ATLAS Upgrade Plans ATLAS Hardware – Challenges and Opportunities Norwegian CERN “Town Meeting” Bergen 2010-04-13.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status & Goals of LHC 1 1pb-1 of delivered and recorded luminosities reached! As of this morning: Delivered: 1420 nb-1 Recorded: 1245 nb-1 New record Inst.
Advertisements

LHC Experiments at Liverpool E2V Visit – Nov 2005 Introduction Si Technology Upgrade/Maintenance Summary.
Tracking Challenges at Future Hadron Colliders Micro-Pattern Gas and Silicon Detectors for Tracking Jose E. Garcia Université de Genève 1.Tracking systems.
Sept. 18, 2008SLUO 2008 Annual Meeting ATLAS Detector Upgrade Opportunities M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
IBL interim-MoU Annexes G. Darbo – INFN / Genova PEIB, 1 March 2010 o IBL interim-MoU Annexes Pixel Extended Institution Board CERN, March 1 st, 2010 NCP.
Consolidation and Upgrade of the LHC Experimental Vacuum Sectors
ATLAS detector upgrades ATLAS off to a good start – the detector is performing very well. This talk is about the changes needed in ATLAS during the next.
February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.
October 24, 2000Milestones, Funding of USCMS S&C Matthias Kasemann1 US CMS Software and Computing Milestones and Funding Profiles Matthias Kasemann Fermilab.
D. Lissauer, BNL. 1 ATLAS ID Upgrade Scope R&D Plans for ATLAS Tracker First thoughts on Schedule and Cost.
IBL Slides G. Darbo – INFN / Genova CSN1, 22 November 2010 o IBL Spare Slides Commissione I – 22 Nov 2010 G. Darbo - INFN / Genova.
Towards a TDR for the IBL G. Darbo - INFN / Genova AW, 24 February 2009 o Towards a TDR for the IBL ATLAS Upgrade Week CERN, 24 February 2009 Session:
ATLAS Upgrade ID Barrel: Services around ‘outer cylinder’ TJF updated According to the drawing ‘Preparation outer cylinder volume reservation’
The ATLAS Insertable B-Layer (IBL) Project C. Gemme, INFN Genova On behalf of the ATLAS IBL COllaboration RD11 Firenze July 2011.
M. Gilchriese ATLAS Upgrade Introduction January 2008.
IBL MoU G. Darbo – INFN / Genova 24 April 2010 o IBL MoU ATLAS Upgrade Week DESY, April 24 th 2010 M. Nordberg, M. Nessi, C. Gößling, H. Pernegger Presented.
CERN, Main challenges for the ATLAS upgrade project in the coming year.
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese U.S. ATLAS Review Revised Version November 29, 2000.
Ideas for LC mechanics (we will work on sensors as well – particular CMOS)
Santa Cruz Meeting August 12 th 2008 Layout options & Schedule Issues David Lissauer 8/12/2008 1David Lissuaer, Santa Cruz Meeting.
U.S. Deliverables Cost and Schedule Summary M. G. D. Gilchriese Revised Version December 18, 2000.
ATLAS FP TRACKER PLANS Steve Watts School of Physics and Astronomy University of Manchester Well defined design in the FP420 Design Report Based on the.
Communications G. Darbo – INFN / Genova IBL MB#15, 5 October 2009 o Bump Bonding Selex / INFN Roma, October, 30 th 2009 G. Darbo - INFN / Genova.
ATLAS Inner Detector MO_B 2012 closure 2013 mid-year status 2014 request H. Pernegger / Pixel PL & ID Resource Coordinator D. Robinson / SCT PL and ID.
PHASE-1B ACTIVITIES L. Demaria – INFN Torino. Introduction  The inner layer of the Phase 1 Pixel detector is exposed to very high level of irradiation.
B-layer integration with beam-pipe and services ATLAS B-layer upgrade E. Anderssen A. Catinaccio.
M. Gilchriese U.S. Pixel Mechanics Overview M. G. D. Gilchriese Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory April 2000.
Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96 TeV  Instantaneous luminosity will.
IBL - Opening G. Darbo - INFN / Genova AW, 25 February 2009 o IBL Introduction & Project Organization ATLAS Upgrade Week CERN, 25 February 2009 Session:
M. Gilchriese ATLAS Pixel Upgrade Thoughts on US Role.
UCSC August 12, 2008 U.S. Upgrade R&D Meeting: Strip Detector  Seiden.
FPCCD VTX Overview Yasuhiro Sugimoto KEK Tokubetsu-Suisin annual meeting 11.
October RRB G. Darbo & H. Pernegger RRB – October 2010 o October RRB Slides for Marzio’s RRB talk CERN, October, 11 th 2010 G. Darbo & H. Pernegger.
