Experiments on strong field QED in crystals (CERN NA63) J.U. Andersen, H. Knudsen, S.P. Møller, A.H. Sørensen, E. Uggerhøj, U.I. Uggerhøj Department of.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.

Advertisements

A Capture Section Design for the CLIC Positron Source A. VIVOLI* Thanks to: L. RINOLFI (CERN) R. CHEHAB (IPNL & LAL / IN2P3-CNRS) O. DADOUN, P. LEPERCQ,

NA63 Electromagnetic processes in strong crystalline fields Status Report Ulrik I. Uggerhøj.

PHENIX Decadal Plan o Midterm upgrades until 2015 o Long term evolution after 2015 Dynamical origins of spin- dependent interactions New probes of longitudinal.

GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.

1 Electron Beam Polarimetry for EIC/eRHIC W. Lorenzon (Michigan) Introduction Polarimetry at HERA Lessons learned from HERA Polarimetry at EIC.

Geant4 simulation of roman pots A. Kupco, P. Ruzicka, M. Tasevsky.

Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September

L. Suszycki, Tel Aviv, Sept, 2005 LumiCal background studies Contents: Guinea Pig results Vermasseren results Remarks on energy reconstruction Conclusions.

NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Sheppard/Pitthan June 26, 2015 Towards an Undulator Based NLC Positron Source Towards an Undulator Based NLC Positron.

NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Sheppard/Pitthan July 14, 2015 POWER Meeting June 8=9,2002 Durham, England POWER Meeting June 8=9,2002 Durham, England.

Bogdan Wojtsekhowski, Jefferson Lab Experimental search for A’ for APEX collaboration 1.

The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.

August 2005Snowmass Workshop IP Instrumentation Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Measurement of: Luminosity (precise and fast) Energy Polarisation.

CRYSTAL-BASED COLLIMATION SYSTEM AS AN ALTERNATIVE WAY TO SOLVE THE COLLIMATION PROBLEM FOR FUTURE HIGH ENERGY ACCELERATORS ALEXEI SYTOV Research Institute.

St. Petersburg State University. Department of Physics. Division of Computational Physics. COMPUTER SIMULATION OF CURRENT PRODUCED BY PULSE OF HARD RADIATION.

Beijing, Feb 3 rd, 2007 LEPOL 1 Low Energy Positron Polarimetry for the ILC Sabine Riemann (DESY) On behalf of the LEPOL Collaboration.

Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.

Suppression of Ultra Relativistic Electron Radiation in a Thin Layer of Matter: Direct Manifestation of “Half-Bare” Particle Interaction S.P. Fomin, A.S.

A study of systematic uncertainties of Compton e-detector at JLab, Hall C and its cross calibration against Moller polarimeter APS April Meeting 2014 Amrendra.

Polarimetry at the LC Source Which type of polarimetry, at which energies for LC ? Sabine Riemann (DESY), LEPOL Group International Workshop on Linear.

The Gas Čerenkov Detector for the Crystal- Barrel Experiment at ELSA D. Kaiser Hemholtz-Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik der Uni Bonn supported by.

Status of Møller Polarimeter Peter-Bernd Otte September 23, th Collaboration Meeting, Mainz.

1 Options for low energy spin manipulation Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October 2009 K. Moffeit, D.

1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.

Oct. 6, Summary of the Polarisation Session J. Clarke, G. Moortgat-Pick, S. Riemann 10 November 2006, ECFA Workshop, Valencia.

Feb. 7, 2007First GLAST symposium1 Measuring the PSF and the energy resolution with the GLAST-LAT Calibration Unit Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test.

Coherent Diffraction Radiation experiment Konstantin Lekomtsev, Grahame Blair, Gary Boorman, Pavel Karataev, Maximilian Micheler John Adams Institute at.

Implementation and study of depolarizing effects in GUINEA-PIG++ beam-beam interaction simulation Advanced QED Methods for Future Accelerators 3 rd -4.

