Stanford Prison Experiment Haney, Banks and Zimbardo Social Psychology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Social psychology Concerned with how others influence the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors of the individual Social thinking When something unexpected.
Advertisements

RESEARCH ETHICS Research Methods. Research Ethics Marketplace of ideas--no scientific misconduct  Research fraud = falsification of data  Plagiarism.
The Stanford Prison Experiment
The Stanford Prison Experiment A study into the effects of prison life.
Stanford Prison Experiment Wyatt G., Connor A., Liz T., Brianna H. Mrs. Menzen English Honors 9 April, 2015.
Conducted by Dr. Phillip Zimbardo and Stanford students.
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Power of the Situation (cont.)
Reicher & Haslam Rethinking the psychology of tyranny: The BBC prison study Tyranny: the arbitrary and/or oppressive exercise of power Question: How do.
Social Psychology Crime Psychology. Social Psychology Attitudes Cognitive Dissonance Group Processes Deindividuation.
Ms. Carmelitano RESEARCH METHODS EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES.
Born March 23, 1933; in New York Professor at Stanford University Majors in anthropology, psychology, & Sociology from Brooklyn College in 1954 He completed.
The Power of the Situation Chapter 16 Music: “Do You Know the Enemy” Green Day “Change is Gonna Come” Adam Lambert.
Stanford Prison Experiment
WEEK 2 Research Methods. Week 1 Summary  Changes in definition of psychology  Current perspectives  Subfields of psychology  Four big ideas.
Social Psychology Contents What is Social Psychology? Assumptions Methods of Investigation Core Studies from Social Psychology: Milgram. (1963) and Zimbardo.
Ms. Carmelitano RESEARCH METHODS EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES.
Module 4 Notes Research Methods. Let’s Discuss! Why is Research Important?
1.2 Understanding the Research Process pages 17 – 24.
Thinking About Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behavior.
Philip Zimbardo By: Steph Cataline. Who is Philip Zimbardo? The “voice and face of contemporary American psychology”. Presently, an Emeritus professor.
Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment College students on summer break recruited through a newspaper ad for a two week experiment being paid $15/day.
Zimbardo recap. Participants were assigned to each condition… 1.Based on age 2.Based on health 3.Randomly 4.Based on ethnicity.
Stanford Prison Experiment. Background Landmark psychological study of the human response to captivity. Conducted in 1971 Led by Philip Zimbardo of Stanford.
The Power of the Situation Chapter 16 Music: “He Got Game” Public Enemy.
Research Strategies. Why is Research Important? Answer in complete sentences in your bell work spiral. Discuss the consequences of good or poor research.
Stanford Prison Experiment - Zimbardo by Peace Park.
Paper III Qualitative research methodology. Objective 1.4 Discuss ethical considerations in qualitative research.
Zambardo Induction and Result. Purpose of the Study Study aimed to answer the question: – “Are the state of prisons due to the dispositional or internal.
SOCIAL INFLUENCE Conforming to Social Roles. What makes people evil? Discuss and mindmap as a group.
AICE.Milgram.
Interpersonal Dynamics in a Simulated Prison Craig Haney and others.
Unit 10: Social Psychology The scientific study of how we think about, influence and relate to one another. Do people behave the way they do because of.
Conformity and Obedience to Authority. What is Conformity? Quick Write: What do you think of when you hear the word ‘conformity’? Why do people conform?
Welcome to Unit 2 Any Questions So Far?. Getting Ready For Project 1: Unit 3 Read assignment carefully Review Rubric and use as checklist Proof read carefully.
 Participants are formally asked to indicate their agreement to participate  They should be informed on the purpose of the experiment and their rights.
Interpersonal Dynamics in a Simulated Prison Chris, PJ, Keenan, Elissa, Christine.
Social Thinking and Social Influence. Introduction.
1.2 Understanding the Research Process PAGES 17 – 24.
The Stanford Prison Experiment: ZIMBARDO OBJECTIVE: To be able to describe a study into identification.
Chapter 2: 1 Ethics and Criminal Justice Research.
Research in Psychology. Quantitative Methods  Quantitative: experiments and studies gathering data with questionnaires and analyzing results with correlations.
Group Processes. The Nature of Groups  The Nature of Groups Group - two or more people who influence each other Group - two or more people who influence.
Phillip Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment. Volunteers More than 70 applicants answered ad & were given interviews & personality tests to eliminate candidates.
The Power of the Situation
Research Methods Purpose: Become familiar with the methods and importance of scientific research in psychology (and everyday life)
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Stanford Prison Experiment
Effects of status and social power within groups
Sociocultural Level of Analysis Revision
In what ways are prisons brutal places?
Chapter 3, 4.
Groups and Obedience The Stanford Prison Experiment
Stanford Prison Experiment
Zimbardo Social influence.

Conformity and Obedience
Obedience to Authority & the Psychology of Evil

Wallboards What were the results of Asch’s Original study?
Research and Ethics.
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Conformity and Obedience to Authority
The Stanford Prison Experiment
How would you answer this question??
Stanford Prison Experiment
Piliavin et al. (1969) Good Samaritanism: An Underground Phenomenon?
Social Psychology The scientific study of how we think about, influence and relate to one another.
The Stanford prison experiment
Presentation transcript:

Stanford Prison Experiment Haney, Banks and Zimbardo Social Psychology

Bellringer This study demonstrated Zimbardo’s theory of the “pathology of power.” Describe how.

1971

The Stanford Prison Experiment What happened after 6 days nobody could have predicted

Philip Zimbardo was a Psychology Professor at Stanford University in California.

The research project looked at the mentality of prisoners and correctional staff, as well as the psychological behaviour associated with prison life. A mock prison was built in the basement of Stanford University and a group of university students were randomly allocated the role of prisoner or guard. The guards were instructed to ‘maintain a reasonable degree of order within the prison necessary for effective functioning’.

Stanford Prison Experiment Q As you watch: Think…What is going on here? In journals: 1. What is the agentic state? Connect the prisoners’ reactions to this phenomenon.

Aim 1. To test the dispositional hypothesis vs. the situational hypothesis. Dispositional hypothesis: A person’s behavior is determined by their natural disposition, or personality traits. 1.To show how the taking of social roles would lead to excessive conformity to those roles

Hypothesis(es) Dispositional hypothesis : prisons are bad because of the people who live and work there. i.e. guards= sadistic, uneducated and insensitive Prisoners: antisocial attitude and behavior

Variables The conditions the participants were randomly assigned: prisoner or guard Independent Variable The resulting behavior Dependent Variable

Sample No of participants= 22 All Male White Recruited through a newspaper advertisement (75 responded) College students Strangers to each other Ethnocentric sampling bias

Method Lab Experiment Observation Self Report Method

Both guards and prisoners were screened before the study and deemed to be “normal, healthy male college students who were predominantly middle class and white.” The 24 participants did not know each other prior to the study. The prisoners remained in the mock prison for 24 hours a day, and the guards worked on an 8 hour shift – allowing them to return home at the end of their shift. Participants were all paid $15 a day to take part in the study, which was to last 14 days.

The Guards: Mirrored sunglasses Khaki shirt and Trousers Night stick Whistle The Prisoners: Stocking cap Smock with ID number sewn on front & back No underwear Rubber sandals Chain and lock around the ankle

The study was ended after 6 days... Five prisoners had to be released earlier because of extreme emotional depression. The guards behaviour towards the prisoners had become so deeming and inhumane, it was clear they had become immersed into their prison guard roles. Prisoners minds ventured far from the reality of the situation as they were continuously woken during the night, deprived of basic human rights and forced to perform degrading exercises for the guards own amusement. Zimbardo himself became so immersed in his role as Prison Superintendent, he found his ability to be impartial was compromised. Zimbardo believes that the study demonstrate the powerful effect roles can have on peoples’ behaviour. Basically the participants were playing the role that they thought was expected of, either a prisoner or prison guard.

Procedure: Up Close In journals: 1. What is the agentic state? Connect the prisoners’ reactions to this phenomenon.

Results Qualitative Data The experiment disintegrated very quickly On the second day the prisoners organized a mass revolt & riot, as a protest about the conditions. Guards worked extra hours & developed a plan to stop the riot, using fire- extinguishers.

Results Effects on prisoners: Pathological prisoner syndrome – Disbelief followed by rebellion (which resulted in failure)followed by a range negative emotions and behaviors) – Passivity (some became very obedient) – Dependency (initiating very little activity without instructions) – Flattened mood – Half the prisoners showed signs of depression, crying, fits of rage and acute anxiety and had to be released early.

Results Effects on guards: Pathology of power – Many seemed to really enjoy the new found power & control that went with the uniform. – All prisoners’ rights were redefined as privileges – They punished the prisoners with little or no justification – They verbally insulted the prisoners – Some of them volunteered to work extra shifts for no pay and were disappointed when the study was over. – They continued to behave in an authoritarian way even when they believed the cameras were not on.

Results Stopped after just 6 days instead of the planned 14 days because of the pathological reactions of the participants. 5 prisoners had to be released even earlier because of extreme emotional reactions

Ecological Validity State the good and bad eco. validity parts Method: Lab experiment so low in eco validity because of controls and artificiality Sample: ethnocentric sampling bias- low ecological validity (subjects had not committed any crime or guard duty or had any prison experience) Location : mock prison in lab hence some many aspects of a real prison lacking (physical, sexual abuse etc.) Procedure: good: arrests made by police uniforms, priest, etc. bad: lack of physical violence, minimum prison sentence, self report, newspaper advert. State the good and bad eco. validity parts Method: Lab experiment so low in eco validity because of controls and artificiality Sample: ethnocentric sampling bias- low ecological validity (subjects had not committed any crime or guard duty or had any prison experience) Location : mock prison in lab hence some many aspects of a real prison lacking (physical, sexual abuse etc.) Procedure: good: arrests made by police uniforms, priest, etc. bad: lack of physical violence, minimum prison sentence, self report, newspaper advert.

Ethics Informed Consent Deception Confidentiality Debriefing Withdrawal Protection

Reliability and Validity ValidityReliability

Remember all participants beforehand were deemed to be; “normal, healthy male college students...” The study provides a situational explanation for behaviour – any person when put in the wrong situation is capable of behaviour they didn’t think was possible.

Homework Visit the website and look for the following: -characteristics of the simulated prison -Overall, was the prison ecologically valid? Why or why not? Provide detail.