1 Simulation of Neutron Backgrounds in the ILC Extraction Line Beam Dump Siva Darbha Supervisors: Lewis Keller and Takashi Maruyama.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Background studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop SLAC, January 18-21, 2011.
Advertisements

GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
1 Vacuum Requirements in the Detector Region from Beam Gas and other Considerations Takashi Maruyama (SLAC) LCWA 2009, Albuquerque October 2, 2009.
Status of the Tagger Hall Background Simulation Simulation A. Somov, Jefferson Lab Hall-D Collaboration Meeting, University of Regina September
Using FLUKA to study Radiation Fields in ERL Components Jason E. Andrews, University of Washington Vaclav Kostroun, Mentor.
Impact of LHCf on BRAN and beam monitoring Y.Itow, H.Menjo (Nagoya University) The 1 st TAN integration workshop Mar10, 2006.
Summary of wg2a (BDS and IR) Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Shigeru Kuroda, Andrei Seryi October 21, 2005.
Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Detector Design Issues:  Interaction Region David Asner/LLNL Linear Collider Retreat, Santa Cruz, June 27-29,
BLM review Mario Santana Leitner OUTLOOK ON FLUKA SIMULATIONS FOR UDULATOR DAMAGE AND BLM RESPONSE Mario Santana Leitner, Alberto.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Jeff Gronberg/LLNL For the Beam Delivery Group LCWS - October 25, 2000.
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
Planning for Electromagnetic Irradiation Studies of Silicon Strip Sensors at SLAC/SCIPP Viltaliy Fadeyev, Spencer Key *, Donish Khan *, Tom Markiewicz,
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project IR Working Group Summary Tom Markiewicz LC R&D Workshop, UCSC June 29, 2002.
Background comparison between 20 mrad and 2 mr crossings Takashi Maruyama SLAC Machine-Detector Interface Workshop SLAC January 6-8, 2005.
Backgrounds and Forward Region Backgrounds and Forward Region FCAL Collaboration Workshop TAU, September 18-19, 2005 Christian Grah.
Status of ongoing studies for comparing 2-mrad and 20-mrad IRs T. Maruyama SLAC.
IR Beamline and Sync Radiation Takashi Maruyama. Collimation No beam loss within 400 m of IP Muon background can be acceptable. No sync radiations directly.
The Detector and Interaction Region for a Photon Collider at TESLA
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC Backgrounds What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle HH-Zeuthen-LC-Meeting Zeuthen September.
Dec 11, 2008S. Kahn -- Muon Collider Detector Backgrounds 1 Detector Backgrounds in a Muon Collider Steve Kahn Muons Inc. Muon Collider Design Workshop.
1 LumiCal Optimization and Design Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, Boulder, September 18, 2008.
Turtle ray interactions with the EMC Tim West University of Manchester.
Jan MDI WS SLAC Electron Detection in the Very Forward Region V. Drugakov, W. Lohmann Motivation Talk given by Philip Detection of Electrons and.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle LCWS 2004 Paris April 19 th 2004.
Backgrounds in the NLC BDS ISG9 December 10 – Takashi Maruyama SLAC.
Beam Background Simulations for HL-LHC at IR1 Regina Kwee-Hinzmann, R.Bruce, A.Lechner, N.V.Shetty, L.S.Esposito, F.Cerutti, G.Bregliozzi, R.Kersevan,
Ivan Smiljanić Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia Energy resolution and scale requirements for luminosity measurement.
Simulation of Beam-Beam Background at CLIC André Sailer (CERN-PH-LCD, HU Berlin) LCWS2010: BDS+MDI Joint Session 29 March, 2010, Beijing 1.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
Integrated Radiation Measurement and Radiation Protection of BES Ⅲ Zhang Qingjiang, Wu protection group, accelerator center, IHEP,
Beam-Beam Background and the Forward Region at a CLIC Detector André Sailer (CERN PH-LCD) LC Physics School, Ambleside 22st August, 2009.
Background Simulations for the LHCb Beam Condition Monitor Overview: ● The LHCb Beam Condition Monitor (BCM) – Purpose, Design and Function – Implementation.
Initial (FLUKA) calculations for synchrotron radiation at TLep April 4 th, 2013 F. Cerutti, A. Ferrari, L. Lari* *BE Dept.
Electron Detection in the SiD BeamCal Jack Gill, Gleb Oleinik, Uriel Nauenberg, University of Colorado ALCPG Meeting ‘09 2 October 2009.
Status of Beam Halo/Gas Simulation A.Stradling(Wisconsin) P. Steinberg(BNL) G. Usai (Chicago) Standard Model Group 6 December 2006 A.Stradling(Wisconsin)
Working Group D Backgrounds M Sullivan for everyone in WG D IRENG07 Sept 20, 2007.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
ILC EXTRACTION LINE TRACKING Y. Nosochkov, E. Marin September 10, 2013.
Dec 2004 Simulation of Low Energy backgrounds in the TESLA IR Impact on feedback BPMs FONT collaboration  QMUL: P Burrows, G Christian, C Clarke, G White,
IHEP/Protvino for FP420 R&D Collaboration 1 IHEP/Protvino Group: Igor Azhgirey Igor Bayshev Igor Kurochkin + one post-graduate student Tools:
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
Radiation Damage Studies for Si Diode Sensors Subject to MRaD Doses Bruce Schum UC Santa Cruz July
OUTGOING NEUTRONS IN CALET CALET AIMS AT DETECTING UHE CR ELECTRONS HIGH REJECTION FACTOR FOR PROTONS/NUCLEI NEEDED POSSIBLE IMPROVEMENT RESPECT ‘STANDARD’
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
1/24 SiD FCAL Takashi Maruyama Tom Markiewicz SLAC TILC’09, Tskuba, Japan, April 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K.
Mokka simulation studies on the Very Forward Detector components at CLIC and ILC Eliza TEODORESCU (IFIN-HH) FCAL Collaboration Meeting Tel Aviv, October.
Feb 7, 2006S. Kahn -- Muon Collider Detector Backgrounds 1 Detector Backgrounds in a Muon Collider Steve Kahn Muons Inc. LEMC Workshop.
Simulation of heat load at JHF decay pipe and beam dump KEK Yoshinari Hayato.
1 LoI FCAL Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K. Krempetz T. MarkiewiczBNLW.
MDI Simulations at SLAC Takashi Maruyama, Lew Keller, Thomas Markiewicz, Uli Wienands, SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting, FNAL June 21, 2013.
FCAL Krakow meeting, 6. May LumiCal concept including the tracker R. Ingbir, P.Růžička, V. Vrba.
Photon & e+e- Hits in Muon Higgs Factory T. Markiewicz T. Maruyama SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting. Fermilab 29 May 2014.
N_TOF EAR-1 Simulations The “γ-flash” A. Tsinganis (CERN/NTUA), C. Guerrero (CERN), V. Vlachoudis (CERN) n_TOF Annual Collaboration Meeting Lisbon, December.
Dark Current in ILC Main Linac N.Solyak, A.Sukhanov, I.Tropin ALCW2015, Apr.23, 2015, KEK LCWS'15, Tsukuba, 04/2015Nikolay Solyak1.
E+/e- Backgrounds at BEPCII/BESIII JIN Dapeng Aug. 22, 2011.
Doses and bunch by bunch fluctuations in BeamCal at the ILC Eliza Teodorescu FCAL Collaboration Meeting June 29-30, 2009, DESY-Zeuthen, Germany.
R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, F. Cerutti, M. Huhtinen, A. Mereghetti
Background simulations: update and simulations of absorbed dose
Analysis of 14/20 mrad Extraction Line Energy Chicane
Neutron and Photon Backscattering from the ILC Beam Dump
Higgs Factory Backgrounds
Simulation of Neutron Backgrounds in the ILC Extraction Line Beam Dump
Backgrounds using v7 Mask in 9 Si Layers at a Muon Higgs Factory
T. Markiewicz / SLAC MAP at SLAC Working Meeting 2 July 2014
GLD IR optimization and background study
Hit density at scoring planes at r=10, 30, and 50 cm.
Background Simulations at Fermilab
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

1 Simulation of Neutron Backgrounds in the ILC Extraction Line Beam Dump Siva Darbha Supervisors: Lewis Keller and Takashi Maruyama

2 Extraction Line and Water Dump z (cm) x (cm) e-e- n e-e- H2OH2O Concrete Tunnel Concrete Collimator e+e+ 20 cm A A’ Most n are directed forward FLUKA was used for all simulations, ROOT for analysis and some particle generation

3 Fluence at IP Flux was treated as isotropic from -1 < cosθ < Flux for 1.5 cm radius scoring plane at z=0 was found from flux in 2 m radius scoring plane x (cm) y (cm) Scoring plane at z=0 At A-A’ (on the surface of the dump) Tunnel Wall Quadrupole aperture

4 1.Leading particle biasing simulating a full EM shower requires long CPU time to save time, take only the most energetic secondary and remove all others applied to e +,e -, and γ’s < 2.5 GeV 2.Photonuclear interaction length #n produced proportional to σ σ was increased by a factor of 50 ‘weight’ associated with each n produced from this was decreased by a factor of 50 to compensate Particle Biasing Three types of biasing were used: γ A → n + X (σ, )

5 Particle Biasing (continued) 3.Splitting/Russian roulette Dump divided into 10 regions Each region given a factor of 2 larger importance As e +, e -, or γ crosses a boundary, their number is increased or decreased on average by the ratio of importances on either side of the boundary ‘weight’ is adjusted accordingly 1248… e-e- x (cm) z (cm)

6 Computation Time 6000 incident e - n total ‘weight’n total number Run #Type of Bias CPU time At z=300m At z=0At z=300m At z=0 1None23 h 35 min LPB1 h 36 min Interaction length 6 h 46 min Splitting/RR6 h 22 min

7 Fluence at IP n’s/cm 2 /year at IP (z=0) Mean (10 runs)RMS No tunnel or collimator 8.33* *10 10 Collimator3.73* *10 10 Tunnel and Collimator 3.65* * n/cm 2 at the VXD would cause displacement damage to CCD Si detectors However, not all neutrons that reach the IP will hit the inner detector

8 Neutron Energy Distribution Information was gathered on the neutron distribution in the backward direction and was used to generate 10 6 neutrons to study the real flux at the VXD 10 MeV bins In 1 st bin

9 Detector C’ C 7 mrad n BeSi VXD x (cm) z (cm) quadrupole 2.4 cm 3.0 cm All n’s were given a 7 mrad trajectory towards the detector W BeamCal 2.4 cm

10 Initial position of n’s n’s randomly and uniformly distributed within the quadrupole bore C-C’

11 CCD Si VXD with Be beampipe A’ A B’ B A-A’ B-B’z (cm) x (cm) y (cm)

12 Results: Fluence at VXD The BeamCal acts as a collimator for neutron backscattering from dump With the W BeamCal, the nominal fluence at Layer 1 of VXD is: 4.277*10 8 n/cm 2 /year No BeamCal W BeamCal Black BeamCal

13 1 MeV Neutron Equivalent Fluence However, the amount of displacement damage done to CCD Si detector by neutrons is a function of neutron energy When relative damage to Si is considered, normalized to 1 MeV, the fluence is: 9.265*10 8 n/cm 2 /year A value of n/cm 2 would damage the CCD Si detector by this measure The other fluences calculated in this study can be normalized similarly 1 MeV

14 BeamCal Radius Dependence Values are not normalized to 1 MeV equivalent fluence

15 Acknowledgements Takashi Maruyama and Lewis Keller Tom Markiewicz Nan Phinney Mario Santana