GIN with Literal AoRs for SIP in SSPs (GLASS) draft-kaplan-martini-glass-00 Hadriel Kaplan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SIP Session-ID draft-kaplan-sip-session-id-02 Hadriel Kaplan.
Advertisements

MARTINI WG Interim draft-ietf-martini-reqs-04 John Elwell Hadriel Kaplan (editors)
MARTINI WG Interim draft-kaplan-martini-with-olive-00 Hadriel Kaplan.
SIP Interconnect Guidelines draft-hancock-sip-interconnect-guidelines-02 David Hancock, Daryl Malas.
DTMF-Relay Info-Package draft-kaplan-dispatch-info-dtmf-package-00 Hadriel Kaplan.
A straw-man proposal for a media-based traceroute function for SIP draft-kaplan-straw-sip-traceroute-00 Hadriel Kaplan.
Sip Traversal Required for Applications to Work (STRAW) WG Proposal straw-man: Hadriel Kaplan.
1 5 th SDO Emergency Services Workshop October 2008 “sos” URI parameter for marking emergency requests Milan Patel 5 th SDO Emergency Services Workshop.
SIP Working Group Stuff Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft.
Identifying intra-realm calls with explicit addressing realm identifier attribute François AUDET SIPPING WG Meeting IETF-57.
9,825,461,087,64 10,91 6,00 0,00 8,00 SIP Identity Usage in Enterprise Scenarios IETF #64 Vancouver, 11/2005 draft-fries-sipping-identity-enterprise-scenario-01.txt.
GRUU Jonathan Rosenberg Cisco Systems. sip and sips General problem –What should gruu say about relationship of sips to gruu? Specific questions –If the.
December 2007IETF 70 - SIPPING1 SIP URI Service Discovery using DNS-SD draft-lee-sip-dns-sd-uri-02 Presented by Henning Schulzrinne Jae Woo Lee & Henning.
Identity in SIP (and in-band) STIR BoF Berlin, DE 7/30/2013.
C1 - UNCLASSIFIED V1.0 R&D 1Vodafone Group PLC27-28 July 2010 Challenges related to SIP session peering - an operator perspective Nick Russell Vodafone.
1 SIP WG meeting 73rd IETF - Minneapolis, MN, USA November, 2008 Return Routability Check draft-kuthan-sip-derive-00 Jiri
Request History – Solution Mary Barnes SIP WG Meeting IETF-57 draft-ietf-sip-history-info-00.txt.
Concerns about designating the MAG as a Default Router James Kempf NETLMM Interim Sept. 27, 2006.
Integrating Live Plant Images with Other Types of Biodiversity Records Steve Baskauf Vanderbilt Dept. of Biological Sciences
1January 2006Richard Stastny Developments around Infrastucture ENUM and their relevance on NGNs Workshop on NGN Interconnection and Numbering TRIS – TISPAN.
Author(s) Politehnica University of Bucharest Automatic Control and Computers Faculty Computer Science Department Implementation of GRUU in SIP Vladut-Stefan.
Discovery issues in atoca Brian Rosen. We need to handle several cases Some alerts are broadcast via some access network specific mechanism (multicast,
IETF 77 MARTINI WG draft-ietf-martini-reqs-02 John Elwell Hadriel Kaplan (editors)
November 2005IETF64 - ECRIT1 Emergency Service Identifiers draft-ietf-sipping-sos-01 draft-schulzrinne-sipping-service-01 Henning Schulzrinne Columbia.
PSAP Callback draft-ietf-ecrit-psap-callback Phone BCP Status Usage Scenarios.
4395bis irireg Tony Hansen, Larry Masinter, Ted Hardie IETF 82, Nov 16, 2011.
Draft-elwell-sipping- redirection-reason-00 Author: John Elwell
SIP Interconnect Guidelines draft-hancock-sip-interconnect-guidelines-01 David Hancock, Daryl Malas.
SIP INFO Event Framework (draft-kaplan-sip-info-events-00) Hadriel Kaplan Christer Holmberg 70th IETF, Vancouver, Canada.
Patrik Fältström. ITU Tutorial Workshop on ENUM. Feb 8, 2002, Geneva Explanation of ENUM (RFC 2916) Patrik Fältström Area Director, Applications Area,
Service Identification Jonathan Rosenberg Cisco. Examples Contrived chess example PoC Game that uses voice for comments vs. telephony with IMs –Both use.
STIR In-Band Signature Transport draft-kaplan-stir-ikes-out-00 Hadriel Kaplan.
Caller Prefs and Friends Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft.
SER Module Speaker: Chin-Chang Chang Date:
1/7 Clarification of Privacy Mechanism for SIP draft-munakata-sipping-privacy-clarified-00 Mayumi Munakata (NTT) Shida Schubert (NTT) IETF67 SIPPING 1.
VERMOUTH for MARTINI SIP MARTINI Variant of 'Event-package for Registrations‘ for Managed Open-ended Username Target Handling (VERMOUTH) draft-kaplan-martini-vermouth-00.
SIP PUBLISH Method Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft.
- 1 -P. Kyzivatdraft-sipping-gruu-reg-event-00 Reg Event Package Extensions draft-sipping-gruu-reg-event-00 IETF64 Nov-2005.
Open-plan Local-number Identifier Values for Enterprises (OLIVE) draft-kaplan-martini-with-olive-02 Hadriel Kaplan.
March 20, 2007BLISS BOF IETF-681 Requirements and Implementation Options for the Multiple Line Appearance Feature using the Session Initiation Protocol.
GRUU Jonathan Rosenberg Cisco Systems. Changes in -06 Editorial as a result of RFC-ED early copy experiment.
Call Completion using BFCP draft-roach-sipping-callcomp-bfcp IETF 67 – San Diego November 7, 2006.
IETF70, Vancouver, December 2007draft-wing-sip-identity-media-011 SIP Identity using Media Path draft-wing-sip-identity-media-01 Dan Wing,
Caller Preferences Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft.
History-Info header and Support of target-uri Solution Requirements Mary Barnes Francois Audet SIPCORE.
SIPPING Drafts Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft. Conferencing Package Issues Only one – scope Depends on broader work in conferencing May include –Participant.
GRUU Jonathan Rosenberg Cisco Systems. Main Changes Up front discussion of URI properties Opaque URI parameter for constructing GRUU Procedure for EP.
Andrew Allen ROUTING OUT OF DIALOG REQUESTS draft-allen-dispatch-routing-out-of-dialog-request-01 Dispatch IETF 92 March 23 rd 2015.
Session-Independent Policies draft-ietf-sipping-session-indep-policy-00 Volker Hilt Gonzalo Camarillo
Globally Identifiable Number (GIN) Registration Adam Roach draft-martini-roach-gin-01 IETF 77 – Anaheim, CA, USA March 22, 2010.
We made domain name registration easy. Search for your perfect domain name then register it instantly - it really is that simple! Register a domain now.
Location Routing Function Requirements Hadriel Kaplan
SDP draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-new-21.txt Colin Perkins.
1 Session Recording Protocol Requirements and Charter IETF 76, Hiroshima Andy Hutton and Leon Portman on behalf of the team Draft authors: Kenneth Rehor,
kitchen design ideas.
THIS IS THE WAY ENUM Variants Jim McEachern
sip-identity-04 Added new response codes for various conditions
Jonathan Rosenberg dynamicsoft
Request History Capability – Requirements & Solution
Phone numbers and dial strings
Examining Session Policy Topologies
Request-URI Param Delivery
Requirements and Implementation Options for the Multiple Line Appearance Feature using the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) draft-johnston-bliss-mla-req-00.
Alfredo Terzoli / Mosioua Tsietsi
SIP URI Service Discovery using DNS-SD draft-lee-sip-dns-sd-uri-02
Welcome hp printer support contact phone number
Introduction to Functions
IETF 101 (London) STIR WG Mar2018
IETF 55 (November 2002, Atlanta)
BINDing URIs to SIP AORs
Presentation transcript:

GIN with Literal AoRs for SIP in SSPs (GLASS) draft-kaplan-martini-glass-00 Hadriel Kaplan

The Problem Draft-gin handles E.164 How do we handle alpha-numeric usernames?

The Solution “Bulk” REGISTER any provisioned AoR, as if the PBX had separately Registered for each one Contact-routing a la RFC3261 still works –If it would have worked for explicit REGISTERs The Contact-URI “expansion” is the provisioned AoR user portion –The same that would be provisioned for a separate REGISTER

Example PBX does a draft-gin REGISTER SSP has provisioning for INVITE to follows rfc3261 OriginatorSSPPBX INVITE INVITE REGISTER sip:ssp.com To: Contact:

Perceived Problems don’t apply Draft-gin really did Register globally unique AoRs –E.g., So now we’re bulk Registering other globally unique AoRs, scoped to the Registered domain (ssp.com) –Just like RFC 3261 would do for any AoR

What about Question: –How does the PBX know the call was for and not for (if both are handled) Answer: it won’t –It wouldn’t have in rfc3261 either, if one REGISTER for did more –Really the call is being re-targeted to – and we have hist-info for figuring out the original target, right?

Other solutions for 1.The PBX can REGISTER to ssp.co.ca –By definition it knows about ssp.co.ca, so it can REGISTER to ssp.co.ca separately 2.Or we can define a new URI user parameter named “user-context”: –Why is this legit? Same thing as phone- context really, just for any alphanumeric

Open Issues Can this just be informational vs. standards-track?