of neutrino masses ROE-JSPS workshop Edinburgh.
CMB Anisotropy 이준호 류주영 박시헌.
Presentation transcript:

Initial conditions for N-body simulations Hans A. Winther ITA, University of Oslo

Overview The N-body simulation Dynamical equations Numerical methods Analysis of the results Identify halos etc. Connect the simulation with observations… Initial Conditions

Introduction Observations (CMB / LSS) suggests that perturbations started from a random Gaussian field (completly described by P(k)) put up by inflation. After inflation, the evolution of the perturbations are well described by linear perturbation theory. Linear perturbations theory breaks down when the density contrast gets larger than one: N-body simulations is needed to follow the late time small scale clustering of matter. We are going to look at some ways to generate initial conditions in order to perform N-body simulations

Initial conditions ?

N-body simulations usually starts with fairly homogenous IC. There are different ways to place particles in the simulation box before we start the simulation. The main requirement is that the distribution is uniform. The most obvious is to put particles on a cubic grid. We can place particles in lattice cells, but at a random displacement from the centre of the cell. Can give large fluctuations which can lead to spurious clustering. Place particles randomly and then evolve the distribution with repulsive gravity (glass initial conditions).

Linear perturbation theory Remember the equations governing the evolution of the density contrast and the velocity field:

Linear perturbation theory In the linear theory the density contrast and the velocity field is given in terms of the gravitational potential. The problem of initial conditions reduces to generate the gravitational potential and using this to calculate the density contrast and the velocity field. In  CDM, the linear density contrast can be written:  = c 1 a + c 2 a -2/3. The Poisson equation can be written:  in = a in  2  in and (d  /da) in = -  v in Which leads to  (a) = (1/5)(3  2  in -2  v in )a + (2/5)(  2  in -  v in )a -2/3 For a system in the growing mode we see that v in =–  in.

Linear perturbation theory We can now generate the initial density field in two different ways: 1.Distribute particles uniformly and have the masses of the particles by proportional to the local density. 2.The velocity is given by the gradient of the potential. Drawback: We have to carry an array with information about the different masses around. 1.Distribute particles uniformly and have the masses of the particles by proportional to the local density. 2.The velocity is given by the gradient of the potential. Drawback: We have to carry an array with information about the different masses around. 1.Distribute particles uniformly and then displace using the velocity for the growing mode. 2.Max displacements should be smaller than the average displacement. Large displacements can lead to an incorrect realization of P(k). 3.If this happens, recompute the gravitational potential and assign velocities again. 4.This method can be shown to reproduce the initial density field given that the initial distribution did not have any inhomogeneities. 1.Distribute particles uniformly and then displace using the velocity for the growing mode. 2.Max displacements should be smaller than the average displacement. Large displacements can lead to an incorrect realization of P(k). 3.If this happens, recompute the gravitational potential and assign velocities again. 4.This method can be shown to reproduce the initial density field given that the initial distribution did not have any inhomogeneities.

The most widely used method to set up a quasi-linear initial condition for the N-body simulation. Zel’dovich approximation is the first order Lagrangian perturbation theory. Normally breaks down later than Eulerian linear theory (the usual perturbation theory). First proposed in the 1970 paper ‘Gravitational Instability: An approximate theory for large density perturbations’. Zel’dovich originally used this method to show that the first structures to form are sheets called Zel’dovich pancakes. Assumptions: Scales of interest are smaller than the size of the horizon. The universe is dominated by dust (pressure less matter). Zel’dovich approximation

Start with some particles. The comoving position of this particle as a function of its Lagrangian position (initial position) can be written: Take the derivatives with respect to time and use perturbation theory yields:

From a power-spectrum P(k) we can make a random realization of the density field: In practice Where R k =Gauss(0,1). The potential is given by: Particles are displaced by using:

Other initial conditions In choosing the initial conditions we also have to choose the size of the box, the number of particles and the start time. These values are not arbitrary: 1.We have to make sure the largest modes are in the linear regime. Starting to late can also introduce shell-crossing (to large displacements). 2.If we start to early the displacements are tiny which can lead to numerical noise (the grid will be extremely regular). 3.By choosing a boxsize and particle number we introduce a minimum and maximum scale we can simulate. Must make sure the interesting scales are within our reach. 4.The variance of the matter distribution should not be too large. The literature suggests:  box < 0.1 – 0.2

Other initial conditions

Glass initial conditions Place the particles at random (Poisson distribution) Evolve the system forward in time, but use negative gravity! Use the new positions as the Lagrangian positions q in the Zel’dovich approximation. Both the grid and the glass method are used in the literature. What is best for a given simulation is not clear.

Glass initial conditions

…problems? Paper (arXiv: E. Sirko) claiming the usual way of imposing initial conditions introduces a significant error in the real space statistical properties of the particles. Sampling the power-spectrum leads to a underestimate of the real space variance (in e.g.  8 ), correlation function and non-linear effects due to a finite box. As discussed above, a finite box means that we impose a cutoff in wavelengths in k-space. The finite size of the box can be taken into account by rescaling cosmic time (or the scale factor) in order to account for long wavelength modes.

Summary The Zel’dovich approximation is the most widely used method for generating initial conditions. Several different ways to apply it: Different masses / grid / glass etc. All methods generates a random realization of the power-spectrum. Importantly, this creates sampling variance. To gain a good statistics, to compare with observations, one should run the code several times with different realizations. Initial conditions places some important constraints on the time we start the simulation.