Total Lightning Characteristics in Mesoscale Convective Systems Don MacGorman NOAA/NSSL & Jeff Makowski OU School of Meteorology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright C. Doswell A Few Issues Concerning Nowcasting Applications Based on Oklahoma Lightning Mapping Array Data Don MacGorman NOAA/National Severe.
Advertisements

Cloud Flash Evaluation Issues and Progress Report Don MacGorman, NOAA/NSSL Al Nierow, FAA Dennis Boccippio, NASA/MSFC.
Mesoscale Features of the 31 January 2011 Oklahoma Storm Jennifer Newman School of Meteorology, University of Oklahoma.
Mesoscale Convective Vortices (MCVs) Chris Davis (NCAR ESSL/MMM and RAL) Stan Trier (NCAR ESSL/MMM) Boulder, Colorado 60-h Radar Composite Animation (00.
Lightning Climatology Oklahoma Lightning Mapping Array May - September, Paul Krehbiel New Mexico Tech September 28, 2005.
Briefing to DC3 Participants by Stephanie Weiss 9 April 2012 Anvil Lightning and Aircraft.
A Spatial Climatology of Convection in the Northeast U.S. John Murray and Brian A. Colle National Weather Service, WFO New York NY Stony Brook University,
Improved Simulations of Clouds and Precipitation Using WRF-GSI Zhengqing Ye and Zhijin Li NASA-JPL/UCLA June, 2011.
A short term rainfall prediction algorithm Nazario D. Ramirez and Joan Manuel Castro University of Puerto Rico NOAA Collaborator: Robert J. Kuligowski.
UW-CIMSS/UAH MSG SEVIRI Convection Diagnostic and Nowcasting Products Wayne F. Feltz 1, Kristopher M. Bedka 1, and John R. Mecikalski 2 1 Cooperative Institute.
Transient Luminous Events and the 9 May 2007 Oklahoma Mesoscale Convective System Contact Info: Timothy J. Lang, CSU Atmospheric Science, Ft. Collins,
STEPS Severe Thunderstorm Electrification and Precipitation Study May-July 2000 S. Rutledge, S. Tessendorf, K. Wiens, T. Lang, J. Miller # Department of.
CONVECTION IN TROPICAL CYCLONES John Molinari and David Vollaro University at Albany, SUNY Northeast Tropical Conference Rensselaerville, NY June 2009.
AMS 28th Conf. on Hurricanes & Tropical Meteorology Orlando, Florida - 29 April 2007 Convection in the Genesis Phase of Ophelia (2005) Wen-Chau Lee*Michael.
The Fourth Symposium on Southwest Hydrometeorology, Tucson Hilton East Hotel, Tucson, AZ September 20-21, 2007 Introduction The objective of this study.
The Tropical Cloud Population R. A. Houze Lecture, Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pune, 9 August 2010.
1 Comparative Lightning Characteristics of a Tornadic and Non-Tornadic Oklahoma Thunderstorm on April , 2006 Amanda Sheffield Purdue University.
Using WSR-88D Reflectivity for the Prediction of Cloud-to- Ground Lightning Nowcasting a storm’s first strike Brandon Vincent NWS-Newport Larry Carey Texas.
Cirrus Production by Tropical Mesoscale Convective Systems Jasmine Cetrone and Robert Houze University of Washington Motivation Atmospheric heating by.
Diurnal Variability of Deep Tropical Convection R. A. Houze Lecture, Summer School on Severe and Convective Weather, Nanjing, July 2011.
Diurnal Variability of Deep Tropical Convection R. A. Houze Lecture, Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pune, 12 August 2010.
Lightning The LDAR II Network Nicholas W. S. Demetriades, Ronald L. Holle and Martin J. Murphy Vaisala, Inc., Tucson, Arizona HEAT Project - First Planning.
The Rapid Evolution of Convection Approaching New York City and Long Island Michael Charles and Brian A. Colle Institute for Terrestrial and Planetary.
A Spatial Climatology of Convection in the Northeast U.S. John Murray and Brian A. Colle Stony Brook University Northeast Regional Operational Workshop.
On the relationship of in-cloud convective turbulence and total lightning Wiebke Deierling, John Williams, Sarah Al-Momar, Bob Sharman, Matthias Steiner.
The Lightning Warning Product Fifth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee November, 2009 Dennis Buechler Geoffrey Stano Richard Blakeslee transitioning.
A Framework for the Statistical Analysis of Large Radar and Lightning Datasets Timothy J. Lang, Steven A. Rutledge, and Amanda Anderson Colorado State.
A statistical framework for the analysis of large lightning and radar datasets Timothy J. Lang and Steven A. Rutledge Department of Atmospheric Science.
Christopher J. Schultz 1, Walter A. Petersen 2, Lawrence D. Carey 3* 1 - Department of Atmospheric Science, UAHuntsville, Huntsville, AL 2 – NASA Marshall.
Lightning Outbreaks in the Eyewall MET 614 Seminar Antti Pessi.
Bryan Jackson General Forecaster WFO LWX. Introduction Utilizing Total Lightning data from the DC- Lightning Mapping Array (DC-LMA) to create a preview.
Scott Rudlosky Characteristics of Positive Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Motivation and Goals Florida Power and Light Corporation dispatchers have observed.
Transient Luminous Events above Two Mesoscale Convective Systems Timothy J. Lang, Steven A. Rutledge, Walt Lyons, Jingbo Li, Steven A. Cummer, and Don.
Experiences with 0-36 h Explicit Convective Forecasting with the WRF-ARW Model Morris Weisman (Wei Wang, Chris Davis) NCAR/MMM WSN05 September 8, 2005.
 Rapidly developing convection is a known source of CIT  Satellite derived cloud top infrared (IR) cooling rate, overshooting tops (OT)/enhanced-V and.
Vaisala TLS200 VHF total lightning mapping for safety and nowcasting applications Nick Demetriades 1, Ron Holle 2, and Nikki Hembury 2 Vaisala Inc. 1 Helsinki,
The Rapid Evolution of Convection Approaching the New York City Metropolitan Region Brian A. Colle and Michael Charles Institute for Terrestrial and Planetary.
Relationships between Lightning and Radar Parameters in the Mid-Atlantic Region Scott D. Rudlosky Cooperative Institute of Climate and Satellites University.
SOME RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN MESOSCALE CONVECTIVE SYSTEMS LIFE CYCLE AND OBSERVED RAINFALL OVER DEL PLATA BASIN Daniel Vila 1,2, Luiz Augusto Toledo Machado.
Determining Relationships between Lightning and Radar in Severe and Non-Severe Storms Scott D. Rudlosky Florida State University Department of Earth, Ocean,
Edward Mansell National Severe Storms Laboratory Donald MacGorman and Conrad Ziegler National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, OK Funding sources in the.
Don MacGorman 1,2, Ted Mansell 1, Kristin Kuhlman 2, Alex Fierro 2, Conrad Ziegler 1, Stephanie Weiss 2, Dave Rust 2 1 NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory.