Photon Flux Control Liping Gan UNCW. Outline PrimEx-  experiment requirement Tagged photon Procedure to obtain the number of tagged photons Relative.

1 Yuri Shestakov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk, Russia Tagging system of almost-real photons for photonuclear experiments at VEPP-3 Moscow,

Hadronic interaction studies with the ARGO-YBJ experiment (5,800 m 2 ) 10 Pads (56 x 62 cm 2 ) for each RPC 8 Strips (6.5 x 62 cm 2 ) for each Pad ( 

» RHIC Polarimetry « Oleg Eyser for the RHIC Polarimetry Group 2014 RHIC Retreat, August 14.

Charged Particle Multiplicity and Transverse Energy in √s nn = 130 GeV Au+Au Collisions Klaus Reygers University of Münster, Germany for the PHENIX Collaboration.

HEP Tel Aviv University LumiCal (pads design) Simulation Ronen Ingbir FCAL Simulation meeting, Zeuthen Tel Aviv University HEP experimental Group Collaboration.

Perspectives for polarized antiprotons Paolo Lenisa Università di Ferrara and INFN - Italy Perspectives for Polarized Antiprotons MENU 2013 – Rome, September.

Electromagnetic processes in strong crystalline fields, H4 Oct. ’07 J.U. Andersen, K. Kirsebom, S.P. Møller, A.H. Sørensen, U.I. Uggerhøj Department of.

Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.

22 th October 2010 IWLC Sources working group J. Clarke, T. Omori, L. Rinolfi, A. Variola Summary of Sources working group WG1 with contributions from.

The Luminosity Calorimeter Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University Desy ( On behalf of the FCAL collaboration ) June 11 th 2008.

 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.

Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.

Validation of Geant4 (V4.2) for GLAST-LAT -Comparison with Theory, Beam Test Data and EGS4 – S. Ogata, T. Mizuno, H. Mizushima (Hiroshima/SLAC) P. Valtersson,

January 13, 2004A. Cherlin1 Preliminary results from the 2000 run of CERES on low-mass e + e - pair production in Pb-Au collisions at 158 A GeV A. Cherlin.

DAMPE has successfully completed 3 weeks of test beam campaign – 2 weeks in the PS T9, 1 week in SPS H4 – ~60 people participated in the setup and data.

Feb. 3, 2007IFC meeting1 Beam test report Ph. Bruel on behalf of the beam test working group Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.

L. Nemenov, EXA05 Using  -  and  -K atoms for the experimental check of low-energy QCD L. Nemenov (CERN, Switzerland) Presented by L. Tauscher Basel.

Tests of beam-beam effects with strong field QED experiments in crystals Ulrik I. Uggerhøj Department of Physics and Astronomy Aarhus University, Denmark.

Ultrarelativistic particles in matter Ulrik I. Uggerhøj (representing the Aarhus group) Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Denmark.

FCAL Krakow meeting, 6. May LumiCal concept including the tracker R. Ingbir, P.Růžička, V. Vrba.

FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.

Luminosity at  collider Marco Zanetti (MIT) 1. Intro,  colliders basics Luminosity at  colliders Sapphire simulation Alternative approaches Luminosity.

Motivation Test of quantum mechanical calculations of synchrotron radiation. Relevant for linear colliders, astrophysical objects like magnetars, heavy.

Status: Structured target resonance Magnetic suppression

Positron production rate vs incident electron beam energy for a tungsten target

Test of Hybrid Target at KEKB LINAC

Exclusive w/h production in pp collisions at Ekin=3.5 GeV with HADES

N.F. Shul’ga Akhiezer Institute for Theoretical Physics,

of secondary light ion beams

Precision Measurement of the Electroproduction of p0 Near Threshold:

Study of e+ e- background due to beamstrahlung for different ILC parameter sets Stephan Gronenborn.

Charged Particle Multiplicity in DIS

Beam-time, June 2009 Beam-time, Oct days of beam time

GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction

PLANNED EXPERIMENT ON INVESTIGATION OF ‘HALF-BARE’ ELECTRON TRANSITION RADIATION PROPERTIES ON 45-MeV CLIO FACILITY S. Trofymenko1,2), N.

