Willow Lake Cobb Gauge site Sample site Mesonet site For more information: We gratefully acknowledge.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lawyer Creek Steelhead Trout Habitat Improvement Project presented by: Lewis Soil Conservation District.
Advertisements

Adapting to Climate Change The Water Sector Robert Morgan, Ph.D., P.E. Beaver Water District.
Kaslo & Area D Climate Change Impacts on Water Provision – INITIAL DRAFT March 19, 2010 Remember Mohs Law of Increased Rate of Chemical Reaction: Each.
Figure 23. Nitrate concentrations on the lower Ventura River from June 2002 to October 2003: the vertical lines mark the beginning of the water year. The.
Transport of nitrogen and phosphorus from Rhode River watersheds during storm events David Correll, Thomas Jordan, and Donald Weller Water Resources Research,
©2003 Institute of Water Research, all rights reserved Water Quality Modeling for Ecological Services under Cropping and Grazing Systems Da Ouyang Jon.
REMM: Riparian Ecosystem Management Model USDA-Agricultural Research Service University of Georgia California State University – Chico USDA-Natural Resources.
SWAT Model Study for Illinois River Drainage Area (IRDA) in Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service Presented by: Dharmendra Saraswat Co-Authors: M. Daniels,
The Wisconsin River TMDL: Linking Monitoring and Modeling Ann Hirekatur, Pat Oldenburg, & Adam Freihoefer March 7, 2013 Wisconsin River TMDL Project Team.
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
Contaminant Source and Watershed Characterization Data Needs Gregory McIsaac, Robert Howarth, and Richard B. Alexander Univ. of Illinois Cornell Univ.
The central theme of this project is to attempt to quantify the effect of riparian cover on stream water temperature at small spatial scales, with a view.
Nidal Salim, Walter Wildi Institute F.-A. Forel, University of Geneva, Switzerland Impact of global climate change on water resources in the Israeli, Jordanian.
Climate Change, Biofuels, and Land Use Legacy: Trusting Computer Models to Guide Water Resources Management Trajectories Anthony Kendall Geological Sciences,
Influence of Catchment Characteristics on Stream Nitrogen Transport to the Hood Canal Osborne, S.N.; Brett, M.T.; Richey, J.E.; Steinberg, P.D.; Newton,
Coming Attractions from the Washington State Climate Impacts Assessment Lara Whitely Binder Alan Hamlet Marketa McGuire Elsner Climate Impacts Group Center.
Real-Time Water Quality Monitoring for Investigating the Strengths and Weaknesses of Existing Monitoring Techniques Little Bear River Basin Jeffery S.
Hydrological Modeling FISH 513 April 10, Overview: What is wrong with simple statistical regressions of hydrologic response on impervious area?
Global Climate Change: What Controversies? Bryan C. Weare Atmospheric Science Program University of California, Davis.
Determining the effectiveness of best management practices to reduce nutrient loading from cattle grazed pastures in Utah Nicki Devanny Utah State University,
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Temporal and Spatial Variability in Nitrate in Subsurface Drains in a Midwestern Agricultural Watershed Paul Capel, USGS, National Water-Quality Assessment.
Impact of Climate Change on Flow in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
How much water will be available in the upper Colorado River Basin under projected climatic changes? Abstract The upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB), is.
1 Integrated Assessment of Climate Change Impact in Typical Agricultural River Basin of the Midwestern US Hyunhee An*, Hua Xie J. Wayland Eheart and Edwin.
V.Jansons Kalme Workshop 16.XI.2009 River Basin Hydrology and Nutrient Run- off from Land to the Surface Waters WP2 V. Jansons, Latvia University of Agriculture.
The Importance of Watershed Modeling for Conservation Policy Or What is an Economist Doing at a SWAT Workshop?
Lake and Stream Hydrology 2009 UJ,UH, &TPU Timo Huttula JY/BYTL& SYKE/VTO
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
1. Introduction The Big Darby Creek is categorized as a national scenic river with an array of biological species. Since this is one of the last pristine.
Forecasting changes in water quality and aquatic biodiversity in response to future bioenergy landscapes in the Arkansas-White-Red River basin Peter E.
Analysis of Raleigh’s Drought Triggers May 8, 2013 and.
Physical Properties Discharge rate, temperature and other physical attributes of the stream.
Potential Effects of Climate Change on New York City Water Supply Quantity and Quality: An Integrated Modeling Approach Donald Pierson, Elliot Schneiderman.
Modeling experience of non- point pollution: CREAMS (R. Tumas) EPIC (A. Povilaitis and R.Tumas SWRRBWQ (A. Dumbrauskas and R. Tumas) AGNPS (Sileika and.
Nutrient Center watersheds Began with WE38 and Mahantango Creek watersheds First runs have been done in Manokin also.
Water Quality Sampling, Analysis and Annual Load Determinations for Nutrients and Solids on the Ballard Creek, 2008 Arkansas Water Resources Center UA.
Hope Mizzell, Ph.D. SC State Climatologist South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Carolinas and Virginia Climate Conference Improving Drought Detection.
Balancing Drought and Flood in the Pacific Northwest: Doug McChesney Water Resources Program Washington Department of Ecology June 12, 2003 The Challenge.
1 State of San Lorenzo River Symposium Nicole Beck, PhD 2NDNATURE April San Lorenzo Lagoon A Decade of Dry Season WQ Monitoring.
Assessment of Runoff, Sediment Yield and Nutrient Load on Watershed Using Watershed Modeling Mohammad Sholichin Mohammad Sholichin 1) Faridah Othman 2)
The climate and climate variability of the wind power resource in the Great Lakes region of the United States Sharon Zhong 1 *, Xiuping Li 1, Xindi Bian.
Trends in Precipitation and Stream Discharge over the Past Century for the Continental United States Andrew Simon 1 and Lauren Klimetz 1,2 1 USDA-ARS National.
Climate Sensitivity of Thinleaf Alder Growth in Interior Alaska: Implications for N-Fixation Inputs to River Floodplains Dana Nossov 1,2, Roger Ruess 1,
Moisture Controls on Trace Gas Fluxes From Semiarid Soils Dean A. Martens and Jean E. T. McLain SWRC – Tucson and Water Conservation Laboratory – Phoenix.
Fine-Resolution, Regional-Scale Terrestrial Hydrologic Fluxes Simulated with the Integrated Landscape Hydrology Model (ILHM) David W Hyndman Anthony D.
A Project to Reduce Bacteria in Texas Waterways: Lone Star Healthy Streams Larry A. Redmon 1, Kevin L. Wagner 2, Robert K. Lyons 3, and Garrett Norman.
Seasonal and elevational variation of surface water  18 O and  2 H in the Willamette River basin J. Renée Brooks 1, Parker J. Wigington 1, Jr., Carol.
Edge of Field Monitoring in the Lake Champlain Basin of Vermont
Research & Systematic Observations (IX) Vulnerability Assessment, Impacts and Adaptation Measures (VII) Research & Systematic Observations (IX) Vulnerability.
Climate change impacts on water resources in the southeastern U.S. – Can we adapt? Peter Caldwell USDA Forest Service, Eastern Forest Environmental Threat.
How much water will be available in the upper Colorado River Basin under projected climatic changes? Abstract The upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB), is.
National Assessment for Cropland. Analytical Approach Sampling and modeling approach based on a subset of NRI sample points. Farmer survey conducted to.
RHESSys and SWAT simulations for modeling of long term water yield GEOG711 December 6, 2007 Yuri Kim.
Precision Management beyond Fertilizer Application Hailin Zhang.
Load Estimation Using Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)
Developing the Vegetation Drought Response Index (VegDRI): Monitoring Vegetation Stress from a Local to National Scale Brian Wardlow National Drought Mitigation.
RESULTS Cont’d EFFECTS OF CROPPING AND TILLAGE SYSTEMS ON SOIL EROSION UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE IN OKLAHOMA X-C. John Zhang USDA-ARS Grazinglands Research.
Montana Climate Assessment stakeholder driven, science informed
Precipitation, Streamflow and a Look at Little Bear River Contaminants
Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS)
Tushar Sinha Assistant Professor
Retaining Water (In A Good Way).
in the Neversink River Basin, New York
An Introduction to VegDRI
ABSTRACT METHODS RESULTS BACKGROUND CONCLUSIONS OBJECTIVES
An Introduction to VegDRI
Soil Loss Estimation. USLE – Universal Soil Loss Equation SLEMSA – Soil Loss Estimation Model for Southern Africa.
Jacob Piske, Eric Peterson, Bill Perry
World Bank Land and Poverty Conference March 2018
Presentation transcript:

Willow Lake Cobb Gauge site Sample site Mesonet site For more information: We gratefully acknowledge USGS for support of stream gauging, and cooperation of land owners and conservationists in the watershed. Climate Impact (Fig. 3): Soluble and bio-available P tended to be higher in warm than cool seasons, and higher in wet than dry periods. Nitrate tended be higher in spring, lower in fall and variable in winter and summer. Suspended sediment tended to be higher in spring and summer, but was most impacted by wet, compared to dry periods. Objectives: Determine annual and interannual patterns of N, P, and sediment in streams in the Fort Cobb watershed and relate water quality to contributing area characteristics. Fig. 1. Massive erosion occurred during extreme events in August, 2007 and August, References Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, EPA Becker, C, and JL Steiner. 200_. Integrated Science to Support the Assessment of Conservation Practices in the Fort Cobb Watershed, Southwestern Oklahoma. U.S. Geol.Surv. Sci. Investigation Rep (In review). SAS SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Ver Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute, Inc Starks, PJ, and Moriasi, DN Spatial resolution effect of precipitation data on SWAT calibration and performance: implications for CEAP. Trans. ASABE 52(4): Abstract: Water quality concerns are associated with agricultural systems and practices, which dominate land use in many watersheds. Land use in the 795 km 2 Fort Cobb Lake watershed is 56% cropland (rainfed and irrigated), 34% grazing land, 5% roads, 5% forests, and 2% water (Starks and Moriasi, 2009). The lake does not meet Oklahoma water quality standards, based on high trophic level. A Total Maximum Daily Load plan Identified phosphorus (P), primarily from agriculture, as the limiting nutrient. In 2001, the Oklahoma Conservation Commission established a 319 Water Quality Project to promote conservation in the watershed. In 2004, the ARS team established research in the watershed as part of USDA’s Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP). Water samples were collected over a 4-year period that included drought in 2005 and 2006, followed by wet conditions and extreme precipitation events in 2007 and Patterns of water quality are related to biophysical, ecological, and management factors in the contributing areas of each site. Better understanding of the annual and interannual dynamics of climate and water quality components can help in identifying conservation needs and developing strategies to mitigate water quality problems while sustaining productivity and profitability of agriculture. Results: Drought prevailed from 2005 through April, 2007, after which high to normal precipitation prevailed. Springtime discharge was low in 2005, 2006, and In contrast, the mean monthly flow in Cobb Creek was highest in March, April, and May, decreased in summer, and increased in October and November (Becker and Steiner, 200_). Results obtained using the SELECTION / MAXR model of PROC REG (SAS,2003), using maximum R 2 improvement for 1 variable, 2 variables, etc. Contributing Area Properties AREA- ha AVG SLOPE- % MAX SLOPE- % CROP AREA- (% of AREA) STREAM DENSITY- km/ha STREAM LENGTH- km STAGE- geomorphic stage (% of stream length ) SS- Si, Sicl, L (% of total soil) SCL- L, Sicl, L (% of total soil) LS- Sil (% of total soil) SA- Fsl, sicl (% of total soil SC- Fsl(% of total soil) Table 1. Regression of water quality constituents with contributing area properties Jan-05 Mar-05 May-05 Jul-05 Sep-05 Nov-05 Jan-06 Mar-06 May-06 Jul-06 Sep-06 Nov-06 Jan-07 Mar-07 May-07 Jul-07 Sep-07 Nov-07 Jan-08 Mar-08 May-08 Jul-08 Sep-08 Nov-08 Daily discharge (m 3 s -1 ) CobbLakeWillow Fig. 2. Temperature, precipitation, and streamflow, Contributing Area Impact (Table 1): Soluble P concentration was related to slope, cropped area, soil texture, and stream density, but not geomorphic stage. Bioavailable P concentration was most related to slope and geomorphic stage. Nitrate concentration was related to stream length and geomorphic stage plus area. Suspended sediment concentration was most related to soil texture, with additional impact of slope, cropped area, and geomorphic stage of the streams. Fig. 3. Seasonal flow and concentrations of suspended sediment, nitrate, bio-available P, and soluble P from Fort Cobb streams.. Media n Outlier Upper quartile 10% 90% Lower quartile o Methods: Data collected 2005 through L samples collected bi-weekly at 15 sites, away from the bank, just below the surface Stream flow measured in Cobb Creek (342 km 2, ~73% of flow to lake), Lake Creek (154 km 2, ~18% of flow), and Willow Creek 75 km 2, ~9% of flow). (Becker and Steiner, 200_) Daily precipitation and temperature (maximum, minimum, and dewpoint) measured at the Fort Cobb Mesonet site. Nitrate, soluble P, bioavailable P, and suspended sediment measured by EPA (1983) methods. Climate Impacts on Water Quality in the Fort Cobb Reservoir (OK) Watershed JL Steiner 1, DN Moriasi 1, PJ Starks 1, S Duke 2, and JA Daniel 3 1 USDA-ARS, El Reno, OK; 2 USDA-ARS College Station, TX, 3 BLM, Elko, NV Jan-05 Mar-05 May-05 Jul-05 Sep-05 Nov-05 Jan-06 Mar-06 May-06 Jul-06 Sep-06 Nov-06 Jan-07 Mar-07 May-07 Jul-07 Sep-07 Nov-07 Jan-08 Mar-08 May-08 Jul-08 Sep-08 Nov-08 Max, Min, Dew Point Temperature ( 0 C) DAVGTMAXTMIN