Clinical Quality Workgroup April 10, 2014 Commenting on the ONC Voluntary 2015 Edition Proposed Rule Marjorie Rallins– co-chair Danny Rosenthal –co-chair.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Measures Vendor Tiger Team December 13, 2013.
Advertisements

ONC 2015 Edition EHR Certification Criteria Notice of Proposed Rulemaking HIT Standards Committee Steve Posnack.
HITSC Clinical Quality Workgroup Jim Walker March 27, 2012.
2014 Edition Release 2 EHR Certification Criteria Final Rule.
Summary of Comments on the ONC Voluntary 2015 Edition Proposed Rule Implementation Workgroup Liz Johnson, co-chair Cris Ross, co-chair April 24, 2014.
S&I Framework Laboratory Initiatives Update June 6, 2013.
Clinical Quality Workgroup April 24, 2014 Comments on the ONC Voluntary 2015 Edition Proposed Rule Marjorie Rallins– co-chair Danny Rosenthal –co-chair.
Companion Guide to HL7 Consolidated CDA for Meaningful Use Stage 2
GOVERNMENT EHR FUNDING: MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 UPDATE October 25, 2012 Jonathan Krasner Healthcare IT Consultant BEI
Overview of Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Presentation to HIT Steering Committee May 24, 2012.
Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup April 17, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair.
HITSP – enabling healthcare interoperability 1 enabling healthcare interoperability 1 Standards Harmonization HITSP’s efforts to address HIT-related provisions.
Discussion of 2015 Ed. NPRM Certification/Adoption Workgroup HIT Policy Committee April 2, 2014.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
S&I Framework Operating Metrics Timing Outputs Participation & Process Framework Launch DateJan 7, 2011 First Initiative Launch DateJan 31, 2011 Elapsed.
Kevin Larsen MD Medical Director, Meaningful Use Office of the National Coordinator of Health IT Improving Outcomes with HIT ASCO Oct
Transport & Security Standards Workgroup Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Comments Dixie Baker, Chair Lisa Gallagher, Co-Chair May 15, 2015.
Meaningful Use: Clinical Quality Measures Dwane J. McGowan 18 th April, 2013.
Quality Measurement Task Force 2016 Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) July 24, 2015 Cheryl Damberg, Co-Chair Kathleen Blake, Co-Chair.
1101 Connecticut Ave NW, Washington, DC :00 pm ET, March 7, (773)
National Efforts for Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Erik Pupo Deloitte Consulting.
Clinical Quality Framework (CQF) Update cqframework.info Kensaku Kawamoto, MD, PhD, MHS Co-Initiative Coordinator, CQF Public Health Tiger Team August.
Quality Measurement Task Force 2016 Inpatient Prospective Payment System June 30, 2015 Cheryl Damberg, Co-Chair Kathleen Blake, Co-Chair.
Transport & Security Standards Workgroup Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Comments Dixie Baker, Chair Lisa Gallagher, Co-Chair April 21, 2015.
HIT Policy Committee Information Exchange Workgroup NwHIN Conditions for Trusted Exchange Request For Information (RFI) May 15,
Larry Wolf, chair Marc Probst, co-chair Certification / Adoption Workgroup March 19, 2014.
HITPC Meaningful Use Stage 3 RFC Comments March 1, 2013 Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi.
EHR-S Functional Requirements IG: Lab Results Interface Laboratory Initiative.
Making better healthcare possible ® Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Changing Seasons of Healthcare Conference WV-HFMA/WV-HIMSS September 27, 2012.
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Report Jamie Ferguson, Chair Kaiser Permanente John Halamka, Co-chair Harvard Medical School 20 August,
Unit 1b: Health Care Quality and Meaningful Use Introduction to QI and HIT This material was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department.
Discussion of 2015 Ed. NPRM Certification/Adoption Workgroup HIT Policy Committee April 7, 2014.
HIT Policy Committee Adoption/Certification Workgroup Comments on NPRM, IFR Paul Egerman, Co-Chair Retired Marc Probst, Co-Chair Intermountain Healthcare.
Provider Data Migration and Patient Portability NwHIN Power Team August 28, /28/141.
Understanding eMeasures – And Their Impact on the EHR June 3, 2014 Linda Hyde, RHIA.
June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.
Larry Wolf, chair Marc Probst, co-chair Certification / Adoption Workgroup March 6, 2014.
Standards Analysis Summary vMR –Pros Designed for computability Compact Wire Format Aligned with HeD Efforts –Cons Limited Vendor Adoption thus far Represents.
Health eDecisions Use Case 2: CDS Guidance Service Strawman of Core Concepts Use Case 2 1.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Ongoing/Planned Activities for Week of 4/29 Final UCR Crosswalk due COB 4/30 Hold two working sessions to complete UCR Crosswalk on 4/30 Hold working session.
HIT Standards Committee Overview and Progress Report March 17, 2010.
Cris Ross, co-chair Anita Somplasky, co-chair December 1, 2015 Certified Technology Comparison (CTC) Task Force.
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente John Halamka Harvard University February 24, 2010.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
Data Access Framework (DAF) Relationship to Other ONC Initiatives 1.
Friday, November 20 th 2015 Transitional Vocabulary Task Force Christopher Chute, Co-Chair Floyd Eisenberg, Co-Chair.
OST Update Health IT Policy Committee March 14, 2013 Doug Fridsma, MD, PhD, FACP, FACMI Chief Science Officer & Director, Office of Science & Technology.
HIT Standards Committee Clinical Operations Workgroup Report on Gaps and Next Steps Jamie Ferguson Kaiser Permanente John Halamka Harvard Medical School.
Ongoing/Planned Activities for Week of 4/29 Final UCR Crosswalk due COB 4/30 Hold two working sessions to complete UCR Crosswalk on 4/30 Hold working session.
Use Case 2 – CDS Guidance Service Transactions CDS Guidance Requestor 2. CDS Response (Clinical Data, Supporting Evidence, Supporting Reference, Actions,
HITPC Meaningful Use Stage 3 RFC Comments July 22, 2013 Information Exchange Workgroup Micky Tripathi.
Data Gathering HITPC Workplan HITPC Request for Comments HITSC Committee Recommendations gathered by ONC HITSC Workgroup Chairs ONC Meaningful Use Stage.
Query Health Technical WG Update 1/5/2012. Agenda TopicTime Slot Administrative stuff and reminders2:00 – 2:05 pm Technical Approach Consensus Update.
Certification and Adoption Workgroup HIT Policy Committee April 28, 2014 Discussion on Incremental Rulemakings.
Health eDecisions (HeD) All Hands Meeting February 21st, 2013.
© 2015 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International.
Lab Results Interface Validation Suite Workgroup and Pilots Workgroup Vision, Charter, NIST Collaboration, July 8,
SNOMED CT Vendor Introduction 27 th October :30 (CET) Implementation Special Interest Group Tom Seabury IHTSDO.
Health IT Standards Committee Update December 19, 2012 Doug Fridsma, MD, PhD, FACP, FACMI Chief Science Officer & Director, Office of Science & Technology.
Walter G. Suarez, MD, MPH – Kaiser Permanente Floyd Eisenberg, MD, MPH – iParsimony, LLC Co-Chairs, HL7 Clinical Quality Information Workgroup Presented.
2014 Edition Test Scenarios Development Overview Presenter: Scott Purnell-Saunders, ONC November 12, 2013 DRAFT.
Interoperability Measurement for the MACRA Section 106(b) ONC Briefing for HIT Policy and Standards Committee April 19, 2016.
HIT Policy Committee Health Information Exchange Workgroup Comments on Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) and Interim Final Rule (IFR) Deven McGraw,
Lab Results Interfaces S&I Framework Initiative Bi-Weekly Initiative Meeting July 18, 2011.
CCHIT Roadmap Discussion Items
Commentary General Comments:
QRDA III STU 2.2 Update January 25, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Clinical Quality Workgroup April 10, 2014 Commenting on the ONC Voluntary 2015 Edition Proposed Rule Marjorie Rallins– co-chair Danny Rosenthal –co-chair