Chapter 5 - Interactions of Ionizing Radiation

N.F. Shul’ga Akhiezer Institute for Theoretical Physics,

Beam-time, June 2009 Beam-time, Oct days of beam time

CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?

Presentation transcript:

Experiments on strong field QED in crystals (CERN NA63) J.U. Andersen, H. Knudsen, S.P. Møller, A.H. Sørensen, E. Uggerhøj, U.I. Uggerhøj Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Denmark P. Sona Dipartimento di Fisica, Universitá degli Studi di Firenze, Polo Scientifico, Sesto F.no, Italy S. Connell, S. Ballestrero Johannesburg University, Johannesburg, South Africa T. Ketel NIKHEF, Amsterdam, Holland S. Kartal, A. Dizdar Department of Physics, Istanbul University, Turkey A. Mangiarotti Laboratório de Instrumentação e F í sica Experimental de Part í culas, Coimbra, Portugal Status Report

Results, Oct run 1. Trident production in strong fields 2. Formation length effects

Trident production

Trident production: Background (no target) in nearly complete agreement with GEANT simulation (= no big surprises) Contributes about 20% Trident (Klein-like) Setup optimized for detection of 1-10 GeV pairs from 200 GeV electrons

Non-aligned crystal JETP Lett.88:80-84,2008 Small multi- hit capability Geometric acceptance

Spectrometer efficiency

Aligned case

Single target Shul’ga-Fomin: Reduced multiple scattering – no suppression from LPM effect JETP Lett. 63, 873 (1996) Bethe-Heitler LPM

Measurements

Results, Oct run 1. Restricted energy loss 2. Formation length effects

Ogle effect Coherence length: Range for tagged e- beam: gamma: [1  10 3 ;4  10 5 ] Alternative (Akhiezer, Shul’ga): Loss of density effect 1. 2.

Sandwich target 10 layers: Ta (10 microns) Air (100 microns) Resonances from formation length

Wednesday, SPS malfunction in B3 (ground error)  12 hrs. lost, max. energy 180 GeV Ilias Efthymiopoulos, Bruno Chauchaix  back in business (thanks!) 6 days lost, 5 days left

Ogle effect – suppression unlikely real, loss of density effect possible

Sandwich ’resonances’ (?) ’onset’ for 120 GeV e -

Plans for week in June

intensity proportional to the logarithm of the thickness intensity linear with thickness 1 week in June

Plans for weeks in autumn

Spin-flip

’Polarization time’

Similar situations ILC / CLIC Bunch-size: 300  0.6  μm 3, 2·10 10 particles Density: Å -3, 0.6 Å -3 (at IP) Si crystal Density: 0.05 Å -3, of Z = 14 Blankenbecler, Drell (PRD 36, 277 (1987), Quantum treatment of beamstrahlung: ”Pulse transforms into a very long narrow ’string’ of N charges.”

Spin contr. to beamstrahlung Blankenbecler and Drell, ”Quantum treatment of beamstrahlung”, PRD 36, 277 (1987) Radiation from crystal C ≈ 1/ χ Spin-flip contribution:

Blankenbecler and Drell, ”Quantum treatment of beamstrahlung”, PRD 36, 277 (1987) Spin contr. to beamstrahlung

Contribution of spin to radiation emission in crystals 2 weeks in autumn Crystals Beamstrahlung Time required for setting up + calibration in autumn: 1 week Total: 1 week in spring, 3 weeks in autumn

Strong interest (CTF3, L. Rinolfi) in positron- production studies with aligned crystals – to be used for e.g. CLIC Simulations. NA63 can measure this – addendum in preparation

Publications and summary

Publications From ’preparatory phase’ of NA63: testrun in 2004 NA63: run in 2007 NA63: 2007, Subm. April ’09 NA63: 2008, Subm. May ’09

From the proposal of NA63 Done. Analysis in progr. First observ., systematical 2009 Alternative routes superior 2009