Water Bodies in Europe: Integrated Systems to assess Ecological Status and Recovery Funded under FP7, Theme 6: Environment (including Climate Change) Contract.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Enhance the Attractiveness of Studies in Science and Technology WP 6: Formal Hinders Kevin Kelly Trinity College Dublin WP 6 Co-ordinator.
Advertisements

Analytical Evidence on Research & Innovation in the Danube Region Progress of WP4 Vienna, Béla Kardon, PhD; RCISD
Evitherm MTR 07 Sept 04 Phill Giles Thermal Technology Consulting (TTC) Evitherm project mid-term review Work Package 2 Phill Giles Thermal Technology.
S L H C – P P Management Tools Kick-off Meeting April 8 th, 2008 Mar CAPEANS CERN This project has received funding from the European.
PROJECT :EVK PROGRAMME:EESD-ESD-3 THEMATIC PRIORITY:EESD WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE.
United Nations International Programme for Short-term Statistics United Nations Statistics Division Training Workshop on the Compilation of Quarterly National.
Interim Evaluation March 2013 NCBI Ireland. Achievements against the work plan The initial phase of agreeing a curriculum structure was achieved at the.
IDARI Workshop, Tartu, June 2005 NUI Galway Work Package 4 Administration Lorna Ryan The IDARI project is financed under the FP5 Quality of Life and Management.
S 1 Annual Meeting 2013 Management and reporting (WP6) Chiara Bearzotti NACLIM project manager.
IMPACT 3-5th November 20044th IMPACT Project Workshop Zaragoza 1 Investigation of extreme flood Processes and uncertainty IMPACT Investigation of Extreme.
Biological methods to detect the effects of hydrological and morphological pressures Introduction and overview of questionnaire responses.
EU Project: Trans-Boundary River Management Phase II and Phase III for the Kura River basin – Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan ( Transboundary.
Water Bodies in Europe: Integrated Systems to assess Ecological Status and Recovery Funded under FP7, Theme 6: Environment (including Climate Change) Contract.
Intercalibration Guidance: update Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
WG 2A ECOSTAT Meeting 4-5 March 2004 Meeting of the WFD CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT summary Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre The.
Framework for the intercalibration process  Must be simple  Aiming to identify and resolve big inconsistencies with the normative definitions and big.
River Intercalibration Phase 2: Milestone 4 reports Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Intercalibration Option 3 results: what is acceptable and what is not ? Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
River Intercalibration Phase 2: Milestone 2 reports Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
River Intercalibration Phase 2: Milestone 3 reports Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Community for Risk Management & Assessment Kick-off January 20 th Brussels N. van Os Veiligheids Regio Zuid-Holland Zuid (Safety Region South-Holland South)
SWAFS NCP Info Day Brussels, 2 February 2016 RTD B7 - Science with and for Society RTD-7.1 Gender Sector HORIZON 2020.
Comparison of freshwater nutrient boundary values Geoff Phillips 1 & Jo-Anne Pitt 2 1 University of Stirling & University College London 2 Environment.
WISER Water bodies in Europe: Integrative Systems to assess Ecological status and Recovery.
DESIRE – Desertification Mitigation and Remediation of Land DESIRE Work Block 3: Gudrun Schwilch / CDE 1 October 2007 / WB3 Training Workshop Murcia, Spain.
Marcel van den Berg / Centre for Water Management The Netherlands
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Finalisation of the intercalibration register Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods
Intercalibration excersice progress report Presented by Palle Haastrup Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
IC network selection process
Results of the metadata analysis Meeting of the Working Group 2A on Ecological Status (ECOSTAT) March 4-5 , 2004, Ispra, Italy Peeter Nõges Anna-Stiina.
CW-TW Intercalibration results
Synthesis of the intercalibration process Working group 2.5.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Objectives & Agenda of the meeting March 2005
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
WG 2A Ecological Status First results of the metadata collection for the draft intercalibration register 2nd meeting WG2A, 15-17/10/03.
Draft Commission Decision on Intercalibration
Task 1 - Intercalibration WG 2A ECOSTAT - Intercalibration
EU Water Framework Directive
Agenda Item 6(a): Review of the list of priority substances (Decision 2455/2001/EC) WG-E(1)-17/10/INERIS - Data collection.
Water Bodies in Europe: Integrated Systems to assess Ecological Status and Recovery Funded under FP7, Theme 6: Environment (including Climate Change)
Johan Kling, Proposal for improved coordination of hydromorphology within CIS structure proposal by SE, NO, EE, IT Johan Kling,
NE Atlantic GIG ECOSTAT April 2013 Summary of NE ATLANTIC GIG Workshop held in Lisbon (24th-25th January 2013) The Next Phase.
Update on progress since last WG meeting (13-14 June 2002)
Meeting of the WFD CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Introduction & objectives Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen Joint Research Centre The Institute.
on a protocol for Intercalibration of Surface Water
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
Progress Report Working Group A Ecological Status Intercalibration (1) & Harmonisation (3) Activities Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen EC Joint Research.
Activities of WG A Ecological Status
WG A Ecological Status Progress report April-October 2009
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
ECOSTAT 2013 – 2015 Tasks and Deliverables
Water Directors meeting Warsaw, 8-9 December 2011
Water Directors meeting Spa, 2-3 December 2010
ECOSTAT meeting, June 28th, 2011
WG A ECOSTAT Intercalibration guidance : Annexes III, V, VI
WFD CIS 4th Intercalibration Workshop
Water Science-Policy Interface (CIS-SPI) Progress report
Reportnet for absolute beginners
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, 22 Febraury 2006 Progress Report.
ASSIGNING WATER BODY TYPES IN THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION Wouter van de Bund EC Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and sustainability,
Lake Intercalibration
Common Implementation Strategy for the
WG A Ecological Status Progress report April-October 2010
Reporting template for milestone reports
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
ECOSTAT nutrient work : Brief update February 2017
WG A Ecological Status Progress report October 2010 – May 2011
Presentation transcript:

Water Bodies in Europe: Integrated Systems to assess Ecological Status and Recovery Funded under FP7, Theme 6: Environment (including Climate Change) Contract No.:

A reminder: What WISER is about Progress with fieldwork Overview of assessment methods Database construction Cooperation with GIGs Dissemination Contents

A reminder: What WISER is about Progress with fieldwork Overview of assessment methods Database construction Cooperation with GIGs Dissemination Contents

Which indicators are best suited for the assessment of ecological status? Which are most reliable? Which are redundant? How can results of different organism groups best be compared, intercalibrated and combined into an integrated appraisal of ecological status? How do organism groups respond to recovery? How is assessment and restoration affected by global change? How can uncertainty be quantified and minimized? Specific aims of the project

1 Management, coordination and reporting 7 Dissemination 2.1 Data service 2.2 Review Rivers Lakes Coastal/trans Rivers 5.1 Effects of management and global change Lakes 5.2 Effects of management and global change Coastal/trans. 5.3 Effects of management and global change 6.1 Uncertainty 6.2 Combination of organism groups 6.3 Cross water categories comparison 6.4 Comparison of recovery processes

Data harmonization – use of many new data sources The five challenges and chances of WISER Field sampling: Agreement about common sampling design – comparison of BQEs and water categories Common sampling design for uncertainty estimation Contribution to remove WFD obstacles – immediate use of results Cooperation with GIGs – datasets, sampling, use of results

Data harmonization – use of many new data sources The five challenges and chances of WISER Field sampling: Agreement about common sampling design – comparison of BQEs and water categories Common sampling design for uncertainty estimation Contribution to remove WFD obstacles – immediate use of results Cooperation with GIGs – datasets, sampling, use of results

A reminder: What WISER is about Progress with fieldwork Overview of assessment methods Database construction Cooperation with GIGs Dissemination Contents

Lake sampling campaign 82600Number of lakes remaining Number of lakes sampled Numer of lakes BIASMAPP 18 lakes are sampled for all BQEs 90% of sampling will be finished in 2009 Sampling finished in September 2010

