Instructional Leadership: Planning for Improvement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Advertisements

1 Lodi Unified School District Monitoring and Accountability A District Program Improvement Update Board of Education Study Session August 19, 2008.
The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
Creating Highly Effective Building Leadership Teams 18 critical components to help you identify your Building Leadership Team’s level of implementation.
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGHS
Mentoring and Coaching: Feedback for Better Teaching
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Theories of Action: What are they, why are they important, and how are they created? January 2015 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell,
Planning High Standards for Student Learning Instructional Leadership:
OSSE School Improvement Data Workshop Workshop #4 June 30, 2015 Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
Having a Strategy for Your Strategy GVSU Learning Network January 2014.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Rhode Island Model Academy for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Day One Professional Practice.
Name of Facilitator Instructional Leadership:. Welcome ©AZ Board of Regents, BEST Professional Development, All rights reserved. Name of Superintendent.
ISLLC Standard #1 ISLLC Standard #1 Planning School Improvement Name: Planning School Improvement that Ensures Student Success Workshop Facilitator.
OSSE School Improvement Data Workshop Workshop #1 January 30, 2015 Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
ISLLC Standard #4 ISLLC Standard #4 Monitoring Diverse Needs Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Coaching Columbia High School February 17, 2011 JoAnn Moore, Facilitator 10 minutes.
The Power of Formative Assessment to Advance Learning.
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
Teacher Mentoring for Teacher Leaders August 19, 2011 Office of Professional and Organizational Development Howard County Public Schools 1.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Supporting Rigorous Curriculum (Overcoming Isolationism) Participants are expected to purchase the book Results Now Instructional Leadership.
Ladder of Inference Instructional Leadership:. © AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Name of Superintendent –Welcome & Why Important Name.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, EDUCATION AND TRAINING DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT, EDUCATION AND TRAINING (Insert appropriate.
ISLLC Standard #2 Supporting Teacher Learning Name Workshop Facilitator.
Introduction to Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System and Framework for Teaching.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
ISLLC Standard #6 Monitoring Education Stakeholders Name Workshop Facilitator.
Coastal Plains RESA Assessment Literacy: Leading Formative Instructional Practices January 28 and February 25 Session One: Modules 1, 2, 3 Session Two:
Instructional Leadership Planning an Accountability System Name Workshop Facilitator.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
ISLLC Standard #1 Implementing a Shared Vision Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership Supporting High Standards.
ISLLC Standard #5 ISLLC Standard #5 Supporting Ethical Decision Making Laura Kent, Valerie Cervantez, Velma Kitcheyan Workshop Facilitators.
Passport to Science MSP Science Program Indianapolis Public Schools.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP Supporting Common Assessments (Time for Common Assessments) © AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, 2012.
Key Work of School Boards Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementing Professional Learning Communities Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #4 Collaborating with Families (and Stakeholders) Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Adult Learning.
ISLLC Standard #4 Planning Collaboration with Families Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #3 Planning for School – wide Behavior Management
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Supporting Education Reform Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Instructional Leadership: Instructional Quality. Welcome Name of Superintendent –Welcome & Why Important Name of Facilitator –Overview / Agenda –Enduring.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Interventions.
ISLLC Standard #6 The Education System Name Workshop Facilitator.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Implementing Educational Policy Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Instructional Leadership: Applying Concern & Use Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership: Implementing Conditions for Success.
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
Instructional Leadership Planning Common Assessments.
TLE The Basics…. Who is here today? Corner 1- New to OKCPS Corner 2- New to Teaching Corner 3- New to Oklahoma Corner 4- New to the U. S.
Supporting Rigorous Curriculum (Overcoming Isolationism) Instructional Leadership.
Welcome TDEC Professional Learning December 22,
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
ISLLC Standard #3 Implementing Effective Meetings Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership: Building Consensus Name Workshop Facilitator.
Instructional Leadership:
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Instructional Leadership
Presentation transcript:

Instructional Leadership: Planning for Improvement

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Name of Superintendent –Welcome & Why? Name of Facilitator –Overview / Agenda –Enduring Understandings –Guiding Questions –Targeted Objectives –Introductions Overview & Introductions

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Participants will…  Surface prior knowledge to indicators of quality instruction.  Organize indicators of quality instruction in a framework.  Connect with current practices to gather data  Apply Impact and Use to plan opportunities for teacher growth.  Create a plan of action to take back to your building to plan for quality instruction. Intended Outcomes

Proposed Norms & Expectations Stay focused and fully engaged –no competing conversations please Participate to grow –share openly and monitor your listening Be a learner –create your own meaning and application Get your needs met –ask questions that benefit the group –personal questions on breaks Housekeeping –silence cell phones –handle business later – share ONE point …then next person

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Student Achievement Teacher Quality Instructional Leadership ImplementingMonitoring Supporting CommunicatingAdvocatingPlanning Instructional Leadership Key Processes Applied to Quality Instruction

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, There are effective practices that maximize student academic and social learning. Quality Instruction

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  How do instructional leaders plan opportunities for teachers to improve their instruction through professional development?  How do instructional leaders plan instructional services for students with special needs using assessment data?  How do instructional leaders plan a schedule that enables quality instruction?  How do instructional leaders plan faculty hiring policies with a focus on effective instructional practices? Research-Based Critical Behaviors

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  By the end of this workshop you will develop an action plan focused on applying the Research- Based Critical Behaviors.  In the column labeled “Current Reality”  Rate yourself on a scale of 1-5  5 = Highly effective  3 = Satisfactorily Effective  1 = Ineffective  Describe the evidence that supports your application of this concept Action Plan

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  How do instructional leaders apply the research regarding professional development impact and use to planning opportunities to improve the quality of instruction. Planning for Improvement Segment Guiding Question

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  Adopt a new program?  Send teachers to a workshop?  Invite an expert presenter?  Send out an edict? Let’s examine what research says: What do you do when Quality Instruction is not present or needs improvement?

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Professional Development Processes: IMPACT & USE Adapted from the research of Joyce & Showers (2002) and Speck & Knipe (2005)

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, What Professional Development will have the greatest impact ?

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, With a shoulder partner, from your own experience identify an effective example and an ineffective example of planning professional development opportunities for teachers to improve instructional practice.

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, Next we will examine some typical scenarios that could happen on any campus. Each table group will be assigned TWO scenarios to discuss and apply the research on impact and use. Your group will present how you will address your scenario.

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  During walkthroughs and in a formal observation, you have observed that 25% -35% of the students in Ms. Smith’s first grade classroom are oriented to the task and focused on the work. Furthermore you have observed 5-7 students in the class of 25 out of their seat during direct instruction. One time you observed 2 boys wrestling on the floor in the back of the room. Ms. Smith has the most referrals to the office of any first grade teacher. She has been in your office on 2 occasions in tears saying that she does not know what she is going to do about these boys in her class. Scenario #1

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  In your middle school, you gathered data in the classes of your 30 teachers at the beginning of a period regarding their use of bellwork. You found the range of time spent on bellwork was 7 minutes to 18 minutes of a 55 minute period. The activities included Mountain Language or Math, journals, pencil sharpening, quick writes, problem of the day among others. Scenario #2

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  You have been contacted by the district reading specialist that your third grade students have scored the lowest in the district on the 2 nd DIBELS Benchmark. Scenario #3

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  Recently you have walked through 55 classrooms in your High School to collect examples of posted learning objectives. You found examples of objectives that stated the activity such as “You will complete a test on order of operations” or “You will view a modern version of Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet” in 45% of the classrooms visited. You also found that 33% of the time, the learning activity matched the learning objective. Scenario #4

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  Questions to Address  What would be the desired practice or outcome?  What changes need to occur to achieve that outcome?  What aspects of impact and use, level of concern and adult learning theory will you need to apply to this situation?  What concrete steps will you take to address the need?  Be prepared to present summary:  Use chart paper & create a display of your answers to these questions for a scenario TASK: Analyze the Scenario

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  Display your chart paper  Choose one spokesperson & explain…  Questions to Address  What would be the desired practice or outcome?  What changes need to occur to achieve that outcome?  What aspects of impact and use, level of concern and adult learning theory will you need to apply to this situation?  What concrete steps will you take to address the need? Group presentations

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  When examining your current practices in planning for quality instruction:  What will you continue and what will you abandon? Reflection

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  Consider the guiding question  Use column labeled “Strategies/Ideas”  Connect today’s discussions with the “Research-Based Critical Behaviors.”  List at least THREE things per box  Pair Share ONE strategy you learned today and how you plan to use it at your school. Closure for this Segment

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  Review the following…  Targeted Objectives  Research-Based Critical Behaviors  Next Steps  What additional data do you need?  Who will you involve in process?  What resources do you need?  Action Plan  Do what? By when? Conclusion and Development of an Action Plan

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  In table groups (in a round robin format)  Share one new learning and describe how you will apply it in your job  NO REPEATS! Workshop Closure

© AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved,  Please complete “Participant Feedback” form  Grant research  Improve future workshops Workshop Closure