Cloud to Ground Lightning Climatology and Hail Prediction in the Mid-South Matthew Reagan Mississippi State University.
25N 30N 65E75E65E75E65E75E Height (km) 8 Distance (km)
Cloud Mask: Results, Frequency, Bit Mapping, and Validation UW Cloud Mask Working Group.
Lightning Jump Evaluation RITT Presentation Tom Filiaggi (NWS – MDL) 11/28/12 Evaluation of “2σ” as Predictor for Severe Weather.
NOAA-MDL Seminar 7 May 2008 Bob Rabin NOAA/National Severe Storms Lab Norman. OK CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison Challenges in Remote Sensing to.
Early Evaluation and Operational Applications of Total Lightning in AWIPS-2 Al Cope NOAA/National Weather Service Forecast Office Mount Holly, NJ
HRV (70-100%)IR10.8 (Tb 35dBz HRV cloud (HRV,HRV,IR10.8) radar Zmax > 35dBz (CC+CG) 10-minute lightning data (CC+CG) Simultaneous.
Applied Meteorology Unit 1 High Resolution Analysis Products to Support Severe Weather and Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Threat Assessments over Florida 31.
The Deep Convective Clouds and Chemistry (DC3) Field Experiment Mary C. Barth (NCAR), W. H. Brune (PSU), C. A. Cantrell (U. Colorado), S. A. Rutledge (CSU),
Developers: John Walker, Chris Jewett, John Mecikalski, Lori Schultz Convective Initiation (CI) GOES-R Proxy Algorithm University of Alabama in Huntsville.
Assimilation of Lightning Data Using a Newtonian Nudging Method Involving Low-Level Warming Max R. Marchand Henry E. Fuelberg Florida State University.
Lightning Mapping Technology & NWS Warning Decision Making Don MacGorman, NOAA/NSSL.
A Study of In-Cloud and Cloud-to-Ground Lightning in Tornado-Bearing Supercells in the Midwest Ben Herzog and Patrick S. Market Dept. of Soil, Environmental.
Investigating Lightning Cessation at KSC Holly A. Melvin Henry E. Fuelberg Florida State University GOES-R GLM Workshop September 2009.
© 2000 Roger Edwards Investigating the Potential of Using Radar to Nowcast Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Initiation over Southern Ontario 18 th Annual GLOMW.
Cheng-Zhong Zhang and Hiroshi Uyeda Hydroshperic Atmospheric Research Center, Nagoya University 1 November 2006 in Boulder, Colorado Possible Mechanism.
Holle | NWA Annual Meeting | October 06 Cloud Lightning from the National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) Ronald L. Holle, Nicholas Demetriades, and.
Operational Use of Lightning Mapping Array Data Fifth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee November, 2009 Geoffrey Stano, Dennis Buechler, and.
Challenges in Convective Storm Prediction for the Coastal-Urban New York City-Long Island Brian A. Colle 1, Kelly Lombardo 2, John Murray 3, and Harrison.
ASAP Convective Weather Research at NCAR Matthias Steiner and Huaqing Cai Rita Roberts, John Williams, David Ahijevych, Sue Dettling and David Johnson.
Paper Review Jennie Bukowski ATS APR-2017
Lightning Flashes in Alabama Tornadic Supercells on 27 April 2011
Warm front in radar images
Locations of the main updraft and downdraft
ASAP Convective Weather Analysis & Nowcasting
Visible Satellite, Radar Precipitation, and Cloud-to-Ground Lightning
Inna M. Gubenko and Konstantin G
A Real-Time Learning Technique to Predict Cloud-To-Ground Lightning
Presentation transcript:

Total Lightning Characteristics in Mesoscale Convective Systems Don MacGorman NOAA/NSSL & Jeff Makowski OU School of Meteorology

Data Sources Lightning Lightning - Oklahoma Lightning Mapping Array (OK-LMA) - National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) National composite base-scan radar reflectivity National composite base-scan radar reflectivity Level II base-scan radar reflectivity Level II base-scan radar reflectivity GOES infrared satellite GOES infrared satellite From MacGorman et al. (2008)

Methodology Studied 30 MCSs which were within the OK-LMA domain for >3 hours and isolated from neighboring convection between 2003 and 2009 Studied 30 MCSs which were within the OK-LMA domain for >3 hours and isolated from neighboring convection between 2003 and 2009 Classified each MCS according to mode of organization Classified each MCS according to mode of organization Analyzed OK-LMA flash initiations and NLDN CG strikes relative to radar reflectivity and IR cloud shield Analyzed OK-LMA flash initiations and NLDN CG strikes relative to radar reflectivity and IR cloud shield Computed cloud shield area < -52, -54, -60, -66, and Computed cloud shield area < -52, -54, -60, -66, and -72 ˚C and minimum brightness temperature for each infrared satellite scan -72 ˚C and minimum brightness temperature for each infrared satellite scan

Lightning Summary 21% of all flashes were cloud-to-ground (CG) strikes 21% of all flashes were cloud-to-ground (CG) strikes 13% of all CGs lowered positive charge to ground 13% of all CGs lowered positive charge to ground Maximum total flash rate (average over 30 min period) across all cases was 700 flashes per minute (fpm) with average maximum flash rate of 179 fpm Maximum total flash rate (average over 30 min period) across all cases was 700 flashes per minute (fpm) with average maximum flash rate of 179 fpm Maximum CG flash rate (average over 30 min period) across all cases was 180 fpm with average maximum flash rate of 37 fpm Maximum CG flash rate (average over 30 min period) across all cases was 180 fpm with average maximum flash rate of 37 fpm

OK -LMA Initiation Points and Radar Reflectivity for a Symmetric MCS LMA initiation points for 10-min period centered on 0435 UTC, 12 June 2003

CG Flashes and Radar Reflectivity for 12 June 2003 MCS ‘+’ indicates positive ground strike

CG Flashes and Radar Reflectivity for 14 May 2003 MCS ‘+’ indicates positive ground strike

OK-LMA Initiation Points, NLDN Ground Strikes and Radar Reflectivity for an Asymmetric MCS LMA initiation points (white) and NLDN ground strikes (black) for 10-min period centered on 1135 UTC, 6 July 2004

OK-LMA Initiation Points and Radar Reflectivity for an Unclassifiable MCS LMA initiation points for 10-min period centered on 0805 UTC, 22 August 2005

OK-LMA Initiation Points and Radar Reflectivity for 1 July 2004 MCS 0405 UTC 0605 UTC 0805 UTC

Composite Mean of Total and CG Flash Rates Total Lightning CG Lightning

Total and CG Lightning Histograms for 19 August 2007 MCS Total activity denoted by barsCG activity denoted by solid line

Total CG and +CG Flash Histograms for 19 August 2007 MCS Total CG activity denoted by bars +CG activity denoted by bars

Infrared Satellite and Radar Reflectivity Overlaid with OK-LMA Initiation Points for 30 May 2007 MCS 1105 UTC

Infrared Satellite and Radar Reflectivity Overlaid with OK-LMA Initiation Points for 21 June 2004 MCS 1105 UTC

Maximum Total and CG Flash Rates vs. Maximum -52 ˚C Cloud Shield Area Total Lightning CG Lightning

Maximum Total and CG Flash Rates vs. Minimum Cloud Shield Temperature Total Lightning CG Lightning

Total and CG Flash Rates vs. Maximum -52 ˚C Cloud Shield Growth Rate Total LightningCG Lightning

Total Lightning Evolution Relative to Cloud Shield Area for 27 May 2008 MCS -52 ˚C -60 ˚C -72 ˚C Time series of total lightning shown in red, with cloud shield area shown in black

Total Lightning Evolution Relative to Cloud Shield Area and Minimum Cloud Top Temperature for 1 July 2004 MCS -52 ˚C -60 ˚C Minimum Brightness Temperature Time Series of total lightning shown in red, with time series of cloud shield area shown in black and minimum brightness temperature shown in gray

Composite Time Series of Total Lightning Relative to -52 and -66 ˚C Cloud Shield Area -52 ˚C Cloud Shield-66 ˚C Cloud Shield Total lightning evolution shown in red, with black line indicating cloud shield evolution

Summary CG and total lightning flash rates usually evolve similarly, but ground flash fraction tends to increase as deep convection weakens CG and total lightning flash rates usually evolve similarly, but ground flash fraction tends to increase as deep convection weakens Most lightning initiated within deep convection; fewer flashes initiated within stratiform precipitation Most lightning initiated within deep convection; fewer flashes initiated within stratiform precipitation Timing of evolution of flash rates is most similar to timing of evolution of coldest cloud shield Timing of evolution of flash rates is most similar to timing of evolution of coldest cloud shield Flash initiations depict configuration of deep convection better than IR cloud shield -- comparable to depiction by radar reflectivity Flash initiations depict configuration of deep convection better than IR cloud shield -- comparable to depiction by radar reflectivity

Total and CG Lightning Histograms for 30 April 2004 MCS Total activity denoted by barsCG activity denoted by solid line

Ground Flash Fraction for 30 April 2004 MCS

Total Flash Rate vs. Ground Flash Percentage

Ground Flash Fraction for 19 August 2007 MCS

Positive Ground Flash Fraction for 19 August 2007