Inverse Barometer correction comparison for Envisat mission between Corrections based on JRA-55 and ERA-Interim atmospheric reanalyses The JRA-55 correction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Domains of Controlllllllllll. Signal processing in aquatic ecosystems.
Advertisements

26/11/2012 – Observatoire de Paris Analysis of wind speed evolution over ocean derived from altimeter missions and models M. Ablain (CLS)
04/22/02EGS G STABILITY OF GLOBAL GEODETIC RESULTS Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
Clima en España: Pasado, presente y futuro Madrid, Spain, 11 – 13 February 1 IMEDEA (UIB - CSIC), Mallorca, SPAIN. 2 National Oceanography Centre, Southampton,
- 1- Quality of real time altimeter products OSTST, Hobart, March 2007 Quality of real time altimeter products impact of the delay G.Larnicol, G. Dibarboure,
Impacts of Climate Change on Physical Systems PPT
Principles of Sea Level Measurement Long-term tide gauge records  What is a tide station?  How is sea level measured relative to the land?  What types.
We have tested the accuracy of borehole temperature profiles in tracking surface air temperatures on short timescales (< 20 y) by direct comparison of.
Monitoring the Global Sea Level Rise Budget with Jason, Argo and GRACE Observations Eric Leuliette and Laury Miller NOAA/Laboratory for Satellite Altimetry.
ICESat TM 04/21/20031 MIT Activities Two main areas of activity: –Validation of atmospheric delays being computed for ICESat –Assessment of statistics.
Calibration in the MBW of simulated GOCE gradients aided by ground data M. Veicherts, C. C. Tscherning, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen,
OSTST Hobart 2007 – SLA consistency between Jason-1 and TOPEX data SLA consistency between Jason-1 and TOPEX/Poseidon data M.Ablain, S.Philipps,
1 Assessment of Geoid Models off Western Australia Using In-Situ Measurements X. Deng School of Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Australia R.
CCI CCMUG meeting | 2-4th June 2014, Exeter, UK ESA’s Sea Level Climate Change Initiative M Ablain 1, G. Larnicol 1, A.Cazenave 2, B. Meyssygnac 2, J.Legeais.
Changes in Floods and Droughts in an Elevated CO 2 Climate Anthony M. DeAngelis Dr. Anthony J. Broccoli.
Evaluation and applications of a new satellite-based surface solar radiation data set for climate analysis Jörg Trentmann1, Richard Müller1, Christine.
Mediterranean Sea Level Variability Changes and Projections at High Frequencies (1-100 Days) Ivica Vilibic, Jadranka Sepic Institut of Oceanography and.
Is sea level rise larger near the coast? Remko Scharroo Altimetrics LLC, Cornish, New Hampshire Eric Leuliette and Laury Miller NOAA / Laboratory for Satellite.
2007 OSTST meeting Y. Faugere (CLS) J. Dorandeu (CLS) F. Lefevre (CLS) Long period errors observed at Envisat crossovers and possible impact of tides.
Meeting of the CCl/OPACE2 Task Team on National Climate Monitoring Products How might NCMPs contribute in future IPCC reports ? Fatima Driouech TT on national.
OSTST Hobart 2007 – Performance assessment Jason-1 data M.Ablain, S.Philipps, J.Dorandeu, - CLS N.Picot - CNES Jason-1 GDR data Performance assessment.
Objective Data  The outlined square marks the area of the study arranged in most cases in a coarse 24X24 grid.  Data from the NASA Langley Research Center.
Page 1 HEND science after 9 years in space. page 2 HEND/2001 Mars Odyssey HEND ( High Energy Neutron Detector ) was developed in Space Research Institute.
Relationship between interannual variations in the Length of Day (LOD) and ENSO C. Endler, P. Névir, G.C. Leckebusch, U. Ulbrich and E. Lehmann Contact:
Investigation on the possibilities of trend detection of spectral irradiance Merle Glandorf and Gunther Seckmeyer Institute of Meteorology and Climatology.
“Very high resolution global ocean and Arctic ocean-ice models being developed for climate study” by Albert Semtner Extremely high resolution is required.
WP3.10 Cross-assessment of CCI-ECVs over the Mediterranean domain.
A Preliminary Evaluation of the Global Water and Energy Budgets in an Upcoming NASA Reanalysis Junye Chen (1,2) and Michael G. Bosilovich (2) 1 ESSIC,
Improved Satellite Altimeter data dedicated to coastal areas :
Jason-2 exploitation review- May 12-14, Before going to the salient scientific results, Let’s go to the backstage…
