FDA PAT Sub-Committee of Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Sciences June 12-13, 2002; Gaithersburg, MD Regulatory Challenges: Post-Approval PAT Applications.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Arthur Fabian, PhD February 7, 2007 FDA Public Meeting Rockville MD.
Advertisements

1 Implementation of Quality by Design (QbD): Status, Challenges and Next Steps Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS,
VALIDATION What is the new guidance?. What is a Compliance Policy Guide? Explain FDA policy on regulatory issues CGMP regulations and application commitments.
Batch Reworking and Reprocessing
Integrating CMC Review & Inspection Industry Recommendations Joe Anisko April 24, 2003.
Rapid Microbiology Methods A Regulatory Viewpoint Bryan S. Riley, Ph.D. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Office.
Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) and Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs): The Big Picture of a Long-term Commitment Elizabeth Pollina Cormier,
Transition to Inspections: USP, 21 CFR 212, And Beyond? Panel Discussion Ravi S. Harapanhalli, Ph.D Louis Marzella, MD Ravindra Kasliwal, Ph.D Wendy Sanhai,
Implementation of Quality-by-Design: ONDQA Initiatives Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science October 5, 2006 Chi-wan Chen, Ph.D. Deputy Director.
Pharmaceutical Product Quality Assurance Through CMC Drug Development Process Presented by Darlene Rosario (Aradigm) 21 October 2003 Meeting of the Advisory.
FDA’s Pharmaceutical Inspectorate Robert Coleman National Expert Drug Investigator Food and Drug Administration.
Manufacturing Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science July 20-21, 2004 Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical.
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLS ACPS March 12-13, 2003 Stephen K. Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team Leader CDER/Office of New Drug Chemistry Co-Chair, Comparability.
Ray Scherzer FDA ACPS October 26, 2005 Breaking with Tradition: The Manufacturing Challenges Ahead!
Assessing Quality-by-Design A CMC Review Perspective
PAT Validation Working Group Process and Analytical Validation Working Group Arthur H. Kibbe, Ph.D. Chair June 13, 2002.
ONDQA Perspective on Post Approval Changes Eric P. Duffy, PhD Director, Division of Post-Market Evaluation, ONDQA, CDER, FDA Public Meeting: Supplements.
1 ACPS November 15, Update Nancy B. Sager, Associate Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science Center for Drug Evaluation & Research Food and.
1 Revisions to 21 CFR Supplements and Other Changes to an Approved Application PhRMA Perspective FDA Public Meeting – 7 Feb 2007.
Learnings from Pre-approval Joint Inspection of a GSK QbD Product with US-FDA & EMA and the application of Continuous Verification 17 May 2011, Beijing,
Xcellerex … speeding medicines to people … PAT for Biologics Ensuring Quality of Biologically Produced Drugs FDA Advisory Committee on Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Quality By Design - A Generic Industry Perspective
Achieving and Demonstrating “Quality-by-Design” with Respect to Drug Release/dissolution Performance for Conventional or Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage.
Risk-Based CMC Review Paradigm
Nonclinical Studies Subcommittee Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science CMC Issues for Screening INDs Eric B. Sheinin, Ph.D. Acting Deputy Director.
ACPS Advisory Committee Meeting October , 2002 ACPS Advisory Committee Meeting October , 2002 Scientific Considerations of Polymorphism in.
Quality by Design Application of Pharmaceutical QbD for Enhancement of the Solubility and Dissolution of a Class II BCS Drug using Polymeric Surfactants.
Establishing Drug release/Dissolution Specifications – QBD Approach Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS, CDER Advisory.
D. Christopher Watts, Ph.D. Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER, FDA Science Seminar Series for the Office of Commissioner April 9, 2004 Process Analytical.
1 Supplements and Other Changes to an Approved Application By: Richard J. Stec Jr., Ph.D. February 7, 2007.
Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDER, FDA ACPS Subcommittee on Manufacturing Science: Identification and Prioritization.
PRODUCT TRANSFER.
ACPS Manufacturing Subcommittee Report October 19, 2004 Judy P. Boehlert, Ph.D. Chair.
Applications of Analytical Chemistry in Pharmaceuticals Corey M. Chong 10Mar10.
Risk Based CMC Review Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science October 22, 2003 Vilayat A. Sayeed, Ph.D. OGD, FDA.
