OWL W3C WORKING GROUP F2F MEETING M. Vacura. OWL 2  OWL 2 extends the OWL 1.0 with a small but useful set of features that have been requested by users,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OWL 1.1 Design Decisions OWL 1.1 Draft Team. 2/15 Contents General Design Principles Structural Specification Expressivity Enhancements Metamodeling Anonymous.
Advertisements

A Proposal for Addressing Issues Related to RDF Mapping.
A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: XML and the DCMI Abstract Model DC Architecture WG Meeting,
CH-4 Ontologies, Querying and Data Integration. Introduction to RDF(S) RDF stands for Resource Description Framework. RDF is a standard for describing.
Improvements on the benchmark suites. October 10th © Raúl García-Castro Improvements on the benchmark suites Raúl García-Castro October 10th, 2005.
Method for developing the benchmark suites. October 10th © Raúl García-Castro Method for developing the benchmark suites Raúl García-Castro October.
Chronos: A Tool for Handling Temporal Ontologies in Protégé
An Introduction to RDF(S) and a Quick Tour of OWL
Logics for Data and Knowledge Representation Web Ontology Language (OWL) Feroz Farazi.
SIG2: Ontology Language Standards WebOnt Briefing Ian Horrocks University of Manchester, UK.
Of 27 lecture 7: owl - introduction. of 27 ece 627, winter ‘132 OWL a glimpse OWL – Web Ontology Language describes classes, properties and relations.
OWL TUTORIAL APT CSA 3003 OWL ANNOTATOR Charlie Abela CSAI Department.
1 Ontology Language Comparisons doug foxvog 16 September 2004.
Chapter 8: Web Ontology Language (OWL) Service-Oriented Computing: Semantics, Processes, Agents – Munindar P. Singh and Michael N. Huhns, Wiley, 2005.
Chapter 8: Web Ontology Language (OWL) Service-Oriented Computing: Semantics, Processes, Agents – Munindar P. Singh and Michael N. Huhns, Wiley, 2005.
Descriptions Robert Grimm New York University. The Final Assignment…  Your own application  Discussion board  Think: Paper summaries  Web cam proxy.
Chapter 3. 2 Chapter 3 - Objectives Terminology of relational model. Terminology of relational model. How tables are used to represent data. How tables.
COMP 6703 eScience Project Semantic Web for Museums Student : Lei Junran Client/Technical Supervisor : Tom Worthington Academic Supervisor : Peter Strazdins.
From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The Making of a Web Ontology Language
RDF: Concepts and Abstract Syntax W3C Recommendation 10 February Michael Felderer Digital Enterprise.
Lecture 2 The Relational Model. Objectives Terminology of relational model. How tables are used to represent data. Connection between mathematical relations.
13 Dec. 2006CmpE 583 Fall 2006 OWL Lite- Property Char’s. 1 OWL Lite: Ch. 13- Property Characteristics Atilla ELÇİ.
Chapter 6 Understanding Each Other CSE 431 – Intelligent Agents.
Okech Odhiambo Faculty of Information Technology Strathmore University
OWL and SDD Dave Thau University of Kansas
OWL 2 Web Ontology Language. Topics Introduction to OWL Usage of OWL Problems with OWL 1 Solutions from OWL 2.
Chapter 6 Understanding Each Other CSE 431 – Intelligent Agents.
OWL 2 in use. OWL 2 OWL 2 is a knowledge representation language, designed to formulate, exchange and reason with knowledge about a domain of interest.
OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: New Features and Rationale Feroz Farazi
Michael Eckert1CS590SW: Web Ontology Language (OWL) Web Ontology Language (OWL) CS590SW: Semantic Web (Winter Quarter 2003) Presentation: Michael Eckert.
Metadata. Generally speaking, metadata are data and information that describe and model data and information For example, a database schema is the metadata.
Design Management: a Collabortive Design Solution ECMFA 2013 Montpellier, France Maged Elaasar (Presenter) Senior Software Engineer, IBM
Advanced topics in software engineering (Semantic web)
Using RDF in Agent-Mediated Knowledge Architectures K. Hui, S. Chalmers, P.M.D. Gray & A.D. Preece University of Aberdeen U.K
SKOS. Ontologies Metadata –Resources marked-up with descriptions of their content. No good unless everyone speaks the same language; Terminologies –Provide.
Artificial Intelligence 2004 Ontology
The future of the Web: Semantic Web 9/30/2004 Xiangming Mu.
OilEd An Introduction to OilEd Sean Bechhofer. Topics we will discuss Basic OilEd use –Defining Classes, Properties and Individuals in an Ontology –This.
Organization of the Lab Three meetings:  today: general introduction, first steps in Protégé OWL  November 19: second part of tutorial  December 3:
6 Dec Rev. 14 Dec CmpE 583 Fall 2008OWL Intro 1 OWL Intro Notes off Lacy Ch. 4 Atilla Elçi.
OWL & Protege Introduction Dongfang Xu Ph.D student, School of Information, University of Arizona Sept 10, 2015.
OWL Web Ontology Language Overview. The OWL Web Ontology Language is designed for use by applications that need to process the content of information.
CS621 : Artificial Intelligence Pushpak Bhattacharyya CSE Dept., IIT Bombay Lecture 12 RDF, OWL, Minimax.
The Relational Model. 2 Relational Model Terminology u A relation is a table with columns and rows. –Only applies to logical structure of the database,
Trait ontology approach Marie-Angélique LAPORTE NCEAS June 7 th 2010.
COMM: Designing a Well-Founded Multimedia Ontology for the Web Wednesday 14 th of November, 2007 Richard Arndt Steffen Staab Rapha.
Lecture 23 XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model. 2 Example 31.7 – User-Defined Function Function to return staff at a given branch. DEFINE FUNCTION staffAtBranch($bNo)
06 Dec Rev. 14 Dec CmpE 583 Fall 2008 OWL Language 1 OWL Language off Lacy Ch. 10 Atilla Elçi.
Web Ontology Language (OWL). OWL The W3C Web Ontology Language (OWL) is a Semantic Web language designed to represent rich and complex knowledge about.
OWL Web Ontology Language Summary IHan HSIAO (Sharon)
Ontology Technology applied to Catalogues Paul Kopp.
Ccs.  Ontologies are used to capture knowledge about some domain of interest. ◦ An ontology describes the concepts in the domain and also the relationships.
Of 24 lecture 11: ontology – mediation, merging & aligning.
Use Outlook Task API to access tasks stored on user’s mailbox. These REST API’s are  Simple to use.  Supports CRUD.  JSON structured.  OAuth 2.0.
Ontology Design Patterns Dr Nicholas Gibbins –
Semantic Web. P2 Introduction Information management facilities not keeping pace with the capacity of our information storage. –Information Overload –haphazardly.
Setting the stage: linked data concepts Moving-Away-From-MARC-a-thon.
OASIS SET TC MeetingAugust 14, 2008 A Proposal for SET TC Requirements.
OWL (Ontology Web Language and Applications) Maw-Sheng Horng Department of Mathematics and Information Education National Taipei University of Education.
Logics for Data and Knowledge Representation
Knowledge Representation Part VII Protégé / RDFS / OWL / ++
Building Trustworthy Semantic Webs
OWL Language off Textbook Ch. 10
Ontology.
ece 720 intelligent web: ontology and beyond
A Snapshot of the OWL Web
Review of Week 1 Database DBMS File systems vs. database systems
Ontology.
Background for Lab 5.
Presentation transcript:

OWL W3C WORKING GROUP F2F MEETING M. Vacura

OWL 2  OWL 2 extends the OWL 1.0 with a small but useful set of features that have been requested by users, for which effective reasoning algorithms are now available, and that OWL tool developers are willing to support.

OWL 2 The new features include:  extra syntactic sugar  additional property and qualified cardinality constructors  extended datatype support  simple metamodelling  extended annotations

Additional constructors PropertyAssertion( a:hasPet a:Peter a:Brian ) ClassAssertion( MaxCardinality(1 a:hasPet ) a:Peter) a:Peter has at most one pet. The maximum cardinality expression MaxCardinality(2 a:hasPet) contains those individuals that are connected by a:hasPet to at most two individuals. a:Peter is classified as an instance of MaxCardinality(2 a:hasPet)

Data Property Restrictions  Class expressions in OWL 2 can be formed by placing restrictions on data property expressions.  Class expressions such as "individuals whose width is greater than their height"

Extended datatype support  Number types (rational numbers)  Date and time types  N-Ary

Simple metamodelling Punning:  In RDF (similary in OWL Full), all possible combinations of punning are allowed.  you can use the same URI for class and a datatype and a property. OWL 2 – some restrictions (??)  No punning between classes and datatypes.  No punning between object and data properties.

Extended annotations Alan's "Richer Annotations" proposal Bijan's "Rich Annotations" proposal  We can have "blobs" of annotations associated with an Entity or Axiom, rather than a single statement per annotation.  Annotations can live in multiple separate "annotation spaces". The easiest way to think about these is if you took the annotations in a space and put them in a separate document.  Annotations can be marked as affecting the content of the domain model.