Lake 1 Station 1 (Deep point) Station 2 (Centre) Station 3 (Near outflow) Sampling scheme for phytoplankton Sub-sample 1 (expert # 1) Sub-sample 2 (expert # 1) Sub-sample 3 (expert # 2) Sample 1 Sample 2 Sub-sample 1 (expert # 1) Sub-sample 1 (expert # 2) Sub-sample 2 (expert # 2) Sub-sample 3 (expert # 1) Sample 1 Sample 2 Sub-sample 1 (expert # 2) Sub-sample 1 (expert # 1) Sub-sample 2 (expert # 1) Sub-sample 3 (expert # 2) Sample 1 Sample 2 Sub-sample 1 (expert # 1)

Coastal / transitional waters

Number of replicate samples (existing data not included) 2712 TW/CWVarna Bay TWLesina Lagoon 1812CWBalearic Islands TWMondego CWBasque Country 12CWHelsinki Bay 27CWOrwell & Stour 12CW Oslofjord/Skagerrak FIBIASMAPPLocation TW/CWTotal in progress to be started Sampling finished in February 2010

A reminder: What WISER is about Progress with fieldwork Overview of assessment methods Database construction Cooperation with GIGs Dissemination Contents

Questionnaire on biological assessment methods - joint activity of IC Steering Group and WISER (Part of the “Guidance on the Intercalibration Process ”) About 30 minutes to 1 hour work to complete it Overview of assessment methods From today on available on Please return by 1/12/09  online database

A reminder: What WISER is about Progress with fieldwork Overview of assessment methods Database construction Cooperation with GIGs Dissemination Contents

Data bases available

Data flow WP 3.1 WP 3.2 WP 3.3 WP L- C Partners' datasets 53-LR-C 78-L- NC WP 5.1 WP 4.1 WP 4.2 WP 4.3 WP 4.4 Workpackage datasets Central database Meta- database Metadata for each dataset WP 5.1 WP 5.2 WP 5.3 WP 6.1 WP 6.2 WP 6.3 WP 6.4 New data

Status of database development TW CW/TW Lakes DB structureInserting dataFinal check (GIG database)

A reminder: What WISER is about Progress with fieldwork Overview of assessment methods Database construction Cooperation with GIGs Dissemination Contents

Questionnaire (“GIG wish list”) Lakes - Returned by the lake GIGs before the project start - Commented by the WISER consortium in May 2009 Coastal/transitional waters - Circulated by the WISER consortium in May Up to now returned by one GIG Presence on meetings WISER was present on all GIG meetings since March 2009 Contacts with GIGs

Data use for mutual benefits Lakes Large overlap of WISER and GIG databasesTWFish Large overlap of WISER and GIG databasesCW/TWInvertebrates Activities planned for last quarter 2009CW/TWMakroalgae/Ang. Activities planned for last quarter 2009CW/TWPhytoplankton WISER and GIGs use identical databaseLakesFish WISER use of intercalibration databaseLakesInvertebrates Mismatch between WISER and GIG data acquisition LakesMakrophytes WISER/GIG data acquisition from countriesLakesPhytoplankton Coastal / transitional waters

Intercalibration: Decision of IC option and common metrics by April 2010 WISER: Most assessment methods to be developed by February 2012 Solution: All WISER workpackages will suggest common metrics (or other suited methods) by spring 2010, based on: -Expert knowledge, reviews -Initial evaluation of field data -Initial evaluation of existing data WISER will then continue to further evaluate and refine these metrics Mismatch of intercalibration and WISER schedules

Guidance paper on how to develop assessment methods to be agreed within the WISER consortium by January 2010 Mismatch of intercalibration and WISER schedules

A reminder: What WISER is about Progress with fieldwork Overview of assessment methods Database construction Cooperation with GIGs Dissemination Contents

Website ( Fact sheets sampling sites Dissemination materials Questionnaire on assessment methods Deliverables (soon to come)

Access will be granted to end-users and GIG convenors Intranet

82 end users have been identified and invited - Rivers: 7 - Lakes: 34 - Coastal/transitional waters: 41 Questionnaire was sent in early September End-users will review deliverables End-users have been / will be invited to workshops End-users will be invited to the mid-term conference End users…

Dissemination materials …more to come…

Water Bodies in Europe: Integrated Systems to assess Ecological Status and Recovery Funded under FP7, Theme 6: Environment (including Climate Change) Contract No.: