Justice/Fairness Approach Learning Plan #5 Sara Deibert, Sara Roxbury, Allie Forsythe, Robert Phillips March 31,2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Justice & Economic Distribution (2)
Advertisements

Rawlsian Contract Approach Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Attempts to reconcile utilitarianism and intuitionism. Theory of distributive.
Roderick T. Long Auburn Dept. of Philosophy
A Capitalist Conception of Justice
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.
2 H i g h e r E d u c a t i o n © Oxford University Press, All rights reserved. Chapter 3: Political theory: Social justice and the state Barr: Economics.
Lecture 6 John Rawls. Justifying government Question: How can the power of government be justified?
John Rawls. Most important pol phil of 20 th cent? No ? The most important lib. Represented academic left vs people like Isaiah Berlin and Robert Nozick.
Kristin Mike Olvina Santigo Cassie Carlson Travis Langolf LP5- Ethical Theories Presentation Performance Assessment Task 6 10/27/2009.
PHIL 104 (STOLZE) Notes on Heather Widdows, Global Ethics: An Introduction, chapter 4.
Chapter Three: Justice and Economic Distribution
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.
L To distribute goods and services fairly, protecting everyone’s right to equal opportunity and bettering the lives of all members of society (liberalism:
COMP 381. Agenda  TA: Caitlyn Losee  Books and movies nominations  Team presentation signup Beginning of class End of class  Rawls and Moors.
Egalitarians View Egalitarians hold that there are no relevant differences among people that can justify unequal treatment. According to the egalitarian,
John Rawls' theory of justice ~ slide 1 John Rawls’ theory of justice zIn A Theory of Justice –1. The basis for the theory äA revised version of.
RAWLS 1 JUSTICE IS FAIRNESS. John Rawls Teachers: H. L. A. Hart Isaiah Berlin Students: Thomas Nagel Martha Nussbaum Onara O’Neill.
THE PRINCIPLE OF UTILITY: Bentham
Ethical Principle of Justice principle of justice –involves giving to all persons their "rights" or "desserts" –the distribution of various resources in.
Thomas Hobbes ( ) l Fear of others in the state of nature (apart from society) prompts people to form governments through a social contract l State.
Andrea Wellenstein, Jill Kollmann, Heather Lammers, and Britni Klein Monday at 1:30-4:30 Ethical Theories Presentations April 6 th, 2010.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
An Introduction to Ethics Week Nine: Distributive Justice and Torture.
Chapter One: Moral Reasons
JUSTICE OR FAIRNESS APPROACH
 Rawls was influenced by Kant and Aristotle  An American Philosopher  Wrote the Following: A Theory of Justice, Political Liberalism, The Law of Peoples,
BAM321 Business Ethics and Social Responsibility Session 7 Business and Management.
CRITICAL QUESTION How should the bounty of a society be distributed?
Ethics Theory and Business Practice
“To be able under all circumstances to practise five things constitutes perfect virtue; these five things are gravity, generosity of soul, sincerity, earnestness.
Business Ethics Week 3. Article on: You See, the Ends Don’t Justify the Means: Visual Imagery and Moral Judgment Visual imagery and Moral judgement –
Ethical Theories Presentation LP 5 Melissa Sweet, Tara Guelig, Katherine Norton April 9 th,2009.
Distributive Justice II: John Rawls Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang.
Justice & Fairness Approach LP: Ethical Theories Presentation By: Nelita, Brandon Keshia,Jennifer Section: Tuesday 5:30 April 1, 2008.
Rawls on justice Michael Lacewing co.uk.
Contractualism and justice (1) Introduction to Rawls’s theory.
John Rawls A Theory of Justice PULSE – April 16, 2013.
Ideas about Justice Three big themes Virtue Ethics Utilitarianism
Chapter One: Moral Reasons Review Applying Ethics: A Text with Readings (10 th ed.) Julie C. Van Camp, Jeffrey Olen, Vincent Barry Cengage Learning/Wadsworth.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
Justice as Fairness John Rawls PHL 110: ETHICS North Central College.
Justice and Economic Distribution
Three Modern Approaches. Introduction Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Have significant new approaches Have significant new approaches.
Rawls & Nozick Liberalism & Libertarianism Warwick Debating Society Training, 11/05/2011.
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls. Rawls looks at justice. Kant’s ethics and Utilitarianism are about right and wrong actions. For example: Is it ethical.
John Rawls Theory of Justice. John Rawls John Rawls (February 21, 1921 – November 24, 2002) was an American philosopher and a figure in moral and political.
Equity: Ethical Approaches to Social Justice “Excuse me, but its important to get those drinks to those who need them the most.”
DEONTOLOGICAL ETHICS (CH. 2.0) © Wanda Teays. All rights reserved.
Deontological Approaches Consequences of decisions are not always the most important elements as suggested by the consequentialist approach. The way you.
WEEK 2 Justice as Fairness. A Theory of Justice (1971) Political Liberalism (1993)
Justice. What is justice? It seems we develop a sense of fairness from an early age and most people would agree with Plato that the only life worth living.
PHIL 104 (STOLZE) Notes on Heather Widdows, Global Ethics: An Introduction, chapter 4.
History of Philosophy.
Political theory and law
Rawl’s Veil of Ignorance
John Rawls’ theory of justice
Principles of Health Care Ethics
Rawls’ Theory of Justice
Theory of Health Care Ethics
John rawls -an American moral and political philosopher
Theories of justice.
Ethical Theories Ethical Theories Unit 5.
Equality of Opportunity
Three Dimensions of Justice
Theories of Justice Retributive Justice – How should those who break the law be punished? Distributive Justice – How should society distribute it’s resources?
John Rawls Theory of Justice.
A Text with Readings TENTH EDITION M A N U E L V E L A S Q U E Z
Rawls’ Theory of Justice
Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 3: JUSTICE AND ECONOMIC DISTRIBUTION Handout #3 CLO#3 Evaluate the relation between justice, ethics and economic.
Presentation transcript:

Justice/Fairness Approach Learning Plan #5 Sara Deibert, Sara Roxbury, Allie Forsythe, Robert Phillips March 31,2008

Summary Focuses on how fairly or unfairly our actions distribute benefits and burdens among the members of a group. Focuses on how fairly or unfairly our actions distribute benefits and burdens among the members of a group. Benefits and burdens may be distributed based on what a person needs, deserves, contributes, etc., or may be distributed equally to all. Benefits and burdens may be distributed based on what a person needs, deserves, contributes, etc., or may be distributed equally to all. All equals should be treated equally All equals should be treated equally

"In distributing benefits and burdens, treat people the same unless there are morally relevant differences between them." "In distributing benefits and burdens, treat people the same unless there are morally relevant differences between them."

Fairness requires that we are consistent in how we treat each other. Fairness requires that we are consistent in how we treat each other. Organ transplants Organ transplants Medical need Medical need Likely to survive Likely to survive

ROBERT NOZICK THE ENTITLEMENT THEORY

Theory is based on the idea that only free market exchanges respect people as equals Theory is based on the idea that only free market exchanges respect people as equals

The theory consists of three principles: 1. Transfer principle 2. Acquisition principle 3. Rectification principle

Nozick's "Entitlement Theory" argues against social and government policies that redistribute wealth via taxation and other programs. Nozick's "Entitlement Theory" argues against social and government policies that redistribute wealth via taxation and other programs. Everyone, regardless of abilities should have their needs met. Everyone, regardless of abilities should have their needs met.

Conflict Who decides what is fair? Who decides what is fair?

John Rawls Theory of Justice

Three Major Principles Three Major Principles Veil of Ignorance Veil of Ignorance The Difference Principle The Difference Principle Distribution in society, Concept of Liberty, and Role of Individuals’ Rights in Society Distribution in society, Concept of Liberty, and Role of Individuals’ Rights in Society

Veil of Ignorance Veil of Ignorance Idea that no one knows their personal status in society Idea that no one knows their personal status in society The best interest of the society is to protect the lowest members of the society, in case they end up in the lower class once the “veil” is lifted The best interest of the society is to protect the lowest members of the society, in case they end up in the lower class once the “veil” is lifted

Difference Principle Two Principles of Justice 1. “Each person is to have an equal right to the most extensive scheme of basics liberties compatible with a similar scheme of liberties for others”

2. “Social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both reasonably expected to be to everyone’s advantage, and attached to positions and offices open to all.”

Conflicts Veil of Ignorance Veil of Ignorance Difference Principle Difference Principle

Application to Organ Transplants

Those who benefit the most are likely to receive at transplant Those who benefit the most are likely to receive at transplant Success rate Success rate Who determines who is most beneficial? Who determines who is most beneficial? Gravely ill may be skipped over Gravely ill may be skipped over

An organ waiting list makes this seem a little more “fair” An organ waiting list makes this seem a little more “fair” Desperately ill often die while on waiting list Desperately ill often die while on waiting list 93,000 people have been recorded on this list at one given time 93,000 people have been recorded on this list at one given time

A patient can still have a beating heart when an organ is taken for a transplant A patient can still have a beating heart when an organ is taken for a transplant Surgeons only need to wait until a patient is declared “brain dead” Surgeons only need to wait until a patient is declared “brain dead” Dying organ-needing patients pressure doctors Dying organ-needing patients pressure doctors Doctors only need to wait 5 minutes after a heart stops beating to remove organs Doctors only need to wait 5 minutes after a heart stops beating to remove organs Infant organs Infant organs

Review Questions What is the basis of the justice theory? What is the basis of the justice theory? What are the 3 principles of Nozick’s theory? What are the 3 principles of Nozick’s theory? What are the 3 principles of Rawl’s theory? What are the 3 principles of Rawl’s theory?