Ozone time series and trends Various groups compute trends in different ways. One goal of the workshop is to be able to compare time series and trends.
Jason-1/Envisat cross-calibration Y. Faugere (CLS) J. Dorandeu (CLS) N. Picot (CNES) P. Femenias (ESA) Jason-1 / Envisat Cross-calibration.
Local and global calibration/validation P. Bonnefond, S. Desai, B. Haines, S. Nerem and N. Picot Jason-1 - T/P Sea Surface Height Formation Flying Phase.
Ocean Surface heat fluxes
2600 High Latitude Issues Data Editing AlgorithmInterestApplicability E1E2ENTPJ1J2G1C2 MSS based editingImproved data editingXXXxxxxx Fine tuned.
Climate extremes and changes in precipitation and wind patterns ( ) in the vicinities of Montevideo, Uruguay V Pshennikov, M Bidegain, F Blixen,
The impact of solar variability and Quasibiennial Oscillation on climate simulations Fabrizio Sassi (ESSL/CGD) with: Dan Marsh and Rolando Garcia (ESSL/ACD),
A. Bonaduce, N. Pinardi Mediterranean Sea level reconstruction during the last century A. Bonaduce (1), N. Pinardi (2) (1) Centro Euro-Mediterraneo per.
Orbit comparison for Jason-2 mission between GFZ and CNES (POE-D) The GFZ orbit is referred to as GFZ in the following study The CNES orbit is referred.
A. Bonaduce, N. Pinardi Mediterranean Sea level recostruction during the last century A. Bonaduce (1), N. Pinardi (2) (1) Centro Euro-Mediterraneo per.
Winter Outlook for the Pacific Northwest: Winter 06/07 14 November 2006 Kirby Cook. NOAA/National Weather Service Acknowledgement: Climate Prediction Center.
Orbit comparison for ERS-2 mission between GFZ and REAPER The GFZ orbit is referred to as GFZ in the following study The REAPER orbit is referred to as.
UBC/UW 2011 Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium Friday, September 30, 2011 DIAGNOSIS OF CHANGING COOL SEASON PRECIPITATION STATISTICS IN THE WESTERN.
Wet tropospheric correction comparison for Jason-1 mission between GPD V2.0 (FCUP) and GPD V1.1 corrections The GPD V2.0 correction is referred to as GPD_V2.0.
The Derivation of Snow-Cover "Normals" Over the Canadian Prairies from Passive Microwave Satellite Imagery Joseph M. Piwowar Laura E. Chasmer Waterloo.
Sea Level_cci AGU 2014 J Benveniste 1, G Gilles 2, A Cazenave 3,4, M Ablain 2, J F Legeais 2, Y Faugère 2, B Lucas 5, S Dinardo 6, J A Johannessen 7, D.
The impact of lower boundary forcings (sea surface temperature) on inter-annual variability of climate K.-T. Cheng and R.-Y. Tzeng Dept. of Atmos. Sci.
Validation strategy MARCDAT-III meeting - Frascati, Italy - May 2011 The validation phase to compare all the algorithms together and to select the best.
Fig Wilkins Ice Shelf breakup events of (a) MODIS band 1 image 10 days after the end of the first event; (b) Envisat ASARimage during the second.
The validation and user assessment of the SL-CCI products has been performed through: - Internal consistency check and comparison with in-situ data. -
ESA Climate Change Initiative Sea-level-CCI project A.Cazenave (Science Leader), G.Larnicol /Y.Faugere(Project Leader), M.Ablain (EO) MARCDAT-III meeting.
Dry Troposphere Correction comparison for Jason-2 mission between the JRA55-based and the ERA-Interim-based corrections The JRA55-based correction is referred.
Wet tropospheric correction comparison GPD V2.0 (FCUP) and GPD V1.1 corrections for ERS-1, ERS-2, Envisat, Jason-1, Jason- 2, TOPEX/Poseidon Synthesis.
Confidence envelop of the Global MSL time- series deduced from Jason-1 and Jason-2 altimetric missions. M. Ablain, L. Zawadzki (CLS), A. Cazenave, B. Meyssignac.
North Atlantic Oscillation and its Influence on Ozone in London
L. Carrère, Y. Faugère, E. Bronner, J. Benveniste
Atmospheric pressure (Gas pressure)
Climate Change Initiative
Orbit comparison for ERS-1 mission between GFZ and REAPER
CNU-KOPRI-KMA activities for winter climate prediction
Wet tropospheric correction comparison for Jason-2 mission between
Question 1 Given that the globe is warming, why does the DJF outlook favor below-average temperatures in the southeastern U. S.? Climate variability on.
Climate Change Initiative
Y. Xue1, C. Wen1, X. Yang2 , D. Behringer1, A. Kumar1,
SSH CCI-product assessment
WP3.10 : Cross-assessment of CCI-ECVs over the Mediterranean domain
Atlantic Ocean Forcing of North American and European Summer Climate
WP3.10 : Cross-assessment of CCI-ECVs over the Mediterranean domain
Presentation transcript:

Inverse Barometer correction comparison for Envisat mission between Corrections based on JRA-55 and ERA-Interim atmospheric reanalyses The JRA-55 correction is referred to as JRA55 in the following study The ERA-Interim correction is referred to as ERA Lionel Zawadzki, Michael Ablain (CLS)

Introduction: We will observe and analyse the impact of the Inverse Barometer correction computed from the JRA- 55 atmospheric reanalysis for climate applications on the Envisat period We will compare this correction with the Inverse Barometer correction computed from the ERA-Interim atmospheric reanalysis. It will be referred to as “ERA”. In order to determine the impact of this alternative Inverse Barometer correction in terms of climate applications and temporal scales, we will try in this study to indicate for each impact detected if it’s a positive (+) or a negative (-) impact : Inverse Barometer correction comparison for Envisat mission No impact detected Low impact Significant impact

Envisat Climate Applications Temporal Scales Round Robin Data Package (RRDP) JRA-55 Versus ERA Global Mean Sea Level Long-term evolution (trend) Inter annual signals (> 1 year) Annual and semi-annual Signals Regional Mean Sea Level Long-term evolution (trend) Annual and semi-annual Signals Mesoscale Signals < 2 months Global Mean Sea Level No impact detected on Global Mean Sea Level trend  0.03mm/yr on the MSL trend difference is not significant Temporal evolution of SLA mean calculated globally.

Envisat Climate Applications Temporal Scales Round Robin Data Package (RRDP) JRA-55 Versus ERA Global Mean Sea Level Long-term evolution (trend) Inter annual signals (> 1 year) Annual and semi-annual Signals Regional Mean Sea Level Long-term evolution (trend) Annual and semi-annual Signals Mesoscale Signals < 2 months Global Mean Sea Level Low impact detected on Inter annual Signals  The figure below shows the mean difference between the two corrections calculated globally by cycle.

Envisat Climate Applications Temporal Scales Round Robin Data Package (RRDP) JRA-55 Versus ERA Global Mean Sea Level Long-term evolution (trend) Inter annual signals (> 1 year) Annual and semi-annual Signals Regional Mean Sea Level Long-term evolution (trend) Annual and semi-annual Signals Mesoscale Signals < 2 months Global Mean Sea Level Low impact detected on Annual and Semi-annual Signals

Envisat Climate Applications Temporal Scales Round Robin Data Package (RRDP) JRA-55 Versus ERA Global Mean Sea Level Long-term evolution (trend) Inter annual signals (> 1 year) Annual and semi-annual Signals Regional Mean Sea Level Long-term evolution (trend) Annual and semi-annual Signals Mesoscale Signals < 2 months - Low impact detected on a short temporal scale (signals < 2 months): Low impact detected on a short temporal scale (signals < 2 months):  Crossovers Variance Differences are generally positive (see figures on next slide) between 0 and +0.1 cm² : this means that the JRA-55 IB correction shows low degradation by comparison to the ERA-Interim correction.  The map of SSH crossovers Variance Differences shows that these degradations are mainly below -40° latitudes. Mesoscale

 Map of Variance differences of Sea Surface Height at crossovers between the JRA-55 and ERA corrections (over all the period): - Low degradation at high negative latitudes (~1cm²)  Temporal evolution of Variance differences of Sea Surface Height at crossovers between two IB corrections : - Low degradation (around 0.1cm²) over all the period

Envisat Climate Applications Temporal Scales Round Robin Data Package (RRDP) JRA-55 Versus ERA Global Mean Sea Level Long-term evolution (trend) Inter annual signals (> 1 year) Annual and semi-annual Signals Regional Mean Sea Level Long-term evolution (trend) Annual and semi-annual Signals Mesoscale Signals < 2 months Significant impact detected on Regional Mean Sea Level  We observe a significant impact (around +1 mm/yr) below -40° latitude and about -0.3mm/yr elsewhere Regional Mean Sea Level

 Map of Sea Level Anomaly differences between two JRA-55 corrections (over all the period)

Envisat Climate Applications Temporal Scales Round Robin Data Package (RRDP) JRA-55 Versus ERA Global Mean Sea Level Long-term evolution (trend) Inter annual signals (> 1 year) Annual and semi-annual Signals Regional Mean Sea Level Long-term evolution (trend) Annual and semi-annual Signals Mesoscale Signals < 2 months  Over 10° latitudes, amplitude differences of annual signal are positive around reach 2mm and negative around -1mm below.  At high latitudes, the corresponding phase shift reaches 10° (~about 10 days) Regional Mean Sea Level Significant impact detected on Annual and Semi-Annual Signals

Regional Mean Sea Level  Map of Sea Level Anomaly differences amplitude for annual signal  Map of Sea Level Anomaly differences amplitude for semi-annual signal SLA with JRA-55 amplitude – SLA with ERA amplitude : semi-annual signal SLA with JRA-55 amplitude – SLA with ERA amplitude : annual signal

Regional Mean Sea Level  Map of Sea Level Anomaly differences phase for annual signal.  Map of Sea Level Anomaly differences phase for semi-annual signal. To be noted a phase value equal to 30° corresponds to a period of one month SLA with JRA-55 phase – SLA with ERA phase : semi-annual signal SLA with JRA-55 phase – SLA with ERA phase: annual signal

 Map of Mean differences between JRA-55 and ERA (extension period) On this map we observe clearly differences near coast reaching 4cm.  Map of Standard deviation differences between JRA-55 and ERA (extension period) On this map we observe differences mainly near coasts reaching 3cm Regional statistics between corrections

To conclude: JRA-55 correction extension shows performances degraded by comparison to ERA-Interim. Main impact is on the long term evolution at regional scale and near coasts.  Performances at crossovers are close, however the analysis of MSL shows a low degradation over this period. Envisat Climate Applications Temporal Scales Round Robin Data Package (RRDP) JRA-55 Versus ERA Global Mean Sea Level Long-term evolution (trend) Inter annual signals (> 1 year) Annual and semi-annual Signals Regional Mean Sea Level Long-term evolution (trend) Annual and semi-annual Signals Mesoscale Signals < 2 months - Inverse Barometer correction comparison for Envisat mission