Meeting with TUM 1/5/2016P. Petagna – LHC Detector Upgrades: Cooling Visit of the President of the Munich Technical University LHC DETECTOR UPGRADES: COOLING.
Simon Kwan - FermilabCMS Tracker Upgrade Workshop – June 3, Update on the Phase 1 FPIX Half Disk Design Simon Kwan Fermilab on behalf of the USCMS.
Local Supports to IDR Discussion ATLAS Upgrade Week November 2014.
IBL Kick-off Meeting – Summary & Issues G. Darbo – INFN / Genova UPO, 21 July 2009 o IBL kick off meeting summary and issues ATLAS Upgrade Project Office.
TC Straw man for ATLAS ID for SLHC This layout is a result of the discussions in the GENOA ID upgrade workshop. Aim is to evolve this to include list of.
Status of ATLAS Resources Presentation to RRB Markus Nordberg ATLAS Resources Coordination CERN-RRB
15/09/20111 ATLAS IBL sensor qualification Jens Weingarten for the ATLAS IBL Collaboration (2 nd Institute Of Physics, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen)
U.S. ATLAS Executive Meeting Silicon M&OWBS 3.1 August 3, 2005Toronto, Canada A. Seiden UC Santa Cruz.
Fabiola Gianotti, 14/10/20031  s = 28 TeV upgrade L = upgrade “SLHC = Super-LHC” vs Question : do we want to consider also the energy upgrade option.
Brief Status of LHC Experimental Vacuum Project Ray Veness CERN TE/VSC.
M. Gilchriese 1 Pixel R&D The useful lifetime of the innermost pixel layer is expected to be limited to a few years at design luminosity. However, there.
Geoff HallLECC LHC detector upgrades Introductory comments on electronic issues Organisation of this short session.
IBL TDR G. Darbo / INFN Genova ATLAS CB – October 2010 o TDR of Insertable B-layer ATLAS CB, October 8 th 2010 G. Darbo / INFN - Genova Indico agenda page:
Eric Vigeolas, July the 3 rd Status The IBL detector construction already started and the components assembly (flex, modules, stave loagin) will.
Simulation Plan Discussion What are the priorities? – Higgs Factory? – 3-6 TeV energy frontier machine? What detector variants? – Basic detector would.
Steinar Stapnes, LHCC June The ATLAS inner detector TRT endcap A+B TRT endcap C TRT barrel SCT barrel SCT endcap Pixels uWhole ID sits inside bore.
Giulio Pellegrini Actividades 3D G. Pellegrini, C. Fleta, D. Quirion, JP Balbuena, D. Bassignana.
August 24, 2011IDAP Kick-off meeting - TileCal ATLAS TileCal Upgrade LHC and ATLAS current status LHC designed for cm -2 s 7+7 TeV Limited to.
R&D for SLHC detectors at PSI and Geneva CHIPP workshop on the high-energy frontier of particle physics Zürich 6. September 2006 R. Horisberger (Paul Scherrer.
TDAQ and L1Calo and Chamonix (Personal Impressions) 3 Mar2010 Norman Gee.
Pixel detector/Readout for SuperB T.Kawasaki Niigata-U.
RD42 Status Report W. Trischuk for the RD42 Collaboration LHCC Meeting – June 12, 2013 Development of CVD Diamond Tracking Detectors for Experiments at.
Dan Tovey PPAP Jamboree July LHC GPD Upgrade Status and Plans Dan Tovey University of Sheffield.
Upgrade plans for ATLAS. Nigel Hessey (Nikhef) is overall ATLAS upgrade coordinator.
An Idiot’s Guide to LHC Upgrades Bohr Lunch Seminar. 16/5/08 Terry Wyatt. University of Manchester.
ATLAS Pixel Upgrade G. Darbo - INFN / Genova LHCC- CERN 1/76/2008 o Pixel/B-layer Developments LHCC Upgrade Session CERN, 1 / 7 / 2008 G. Darbo - INFN.
Straw man layout for ATLAS ID for SLHC
ATLAS Preparation for LHC Phase-1 Upgrade
FBK / INFN Roma, November , 17th 2009 G. Darbo - INFN / Genova
IBL Overview Darren Leung ~ 8/15/2013 ~ UW B305.
Consolidation and Upgrade of the LHC Experimental Vacuum Systems
ALICE upgrade plans Paolo Giubellino LHCC Upgrades
SVT Issues for the TDR What decisions must be taken before the TDR can be written? What is the mechanism for reaching those decisions How can missing information.
WG4 – Progress report R. Santoro and A. Tauro.
(with R. Arcidiacono, A. Solano)
Update on ATLAS insertable B-layer
Basic starting point New tracker layers on the timescale of the first 5 years of running are a sensible first step Contained in the volume from pixel layer.
Presentation transcript:

ATLAS Upgrade Plans ATLAS Hardware – Challenges and Opportunities Norwegian CERN “Town Meeting” Bergen

ATLAS Hardware Overview Boundary Conditions: LHC Running, Upgrades “Phase-1”: Inserted B-Layer “Phase-2”: Next Inner Detector Norwegian ATLAS Hardware: – Recent (2007 – present): 3D Pixel Sensors R&D – Current (thru 2014): IBL Design, Construction – Future (2015 – 2021): New ID Bergen Town Meeting2

Coupling to the LHC Schedule Assumed identities: – “Phase-1” == IBL – “Phase-2” == New ID Rad. damage & Physics rate Chamonix 2010: – Roadmap to 7+7 TeV – Roadmap to 1000fb-1 – Linac4, PSB, PS2, IR… Not so obvious anymore… Bergen Town Meeting3 S. Myers, LHCC,

Current ATLAS Policy (?) New Pixel layer to be constructed, installation ASAP (2014) New Inner Detector needed for the 2 nd decennium of the ATLAS program Bergen Town Meeting4

IBL: Motivation and Concept Original forecast: – The innermost Pixel layer (B-Layer) expected to burn out and need replacement after a few years of running Study group ( ) findings: – BL replacement difficult and hazardous – Unclear timescale of rad. damages – Smaller diameter beam-pipe is feasible 4 th Pixel barrel: The Inserted B-Layer (IBL) – Insurance against catastrophic BL failure – Improved physics performance Bergen Town Meeting5

IBL: Requirements Improve B-tagging performance: – About 50% of existing BL material (X/X0≈1.5%) Active parts must fit inside existing BL: – = 32 mm – L(Z) = 640 mm Services must fit within existing ID/routing Safe, fast, and feasible extraction and installation Operate as integral part of Pixels Bergen Town Meeting6

IBL: Design and Technology Sensors: – Planar n-type thinned, slim-edge (avalanche?) – 3D DRIE etched vertical columns – CVD Diamond Front-end FE-I4: – 50 x 250 um**2 pixels – 16 x 20 mm**2 active area – 160 Mbps data link Local support: – Carbon foam, Skinned stave – Titanium cooling pipes (Carbon fiber for fall-forward) – CO2 evaporative cooling (C3F8 for fallback) Bergen Town Meeting7

IBL: Project status Project organization (PL, TC, WGs) in place Baseline design, technology: almost defined Draft-TDR being circulating with select reviewers Interim-MoU under discussion Budget: 9-10 MCHF (MoU A/B + “fresh money”) Current Schedule: – Sensor type decision early-mid 2011 – Production 2011 thru 2013 – Install in 2014 Bergen Town Meeting8

ID Upgrade: Concept Replace entire Inner Detector – Handle 10 – 20 x peak luminosity Granularity vs Occupancy matching – Short, longer pixels – Short strips – Long strips Low-level track trigger – “Low” B-field drawback wrt CMS – Detector provides track stubs – Match to Muon-system – Match IP z-position – Level-0.5 and Level-1.5 schemes Letter of Intent – Funding agencies to make commitments from 2015 – Design and construction for installation in the early twenties Bergen Town Meeting9

ID Upgrade: Technology Completely (?) Solid State – Match sensor (CVD, 3D, Planar) to radiation damage – Gaseous Pixels (Gossip) - somewhat unlikely ? Advanced powering schemes: – Minimize dead volume and X/X0 – Serial powering – DC/DC converters Data bandwidth vs power dissipation Local intelligence (ZS, triggers) Bergen Town Meeting10

Norwegian IBL contribution Norwegian share of CORE: – 73 kCHF (unconditional) – Up to 300 kCHF total (if 3D sensors) – Alternative “project” in case non-3D? Already spending 100 kCHF – SINTEF 3D sensor prototype – CORE weight < 0.5 – Considerable risk one run not enough Personnel: – 2 – 3 Faculty (part time) – 1 – 2 Post.doc (full time) – 1 – 2 Ph.D (part or full time) – 1 – 2 FTE Engineering support Bergen Town Meeting11

Norwegian ID Upgrade Contribution ATLAS ID Upgrade: 250 MCHF CORE Need to define during next funding period – 0.88% of ATLAS authors – 3% of current ID Aim for 2.5 MCHF to 5.0 MCHF CORE – E.g. fraction of 3D sensors (if SINTEF) – Build, integrate and commission modules (ref SCT) Personnel: – Retain IBL group – Add e.g. advanced tracking – Possibly physics studies Bergen Town Meeting12

Conclusions IBL contribution defined; small but focused: – Non-overlap with our funding period – Somewhat over-subscribed in terms of interest – Complex sociology of “old” and “new” groups ID Upgrade contribution – Need to define during 2012 – 2015 – Expect to start construction 2015 A credible Norwegian ATLAS HW program – Continuous personnel efforts (2 – 3 Ph.D/Post.doc) – Local infrastructure upgrades – Substantial CORE investments from 2015 (somewhat difficult as in middle of next funding period) Bergen Town Meeting13