Speech-Language Dismissal. This event is being funded with State and/or Federal funds and is being provided for employees of school districts, employees.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Speech Language Pathologist’s Role in Schools
Advertisements

New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
ABC Child Find Screening
THE IEP PROCESS Cassie A. Newson. Purpose of Initial Evaluation  To see if the child is a “child with a disability,” as defined by IDEA  To gather information.
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
1 Evaluation Reviews and Reevaluations Macomb ISD Special Education Management Services August, 2006.
Special Education Collaborative Meeting Policies, Procedures, Practices Fall 2011.
Understanding the IEP Process
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
The Special Education Process 1 Connecting Research to Practice for Teacher Educators.
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
Hot Topics in Speech/Language “Getting You Answers…” Keisha Dixon – Program Coordinator Mississippi Department of Education (MDE) Office of Special Education.
Extended School Year Decision Determination Process February 3,
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
Secondary Goals and Transition Strategies Speech and Language Support.
Report Writing Tips for Speech Language Pathologists
Speech and Language Eligibility Criteria Update Sheryl Squier DPI Educational Consultant Speech and Language Programs
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
ELIGIBILITY PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES Chapter Seventeen.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Students with Communication Disorders Chapter 7.
Function ~ Process ~ Responsibilities
Special Education Update Mississippi Department of Education Office of Special Education MASS Summer Conference 2013.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
A Child with a Hearing Impairment, Including Deafness ECEA Disability Category, Definition and Eligibility Criteria CDE Eligibility Training Slides March.
True or False A student’s need for AT must be considered at every ARD.
Special Education Process What are the steps if your child is suspected of having a disability? Mary K. Antonucci EDU 621.
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
Understanding Transition from Early Intervention to Preschool An Overview for Families New Jersey Department of Education New Jersey Department of Health.
1. Suspicion of Disability = Obligation to seek informed parental consent to evaluate 2. Consideration of performance domains assures a “full and individual.
Reevaluation Process NRMPS Exceptional Children’s Program Reevaluation Process December 15, 2008.
Special Education Process: Role of the School Nurse Marge Resan, Education Consultant Special Education Team Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
ARC Chairperson Training Introduction 1. The Language of Special Education Acronyms 2.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) for Special Education April 7, 2015 April 2015Office of Special Education1.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
Significant Cognitive Disability Criteria and the SCD Determination Guidance Document Webinar.
215 / 216 What’s the Difference?. This training is designed to provide administrators with clear guidelines for the provision of speech and language services.
Special Considerations: Assistive Technology and Communication Office of Special Education Division of District Support.
Transition Planning: From Age-Appropriate Assessments to Transition Services.
Significant Developmental Delay Annual State Superintendent’s Conference on Special Education and Pupil Services October 20-21, 2015.
1 The Development of a Compliant and Instructionally-Relevant Individualized Education Plan Solitia Wilson ADMS 625 Summer 2014.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
Age Appropriate Assessments: A Necessary Component to Transition.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
Under 34 CFR , the public agency must conduct a full and individual evaluation Under 34 CFR , the public agency must ensure: The child is.
Chapter 2 The Assessment Process. Two Types of Decisions Legal Decisions The student is determined to have a disability. The disability has an adverse.
Mountain BOCES. Definition of APD A deficit in the processing of information that is specific to the auditory modality. The problem may be exacerbated.
Presented by Damon Watts.  Students who receive special education are a very diverse group.  Special education is not a separate program or place-it.
And Referral for Special Education Evaluations By Special Ed Speech Therapy Staff.
The Evaluation and Re-evaluation Process Guidelines for Parents Karen Finigan, Director of Special Education & Michelle Giovanola, Lead School Psychologist.
Annual Review of Student Services, Special Education, Civil Rights Cohasset Public Schools.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
Child Find Office of Special Education Division of District Support.
Individual Family Service Plans vs
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Specific Components of the IEP Checklist
Understanding the IEP Process
The Special Education Process
Office of Special Education Updates
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
The Speech Language Pathologist’s Role in Schools
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Speech-Language Dismissal

This event is being funded with State and/or Federal funds and is being provided for employees of school districts, employees of the Mississippi Department of Education and Department contractors. Miss. Const. Art. 4, Section 66 prohibits governing authorities from making donations. According to the Mississippi Attorney General, once the Federal funds are turned over to the State, the rules for the expenditure of State funds apply. Based on Mississippi law, this event is not being provided for third party vendors or external providers ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support2

Vision _________________________________ To create a world-class educational system that gives students the knowledge and skills to be successful in college and the workforce, and to flourish as parents and citizens Mission _______________________________ To provide leadership through the development of policy and accountability systems so that all students are prepared to compete in the global community ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support3

All Students Proficient and Showing Growth in All Assessed Areas Every Student Graduates High School and is Ready for College and Career Every Child Has Access to a High-Quality Early Childhood Program Every School Has Effective Teachers and Leaders Every Community Effectively Using a World-Class Data System to Improve Student Outcomes ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support4

The OSE now has a teacher listserv available for special education teachers. The purpose of the listserv is to inform special education teachers of upcoming trainings, upcoming webinars, and other resources provided by MDE ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support5

