Injector Options for CLIC Drive Beam Linac Avni Aksoy Ankara University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Paul Emma SLAC January 14, 2002 BERLIN CSR Benchmark Test-Case Results CSR Workshop.
Advertisements

ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
Tessa Charles Australian Synchrotron / Monash University 1 Bunch Compression Schemes for X-band FELs.
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
Bunch compressors ILC Accelerator School May Eun-San Kim Kyungpook National University.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Chris Tennant Jefferson Laboratory March 15, 2013 “Workshop to Explore Physics Opportunities with Intense, Polarized Electron Beams up to 300 MeV”
Possible new EMMA injectors bdm. Motivation ALICE due to shut down soon Alternate EMMA injection (assuming EMMA project continues which it should …) Several.
CLIC Drive Beam Injector Design Update Shahin Sanaye Hajari 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran 2.CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
CTF3 commissioning status R. Corsini - CTF3 committee 17 th September 2009 Update on CTF3 Operations and schedule This time I will try to give a more complete.
7.8GHz Dielectric Loaded High Power Generation And Extraction F. Gao, M. E. Conde, W. Gai, C. Jing, R. Konecny, W. Liu, J. G. Power, T. Wong and Z. Yusof.
Influence of the Third Harmonic Module on the Beam Size Maria Kuhn University of Hamburg Bachelor Thesis Presentation.
Drive Beam Linac Stability Issues Avni AKSOY Ankara University.
High Current Electron Source for Cooling Jefferson Lab Internal MEIC Accelerator Design Review January 17, 2014 Riad Suleiman.
S2E in LCLS Linac M. Borland, Lyncean Technologies, P. Emma, C. Limborg, SLAC.
Max Cornacchia, Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Max Cornacchia, Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center  Proposed by M. Cornacchia (Nov.
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
DEVELOPMENT OF A BEAM LOSS DETECTION SYSTEM FOR THE CLIC TEST FACILITY 3 T. Lefevre Beam loss monitors for the CLIC Test Facility 3 Preliminary study done.
Design of the Turnaround Loops for the Drive Beam Decelerators R. Apsimon, J. Esberg CERN, Switzerland.
CLIC Drive Beam Injector Bunching System Sh. Sanaye H. 1,2, S. Doebert 2, S. H. Shaker 1,2 1.Institute For Research in Fundamental Science (IPM), Tehran,
R&D opportunities for photoinjectors Renkai Li 10/12/2015 FACET-II Science Opportunities Workshops October, 2015 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
CLIC work packages CTF3-003 (TBL+) CLIC0-001 (CLIC DB injector) CLIC0-002 (photo injector option for CLIC DB injector.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors LCWS, Arlington, Texas, October 22 th -26 th, 2012Steffen Döbert, BE-RF Overview of the CLIC main beam injectors.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Tor Raubenheimer Beam Delivery System Design Differences American Linear Collider Physics Meeting SLAC January 8.
‘S2E’ Study of Linac for TESLA XFEL P. Emma SLAC  Tracking  Comparison to LCLS  Re-optimization  Tolerances  Jitter  CSR Effects.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Jorg Kewisch, Dmitri Kayran Electron Beam Transport and System specifications.
P. Urschütz - CTF3 Collaboration Meeting 2007 CTF3 commissioning & operation in 2006 P. Urschütz for the CTF3 operations team  Commissioning of the Delay.
J. Wu J. Wu working with T.O. Raubenheimer LCLS-II Accelerator Physics meeting May 09, 2012 Study on the BC1 Energy Set Point LCLS-II Accel. Phys., J.
S. Bettoni, R. Corsini, A. Vivoli (CERN) CLIC drive beam injector design.
Interface between TAC SR and SASE FEL Possibility for testing CLIC structure Avni AKSOY Ankara University.
Twin bunches at FACET-II Zhen Zhang, Zhirong Huang, Ago Marinelli … FACET-II accelerator physics workshop Oct. 12, 2015.
Oleksiy Kononenko CERN and JINR
Main and Drive Beam Dynamics Working Group Caterina Biscari, Daniel Schulte Attending people ~ 20 ± 5 Presentations ~ 18 (7 from CERN) CL IC 07.
2 February 8th - 10th, 2016 TWIICE 2 Workshop Instability studies in the CLIC Damping Rings including radiation damping A.Passarelli, H.Bartosik, O.Boine-Fankenheim,
T. Atkinson*, A. Matveenko, A. Bondarenko, Y. Petenev Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie The Femto-Science Factory: A Multi-turn ERL.
X-band Based FEL proposal
ELI PHOTOINJECTOR PARAMETERS: PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS AND SIMULATIONS C. RONSIVALLE.
CLIC DB injector facility, photo-injector option studies LCWS, Granada, September 26 th -30 th,2011Steffen Döbert, BE-RF  CLIC DB injector  Thermionic.
MAX IV linac overview and scope of automation Sara Thorin.
B. Marchetti R. Assmann, U. Dorda, J. Grebenyuk, Y. Nie, J. Zhu Acknowledgements: C. Behrens, R. Brinkmann, K. Flöttmann, M. Hüning,
C. Biscari, D. Alesini, A. Ghigo, F. Marcellini, LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy B. Jeanneret, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland CLIC DRIVE BEAM FREQUENCY MULTIPLICATION.
CLIC 09 Workshop - C. Biscari C. Biscari, D. Alesini, A. Ghigo, F. Marcellini, LNF-INFN, Frascati, Italy B. Jeanneret, F. Stulle, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
SABER Longitudinal Tracking Studies P. Emma, K. Bane Mar. 1, 2006
Frank Stulle, ILC LET Beam Dynamics Meeting CLIC Main Beam RTML - Overview - Comparison to ILC RTML - Status / Outlook.
A. Aksoy Beam Dynamics Studies for the CLIC Drive Beam Accelerator A. AKSOY CONTENS ● Basic Lattice Sketches ● Accelerating structure ● Short and long.
Drive Beam Feedforward and Compression
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
Multi-bunch Operation for LCLS, LCLS_II, LCLS_2025
Beam dynamics for an X-band LINAC driving a 1 keV FEL
Abstract EuSPARC and EuPRAXIA projects
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
Steering algorithm experience at CTF3
Injector and positron source scheme. A first evaluation Thanks to O
Status of the CLIC main beam injectors
X-band FEL beam dynamics issues
Have a chance to operate your own beam at CERN
CLIC Drive Beam Stabilisation
Measurements, ideas, curiosities
SuperB project. Injection scheme design status
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
The Cornell High Brightness Injector
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Linac/BC1 Commissioning P
Explanation of the Basic Principles and Goals
LCLS Tracking Studies CSR micro-bunching in compressors
CLIC Feasibility Demonstration at CTF3
J. Seeman Perugia Super-B Meeting June 2009
Presentation transcript:

Injector Options for CLIC Drive Beam Linac Avni Aksoy Ankara University

Introduction  The beam pulse with 140 µs pulse length and 4.2 A current which consists of 24 × 24 sub-trains of about 120 bunches each is accelerated up to 2.4 GeV in Drive Beam Linac (DBL).  After DBL, 24 sub-trains will be merged into a single sub-train using delay loop (DL), combiner ring one (CR1) and combiner ring two (CR2). (Each sub train will have 100 A pulse current and 240 ns pulse length)  In order to avoid effect of CSR the beam will be decompressed and compressed several times before and after dispersive sections. Current stability  0.75 × Phase stability  GHz Bunch length stability  1% Phase stability  GHz  GHz Bunch length stability  1% Full energy spread  < 50 MeV A. Aksoy CLIC Workshop 2015

Motivation  Bunch compression To compress a bunch longitudinally, trajectory in dispersive region must be shorter for tail of the bunch than it is for the head. z  E/E lower energy trajectory higher energy trajectory center energy trajectory Tail Head A path length difference for particles with a relative energy deviation d is :  : relative energy deviation (=  E/E)  R 56 : linear longitudinal dispersion (leading term for bunch compression)  T 566 : second - order longitudinal dispersion A. Aksoy CLIC Workshop 2015

Motivation  Effect of charge distribution to wake potential, therefore to relative energy spread.. λ  longitudinal charge distribution Wz  wake function of structure Any tail or spike on charge distribution will introduce nonelinear chirp A. Aksoy CLIC Workshop 2015

Bunch coming from injector Shahin Sanaye Hajari Not only the satellites are problem Bunch charge distribution will lead the wakefield effect A. Aksoy CLIC Workshop 2015

Tracking the bunch through linac  The chirp is not suitable for compressing (decompressing) on further steps..  The energy spread is much more larger than accepted on DL  The tail will cause beam loss at high energies A. Aksoy CLIC Workshop 2015

We propose a chicane to improve the longitudinal charge distribution Use a scrapper as energy collimator on the middle of chicane We propose energy collimator just after injector (a) After we remove tails and try to optimize charge distribution the longitudinal phase space of bunch at the end of linac seems suitable for compression with small R56 The spike can cause large CSR effect? A. Aksoy CLIC Workshop 2015

We propose energy collimator just after injector (b) Seems suitable for compression with small R56 but not perfect.. The spike can cause large CSR effect? In order to improve this situation we have to find better initial distribution A. Aksoy CLIC Workshop 2015

Photocathode RF gun based injector ● Phin gun is scaled to 1 Ghz Structures are identical to DBL structure σ z =25 ps σ x,y =2.5 mm A. Aksoy CLIC Workshop 2015

Bunch after Photo injector A. Aksoy CLIC Workshop 2015

DBL layout with photo injector ● Linerazer is chosen the 3 GHz structure being used at CTF3 The longitudinal distribtion much more better for decompression / compression on further sections of DBL A. Aksoy CLIC Workshop 2015

We have preliminary compared thermionic gun based injector and photocathode gun based injector  The advantages of photocathode gun – Satellite problem can be solved – Lower emittance – Better charge distribution against the effect of wakefiled  The disadvantages of photocathode gun – Laser technology – Laser stabilization → charge stabilization – Cathode lifetime  The advantages of thermionic gun – Demonstrated at CTF3 and operation for long time – Easy to operate – Long cathode life time  The disadvantages of thermionic gun – Almost impossible to remove satellites – Large emittance – Worse charge distribution against the effect of wakefiled Conclusion ● In terms of longitudinal tolerances the photocathode injector is more relax than thermionic case since we use single dispersive section. ● It is possible to reduce R56 on chicane also ● One should also compare the efficiency of power generation using the final distributions A. Aksoy CLIC Workshop 2015 Thank you !