South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ODOT’s Section 106 Training
Advertisements

SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Presented by: The Ohio Department of Transportation 1 36 CFR Part 800 Protection of Historic Properties Section 106 Managing the Environmental & Project.
Jennifer Horn, Preservation Pennsylvania. Who is Preservation Pennsylvania? Pennsylvania’s only private, non-profit, statewide organization dedicated.
The Section 106 Review Process: Introduction and Overview
Environmental Compliance Negotiating our way through the process…
Program Alternatives under 36 CFR Part 800 Dave Berwick Army Affairs Coordinator Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Geothermal Projects and Indian Tribes: Dealing with Cultural Resources Issues Michael P. O’Connell Stoel Rives LLP O R.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
Section 106, Section 4(f) and You!: The Role of Consulting Parties in Transportation Projects Kevin Mock, Historic Preservation Specialist Pennsylvania.
Introduction to Historical Resources and Section 106 Division of Historical Resources (DHR) NH Department of Cultural Resources State Historic Preservation.
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT of 1966 as amended Garry J. Cantley Regional Archeologist Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Section 106 The reasons, the actions, the participants.
Cultural Resource Management Plans What good are they?
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Environmental Review Todd Levine Architectural historian, environmental reviewer, Connecticut Freedom Trail coordinator, Washington- Rochambeau Revolutionary.
Federal Preservation Activities: Part 1. What did With Heritage So Rich (1965) and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 provide to administer.
A BEGINNERS GUIDE TO SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE SECTION 106 REVIEW PROCESS TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE: REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Anacostia Streetcar Phase 2 Environmental Assessment & Section 106 Evaluation: Community Workshop January 12, 2011.
EPA!!!!.  One of the first laws ever created to protect the environment  Came into effect due to public concern about the deteriorating human environment.
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. Management and Preservation of Indiana's Historic Bridges: A Programmatic Approach Thanks to Mead & Hunt & FHWA-IN.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.
Monroe Executed Programmatic Agreement The Army’s Responsibilities Include: Identify Significant Viewsheds (initiated)-18 Months =Oct 2010 Cultural Landscape.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
SAFETEA-LU Changes  Exemption of the Interstate System from Section 4(f) [Section 6007]  de minimis impacts to historic sites [Section 6009(a)]  de.
Environmental Planning CULTURAL RESOURCES CH 5 - HO # 13
Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
1 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CULTURAL RESOURCES LAWS AND REGULATIONS CH 5 CH 5 HO # 13, 13a, 13b
Positive Train Control Infrastructure: Section 106 Review Process under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s May 2014 Program Comment For More.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
Nadine Peterson Preservation Planner NH Division of Historical Resources Lynne E. Monroe Preservation Company Christopher W. Closs Christopher W. Closs.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Environmental Review Process for Responsible Entities 24 CFR Part 58 NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM.
Section 106: Historic Preservation Review and Compliance as it relates to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 “How Can State Agencies Assist.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
Environmental Commitments/Tracking. Environmental Commitments Federal Agencies Shall –Use all practicable means consistent with the requirements of.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
Army BRAC Historic Preservation Opportunities and Challenges.
1 Historic Preservation Webinar "Reporting Through PAGE and to PMC"
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
NEPA and Section 106: An Introduction WISDOT MEETING NOVEMBER 3-4, 2015.
Executive Order Environmental Stewardship and Transportation Infrastructure Project Reviews Priority Issues.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
The National Register. The National Register of Historic Places The National Register of Historic Places is authorized by Section 101 (a)(1)(A)of the.
Anth January 2012.
National Treasures: Brownfields and the National Historic Preservation Act Brownfields 2006 Boston, MA.
101 New London Road Newark, Delaware
Pedestrian Survey.
Monte Mills Alexander Blewett III School of Law University of Montana
Section 106 Consulting Parties Meeting
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Susan Barnes Vice-Chairman Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
May 8, 2018 Marion Werkheiser, Cultural Heritage Partners
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
National Historic Preservation Act
The Role of the SHPO John Pouley, Assistant State Archaeologist
© Paul Graham Washington Department of Transportation © Paul Graham
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
Programmatic Approaches to Section 106 Compliance
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Presentation transcript:

South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center

  Federal Preservation Laws  National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and 36CFR800  Purpose of the Programmatic Agreement (PA)  Consultation with the Public  Next Steps  Questions, Comments, and Concerns Discussion Points

 Federal Preservation Laws

  Signed October 15, 1966  First National Policy Regarding Preservation  Established the Advisory Council for Historic Preservation (ACHP), the State Historic Preservation Offices (SHPOs), and the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)  Articulated Policy Regulating Federal Undertakings Section 106 of this Act mandates Compliance and Review Process (36CFR800 Regulations) National Historic Preservation Act

  Any federally funded, licensed or permitted project requires consideration of historic resources under Section 106 Applies to minimum, minor and major projects. Applies to any deliberative decision on the part of the agency – permits, plans, NEPA  Intent is to protect historic resources What Actions Require Section 106 Compliance?

Examples of Actions that require Section 106 Compliance include Oil and Gas Fields

Road Construction

Range Improvement Projects

  A district, site, building, structure or object that is significant in the history, architecture, engineering, archaeology or culture of this state, its communities, or the nation. What Is a Historical Resource?

Examples of Historical Resources include Harney Peak Lookout Tower, Dam, Pumphouse and Stairway

Beaver Creek Bridge in Wind Cave NP

Wounded Knee Site

 This current process is as follows:  Initiate the undertaking and determine if surveys are necessary  Identify historic resources  Evaluate Significance of sites in local and national context  Assess whether the project will adversely affect any significant resources  Resolve Adverse Affects (if any ) 36CFR800 Process Applies to SHPO, Federal Agency, Proponents, and Public

  Consult…. Consult…..Consult One of the most important provisions in the regulation  Individuals with demonstrated interest in undertaking, local governments, tribes, applicants. Regulations, FS policy, and recent Executive Orders (13007, 13175) call for earlier and broader public participation in the review process Intended to ensure that people and entities most affected by federal projects have a strong voice in decisions relating to them Throughout the Compliance Process

 Purpose of the Programmatic Agreement (PA) A Programmatic Agreement between the NNFG and the South Dakota SHPO would  Streamline the Section 106 Process,  Minimize delays in low-risk projects, and  Allow the NNFG to complete NEPA analysis, sign decision documents, and implement projects in a more timely manner.

  Participation of consulting parties early and throughout the process SHPO/THPO Tribes Representatives of local governments Applicants for Federal assistance, permits, licenses, approvals Additional consulting parties with demonstrated interests Preservation Partners and ACHP Consultation with the Public

 Next Steps  Take your comments and suggestions tonight  Schedule and hold meetings targeting additional interested parties (Tribes, grazing associations, and others)  Draft a document that takes public concerns into consideration  Invite the Advisory Council to participate  Allow the public and other interested parties time to review the draft document  Negotiate with the South Dakota SHPO to produce a mutually-agreed upon process

 Questions, Comments, and Concerns