Doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/1229r0 Submission 802.11ah M2M Channel Access Performance Date: 2011-09-19 September 2011 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Authors:

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Doc.: IEEE /1515r0 Submission November 2011 Timo Koskela, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide ah Wi-Fi Offloading Considerations Date:

Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0868r0 July 2014 Johan Söder, Ericsson ABSlide 1 UL & DL DSC and TPC MAC simulations Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0785r0 Submission July 2009 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Investigation of PA Model Sample Rate for TGac Date:

Doc.: IEEE /1294r0 Submission September 2011 Rolf de Vegt, QualcommSlide 1 Spec Framework Text for.11ah Bandwidth Modes Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission Uplink Channel Access Date: Authors: May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /1196r1 Submission Data Rate and Spectrum Requirements for IEEE aj (45 GHz) Date: Authors: Haiming Wang (SEU)Slide.

Doc.: IEEE /388r2 Submission TGah Efficient TIM Encoding Date: Authors: May 2012 Minyoung Park, et. al. Intel Corp.Slide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /1316r1 Submission Considerations for Cellular-Offloading Use Case Date: September 2011 Joseph Teo Chee Ming et al, I2R.

Doc.: IEEE /0062r1 Submission January 2011 Qualcomm, Inc.Slide 1 Introductory Submission for TGah Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /1019r1 Submission July 2011 MediaTek, Inc Slide 1 Supporting Large Number of STAs in ah Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/613r0 May 2015 Chinghwa Yu et al, MediaTek Inc.Slide 1 Box 5 Calibration Result Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0551r1 SubmissionSuhwook Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 OBSS Preamble Detection Evaluation Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .

Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .

Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide ai simulations Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1455r0 Nov 2011 Fei Tong,Les Smith, CSRSlide ah network outdoor deployment issues Date: 2011-Nov-03 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0028r1 Submission January 2012 Anna Pantelidou, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Power Saving Possibilities for Networks Supporting.

Doc.: IEEE /0707r0 Submission May 2011 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Overview on TGah Specification Framework Development Date:

Doc.: IEEE /1268r0 Submission November 2010 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Low Power Consumption Opportunity in Sub 1 GHz Date:

Doc.: IEEE /0060r1 Submission January 2011 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Low Power Capability Support for ah Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0130r0 Submission January 2012 Seunghee Han, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Beacon Reception of Long Sleeper Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0424r0 Submission March 2012 Ron Porat, Broadcom Downclocking Options for TGaf PHY Date: Authors: Slide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /0935r0 Submission July 2012 Vinko Erceg, Broadcom 6-10GHz UWB Link Budget and Discussion Date: Authors: Slide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /0094r2 Submission Jan 2012 Slide 1 Authors: MAC Header Design for Small Data Packet for ah Date: Lv kaiying, ZTE.

Doc.: IEEE /1296r3 Submission September 2011 Rolf de Vegt, QualcommSlide 1 Potential Channelization for ah Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /1484r1 Submission November 2011 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 11ah Data Transmission Flow Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0242r0 Submission Doc.:IEEE /0242r0 February 14, 2011 Rolf de Vegt (Qualcomm)Slide ah Usage Model Submission Sensor.

Doc.: IEEE /117r0 Submission January 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 TGah TIM Operation Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 SubmissionMukul Goyal, U Wisconsin MilwaukeeSlide 1 Impact of IEEE n Operation On IEEE Performance Notice: This.

Doc.: IEEE /0726r2 Submission May 2011 Mediatek, HTCSlide 1 Data Rate Requirement Of WiFi Offloading in TGah Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /388r1 SubmissionMinyoung Park, et. al. Intel Corp.Slide 1 TGah Efficient TIM Encoding Date: Authors: March 2012.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1512r4 November 2011 Slide 1 MAC considerations for ah (Probe and Pull MAC) Date: Authors: Zhong-Yi Jin, Nokia.

Doc.: IEEE /0553-r1 Submission April 2011 James Wang, et al, Mediatek COST231 Walfish Ikegame Model for for 11ah Date: Authors: Slide.

Doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission AP Assisted Medium Synchronization Date: Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /663r3 Submission May 2012 Zhanji Wu, et. Al.Slide 1 Low-rate compatible BCC for IEEE ah lowest MCS Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /374r0 Submission March 2012 Anna Pantelidou, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Grouping For.11ah Networks Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 1 RTS/CTS Operation for Wider Bandwidth Date: Authors: Nov

Submission doc.: IEEE /0890r0 July 2012 Fei Tong, CSRSlide ah Multi-User Aggregation PDU Date: 2012-July-16 Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-11/1512r1 Company Confidential November 2011 Slide 1 MAC considerations for ah (Probe and Pull MAC) Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0866r0 July 2014 Johan Söder, Ericsson ABSlide 1 Traffic modeling and system capacity performance measure Date:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1401r0 Nov Josiam, Kuo, Taori et.al., SamsungSlide 1 System Level Assessments for Outdoor HEW Deployments Date: YYYY-MM-DD.

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/1511r0 Company Confidential November 2011 Chittabrata Ghosh, NokiaSlide 1 Fairness of DCF in ah Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /1230r1 Submission ah Channel Access Improvement Date: Authors: May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.

Doc.: IEEE /0299r0 Submission March 2011 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 TGah Use Cases Summary and Aggregated PHY Rates Analysis Date:

Doc.: IEEE /30r2 SubmissionMukul Goyal, U Wisconsin MilwaukeeSlide 1 Impact of IEEE n Operation On IEEE Performance Notice: This.

Low-Power Wake-Up Receiver (LP-WUR) for

Doc.: IEEE /1047r0 September 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Random RU selection process upon TF-R reception Date: Slide.

Doc.: IEEE /0619r3 Submission May 2012 Haiguang Wang et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 Overlapping IEEE ah Networks of Different Types Date:

Doc.: IEEE /0645 Submission May 2012 Open-Loop Link Margin Index for Fast Link Adaptation Date: Authors: Slide 1Yong Liu, Marvell,

Doc.: IEEE /0061r0 Submission Jan 2013 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 Receiver Sensitivity Levels Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0341r2 Submission March 2011 MediaTek, Inc Slide 1 Usage Cases for ah Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0370r0 Submission January 2012 Haiguang Wang et. al, I2R, SingaporeSlide 1 TIM Compression Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0535r0 Submission May 2008 Thomas Kenney, Minyoung Park, Eldad Perahia, Intel Corp. Slide 1 PHY and MAC Throughput Analysis with 80.

Doc.: IEEE /1484r4 Submission January 2012 Hongyuan Zhang, et. Al.Slide 1 11ah Data Transmission Flow Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0400r0 SubmissionZander Lei, I2R SingaporeSlide 1 ACK Transmission Date: Authors: March 2012.

Considerations on short packet transmission overhead

Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions

TGah Efficient TIM Encoding

Performance Simulations

Discussion on 11ah Peak Throughput Requirements

Overlapping IEEE ah Networks of Different Types

Investigation of PA Model Sample Rate for TGac

Single User MCS Proposal

July,2011 doc.: IEEE /0985r0 July,2011 Performance Evaluation of Multiple STAs’ Authentication and Association Process Date: Authors:

Overlapping IEEE ah Networks of Different Types

Consideration on System Level Simulation

July,2011 doc.: IEEE /0985r0 July,2011 Performance Evaluation of Multiple STAs’ Authentication and Association Process Date: Authors:

S1G Coexistence Simulation Profile

Discussion on 11ah Peak Throughput Requirements

Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /1229r0 Submission ah M2M Channel Access Performance Date: September 2011 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Authors:

doc.: IEEE /1229r0 Submission Abstract This presentation provides simulation results to show existing CSMA/CA is sufficient to support machine-to-machine channel access (e.g. sensor use case) in ah. September 2011 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 2

doc.: IEEE /1229r0 Submission ah Sensor Use Case Sensor applications traffic [1] –Data packet size: few hundred bytes –Low duty-cycle: transmits data every few minutes –Number of stations could be as large as 6000 stations September 2011 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 3

doc.: IEEE /1229r0 Submission Simulation Deployment Setting 6000 machines uniformly distributed within a 1km radius circle around the AP. Each machine selects its MCS based on the received signal strength. –E.g., machines within the inner ring operate at the highest MCS. Outdoor channel model [2]: –Macro deployment path-loss model: PL(d) =8+37.6log10(d) September 2011 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 4 (MCS0=6.5Mbps/8) (MCS7= 65Mbps/8)

doc.: IEEE /1229r0 Submission Simulation Parameters September 2011 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 5 ParameterValue Operating frequency900 MHz Bandwidth2.5 MHz Sensor packet size256 bytes Sensor transmission period 2 minutes Sensor Tx power30 dBm Antenna gain3 dBi Slot time37 µs SIFS128 µs MCS Index ModulationR 2.5MHz (1/8 down-clocking) Data rate (Mb/s) 6.4 us GI 0BPSK1/ QPSK1/ QPSK3/ QAM1/ QAM3/ QAM2/ QAM3/ QAM5/ Data rates used in the simulation: Data rate for control frames: MCS0 Access delay performance measurement –Total amount of time required from packet generation till successful ACK reception. = (defer + backoff + retransmissions including the final successful packet transmission + SIFS + ACK)

doc.: IEEE /1229r0 Submission Simulation Results September 2011 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 6 Avg. access delay of all machines: usec Avg. access delay of machines with the highest data rate (8.125Mbps): usec Avg. access delay of machines with the lowest data rate (812.5Kbps): usec Over 95% of users are with less than 5ms delay.  Access delay is not an issue for sensors.

doc.: IEEE /1229r0 Submission Conclusion Under reasonable traffic intensity, e.g., transmission of 256 bytes every 2 minutes, access delay is not an issue even with large number (6000) of sensor deployment. September 2011 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 7

doc.: IEEE /1229r0 Submission References [1] Rolf de Vegt, “Potential Compromise for ah Use Case Document,” 11-11/457r0. [2] Ron Porat et. al., “TGah channel model – proposed text,” /0968r1. September 2011 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 8