August 2012 Wholesale Market Operations Constraints Competitiveness Tests (CCT) – Annual CCT 2013 Study Result with New Approach Market Support and Analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update IDCWG October 12 th, 2011.
Advertisements

Modeling Tres-Amigas Update Modeling Work Group Meeting February 10, 2011 WECC Staff.
Ancillary Services and SCED Jeff Gilbertson Market Analyst Congestion Management Working Group 9/4/2013.
Overview of ERCOT Outage Coordination Woody Rickerson Director Grid Coordination January 2015.
Discussion: Use of RAPs in system operations Kris Dixit 1.
February 2012 CMWG Constraints Competitiveness Tests (CCT)
March 30, 2015 SCED Event Follow up: Proposed Improvements QMWG, May 08, 2015.
1 TSP Nodal Engagement Market Participant Call ERCOT August 04, 2010.
December 2, 2011 QMWG Summary of Potential Issues with NPRR385 Price Floor ERCOT.
Monthly TCR Calculation DRAFT 3 James J. Teixeira 05/11/02 Also review ERCOT Protocols Section 7 for more details and additional data.
Capacity Forecast Report Sean Chang Market Analysis and Design Suresh Pabbisetty CQF, ERP, CSQA Credit CWG/MCWG September 16, 2015 ERCOT Public.
Market Mitigation Concept Group Update Jim Galvin April 26, 2004.
1 WMS Report To TAC September In Brief Four Working Group Reports Four Working Group Reports One Task Force Report One Task Force Report Three.
CRR Auction Scope John Moseley. To outline aspects of the CRR market process to assure that these proposed CRR market protocols (as interpreted by ERCOT.
March 11, 2011 RPG Meeting Lower Rio Grande Valley (LRGV) Import.
Wholesale Market Subcommittee April 12, 2012 ERCOT Dynamic Ratings Application.
West to North CSC Location Scenario 3b WMS August 20, 2008.
1Texas Nodal Market Trials Update. 2Texas Nodal Full System Market and Reliability Test 24-Hour Test Observations Duration of Test for Week of 8/ Hour.
Kenan Ogelman TAC Chair Tab 8.2: 2013 Competitive Constraints Board of Directors Meeting ERCOT Public September 18, 2012.
April 28, 2008 Constraint Competitiveness Tests, an Overview Congestion Management Working Group.
East Texas Export Limit ERCOT Operations Planning ERCOT Market Presentation
September 2012 Wholesale Market Subcommittee Report to Technical Advisory Committee.
1 Market Trials Update NATF June 1, 2010.
CMWG Update to WMS Report of CMWG Meeting of M Wagner Edison Mission Marketing & Trading.
March 6, 2012 ERCOT Public ERCOT CRR Update Matt Mereness ERCOT Manager Day-Ahead Market and CRR Auction.
April 2, 2008 CRR Team Update PCRRs CRR Team UpdateApril 2, 2008 Table of contents 1.What is a PCRR? 2.Which NOIEs are eligible for PCRRs? 3.What.
Slack Bus Change and Impact to Market Market Analysis, ERCOT QMWG Sep. 4, 2015.
Option 2 Summary Wes Woitt CenterPoint Energy 2010 SSWG Chair.
CRR Issues Transparency provided by CRR Reports CRR EDS handbook Business process NPRR TPTF November 27, 2007.
CRR Model Building Process Bradley Bell CRR Engineer.
© Property of ERCOT /17/20041 RTCA, CAM, and SFT Presented by: John Adams November 17, 2004.
2016 Long-Term Load Forecast
ERCOT, Market Analysis 2013 Annual Constraint Competitiveness Test (CCT) Study Results – Update for 8/27/12 CMWG 8/27/2012 ERCOT Public.
Competitive Constraints/ Protocols 3.19 Presented to CMWG 10/14/2011 Steve Reedy, Manager, CRR.
DREAM November Meeting. Agenda Introduction and Expectations Path to becoming a Resource Node – ERCOT Registration process for non-modeled resources –
Congestion Management Working Group WMS update 11/7/2012.
ISO Proposed Flexible Capacity Requirements Stephen Keehn Senior Advisor California ISO CPUC Workshop January 26, 2012.
July 10, 2008 ROS Early Delivery Systems Status – R6.3 2 Hour Test John Dumas and Jeff Gilbertson.
2% Shift Factor rule and associated price discrepancies Kris Dixit 1.
Lance Cunningham, Ph.D., PE November Frisco, TX 2.
CMWG Update to WMS Report of CMWG Meetings of &
ORDC Options Analysis SAWG Market Analysis 12/16/2015.
Wholesale Market Subcommittee Update May 2 nd, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee.
1 Tests for Reasonable LMPs & Price Validation Tool Overview October 27, 2009 NATF.
2010 CSC & Zone Selection: 6 Lines W-N & 4 Zones (WN2_SN0-4Z) Shams Siddiqi, Ph.D. Crescent Power, Inc. (512) August 19,
Protocol Revision Subcommittee Tom Burke September 7, 2012.
Report to TAC July In Brief Working Group Reports Working Group Reports CMWG CMWG DSWG DSWG MCWG MCWG MWG MWG QMWG QMWG VCWG VCWG Task Forces Task.
CMWG NATF 11/02/2010- CCT/DME update + Outages in the CRR Model follow-up Steve Reedy – Market Design and Analysis 1.
Congestion Management Work Group Update WMS I Flores, S Reedy—ERCOT M Wagner--PSEG TX.
1 WMS Report TO TAC April 2007 (which is in March)
Technical Advisory Committee Presentation to the ERCOT Board of Directors September 16, 2008.
ERCOT PUBLIC November RPG Meeting RTP – Study Scope November 20, 2015.
September 1, 2011 TAC Lower Rio Grande Valley Regional Planning Group Project Jeff Billo Manager, Mid-Term Planning.
CMWG Update to WMS Report of CMWG Meeting of M. Wagner Edison Mission Marketing & Trading Thanks to ERCOT Staff for Graphics See ERCOT.
Constraints Competitiveness Tests (CCT) Results Analysis of 2010 SSWG Peak Summer Case Presented to CMWG 1/27/2010.
Discussion on FGR Settlement Protocol Language David Maggio CMWG February 17, 2014.
WMS 1/9/20131 Priority Power Management, LLC Proposed Changes to Holistic Solution WMS January 9, 2013 James Z. Brazell Law Office of James Z. Brazell.
SPP-Entergy Market Power Analysis Update Presented By: David B. Patton, Ph.D. President, Potomac Economics April 16, 2008.
2% Shift Factor dispatchable rule discussion and alternatives for the 2% rule Kris Dixit 1.
ERCOT PUBLIC 3/25/ RTP Inputs and Assumptions March 25, 2014.
CMWG Update to WMS Report of CMWG Meeting of
NPRR 520 Resmi Surendran ERCOT. Current CCT Process Annual CCT (ACCT) is run every year to feed the results to Monthly CCT (MCCT) MCCT is run every month.
RCWG Update to WMS March 7, Draft NPRR, Caps and Floors for Energy Storage Resources Chair of ETWG gave high level overview ERCOT had questions.
Capacity Forecast Report Fall Update Sean Chang Market Analysis and Design Suresh Pabbisetty CQF, ERP, CSQA Credit CWG/MCWG December 16, 2015 ERCOT Public.
Proposal for Consideration Regarding Holistic Solution to Congestion Irresolvable in SCED Issue:How do you identify when constraint is irresolvable Proposal:Adopt.
CMWG Update to WMS Met 4/24 & 5/11 Continued Work on PRR 801 –Discussed outages as related to TCR Cases –ERCOT evaluates various outage combinations.
Congestion Management Work Group 2008 Overview CMWG Marguerite Wagner, Reliant Energy Inc.
Reliability Must Run Workshop RMR Study Process May 24, 2016.
ERCOT CRR Update to CMWG
Presentation transcript:

August 2012 Wholesale Market Operations Constraints Competitiveness Tests (CCT) – Annual CCT 2013 Study Result with New Approach Market Support and Analysis

2 Changes from Current Approach to New Approach ERCOT PublicAugust 2012 Current ApproachNew Approach Shift factor reference Import and export terminals Distributed load ECI impact Product of capacity and shift factor Product of capacity and square of shift factor ECI significant threshold 1/3 of maximum SF as well as not contributed to worst flow Minimum of absolute 0.02 value and 1/3 of maximum SF Overload-ability (worst flow) Accumulate generation impact from worst SF until meet system total load impact +/- line limit, then compare accumulated generation capacity to system total load Accumulate generation capacity from worst SF until meet system total load, then compare accumulated generation impact to line limit Wind capacity available ratio Expected on-peak output0% for those with SF<0

3 Implemented CCT Logic for this Study A constraint is “Competitive” if –Constraint can not be overloaded under worst case scenario OR –Combination of There are resources with absolute Shift Factor >=2 % AND positive-SF ECI of squared SF with min(0.02, 1/3) threshold < 2500 AND negative-SF ECI of squared SF with min(0.02, 1/3) threshold < 2000 AND no pivotal player exists Otherwise, it is “Non-Competitive” An option up for consideration is ignoring the “overloaded under worst case scenario” check –May be appropriate because we are only analyzing one month, which is a peak load month, as oppose to 12 monthly cases ERCOT PublicAugust 2012

4 Constraint Sets and Models used in Annual CCT Study Models –SSWG 2013 Summer case (dated 2/27/2012) with CRR Annual Auction August 2013 constraint and contingency definitions (dated 9/28/2011) –CRR Auction August 2013 case (dated 7/23/2012) –Basic picture on both models Total generation capacity about 94,000 MW from registration data Total load about 74,000 MW from SSWG 2013 Summer case Entire topology considered, no outages on lines and transformers Constraint Sets –SCED historical constraints since go-live (693 distinct constraints, all evaluated for both directions) –CSC/CRE (332 distinct constraints, all evaluated for both directions) ERCOT PublicAugust 2012

5 Result on SCED Historical Constraints (Zero-out Negative Wind Flow, ECI Threshold [2000,2500], OL Flag Check) ERCOT PublicAugust 2012 Current Approach New Approach SSWG Model Count SSWG Model Percentage Competitive % Non-competitive % Non-competitive Competitive % Non-competitive % Total % Current Approach New Approach CRR Auction Model Count CRR Auction Model Percentage Competitive % Non-competitive % Non-competitive Competitive 70.52% Non-competitive % Total %

6 Result on CSC/CRE Constraints (Zero-out Negative Wind Flow, ECI Threshold [2000,2500], OL Flag Check) ERCOT PublicAugust 2012 Current Approach New Approach SSWG Model Count SSWG Model Percentage Competitive % Non-competitive % Non-competitive Competitive % Non-competitive % Total % Current Approach New Approach CRR Auction Model Count CRR Auction Model Percentage Competitive % Non-competitive % Non-competitive Competitive % Non-competitive % Total %

7 Result on SCED Historical Constraints (Zero-out Negative Wind Flow, ECI Threshold [2000,2500], No OL Flag Check) ERCOT PublicAugust 2012 Current Approach New Approach SSWG Model Count SSWG Model Percentage Competitive % Non-competitive % Non-competitive Competitive % Non-competitive % Total % Current Approach New Approach CRR Auction Model Count CRR Auction Model Percentage Competitive % Non-competitive % Non-competitive Competitive 50.37% Non-competitive % Total %

8 Result on CSC/CRE Constraints (Zero-out Negative Wind Flow, ECI Threshold [2000,2500], No OL Flag Check) ERCOT PublicAugust 2012 Current Approach New Approach SSWG Model Count SSWG Model Percentage Competitive % Non-competitive % Non-competitive Competitive % Non-competitive % Total % Current Approach New Approach CRR Auction Model Count CRR Auction Model Percentage Competitive % Non-competitive % Non-competitive Competitive 71.05% Non-competitive % Total %

9 Summary of Study Results – Number of Competitive Constraints ERCOT PublicAugust 2012 ECI Threshold OptionECI Threshold [2000,2500]ECI Threshold [2500,3000] Overload Flag Check OptionOL Flag CheckNo OL FlagOL Flag CheckNo OL Flag Constraint SetModel Comp. or Non- Comp. CountPctgCountPctgCountPctgCountPctg SCED Historical SSWG Competitive %392.82% %705.05% Non-Competitive % % % % CRR Auction Competitive %382.81% %856.29% Non-Competitive % % % % CSC/CRE SSWG Competitive % % % % Non-Competitive % %436.47% % CRR Auction Competitive % % % % Non-Competitive % %568.43% %

10 Inconsistent Results Between the 2 Models (Switch between Competitive/Non-existing and Non-competitive) ERCOT PublicAugust 2012 DatasetDescriptionCount csc CSC/CRE constraint set existing in both SSWG 2013 model and CRR auction Aug 2013 model 45 sced_crraug SCED historical constraint set existing only in CRR auction Aug 2013 model 56 sced_sswg SCED historical constraint set existing only in SSWG 2013 model 38 scedhist SCED historical constraint set existing in both SSWG 2013 model and CRR auction Aug 2013 model 189 Total328 (Zero-out Negative Wind Flow, ECI Threshold [2000,2500], OL Flag Check)

11 Causes of Inconsistent Results between the 2 Models Actual topology change –Results in shift factor change –Results in ECI change Line limit change –Results in overload-ability change –Result in PPI change once compared pivotal flow to line limit ERCOT PublicAugust 2012

12 Concerns during Annual CCT Study DC-Ties (all DC-Ties have been considered in the study with entity as ERCOT) Only the decision making entity was considered for this study, not Affiliates Impact of peak load in cases that were studied –Significantly reduced the number of overload-able constraints, –A high-ECI constraint can be competitive just because it won’t be overloaded in the worst case when generators with SF<0 are used to meet peak load Should negative WGR shift factors be included in the shift factor cut-off even if the MWs are considered to be 0 ERCOT PublicAugust 2012

13 Additional Material ERCOT PublicAugust 2012

14 Summary of all New Study Results ERCOT PublicAugust 2012 ECI Threshold OptionECI Threshold [2000,2500]ECI Threshold [2500,3000] Overload Flag Check OptionOL Flag CheckNo OL FlagOL Flag CheckNo OL Flag Constraint SetModelPatternCountPctgCountPctgCountPctgCountPctg SCED Historical SSWG Comp to Comp %261.88% %674.83% Comp to Non-Comp % % % % Non-Comp to Comp141.01%130.94%40.29%30.22% Non-Comp to Non-Comp % %825.92%835.99% CRR Auction Comp to Comp %332.44% %856.29% Comp to Non-Comp % % % % Non-Comp to Comp70.52%50.37%00.00%0 Non-Comp to Non-Comp % % % % CSC/CRE SSWG Comp to Comp % % % % Comp to Non-Comp537.98% %365.42% % Non-Comp to Comp131.96%121.81%111.66%111.66% Non-Comp to Non-Comp507.53%517.68%71.05%7 CRR Auction Comp to Comp % % % % Comp to Non-Comp % %527.83% % Non-Comp to Comp131.96%71.05%274.07%253.77% Non-Comp to Non-Comp588.73%649.64%40.60%60.90%

15 Results Presented During 8/6 CMWG Meeting For the results presented at the 8/6 CMWG Meetings, the ECI thresholds that were used were 3000 and 2500 (as oppose to 2500 and 2000) For the wind capacity ratio –ECI: 0% for the WGRs with shift factors < 0 –PPI: 100% for all (impact on constraint considered to be 0) ERCOT PublicAugust 2012

16 Results Presented During 8/6 CMWG Meeting Results on SCED Historical Constraints – Overload Check ERCOT PublicAugust 2012 Current ApproachNew Approach SSWG Model Count SSWG Model Percentage Competitive % Non-competitive % Non-competitive Competitive 40.29% Non-competitive % Total % Current ApproachNew Approach CRR Auction Model Count CRR Auction Model Percentage Competitive % Non-competitive % Non-competitive Competitive 00.00% Non-competitive % Total %

17 Results Presented During 8/6 CMWG Meeting Results on CSC/CRE Constraints – Overload Check ERCOT PublicAugust 2012 Current ApproachNew Approach SSWG Model Count SSWG Model Percentage Competitive % Non-competitive % Non-competitive Competitive % Non-competitive 71.05% Total % Current ApproachNew Approach CRR Auction Model Count CRR Auction Model Percentage Competitive % Non-competitive % Non-competitive Competitive % Non-competitive 60.90% Total %

18 Results Presented During 8/6 CMWG Meeting Results on SCED Historical Constraints – No Overload Check ERCOT PublicAugust 2012 Current ApproachNew Approach SSWG Model Count SSWG Model Percentage Competitive % Non-competitive % Non-competitive Competitive 40.29% Non-competitive % Total % Current ApproachNew Approach CRR Auction Model Count CRR Auction Model Percentage Competitive % Non-competitive % Non-competitive Competitive 00.00% Non-competitive % Total %

19 Results Presented During 8/6 CMWG Meeting Results on CSC/CRE Constraints – No Overload Check ERCOT PublicAugust 2012 Current ApproachNew Approach SSWG Model Count SSWG Model Percentage Competitive % Non-competitive % Non-competitive Competitive % Non-competitive 71.05% Total % Current ApproachNew Approach CRR Auction Model Count CRR Auction Model Percentage Competitive % Non-competitive % Non-competitive Competitive % Non-competitive 60.90% Total %

20 Other Previously Discussed Results If at another Load Profile - Compared to Previous Study in May 2012 –Out of 542 CSC/CRE constraints, 522 are competitive and 20 are non-competitive with current CCT approach. Note it considers ECI, PPI and worst case flow. –While with proposed min(0.02, 1/3) squared SF approach, out of 542 CSC/CRE constraints, 290 are competitive and 252 are non- competitive. Note it considers ECI, PPI and worst case flow as well. –The competitive ratio for CSC set reduces from 96% to 53%. –Note that this version of result is based on DCCT 11/30/2011. ERCOT PublicAugust 2012