The Subject Matter and Deadline What are we commenting on? Notice of proposed rulemaking: Voluntary 2015 Edition Electronic Health Record (EHR) Certification Criteria; Interoperability Updates and Regulatory Improvements (79 FR 10880).Voluntary 2015 Edition Electronic Health Record (EHR) Certification Criteria; Interoperability Updates and Regulatory Improvements How are we commenting? Please use the Public Comment Template and Submit: Comment Templatehttp:// By When? ONC is accepting comments through April 28, 2014 HITSC Workgroups reporting out to the HITSC April 24,

Clinical Quality WG Assignments DescriptionPDF Starting Page HITSC WG Assignment Unchanged in 2015 Edition 2015 Edition Issues*2017 Edition Issues CDS – Health eDecisions Proposal41Clinical QualityX CQM – Import and Calculate88Clinical QualityX CQM – Electronic submission88Clinical QualityX CQM – Patient Population Data Filtering88Clinical QualityX CQM - Electronic Processing83Clinical QualityX CQM – Functions and Standards for CQM Certification 86Clinical QualityX CQM – Capture and Export87Clinical QualityXX Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 2

Getting It Done! Schedule of CQ Workgroup Meetings 1 st meeting is April 2 nd, EST 2 nd meeting is on April 7 th, EST 3 rd meeting is on April 10 th, EST Presentation of comments to HIT Standards Committee on April 24 th Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 3

Clinical Decision Support: Health eDecisions Proposal ONC proposes to adopt the HL7 Implementation Guide: Clinical Decision Support Knowledge Artifact Implementation Guide, Release 1 (January 2013) (“HeD standard”) as a standard at § (d) and to require that EHR technology be able to electronically process a CDS artifact formatted in the HeD standard. We also propose to adopt the HL7 Decision Support Service Implementation Guide, Release 1, Version 1 (December 2013) as a standard at § (e) and to require that EHR technology demonstrate the ability to make an information request, send patient data, and receive CDS guidance according to the interface requirements defined in the Decision Support Service IG. CQ Workgroup to comment on: a)The ease with which EHR technology could be developed to consume CDS Knowledge Artifacts b)Whether we should work to distinguish between complex CDS Knowledge Artifacts and simple Knowledge Artifacts and to require only acceptance and incorporation of simple Knowledge Artifacts in the 2015 Edition, with increasing expectations of more complex capabilities in future editions c)The ability to map the CDS Knowledge Artifact standard to data within the EHR technology (including medications, laboratory, and allergies information) d)The ability to store and auto-configure a CDS Knowledge Artifact in EHR technology e)The feasibility of implementing the interface requirements defined in the Decision Support Service IG to make an information request, send patient data, and receive CDS guidance in near real-time f)What specifically ONC should focus on when it comes to testing and certification for acceptance and incorporation of CDS Knowledge Artifacts Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 4

Clinical Quality Measures: Unchanged Criteria ONC proposes to adopt a 2015 Edition certification criterion that is the same as the 2014 Edition version. § (c)(2) CQM - import and calculate § (c)(3) CQM - electronic submission Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 5

Clinical Quality Measures: § (c)(4) Patient Population Filtering ONC proposes to adopt a new 2015 Edition certification criterion to require filtering of CQMs by patient population characteristics and propose to require that EHR technology be able to record structured data for the purposes of being able to filter CQM results to create different patient population groupings by one or a combination of the following patient characteristics : Practice site and address; Tax Identification Number (TIN), National Provider Identifier (NPI), and TIN/NPI combination; Diagnosis (e.g., by SNOMED CT code); Primary and secondary health insurance, including identification of Medicare and Medicaid dual eligibles; Demographics including age, sex, preferred language, education level, and socioeconomic status. ONC solicits comment on: Whether current CQM standards (e.g., QRDA Category I and Category III) can collect metadata for the characteristics listed above to filter and create a CQM report for a particular characteristic or combination of characteristics Are there vocabulary standards that could be used to record the characteristics proposed above Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 6

Clinical Quality Measures: § (c)(1) Capture and Export ONC proposes to adopt a 2015 Edition certification criterion that is the same as the 2014 Edition version. However… ONC solicits comment on upcoming 2017 Edition Rulemaking ONC solicits public comment on the potential usefulness of broadening the export requirement to also include reference to a QRDA Category II formatted data file, which would address the bulk reporting of quality data that includes the patient level data as outlined in the QRDA Category I report. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 7

Clinical Quality Measures: Electronic Processing eMeasures For 2017 Edition rulemaking, ONC hopes to propose for adoption a certification criterion focused on EHR technology’s ability to electronically process CQMs. ONC solicits comment on: Industry readiness to adopt the HL7 Health Quality Measures Format (HQMF) R2 standard for representing a clinical quality measure as an electronic document. Industry support for unified, modularized CDS and CQM standards for the 2017 Edition. What should ONC require EHR technology to be able to demonstrate for certification (e.g., to require that EHR technology be able to electronically process any eCQM formatted in a unified, modularized CQM standard such as a new HQMF standard). Recommended testing and certification processes for the electronic processing of eCQMs; A way in which to classify measures so as to select a subset of measures that would be easier and simpler to be electronically processed by EHR technology in testing and certification; The ability/readiness of EHR technology to store and incorporate an eCQM in HQMF R2; The ability/readiness of EHR technology to map the HQMF R2 standard to data within the EHR technology (including medications, laboratory, allergies information).. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 8

Clinical Quality Measures: Functions & Standards Certification For 2017 Edition Rulemaking, ONC solicits comment on: What requirements for supplemental data and reporting should be included as part of CQM certification criteria. What specific capabilities, reporting requirements, standards, and data elements ONC should consider for CQM certification going forward. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 9

Wrap-Up Public Comment Adjourn 10

Additional Items to Address (Time / Interest permitting) § (a)(4) (Drug-drug, drug-allergy interaction checks) (Unchanged from 2014 Ed) § (a)(18) (Inpatient setting only – electronic medication administration record) (Unchanged from 2014 Ed) § (a)(16) (Patient list creation) (Unchanged from 2014 Ed) § (a)(17) (Patient-specific education resources) (Proposed changes) § (a)(12) Drug formulary checks – 2017 Ed Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 11