©MDE - Office of Instructional Support6

This training is designed to provide Speech- Language Pathologists and Speech Therapists with information on procedures for dismissing a student from Speech-Language, whether it is the primary disability or a related service. The ultimate goal is to provide therapy for as short a time as is feasible, and return the student to his Least Restrictive Environment with full access to grade-level academics as soon as possible ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support7

Reevaluation procedures must be followed when dismissal is considered for a student with a Speech-Language disability. The IEP Committee must meet to determine if the student is no longer in need of special education. Reevaluation data should be collected and reviewed at the IEP meeting. The procedures are the same, whether S/L is the primary disability or a related service ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support8

Reevaluation data may include, but is not limited to: Observation across settings Interviews with teachers, parents, student Therapy log data Current academic status (report cards, progress reports, etc.) Discipline and absence reports Universal screening data Eligibility criteria / adverse impact ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support9

For a child ages 30 months or older, there must be evidence that the child’s articulation skills are below age-appropriate peers based on normative data. Documentation of a communication impairment that adversely affects educational performance in academic, social, and/or vocational settings ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support10

A student with speech and language difficulties may be eligible for special education services if s/he meets one or more of the following criteria: (1) Articulation Disorder, which reduces intelligibility and significantly interferes with communication and attracts adverse attention. The student’s articulation competency must be below what is expected for her/his chronological age or developmental level and not just an abnormal swallowing pattern; (2) Voice Disorder, which is characterized by persistent, defective voice quality, pitch, or loudness; (3) Fluency Disorder, in which the flow of verbal expression, including rate and rhythm, adversely affects communication between the student and listener; (4) Language Disorder, standardized test score must be at least 1.5 standard deviations below the mean of the test in the areas of expressive language and/or receptive language, including morphology, syntax, semantics, and/or pragmatics ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support11

Current data must be sufficient to determine whether the student no longer has a Speech-Language (S/L) disability that causes an adverse effect on his/her academic, social/behavioral, and/or vocational performance, or his/her ability to benefit from special education ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support12

Adverse impact is evident when a student’s disability negatively impacts his/her: Involvement and advancement in the general education program (academic impact); Education and participation with other students without disabilities (social impact); Participation in extracurricular and other non- academic activities (vocational impact) ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support13

Federal special education law distinguishes between “educational” performance and “academic” performance and establishes that “educational” performance is a broad concept. For example, children must be assessed by schools in all areas of suspected disability. [20 U.S.C. Sec. 1414(b)(3)(B).] Those areas are defined by Federal regulations to include: health, vision, hearing, social and emotional status, general intelligence, academic performance, communicative status, and motor abilities. [34 C.F.R. Sec (c)(4).] Academic performance is only one of the areas in which children must be assessed ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support14

Examples: The child is unable to make letter/sound associations and spell phonetically due to his/her inability to articulate age-appropriate sounds. (articulation) A child has difficulty comprehending grade-level reading material. (language) A child with average or above average intelligence remains quiet during class discussions or free time. (fluency) A child is bullied or shunned due to his inability to understand jokes, or because he sounds different. (social) ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support15

©MDE - Office of Instructional Support16 By Ana Paula G. Mumy, MS, CCC-- ‐ SLP

If current information does not clearly indicate that there is no longer a disability, the IEP Committee may decide that a more extensive formal evaluation is necessary to make a conclusive decision. If a parent requests additional assessment prior to dismissal, the IEP Committee must comply ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support17

A reevaluation is not required for dismissal if: 1.The student is graduating with a standard high school diploma, or 2.The student has exceeded the age limit for FAPE under State law (20) ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support18

©MDE - Office of Instructional Support19

Procedures should include, but are not limited to: A review of the IEP; Review of current data to determine adverse educational impact; Administration of formal assessments, if appropriate; Interviews with teachers, parents, and therapist(s); Observations across settings ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support20

If formal assessment is warranted, or requested by the parent, the parent must receive: –Procedural Safeguards –Prior Written Notice –Informed Parental Consent for testing Any decision made by the IEP Committee should be fully documented on the IEP in the PLAAFP and the Summary of Revisions. Progress should be marked on all goals relevant to dismissal ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support21

Students should be dismissed from speech therapy when one of the following criteria is met: They no longer have a disability; and/or They no longer require speech services due to their disability ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support22

The IEP Committee can determine that S/L services are no longer warranted because: A.The student no longer meets eligibility criteria for S/L services when: o He/she has mastered IEP goals/objectives. o S/L skills are within normal limits ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support23

B.The student’s progress has plateaued and/or the student no longer benefits from S/L services. o IEP shows lack of progress, and reevaluation data supports this. o Lack of progress is due to: Limited ability to self-monitor communication; Poor attendance; Lack of motivation; Limited potential for significant change ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support24

C.Communication skills no longer have an adverse impact on academic, social/behavioral, or vocational performance. D.The student no longer requires S/L services due to their disability. o Skills can be monitored and maintained in the student’s environment. o Skills are being addressed by others in the student’s environment (i.e., special education teacher, general education teacher, parent, etc.) ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support25

SLP Handbook forms: Reevaluation Checklist, pg. 101 Dismissal Criteria Form, pg. 102 These forms are not required, but contain checklists of dismissal procedures and criteria for your convenience ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support26

©MDE - Office of Instructional Support27

Teresa Laney, M.S., CCC-SLP, Instructional Specialist April Rice, Office Director Tanya Bradley, Bureau Director Office of Special Education ©MDE - Office of Instructional Support28