FDA Regulation of Drug Quality: New Challenges Janet Woodcock, M.D. Director, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration April.
1 PAT and Biological Products Tom Layloff FDA-SGE Management Sciences for Health The views expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily.
FDA’s Perspective on the “Pharmaceutical cGMPs for the 21st Century” Initiative David J. Horowitz, Esq. Director, CDER/FDA, Office of Compliance Advisory.
1-7.The ICH Q8 “Minimal Approach” to Pharmaceutical Development
Bioequivalence Studies and Other Recommendations for Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products: Work of the ITFG/IPAC-RS Collaboration Presented by Cynthia.
FDA’s Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science The Subcommittee on Process Analytical Technologies (PAT): Opening Remarks Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D.
Proposal for End-of-Phase 2A (EOP2A) Meetings Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Sciences Clinical Pharmacology Subcommittee November 17-18, 2003 Lawrence.
Quality by Design & Question-Based Review: Observations by the Generic Pharmaceutical Industry Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science October 5,
Overview of FDA's Regulatory Framework for PET Drugs
Risk-Based CMC Review - OGD Perspective Gary J. Buehler, R.Ph. Director Office of Generic Drugs July 21, 2004 Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science.
Molecule-to-Market-Place Quality
GMP issues for Quality Assessment of Dossiers Rutendo Kuwana Technical Officer Prequalification of Medicines Program WHO.
COMPARABILITY PROTOCOLUPDATE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE Manufacturing Subcommittee July 20-21, 2004 Stephen Moore, Ph.D. Chemistry Team.
Some Future Developments Brian Carlin, Ph.D FMC Chris Moreton, Ph.D FinnBrit Consulting IPEC-Americas FDA Seminar, October 21,
FDA PROCESS ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGY SUB COMMITTEE MEETING 25 TH FEBRUARY 2002 PERSPECTIVE ON PROCESS AND ANALYTICAL VALIDATION Robert S Chisholm.
Blend Uniformity: Update Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D.. Background Issue: Assuring and documenting “adequacy of mixing” operations –PQRI’s Proposal Stratified.
Excipient Variability Sources, Importance and Potential Impact Chris Moreton, Ph.D Past Chair IPEC-Americas Partner – FinnBrit Consulting
Progress in FDA’s Drug Product Quality Initiative Janet Woodcock, M.D. November 13, 2003.
General Aspects of Quality assessment of multisource interchangeable medicines Rutendo Kuwana Technical Officer, WHO, Geneva Training workshop: Assessment.
Process Understanding and PAT
1 PAT Subcommittee Closing Report 12 March 2003 Tom Layloff Acting Chair.
Process Analytical Technologies (PATs), Applications and Benefits Working Group.
Second Meeting of the FDA/ACPS Process Analytical Technology: Closing Remarks Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy Director Office of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
FDA’s Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science The Subcommittee on Process Analytical Technologies (PAT): Closing Remarks Ajaz S. Hussain, Ph.D. Deputy.
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA Site Visit Introduction Kathryn M. Carbone, M.D. Associate Director for Research.
Examining Drug Quality Regulation Douglas C. Throckmorton, MD Deputy Director Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Public Meeting on 21 CFR February,
Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products (OINDP) Subcommittee Report to the Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Sciences Rockville, Maryland November 15,
开发报批美国 FDA 的仿制药 与相关问题探讨 上海复星普适医药科技有限公司何平. 内容提要 开发仿制药的重要性和机遇 开发仿制药的重要性和机遇 开发仿制药的挑战 开发仿制药的挑战 申报仿制药的分类 申报仿制药的分类 仿制药研发团队 仿制药研发团队 仿制药的研发过程 仿制药的研发过程 QbD 在制剂开发中怎么体现.
Product & Process Working Group February 26, 2002.
David G. Donne, Ph.D. and Thomas J. DiFeo, Ph.D.
© G.K.Raju, Ph.D. Manufacturing Science Sept 17th 2003 QUALITY BY DESIGN: The Means To Fundamental Manufacturing Science G.K.Raju, Ph.D.
Integration of Excipients into the Design of Experiments for Pharmaceutical Product and Design Space Development Chris Moreton, Ph.D. FinnBrit Consulting.
PROCESS ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGY – A REVIEW By Mr. Akash Mali DEPARTMENT OF PHARMACEUTICS, G.I.P.E.R., LIMB, SATARA. 1.
Pharmaceutical Quality Control & current Good Manufacturing Practice
Implementation of Quality by Design (QbD): Status, Challenges and Next Steps Moheb M. Nasr, Ph.D. Office of New Drug Quality Assessment (ONDQA), OPS, CDER.
Presentation transcript:

FDA PAT Sub-Committee of Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Sciences June 12-13, 2002; Gaithersburg, MD Regulatory Challenges: Post-Approval PAT Applications Dhiren N. Shah, Ph.D. Director, DRA-CMC Aventis Pharmaceuticals

FDA Advisory Committee Meeting; Dhiren N. Shah, Ph.D., PA-PAT Applications; June 12-13, Outline  Need for post-approval (PA) PAT Applications  Challenges in PA-PAT Applications  PA- PAT Applications to –  APIs  Drug Products  Guidance Development Consideration–  CMC Review  Type and amount of CMC information required  Regulatory submission type  Compliance Audit  Summary & Conclusions

FDA Advisory Committee Meeting; Dhiren N. Shah, Ph.D., PA-PAT Applications; June 12-13, Need for PA-PAT Applications  Improve quality of existing products  Improve analytical testing  Increase manufacturing efficiency  Reduce/eliminate OOSs, avoid potential recalls, enhance compliance  Potential long-term cost-savings

FDA Advisory Committee Meeting; Dhiren N. Shah, Ph.D., PA-PAT Applications; June 12-13, Challenges in PA-PAT Applications Two kinds of post-approval situations 1. Products without PAT applications in the original submission  Identify process critical control parameters (PCCP)  Replacement or adjustments of in-process controls and possibly final specifications  Correlation between PAT-based controls and approved conventional controls  Review and compliance processes  OOSs – How to handle?  Difficult to apply for this type of product

FDA Advisory Committee Meeting; Dhiren N. Shah, Ph.D., PA-PAT Applications; June 12-13, Challenges in PA-PAT Applications Two kinds of post-approval situations 2. Products with PAT-based controls in the original submission  Changes to approved PAT-based controls  Addition of new PAT-based controls  Deletion of a specification to eliminate non- value-added controls  Review and Compliance processes  OOSs – How to handle?  Much easier to further apply PAT

FDA Advisory Committee Meeting; Dhiren N. Shah, Ph.D., PA-PAT Applications; June 12-13, PA-PAT Applications to APIs  No change to DS synthetic pathway  In-process controls such as –  Impurity levels  Residual solvents (including moisture)  Completion of reaction  Isolation/purification  Initiation and completion of crystallization  Correlation between the conventional IPCs and PAT-based IPCs  Final API specifications?  Parametric release?

FDA Advisory Committee Meeting; Dhiren N. Shah, Ph.D., PA-PAT Applications; June 12-13, PA-PAT Applications to DPs  No changes to drug product  Drug product type dependent – SODF (IR and MR), Sterile, Semi-solids, etc.  Raw materials controls – ID, assay, uniformity, physical properties  In-process controls such as –  Granulation end-point  Moisture content in granulation  Blend uniformity (direct compression and blending of running powders to wet granulation)  Content uniformity  Viscosity measurements  Co-relation between conventional IPCs and PAT-based IPCs  Parametric release?

FDA Advisory Committee Meeting; Dhiren N. Shah, Ph.D., PA-PAT Applications; June 12-13, Guidance Development for PA-PAT-based Controls Guidance Development for PA-PAT-based Controls CMC Review  Equivalence to conventional controls  Enhanced assurance that the product will meet SIPPQ – How to show?  Scientific basis for PAT controls  Type/amount of CMC information requirement –  Number/scale of batches requirements  Statistical support  Stability requirements?  Post-approval commitments?  Regulatory submission route –  AR, CBE-0, CBE-30, PAS?

FDA Advisory Committee Meeting; Dhiren N. Shah, Ph.D., PA-PAT Applications; June 12-13, Guidance Development for PA-PAT-based Controls Guidance Development for PA-PAT-based Controls Compliance Audit  PA PAT-based changes to controls –  Evaluate adequacy  Validation (IQ, OQ, PQ)  Any link with Part 11?  Investigator training  OOSs?

FDA Advisory Committee Meeting; Dhiren N. Shah, Ph.D., PA-PAT Applications; June 12-13, Summary & Conclusions  PA-PAT Applications –  Easier for original applications with PAT  Difficult for original applications with conventional controls  Proof of equivalence/enhancements  Validation  How to deal with OOSs?  Role of Compliance  Incentive for the Industry – Cost/Benefit  Training of Industry as well as FDA staff  Welcome FDA’s this important initiative