The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems IDEA Part C and Part B 619 Data Systems: More Findings from the DaSy Center Needs Assessment Donna Spiker.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Policies and Procedures: Issues for Implementation, Policy and Scaling up Barbara J. Smith, U. of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center Policy.
Advertisements

The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems A National Look at Statewide Data Systems from the Perspective of IDEA Early Childhood Programs Donna.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference September 15-17, 2013 Washington, DC Why CEDS for Part C.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems IDEA Part C and Part B 619 Data Systems: More Findings from the DaSy Center Needs Assessment Donna Spiker.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems IDEA Part C and Part B 619 Data Systems: Current Status and Future Priorities Donna Spiker DaSy Center.
Building and Using Coordinated State ECE Data Systems: Inaugural State Analysis Elizabeth Laird July 26, 2011.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Building & Using State Early Childhood Data Systems Measuring Child & Family Outcomes Conference July 30,2010 Tom Schultz –
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems 2014 Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference September 9, 2014 State Panel on the Benefits of CEDS:
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Head Start National Research Conference Washington, DC July 9, 2014 Collaboration through Information.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Collaboration through Information Sharing: Building Early Childhood Integrated Data Systems (ECIDS) Head.
Early Childhood Information Sharing Toolkit for Community Providers.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Data Governance Demystified: Concepts to Reality Session presented at: Improving Data, Improving Outcomes.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Using Needs Assessments to Identify and Evaluate Technical Assistance: Results of a National Survey about.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
First, a little background…  The FIT Program is the lead agency for early intervention services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Performance Review and Staff Development (PRSD) The Role of Governors Governor Reviewer Training.
FROM DATA TO OUTCOMES How Standards and Measures Drive Quality 3/9/121FROM DATA TO OUTCOMES | NACCRRA Policy Symposium.
JCAHO UPDATE June The Bureau of Primary Health Care is continuing to encourage Community Health Centers to be JCAHO accredited. JCAHO’s new focus.
Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs Overview to Trends and Issues in Quality Services Jane Nell Luster,
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
States’ Plans for ECE Data Systems: Trends & Opportunities in RTTT-ELC October 28, 2012 Child & Families Outcomes Conference Albert Wat National Governors.
THE WISCONSIN EARLY CHILDHOOD LONGITUDINAL DATA SYSTEM (WI EC-LDS) PROJECT Briefing for Department of Children and Families December 12, 2011.
SPCAA Head Start & Early Head Start Mental Health and Disability.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Improving Outcomes Through Knowledge: The Power of Early Childhood State Databases Kathleen Hebbeler,
Presented at 2012 Child and Family Outcome Conference Minneapolis, MN October, 2012 The Child and Family Outcomes Measurement Frameworks Donna Spiker Early.
Health Data Initiative Forum III June 5, Our Mission ACF is responsible for federal programs that promote the economic and social well-being of.
> Tom Wolf, Governor Pedro Rivera, Acting Secretary of Education | Ted Dallas, Acting Secretary of Human Services Early Learning in Pennsylvania Today.
Outreach to Physicians to Increase Early Identification and Referrals to Early Intervention Linda Tuchman-Ginsberg, PhD Director of the Early Childhood.
Massachusetts State Advisory Council (SAC) on Early Childhood Education and Care Review of Grant and Work Plan December
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Benefits and Challenges of Integrating Data in Early Childhood: The Case of Early Intervention and Early.
Evaluation of the Indiana ECCS Initiative. State Context Previous Early Childhood System Initiatives –Step Ahead –Building Bright Beginnings SPRANS Grant.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems CEDS: Common Data Elements and Definitions for Part C and 619 Programs Meredith Miceli, OSEP Missy Cochenour,
Presented at State Kindergarten Entry Assessment (KEA) Conference San Antonio, Texas February, 2012 Comprehensive Assessment in Early Childhood: How Assessments.
THE CENTER FOR IDEA EARLY CHILDHOOD DATA SYSTEMS FPG Seminar Series November 18, 2013 Presented by: Kellen Reid Martha Diefendorf Introducing the DaSy.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Improving Outcomes Through Knowledge: The Power of Early Childhood State Databases Kathleen Hebbeler,
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
State Advisory Council Community Support Grant Summary Presentation for Policy Committee Meeting December 3, 2012.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Data Sharing: Federal TA Efforts, What We Know & What We Need to Know Improving Data Improving Outcomes Meeting September 2013 Washington, DC 1.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Why Should EI/ECSE Participate in Early Childhood Integrated Data Systems (ECIDs)? Missy Cochenour (DaSy.
Medicaid/SCHIP Technical Assistance for Health IT/HIE 2008 AHRQ Annual Conference Presented by: Linda Dimitropoulos, RTI International.
Parent and National TA Perspectives on EC Outcomes Connie Hawkins, Region 2 PTAC Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn ECO at FPG and NECTAC.
VERMONT: a State Example of Building Coordinated Services for Young Children Carlota Schechter Consultant, Help Me Grow National Center Connecticut Children’s.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference, September 2014 Digging into “Data Use” Using the DaSy Framework.
The Status of Part C Data Systems DaSy Conference, September 15-17, 2013 Lisa Balivet, ITCA Data Committee Co-Chair Alaska Acting Part C Coordinator.
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference Washington, DC Sept , 2013 Planful Changes: Using Self-Assessments to Improve Child and Family Outcome.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems Stockholm Sweden, June 2016 Missy Coffey Cochenour, M.A. Kathleen Hebbeler, Ph.D Abby Schachner, Ph.D.
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010 Cornelia Taylor, ECO Christina Kasprzak, ECO/NECTAC Lisa Backer, MN DOE 1.
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems The Importance of Personnel Data Donna Spiker Co-Director, DaSy Center OSEP 2016 Virtual leadership Conference.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
Status of Part B 619 State Data Systems
Using Formative Assessment
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference August, 2016
Foster Care Managed Care Program
Sherry Franklin, North Carolina Part C Coordinator
Child Outcomes Data: A Critical Lever for Systems Change
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference, September 2014
Maryland’s Online IFSP Database
Sherry Franklin, North Carolina Part C Coordinator
Data on Child and Family Outcomes: Tools for Improving State Systems
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems (DaSy)
The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems (DaSy)
OSEP “Hot Topics in Early Childhood” Meeting
Benefits and Challenges of Integrating Data in Early Childhood:
History of work between ODE and ECO
Head Start Research Conference Washington, DC July 2014
Alignment Across the Ages
Presentation transcript:

The Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems IDEA Part C and Part B 619 Data Systems: More Findings from the DaSy Center Needs Assessment Donna Spiker DaSy SRI International Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference Washington, DC September 2013

DaSy Center needs assessment conducted with all states and territories Additional information not covered in plenary session: Data governance Procedures for checking data Data access and use Discuss your reactions to the findings What we will cover…… 2

To inform the DaSy Center’s work, the Center collected information about the: Current status of Part C and Part B 619 state data systems, Priorities for improvement, and Areas where the states would like TA. Online survey completed by Part C and Part B 619 coordinators, with data managers and other state staff Report focuses on information from 50 states, DC, Puerto Rico Response rate was 94% for C and 96% for 619 Brief reminder about purposes, methods, respondents…. 3

Defined as entities that establish policy and procedures for the overall management of the availability, usability, integrity, quality, and security of the data Having good data governance helps states have confidence that data are accurate and trustworthy and then they can be used for decisionmaking Data governance: What is it and why is it important? 4

69% of states have no data governance body that includes Part C. 72% of states have a data governance body for % include Part C 37% include other EC programs 62% include K12 special education 52% include K12 general education Many states have a data governance body that includes 619, but not one that includes Part C. 5

Question 6 What do you think about the information on data governance?

To effectively manage data, states need to have processes and procedures to check and verify that the data are accurate, complete, and internally consistent. To ensure and check that data are trustworthy: in their collection entry into the data system consistency with other data in the data system. Checking data quality: Why is it important? 7

For both Part C and 619, states use many tools and procedures to check their data. 8 Part C619 Audits built into data system98%92% User manual83%90% Verification visits81%71% Annual or regular trainings69%79% Data dictionary65%69%

Question 9 What supports are needed for states to check data for its quality?

The ultimate goals of collecting data and having good state data systems is to have available high- quality information that can be used for different purposes. Access is important because using data to inform decisionmaking at any level (state to local program to teacher or service provider) requires access to information. Access to and use of data: Why is it important? 10

For both Part C and 619, access to child data is most common for state staff and least common for teachers and service providers. 11 Personnel with access Aggregate data Individual data Part C619Part C619 Part C and 619 coordinators96%77%94%83% Regional lead or district/LEA77%73%67%75% School/program58%64%62%67% Teachers/service provider42%44%56%52%

For both Part C and 619, states use their data for a variety of purposes. 12 Uses for dataPart C619 Checking/reviewing data quality94%89% Planning for program improvement89% Monitoring program improvement87%65% Identifying professional development and TA needs 75%79% Reporting to the public, governor and the legislature 85%79%

Questions 13 What do you think about the more limited access to data at the teacher and service provider levels? Is it surprising that only 77% of the Part B 619 coordinators have access to aggregate-level child data?

These can be linkages: Within Part C and within 619 Across Part C and 619 With K12 education With other early childhood program, social services, health data What is interesting about the information on linkages? 14

Only about one-third of states have linked data across Part C and

There is infrequent use of common identifiers across Part C and Common identifier for C and 619 Child-level21% Program-level or school-level12% Workforce-level6%

Linkages with K12 education data are more common for 619 than for Part C. 17 Types of education data in same system or have been linked Part C619 K12 special education41%87% K12 general education14%79%

Few states have linkages with other EC data for Part C, and almost half have linkages with state preK for Types of other EC data Part C619 State pre-K 12%46% Head Start 6%22% Early Head Start 2%10% Child care 6%8% Home visiting 8%

Linkages with health data are more common for Part C than for Types of health dataPart C619 Medicaid/SCHIP42%12% EHDI37%8% Vital records21%0% Birth defects registry21%2% All-payer claims (insurance)13%0% WIC/SNAP8%6% Hospital6%2% Behavioral health4%2%

Very few states have linked Part C or 619 data to social services data. 20 Types of social services dataPart C619 Child welfare21%10% Foster care12%8% Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)10%14% Homeless services6%14%

Questions 21 What is interesting about the information on linkages? Which of the linkages are most important to you and why? What are the challenges states face in creating these linkages?

What do you think about the limited availability of program-level data in state data systems? 22 Data systemPart C619 Child-level94%96% Program-level29%40% Workforce: EI providers65%---- Workforce: special education teachers----83% Workforce: related service providers----71% Workforce: general education teachers----71%

Questions 23 To get copy of report: