Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 1 Statistical Considerations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Equivalence Tests in Clinical Trials
Advertisements

Applying Multilevel Models in Evaluation of Bioequivalence in Drug Trials Min Yang Prof of Medical Statistics Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit School of.
The equivalence trial Didier Concordet NATIONAL VETERINARY S C H O O L T O U L O U S E.
Waivers of in-vivo BE studies
Kamal K. Midha C.M., Ph.D, D.Sc College of Pharmacy and Nutrition,
1 Endogenous Substance Bioavailability and Bioequivalence: Levothyroxine Sodium Tablets Steven B. Johnson, Pharm.D. Division of Pharmaceutical Evaluation.
Sample size optimization in BA and BE trials using a Bayesian decision theoretic framework Paul Meyvisch – An Vandebosch BAYES London 13 June 2014.
Kyiv, TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE & BIOEQUIVALENCE Statistical Considerations for Bioequivalence.
Bioequivalence of Highly Variable (HV) Drugs: Clinical Implications Why HV Drugs are Safer Leslie Z. Benet, Ph.D. Professor of Biopharmaceutical Sciences.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
Kyiv, TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PHARMACEUTICAL QUALITY, GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE & BIOEQUIVALENCE Introduction to the Discussion of Bioequivalence.
Common Problems in Writing Statistical Plan of Clinical Trial Protocol Liying XU CCTER CUHK.
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 1 Regulatory Requirements.
Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
Slide 1 of 19D.K. Mubangizi, Dar Es Salaam Sept Training Workshop for Evaluators from National Medicines Regulatory Authorities in East African Community.
Hanoi, WORKSHOP ON PREQUALIFICATION OF ARV: BIOEQUIVALENCE Introduction to the Discussion of Bioequivalence Study Design and Conduct Presented.
Artemisinin combined medicines, Kampala, February |1 | Training workshop on regulatory requirements for registration of Artemisinin based combined.
Exercise 6 Dose linearity and dose proportionality
WHO Prequalification Program Workshop, Kiev, Ukraine, June 25-27,2007.
Regulatory requirements for BE and Existing Guidelines
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
Interchangeability and study design Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
Tanzania, August, 2006 Dr. Barbara Sterzik, BfArM, Bonn 1 Guidelines and Tools available TRS 937 and BTIF (Bioequivalence Trial Information Form)
1 MARKETING AUTHORIZATION OF PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO MULTISOURCE (GENERIC) PRODUCTS: A MANUAL FOR DRUG REGULATORY AUTHORITIES.
Documentation of bioequivalence Drs. J. Welink Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October 2009.
Bioequivalence Studies Dr Sanet Aspinall, PhD Managing Director AddClin Research Pretoria 20 March 2009.
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 1 Quality of Bioequivalence.
Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines Quality of BE Data Dr. Henrike Potthast Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable.
regulatory requirements
Prequalification project Drs. Jan Welink. * Note to applicants on the choice of comparator products for the prequalification.
OVERVIEW OF DACA BIOEQUIVALENCE REPORT EVALUATION Presented by Solomon Shiferaw 31Augst 2010.
Exercise 5 Monte Carlo simulations, Bioequivalence and Withdrawal time
Week 6- Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
Consumer behavior studies1 CONSUMER BEHAVIOR STUDIES STATISTICAL ISSUES Ralph B. D’Agostino, Sr. Boston University Harvard Clinical Research Institute.
Regulatory requirements Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009.
ACPS Meeting, October 19-20, 2004 BioINequivalence: Concept and Definition Lawrence X. Yu, Ph. D. Director for Science Office of Generic Drugs, OPS, CDER,
Quality of Bioequivalence Data Alfredo García - Arieta Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
Alfredo García – Arieta, PhD WHO Workshop on Assessment of Bioequivalence Data, 31 August – 3 September, 2010, Addis Ababa Statistical Considerations.
Issues in Generic Substitution: Safety/Efficacy, Cost Savings and Supply Robert J. Herman, MD, FRCPC Professor, Department of Medicine University of Calgary.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
WHO Workshop on Assessment of Bioequivalence Data Addis Ababa, 31. August – 3. September 2010 Artemisinin-based Products Dr. Henrike Potthast
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
Statistical considerations Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009.
Center for Professional Advancement Generic Drug Approvals Course Bioequivalence & Bioavailability Michael A. Swit, Esq. Vice President.
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health (BMG) The use of.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
Issues concerning the interpretation of statistical significance tests.
Bioequivalence Dr Mohammad Issa Saleh.
WHO Prequalification Programme June 2007 Training Workshop on Dissolution, Pharmaceutical Product Interchangeability and Biopharmaceutical Classification.
1 Study Design Issues and Considerations in HUS Trials Yan Wang, Ph.D. Statistical Reviewer Division of Biometrics IV OB/OTS/CDER/FDA April 12, 2007.
Bioavailability Dr. Basavaraj K. Nanjwade M. Pharm., Ph. D Department of Pharmaceutics Faculty of Pharmacy Omer Al-Mukhtar University Tobruk, Libya.
Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte Pt WHO-consultant 1 WHO Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Quality, Good Manufacturing Practice &
WHO Workshop on Assessment of Bioequivalence Data Addis Ababa, 31. August – 3. September 2010 Selection of comparators Compiled by Jan Welink WHO Workshop.
Pre-qualification Program: Priority Medicines Interchangeability of Multi Source Drug Products SALOMON STAVCHANSKY, PH.D. ALCON CENTENNIAL PROFESSOR OF.
Using Product Development Information to Address the Bioequivalence Challenges of Highly-variable Drugs Lawrence X. Yu, Ph. D. Director for Science Office.
Examples of deficiencies in submitted data Drs. J. Welink Workshop on WHO prequalification requirements for reproductive health medicines, Jakarta, October.
Malaysia, EVALUTION OF DOSSIERS IN WHO- PREQUALIFICATION PROJECT MULTISOURCE TB-DRUGS Evaluation of bioavailability/bioequivalence data Based,
Exact PK Equivalence for a bridging study Steven Novick, Harry Yang (MedImmune) and Xiang Zhang (NC State) NCB, October 2015.
Individual Bioequivalence: Have the Opinions of the Scientific Community Changed? Leslie Z. Benet, Ph.D. University of California San Francisco.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - WHO Training workshop / 5-9 November |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority.
Interchangeability and study design Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Assessment of Interchangeable Multisource Medicines, Kenya, August 2009.
Blood Level Bioequivalence VICH GL 52 Chair: Marilyn N. Martinez, US FDA.
In vitro - In vivo Correlation
The First Conference for Medicines Regulatory Authorities In Sudan and Neighboring Countries Khartoum December 2014 Alain PRAT, Technical Officer,
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
The process of drug development. Drug development 0,8 – 1 mld. USD.
Tanzania, August 2006 Dr. Barbara Sterzik, BfArM, Bonn 1 Bioequivalence dossier requirements for the prequalification project WHO Training Workshop.
Applications of Pharmacokinetics
Common Problems in Writing Statistical Plan of Clinical Trial Protocol
Bioequivalence trials: design, evaluation, regulatory requirements
Presentation transcript:

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 1 Statistical Considerations Evaluation of Quality and Interchangeability of Medicinal Products 10 – 14 September 2007 Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania Dr. Henrike Potthast; Temporary Advisor to WHO

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 2 Statistical Considerations  Bioequivalence – equivalent bioavailability within pre-set acceptance ranges  Bioequivalence  therapeutic equivalence

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 3 Statistical Considerations F“The primary concern in bioequivalence assessment is to limit the risk of a false declaration of equivalence. Statistical analysis of the bioequivalence trial should demonstrate that the clinically significant difference in bioavailability is unlikely…..” [WHO Working Document Multisource (Generic) Pharmaceutical Products: Guidelines on Registration Requirements to Establish Interchangeability November 2005]

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 4 Statistical Considerations HOW SIMILAR IS SIMILAR?

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 5 Statistical Considerations  basic measures ♦AUC area under the plasma concentration curve

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 6

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 7 Statistical Considerations  basic measures ♦Cmax – observed peak concentration ♦tmax – the time after administration at which Cmax is observed (highly dependent on the sampling schedule!) ♦t1/2 – half-life ♦…a.o.

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 8 Statistical Considerations  log transformation…. ♦….for all concentration dependent pharmacokinetic parameters (e.g. AUC and Cmax) ♦analysis of log-transformed data by means of ANOVA (analysis of variances)

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 9 Statistical Considerations  ANOVA model includes…. ♦….usually formulation, period, sequence or carry- over, and subject factors

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 10 Statistical Considerations  Parametric (normal-theory)…. ♦….to construct a 90 % confidence interval for µT-µR ♦….which is equivalent to carrying out two-one sided tests of hypothesis at the 5 % level of significance.

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 11 Statistical Considerations  …the constructed 90% confidence interval has to meet the pre-set acceptance criteria FAUC – 80 – 125 % FCmax – 80 – 125 % (75 – 133 % may be possible if prospectively justified in terms of safety and efficacy) Ftmax – therapeutic relevance of mean difference

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 12

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 13 Statistical Considerations  ‘Outliers’ Fdefinition – explanation – handling?! ♦aberant/irregular values (e.g. no plasma concentration, late high concentrations….)

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 14 Statistical Considerations  ‘Outliers’ Fdefinition – explanation – handling?! ♦vomiting? ♦non-compliant volunteers? ♦bioanalytical failure? ♦individual pharmacokinetics? ♦protocol violations? ♦……

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 15 Statistical Considerations  ‘Outliers’ Fdefinition – explanation – handling?! ♦“…pharmacokinetic data can only be excluded based on non-statistical reasons that have been … defined previously in the protocol…Exclusion of data can never be accepted on the basis of statistical analysis or for pharmacokinetic reasons alone, because it is impossible to distinguish between formulation effects and pharmacokinetic effects…Results of statistical analyses with and without the ….excluded subjects should be provided.” (excerpt from Q&A Doc Ref: EMEA/CHMP/EWP/40326/2006)

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 16 Statistical Considerations  ‘carry-over’ Fdefinition – explanation – handling?!

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 17 Statistical Considerations Fdifferential ‘carry-over’ … ♦…is coming from the drug given at the previous period ♦…in a 2x2 crossover it occurs if the carry-over is not the same for the sequence TR and RT ♦…a non-differential carry-over translates into a period effect ♦…a poor randomization can be wrongly interpreted as a carry-over ♦…no valid study with a significant carry-over

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 18 Statistical Considerations F… to avoid a ‘carry-over’ … ♦…the wash-out period should be sufficiently long (appr. 5 x t1/2)

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 19 Statistical Considerations F… a sequence effect may occur… ♦…if the two groups of volunteers (TR and RT) are really different (unlikely by correct selection) ♦…due to a different carry-over effect from the formulations (may be visible by non-zero samples at the second period) ♦…due to a formulation-period interaction (minimized by the same standardized conditions for both periods)

Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices The BfArM is a Federal Institute within the portfolio of the Federal Ministry of Health 20 Statistical Considerations THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION