Representing Range Compensators with Computational Geometry in TOPAS Forrest Iandola 1,2 and Joseph Perl 1 1 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 2 University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Photon Collimation For The ILC Positron Target Lei Zang The University of Liverpool Cockcroft Institute 24 th March 2007.
Advertisements

Monte Carlo Based Implementation of an Energy Modulation System for Proton Therapy G.A.P. Cirrone Qualified Medical Physicist PhD Laboratori Nazionali.
PSD9, Aberystwyth, UK, 15 Sept Politecnico di Milano, Italy Development of a camera for imaging of prompt gamma rays in measurements.
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
GEANT4 simulation of an ocular proton beam & benchmark against MC codes D. R. Shipley, H. Palmans, C. Baker, A. Kacperek Monte Carlo 2005 Topical Meeting.
GEANT4 Simulations of TIGRESS
UGDIE PROJECT MEETING Athens September WP6 – Assessment and Evaluation  Evaluation Results  Deliverable D 13 (first release issued and delivered.
Energy deposition and neutron background studies for a low energy proton therapy facility Roxana Rata*, Roger Barlow* * International Institute for Accelerator.
Parameterized Shower Simulation in Lelaps: a Comparison with Geant4 Daniel Birt, Amy Nicholson.
W. Clarida, HCAL Meeting, Fermilab Oct. 06 Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Geant4 Simulation Progress W. Clarida The University of Iowa.
Estimation of the effects of a lead vest on dose reduction for NPP workers using Monte Carlo calculations KIM JEONG-IN.
Quick Intro to Geant4 Joseph Perl (SLAC/SCCS) G4NAMU AAPM Minneapolis 22 July 2007.
Building clinical Monte Carlo code from Geant4, PENELOPE or EGSnrc Joao Seco 1, Christina Jarlskog 1, Hongyu Jiang 2 and Harald Paganetti 1 1 Francis H.
Geant4 Accuracy and Benchmarking Bruce Faddegon, UCSF.
Bruce Faddegon, UCSF Inder Daftari, UCSF Joseph Perl, SLAC
Applications of Geant4 Geant4 Mini-Tutorial Hebden Bridge 15 September 2007 Joseph Perl, SLAC (mostly stolen from a talk by Makoto Asai)
Electromagnetic Physics I Joseph Perl SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (strongly based on Michel Maire's slides) Geant4 v9.3.p01 Standard EM package.
Interactions of charged particles with the patient I.The depth-dose distribution - How the Bragg Peak comes about - (Thomas Bortfeld) II.The lateral dose.
J. Tinslay 1, B. Faddegon 2, J. Perl 1 and M. Asai 1 (1) Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Menlo Park, CA, (2) UC San Francisco, San Francisco, CA Verification.
(Geant4) Monte Carlo benchmarking
G4NAMU GEANT4 North America Medical Users Organization (G4NAMU) GEANT4 in external beam therapy Harald Paganetti.
Tissue inhomogeneities in Monte Carlo treatment planning for proton therapy L. Beaulieu 1, M. Bazalova 2,3, C. Furstoss 4, F. Verhaegen 2,5 (1) Centre.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project IR Working Group Summary Tom Markiewicz LC R&D Workshop, UCSC June 29, 2002.
Dr. Paul Gueye Hampton University G4NAMU - SLAC Overview Of Geant4 Medical Activities At Hampton UniversityJefferson Lab Hampton University - Hampton,
Variance reduction A primer on simplest techniques.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
The Skandion clinic, plans for the use of particle beams for radiation therapy in Sweden presented by Erik Grusell, medical radiation physicist Dept of.
Varian Medical Systems By KJ Neish. History ›Originally incorporated in 1948 as Varian Associates, Inc. ›Changed name to Varian Medical Systems, Inc.
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE Gilda experiences and tools in porting application Giuseppe La Rocca INFN – Catania ICTP/INFM-Democritos.
SOI detector Geant4-based studies to characterise the tissue-equivalence of SOI and diamond microdosimeteric detectors, under development at CMRP S. Dowdell,
1 GEANT4: Applications in Medical Physics B. Caccia Department of Technology and Health Istituto Superiore di Sanità (Italian National Institute of Health)
Preliminarily results of Monte Carlo study of neutron beam production at iThemba LABS University of the western cape and iThemba LABS Energy Postgraduate.
Milestones M5 and M6 Mid-Term Review, October 2013M. Silari – ARDENT overview1 M5: comparison of detector technologies (WP1) M6: choice of detector technology.
Joseph Perl SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Scientific Computing Workshop 20 June 2011 Work supported in part by the U.S. Department of Energy under.
Ian C. Smith 1 A portal-based system for quality assurance of radiotherapy treatment plans using Grid-enabled High Performance Computing clusters CR Baker.
YongPyong 2012 Winter Conference on Particle Physics February 20~23,
Nick Draper 05/11/2008 Mantid Manipulation and Analysis Toolkit for ISIS data.
Summer Practice in JINR Mathematical modeling of high-energy particle beams in accelerators.
Computing Performance Recommendations #13, #14. Recommendation #13 (1/3) We recommend providing a simple mechanism for users to turn off “irrelevant”
Dept of Materials Engineering l Use of a Virtual Laboratory to plan, execute and analyse Neutron Strain Scanning experiments. John A James 1, Javier R.
ARDENT Advanced Radiation Dosimetry European Network Training initiative WP1: Gas Detectors S. Rollet.
1 Radiotherapy, hadrontherapy and treatment planning systems. Faiza Bourhaleb INFN-Torino University Med 1er-Morocco  Radiotherapy  Optimization techniques.
Araki F. Ikegami T. and Ishidoya T.
TPS & Simulations within PARTNER D. Bertrand, D. Prieels Valencia, SPAIN 19 JUNE 2009.
Shielding Measurements For A Proton Therapy Facility S. Avery, K. P. Risolo, M. Bartels, C. Ainsley, J McDonough, R. L. Maughan University of Pennsylvania.
Improvement of the Monte Carlo Simulation Efficiency of a Proton Therapy Treatment Head Based on Proton Tracking Analysis and Geometry Simplifications.
Dual Target Design for CLAS12 Omair Alam and Gerard Gilfoyle Department of Physics, University of Richmond Introduction One of the fundamental goals of.
Neutron measurement with nuclear emulsion Mitsu KIMURA 27th Feb 2013.
1 Neutron Effective Dose calculation behind Concrete Shielding of Charge Particle Accelerators with Energy up to 100 MeV V. E Aleinikov, L. G. Beskrovnaja,
ESTRO, Geneva 2003 The importance of nuclear interactions for dose calculations in proton therapy M.Soukup 1, M.Fippel 2, F. Nuesslin 2 1 Department of.
Implementation of a New Monte Carlo Simulation Tool for the Development of a Proton Therapy Beam Line and Verification of the related Dose Distributions.
The PrimEx-I Beam line. A. GasparianPrimEx-II Beam Line, August 5, MC Results for the PrimEx-I configuration Beam Background on HyCal: Energy Distribution.
Seoul National University Han-wool Ju CUNPA Kick-off Meeting Aug.22-23, 2013.
Se Byeong Lee, Ph.D Chief Medical Physicist Proton Therapy Center in NCC, Korea.
Koichi MurakamiGeant4 Physics Verification and Validation (17-19/Jul./2006) 1 Results from the recent carbon test beam at HIMAC Koichi Murakami Statoru.
MCS overview in radiation therapy
Achim Stahl RWTH Aachen Hadron Therapy, Jülich Oct, Workshop Nuclear Models for Use in Hadron Therapy October 8./ Achim Stahl – RWTH Aachen.
Primary Radiation Calculation for Sun Yat-Sen Proton Hospital
BDSIM for proton therapy gantry simulation
INTERCOMPARISON P3. Dose distribution of a proton beam
n_ToF dump as a facility for Neutron Radiation Testing
Fast Radiation Simulation and Visualized Data Processing Method
A Comparative Study of Biological Effects of VHEE, Protons and other Radiotherapy Modalities Kristina Small University of Manchester, Christie NHS Foundation.
Development and characterization of the Detectorized Phantom for research in the field of spatial fractionated radiation therapy. D. Ramazanov, V. Pugatch,
Science parks and technological support at ELI Beamlines
Neutronics Studies for the Nab Experiment
PET-utilized proton range verification using 13N signals
Feasibility of using O-18 for PET proton range verification
Geant4 at IST Applications in Brachytherapy
Estimation of the effects of a lead vest on dose reduction for NPP workers using Monte Carlo calculations KIM JEONG-IN.
Presentation transcript:

Representing Range Compensators with Computational Geometry in TOPAS Forrest Iandola 1,2 and Joseph Perl 1 1 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 2 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

2 Forrest Iandola Computational Geometry Compensators Overview Medical Physics in 30 Seconds Introduction to TOPAS What is a range compensator? Subtraction Solid geometry Modeling compensators with Subtraction Solids Approximation with polyhedrons for (potentially) faster performance

3 Forrest Iandola Computational Geometry Compensators Medical Physics in 30 Seconds Goal: kill cancer with radiation Deliver radiation with protons, photons, other particles, or ions Monte Carlo simulation of proton therapy beams is an up-and-coming field

4 Forrest Iandola Computational Geometry Compensators Introduction to TOPAS TOPAS (Tool for Particle Simulation) TOPAS = Monte Carlo simulation of radiation therapy beamlines User can easily customize beamline for specific treatment facilities Uses Geant4 for the “real” physics

5 Forrest Iandola Computational Geometry Compensators What is a Range Compensator? A radiation therapy beamline collimates the beam and produces a specific energy spread Range compensator produces an energy spread Construction: drill a number of holes out of a cylinder of lucite Each drill hole may have a unique depth “The thickness of the Lucite [plastic] will proportionally reduce the depth [energy] of the protons” 1 1

6 Forrest Iandola Computational Geometry Compensators What is a Range Compensator?

7 Forrest Iandola Computational Geometry Compensators Subtraction Solids Geant4 supports boolean solid combinatorial geometry –Subtraction solids –Union solids It’s as simple as newSolid = Solid1 - Solid2 Overlap among subtracted solids is acceptable Solids can be recursively subtracted

8 Forrest Iandola Computational Geometry Compensators Compensator with Subtraction Solids Compensator comprised of a bigCylinder with n holes subtracted: newSolid1 = bigCylinder - smallCylinder1 newSolid2 = newSolid1 - smallCylinder2 … Compensator = newSolid(n-1) - smallCylinder(n)

9 Forrest Iandola Computational Geometry Compensators Compensator with Subtraction Solids

10 Forrest Iandola Computational Geometry Compensators Approximation for Performance Gains Approximate the drill holes with a collection of hexagons Lack of overlap among hexagons allows us to model all hexagons as a single polyhedron Future work: evaluate performance benefits (and accuracy reduction) with polyhedron method

11 Forrest Iandola Computational Geometry Compensators Approximation for Performance Gains Subtraction SolidPolyhedron

12 Forrest Iandola Computational Geometry Compensators Approximation for Performance Gains Future work: evaluate performance benefits (and accuracy reduction) with polyhedron method

13 Forrest Iandola Computational Geometry Compensators Acknowledgements Harald Paganetti (Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard University) Jan Schuemann (Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard University) Jungwook Shin (UC San Francisco) Bruce Faddegon (UC San Francisco) DOE and NIH for generous support Contact: