SL: Basic syntax - formulae Atomic formulae – have no connectives If P is a formula, so is ~P If P and Q are formulae, so are (P&Q), (P  Q), (P  Q),

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aristotelian logic Lesson 7.
Advertisements

1Everyone that Michael likes likes either Henry or Sue 2Michael likes everyone that both Sue and Rita like 3Michael likes everyone that either Sue or Rita.
The Logic of Quantified Statements
The assertoric syllogism Paul Thom. The first figure a a a Barbara e e Celarent i i Darii Ferio o A B C.
Sentential Logic. One of our main critical thinking questions was: Does the evidence support the conclusion? How do we evaluate whether specific evidence.
Chapter 1: The Foundations: Logic and Proofs 1.1 Propositional Logic 1.2 Propositional Equivalences 1.3 Predicates and Quantifiers 1.4 Nested Quantifiers.
Exam #3 will be given on Monday Nongraded Homework: Now that we are familiar with the universal quantifier, try
Predicate Logic and the language PL  In SL, the smallest unit is the simple declarative sentence.  But many arguments (and other relationships between.
Test 4 Review For test 4, you need to know: Definitions the recursive definition of ‘formula of PL’ atomic formula of PL sentence of PL bound variable.
FOL Practice. Models A model for FOL requires 3 things: A set of things in the world called the UD A list of constants A list of predicates, relations,
Section 1.4: Nested Quantifiers We will now look more closely at how quantifiers can be nested in a proposition and how to interpret more complicated logical.
Proofs in Predicate Logic A rule of inference applies only if the main operator of the line is the right main operator. So if the line is a simple statement,
Discussion #16 1/12 Discussion #16 Validity & Equivalences.
For Wednesday, read chapter 6, section 1. As nongraded HW, do the problems on p Graded Homework #7 is due on Friday at the beginning of class. In.
For 42 – 47: UD = everything; Ax = x is an apple; Nxy = x is in y; Px = x is a pear; Rx = x is rotten; b = the basket 42There are apples and pears in the.
Review Test 5 You need to know: How to symbolize sentences that include quantifiers of overlapping scope Definitions: Quantificational truth, falsity and.
Predicate Logic (PL) 1.Syntax: The language of PL Formula VS. Sentence Symbolize A-, E, I-, and O-sentences 2.Semantic: a sentence compare two sentences.
March 5: more on quantifiers We have encountered formulas and sentences that include multiple quantifiers: Take, for example: UD: People in Michael’s office.
EE1J2 - Slide 1 EE1J2 – Discrete Maths Lecture 6 Limitations of propositional logic Introduction to predicate logic Symbols, terms and formulae, Parse.
Formal Logic Mathematical Structures for Computer Science Chapter 1 Copyright © 2006 W.H. Freeman & Co.MSCS SlidesFormal Logic.
PL continued: Quantifiers and the syntax of PL 1. Quantifiers of PL 1. Quantifier symbols 2. Variables used with quantifiers 2. Truth functional compounds.
1Everyone that Michael likes likes either Henry or Sue 2Michael likes everyone that both Sue and Rita like 3Michael likes everyone that either Sue or Rita.
Predicate-Argument Structure Monadic predicates: Properties Dyadic predicate: Binary relations Polyadic Predicates: Relations with more then two arguments.
Predicate Logic. Goal of Logic The goal of logic is to develop formal tests for validity. This is done by finding deductively valid argument forms. In.
1 CS 1502 Formal Methods in Computer Science Lecture Notes 12 Variables and Quantifiers.
Categorical Syllogisms
Chapter 1: The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
Formal Logic Mathematical Structures for Computer Science Chapter Copyright © 2006 W.H. Freeman & Co.MSCS SlidesFormal Logic.
ITIS 1210 Introduction to Web-Based Information Systems Internet Research Two How Search Engines Rank Pages & Constructing Complex Searches.
Quantifiers, Predicates, and Names Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College Universals, by Dena Shottenkirk.
1 Section 7.2 Equivalent Formulas Two wffs A and B are equivalent, written A  B, if they have the same truth value for every interpretation. Property:
PART TWO PREDICATE LOGIC. Chapter Seven Predicate Logic Symbolization.
Introduction to Quantification Chapter 9 Language, Proof and Logic.
1Everyone that Michael likes likes either Henry or Sue 2Michael likes everyone that both Sue and Rita like 3Michael likes everyone that either Sue or Rita.
First Order Logic Dr. Rogelio Dávila Pérez Professor - Researcher Information Technologies Department ITESM, Campus Guadalajara.
Selected Exercises of Sec. 1.2~Sec.1.4 Sec. 1.2 Exercise 41 p, q, r 중에 두 개가 참이면 참이 되고, 그 외 의 경우에는 거짓이 되는 복합명제를 구하 시오. Find a compound proposition involving.
Natural Deduction for Predicate Logic Bound Variable: A variable within the scope of a quantifier. – (x) Px – (  y) (Zy · Uy) – (z) (Mz  ~Nz) Free Variable:
For Wednesday Read chapter 9, sections 1-3 Homework: –Chapter 7, exercises 8 and 9.
Lecture 8 Predicate Logic TF4233 Mathematical Logic Semester 2, 2006/2007 Dr. Rolly Intan & Cherry Ballangan, MAIT Informatics Department, Petra Christian.
Chapter 2 Symbolic Logic. Section 2-1 Truth, Equivalence and Implication.
For Friday Read chapter 8 Homework: –Chapter 7, exercises 2 and 10 Program 1, Milestone 2 due.
CSC 411/511: DBMS Design Dr. Nan WangCSC411_L5_Relational Calculus 1 Relational Calculus Chapter 4 – Part B.
Sentential Logic.
80-210: Logic & Proofs July 30, 2009 Karin Howe
Chapter 9: Syntax and Semantics II : Logic & Proofs July 23, 2009 Karin Howe.
Review for Final Exam : Logic & Proofs August 6, 2009 Karin Howe.
Theory of (categorical) syllogisms (A4-6 about the three „figures”) Three terms: A, B, C Suppose that relation a holds between B and C and a or e holds.
Aristotelian Logic.
Lecture 1-3: Quantifiers and Predicates. Variables –A variable is a symbol that stands for an individual in a collection or set. –Example, a variable.
EXAMPLE FORMULA DEFINITION 1.
Discrete Math - Module #1 - Logic
Modal, Dynamic and Temporal Logics
Predicate Calculus Discussion #14 Chapter 2, Section 1 1/20.
Discussion #14 Predicate Calculus
Sets and Logic…. Chapter 2
CS201: Data Structures and Discrete Mathematics I
Decidability of logical theories
Predicate Calculus Discussion #14 Chapter 2, Section 1.
Mathematical Structures for Computer Science Chapter 1
1st-order Predicate Logic (FOL)
Metatheorems Computational Logic Lecture 8
Xuan Guo Lab 3 Xuan Guo
Reason and Argument Chapter 7 (2/2).
Proofs in Predicate Logic
Decidability of logical theories
Predicate Logic Hurley 8.1 Translation.
X X X X Logical relations among categorical propositions S P S P S P
CS201: Data Structures and Discrete Mathematics I
Predicate Calculus. Predicate Calculus Topics Predicates Variables and instantiation Quantifiers Logical expressions Bound and free variables.
1st-order Predicate Logic (FOL)
Presentation transcript:

SL: Basic syntax - formulae Atomic formulae – have no connectives If P is a formula, so is ~P If P and Q are formulae, so are (P&Q), (P  Q), (P  Q), (P  Q) nothing else is a formula

PL: Basic syntax – formulae of PL Atomic formulae of PL are formulae If P is a formula, so is ~P If P and Q are formulae, so are (P&Q), (P  Q), (P  Q), (P  Q) If P is a formula with at least one occurrence of x and no x-quantifier, then  xPx and  xPx are formulae nothing else is a formula

PL: Basic syntax – definitions of important notions Atomic formulae

PL: Basic syntax – definitions of important notions Atomic formulae Formulae

PL: Basic syntax – definitions of important notions Atomic formulae Formulae (Main) Logical operator

PL: Basic syntax – definitions of important notions Atomic formulae Formulae (Main) Logical operator Scope of a quantifier

PL: Basic syntax – definitions of important notions Atomic formulae Formulae (Main) Logical operator Scope of a quantifier Bound/Free variable

PL: Basic syntax – definitions of important notions Atomic formulae Formulae (Main) Logical operator Scope of a quantifier Bound/Free variable Sentence

PL: Basic syntax – definitions of important notions Atomic formulae Formulae (Main) Logical operator Scope of a quantifier Bound/Free variable Sentence Substitution instance

Aristotle

Aristotle’s Syllogistic AUniversal affirmative:All As are B  x(Ax  Bx) EUniversal negative:No As are B  x(Ax  ~Bx) or ~  x(Ax & Bx) IParticular affirmative:Some As are B  x(Ax & Bx) OParticular negative:Some As are not B  x(Ax & ~ Bx) or ~  x(Ax  Bx)

Logical Square

 x(Sx  Px)  x(Sx & ~ Px) or ~  x(Sx  Px)

Logical Square  x(Sx  Px)  x(Sx & ~ Px) or ~  x(Sx  Px)  x(Sx & Px)  x(Sx  ~Px) or ~  x(Sx & Bx)

All Syllogisms First Figure: L, M, S If every M is L and every S is M, then every S is L (Barbara) If no M is L and every S is M, then no S is L (Celarent) If every M is L and some S is M, then some S is L (Darii) If no M is L and some S is M, then some S is not L (Ferio). Second Figure: M, L, S If no L is M and every S is 11.I, then no S is L (Cesare) If every L is M and no S is M, then no S is L (Camestres) If no L is M and some S is M, then some S is not L (Festino) If every L is M and some S is not M, then some S is not L (Baroco). Third Figure: L, S, M If every M is L and every M is S, then some S is L (Darapti) If no M is L and every M is S, then some S is not L (Felapton) If some M is L and every M is S, then some S is L (Disamis) If every M is L and some M is S, then some S is L (Datisi) If some M is not L and every M is S, then some S is not L (Bocardo) If no M is L and some M is S, then some S is not L (Ferison).

1.1. If every M is L and every S is M, then every S is L (Barbara). All Ms are L All Ss are M So all Ss are L Barbara

1.1. If every M is L and every S is M, then every S is L (Barbara). All Ms are LA All Ss are MAbArbArA So all Ss are LA Barbara

Chrysippus

Greece

7.6E2 a. ( ∀ y)(By ⊃ Ly)

7.6E2 a. ( ∀ y)(By ⊃ Ly) b. ( ∀ x)(Rx ⊃ Sx)

7.6E2 a. ( ∀ y)(By ⊃ Ly) b. ( ∀ x)(Rx ⊃ Sx) c. ( ∀ z)(Rz ⊃ ∼ Lz)

7.6E2 a. ( ∀ y)(By ⊃ Ly) b. ( ∀ x)(Rx ⊃ Sx) c. ( ∀ z)(Rz ⊃ ∼ Lz) d. ( ∃ w)(Rw & Cw)

7.6E2 a. ( ∀ y)(By ⊃ Ly) b. ( ∀ x)(Rx ⊃ Sx) c. ( ∀ z)(Rz ⊃ ∼ Lz) d. ( ∃ w)(Rw & Cw) e. ( ∃ x)Bx & ( ∃ x)Rx

7.6E2 a. ( ∀ y)(By ⊃ Ly) b. ( ∀ x)(Rx ⊃ Sx) c. ( ∀ z)(Rz ⊃ ∼ Lz) d. ( ∃ w)(Rw & Cw) e. ( ∃ x)Bx & ( ∃ x)Rx f. ( ∃ y)Oy & ( ∃ y) ∼ Oy

7.6E2 a. ( ∀ y)(By ⊃ Ly) b. ( ∀ x)(Rx ⊃ Sx) c. ( ∀ z)(Rz ⊃ ∼ Lz) d. ( ∃ w)(Rw & Cw) e. ( ∃ x)Bx & ( ∃ x)Rx f. ( ∃ y)Oy & ( ∃ y) ∼ Oy g. [( ∃ z)Bz & ( ∃ z)Rz] & ∼ ( ∃ z)(Bz & Rz)

7.6E2 a. ( ∀ y)(By ⊃ Ly) b. ( ∀ x)(Rx ⊃ Sx) c. ( ∀ z)(Rz ⊃ ∼ Lz) d. ( ∃ w)(Rw & Cw) e. ( ∃ x)Bx & ( ∃ x)Rx f. ( ∃ y)Oy & ( ∃ y) ∼ Oy g. [( ∃ z)Bz & ( ∃ z)Rz] & ∼ ( ∃ z)(Bz & Rz) h. ( ∀ w)(Rw ⊃ Sw) & ( ∀ x)(Gx ⊃ Ox)

7.6E2 a. ( ∀ y)(By ⊃ Ly) b. ( ∀ x)(Rx ⊃ Sx) c. ( ∀ z)(Rz ⊃ ∼ Lz) d. ( ∃ w)(Rw & Cw) e. ( ∃ x)Bx & ( ∃ x)Rx f. ( ∃ y)Oy & ( ∃ y) ∼ Oy g. [( ∃ z)Bz & ( ∃ z)Rz] & ∼ ( ∃ z)(Bz & Rz) h. ( ∀ w)(Rw ⊃ Sw) & ( ∀ x)(Gx ⊃ Ox) i. ( ∃ y)By & [( ∃ y)Sy & ( ∃ y)Ly]

7.6E2 a. ( ∀ y)(By ⊃ Ly) b. ( ∀ x)(Rx ⊃ Sx) c. ( ∀ z)(Rz ⊃ ∼ Lz) d. ( ∃ w)(Rw & Cw) e. ( ∃ x)Bx & ( ∃ x)Rx f. ( ∃ y)Oy & ( ∃ y) ∼ Oy g. [( ∃ z)Bz & ( ∃ z)Rz] & ∼ ( ∃ z)(Bz & Rz) h. ( ∀ w)(Rw ⊃ Sw) & ( ∀ x)(Gx ⊃ Ox) i. ( ∃ y)By & [( ∃ y)Sy & ( ∃ y)Ly] j. ∼ ( ∃ z)(Rz & Lz)

7.6E2 a. ( ∀ y)(By ⊃ Ly) b. ( ∀ x)(Rx ⊃ Sx) c. ( ∀ z)(Rz ⊃ ∼ Lz) d. ( ∃ w)(Rw & Cw) e. ( ∃ x)Bx & ( ∃ x)Rx f. ( ∃ y)Oy & ( ∃ y) ∼ Oy g. [( ∃ z)Bz & ( ∃ z)Rz] & ∼ ( ∃ z)(Bz & Rz) h. ( ∀ w)(Rw ⊃ Sw) & ( ∀ x)(Gx ⊃ Ox) i. ( ∃ y)By & [( ∃ y)Sy & ( ∃ y)Ly] j. ∼ ( ∃ z)(Rz & Lz) k. ( ∀ w)(Cw ⊃ Rw) & ∼ ( ∀ w)(Rw ⊃ Cw)

7.6E2 a. ( ∀ y)(By ⊃ Ly) b. ( ∀ x)(Rx ⊃ Sx) c. ( ∀ z)(Rz ⊃ ∼ Lz) d. ( ∃ w)(Rw & Cw) e. ( ∃ x)Bx & ( ∃ x)Rx f. ( ∃ y)Oy & ( ∃ y) ∼ Oy g. [( ∃ z)Bz & ( ∃ z)Rz] & ∼ ( ∃ z)(Bz & Rz) h. ( ∀ w)(Rw ⊃ Sw) & ( ∀ x)(Gx ⊃ Ox) i. ( ∃ y)By & [( ∃ y)Sy & ( ∃ y)Ly] j. ∼ ( ∃ z)(Rz & Lz) k. ( ∀ w)(Cw ⊃ Rw) & ∼ ( ∀ w)(Rw ⊃ Cw) l. ( ∀ z)Rx & [( ∃ y)Cy & ( ∃ y) ∼ Cy]

7.6E2 a. ( ∀ y)(By ⊃ Ly) b. ( ∀ x)(Rx ⊃ Sx) c. ( ∀ z)(Rz ⊃ ∼ Lz) d. ( ∃ w)(Rw & Cw) e. ( ∃ x)Bx & ( ∃ x)Rx f. ( ∃ y)Oy & ( ∃ y) ∼ Oy g. [( ∃ z)Bz & ( ∃ z)Rz] & ∼ ( ∃ z)(Bz & Rz) h. ( ∀ w)(Rw ⊃ Sw) & ( ∀ x)(Gx ⊃ Ox) i. ( ∃ y)By & [( ∃ y)Sy & ( ∃ y)Ly] j. ∼ ( ∃ z)(Rz & Lz) k. ( ∀ w)(Cw ⊃ Rw) & ∼ ( ∀ w)(Rw ⊃ Cw) l. ( ∀ z)Rx & [( ∃ y)Cy & ( ∃ y) ∼ Cy] m. ( ∀ y)Ry ∨ [( ∀ y)By ∨ ( ∀ y)Gy]

7.6E2 a. ( ∀ y)(By ⊃ Ly) b. ( ∀ x)(Rx ⊃ Sx) c. ( ∀ z)(Rz ⊃ ∼ Lz) d. ( ∃ w)(Rw & Cw) e. ( ∃ x)Bx & ( ∃ x)Rx f. ( ∃ y)Oy & ( ∃ y) ∼ Oy g. [( ∃ z)Bz & ( ∃ z)Rz] & ∼ ( ∃ z)(Bz & Rz) h. ( ∀ w)(Rw ⊃ Sw) & ( ∀ x)(Gx ⊃ Ox) i. ( ∃ y)By & [( ∃ y)Sy & ( ∃ y)Ly] j. ∼ ( ∃ z)(Rz & Lz) k. ( ∀ w)(Cw ⊃ Rw) & ∼ ( ∀ w)(Rw ⊃ Cw) l. ( ∀ z)Rx & [( ∃ y)Cy & ( ∃ y) ∼ Cy] m. ( ∀ y)Ry ∨ [( ∀ y)By ∨ ( ∀ y)Gy] n. ∼ ( ∀ x)Lx & ( ∀ x)(Lx ⊃ Bx)

7.6E2 a. ( ∀ y)(By ⊃ Ly) b. ( ∀ x)(Rx ⊃ Sx) c. ( ∀ z)(Rz ⊃ ∼ Lz) d. ( ∃ w)(Rw & Cw) e. ( ∃ x)Bx & ( ∃ x)Rx f. ( ∃ y)Oy & ( ∃ y) ∼ Oy g. [( ∃ z)Bz & ( ∃ z)Rz] & ∼ ( ∃ z)(Bz & Rz) h. ( ∀ w)(Rw ⊃ Sw) & ( ∀ x)(Gx ⊃ Ox) i. ( ∃ y)By & [( ∃ y)Sy & ( ∃ y)Ly] j. ∼ ( ∃ z)(Rz & Lz) k. ( ∀ w)(Cw ⊃ Rw) & ∼ ( ∀ w)(Rw ⊃ Cw) l. ( ∀ z)Rx & [( ∃ y)Cy & ( ∃ y) ∼ Cy] m. ( ∀ y)Ry ∨ [( ∀ y)By ∨ ( ∀ y)Gy] n. ∼ ( ∀ x)Lx & ( ∀ x)(Lx ⊃ Bx) o. ( ∃ w)(Rw & Sw) & ( ∃ w)(Rw & ∼ Sw)

7.6E2 a. ( ∀ y)(By ⊃ Ly) b. ( ∀ x)(Rx ⊃ Sx) c. ( ∀ z)(Rz ⊃ ∼ Lz) d. ( ∃ w)(Rw & Cw) e. ( ∃ x)Bx & ( ∃ x)Rx f. ( ∃ y)Oy & ( ∃ y) ∼ Oy g. [( ∃ z)Bz & ( ∃ z)Rz] & ∼ ( ∃ z)(Bz & Rz) h. ( ∀ w)(Rw ⊃ Sw) & ( ∀ x)(Gx ⊃ Ox) i. ( ∃ y)By & [( ∃ y)Sy & ( ∃ y)Ly] j. ∼ ( ∃ z)(Rz & Lz) k. ( ∀ w)(Cw ⊃ Rw) & ∼ ( ∀ w)(Rw ⊃ Cw) l. ( ∀ z)Rx & [( ∃ y)Cy & ( ∃ y) ∼ Cy] m. ( ∀ y)Ry ∨ [( ∀ y)By ∨ ( ∀ y)Gy] n. ∼ ( ∀ x)Lx & ( ∀ x)(Lx ⊃ Bx) o. ( ∃ w)(Rw & Sw) & ( ∃ w)(Rw & ∼ Sw) p. [( ∃ w)Sw & ( ∃ w)Ow] & ∼ ( ∃ w)(Sw & Ow)

7.6E2 a. ( ∀ y)(By ⊃ Ly) b. ( ∀ x)(Rx ⊃ Sx) c. ( ∀ z)(Rz ⊃ ∼ Lz) d. ( ∃ w)(Rw & Cw) e. ( ∃ x)Bx & ( ∃ x)Rx f. ( ∃ y)Oy & ( ∃ y) ∼ Oy g. [( ∃ z)Bz & ( ∃ z)Rz] & ∼ ( ∃ z)(Bz & Rz) h. ( ∀ w)(Rw ⊃ Sw) & ( ∀ x)(Gx ⊃ Ox) i. ( ∃ y)By & [( ∃ y)Sy & ( ∃ y)Ly] j. ∼ ( ∃ z)(Rz & Lz) k. ( ∀ w)(Cw ⊃ Rw) & ∼ ( ∀ w)(Rw ⊃ Cw) l. ( ∀ z)Rx & [( ∃ y)Cy & ( ∃ y) ∼ Cy] m. ( ∀ y)Ry ∨ [( ∀ y)By ∨ ( ∀ y)Gy] n. ∼ ( ∀ x)Lx & ( ∀ x)(Lx ⊃ Bx) o. ( ∃ w)(Rw & Sw) & ( ∃ w)(Rw & ∼ Sw) p. [( ∃ w)Sw & ( ∃ w)Ow] & ∼ ( ∃ w)(Sw & Ow) q. ( ∃ x)Ox & ( ∀ y)(Ly ⊃ ∼ Oy)

1Everyone that Michael likes likes either Henry or Sue 2Michael likes everyone that both Sue and Rita like 3Michael likes everyone that either Sue or Rita like 4Rita doesn’t like Michael but she likes everyone that Michael likes 5Grizzly bears are dangerous but black bears are not 6Grizzly bears and polar bears are dangerous but black bears are not 7Every self-respecting polar bear is a good swimmer

1Everyone that Michael likes likes either Henry or Sue  x(Lmx  Lxs  Lxh) 2Michael likes everyone that both Sue and Rita like 3Michael likes everyone that either Sue or Rita like 4Rita doesn’t like Michael but she likes everyone that Michael likes 5Grizzly bears are dangerous but black bears are not 6Grizzly bears and polar bears are dangerous but black bears are not 7Every self-respecting polar bear is a good swimmer

1Everyone that Michael likes likes either Henry or Sue  x(Lmx  Lxs  Lxh) 2Michael likes everyone that both Sue and Rita like  x(Lsx&Lrx  Lmx) 3Michael likes everyone that either Sue or Rita like 4Rita doesn’t like Michael but she likes everyone that Michael likes 5Grizzly bears are dangerous but black bears are not 6Grizzly bears and polar bears are dangerous but black bears are not 7Every self-respecting polar bear is a good swimmer

1Everyone that Michael likes likes either Henry or Sue  x(Lmx  Lxs  Lxh) 2Michael likes everyone that both Sue and Rita like  x(Lsx&Lrx  Lmx) 3Michael likes everyone that either Sue or Rita like  x(Lsx  Lrx  Lmx) 4Rita doesn’t like Michael but she likes everyone that Michael likes 5Grizzly bears are dangerous but black bears are not 6Grizzly bears and polar bears are dangerous but black bears are not 7Every self-respecting polar bear is a good swimmer

1Everyone that Michael likes likes either Henry or Sue  x(Lmx  Lxs  Lxh) 2Michael likes everyone that both Sue and Rita like  x(Lsx&Lrx  Lmx) 3Michael likes everyone that either Sue or Rita like  x(Lsx  Lrx  Lmx) 4Rita doesn’t like Michael but she likes everyone that Michael likes ~Lrm &  x(Lmx  Lrx) 5Grizzly bears are dangerous but black bears are not 6Grizzly bears and polar bears are dangerous but black bears are not 7Every self-respecting polar bear is a good swimmer

1Everyone that Michael likes likes either Henry or Sue  x(Lmx  Lxs  Lxh) 2Michael likes everyone that both Sue and Rita like  x(Lsx&Lrx  Lmx) 3Michael likes everyone that either Sue or Rita like  x(Lsx  Lrx  Lmx) 4Rita doesn’t like Michael but she likes everyone that Michael likes ~Lrm &  x(Lmx  Lrx) 5Grizzly bears are dangerous but black bears are not  x(Gx  Dx) &  x(Bx  ~Dx) 6Grizzly bears and polar bears are dangerous but black bears are not 7Every self-respecting polar bear is a good swimmer

1Everyone that Michael likes likes either Henry or Sue  x(Lmx  Lxs  Lxh) 2Michael likes everyone that both Sue and Rita like  x(Lsx&Lrx  Lmx) 3Michael likes everyone that either Sue or Rita like  x(Lsx  Lrx  Lmx) 4Rita doesn’t like Michael but she likes everyone that Michael likes ~Lrm &  x(Lmx  Lrx) 5Grizzly bears are dangerous but black bears are not  x(Gx  Dx) &  x(Bx  ~Dx) 6Grizzly bears and polar bears are dangerous but black bears are not  x(Gx  Px  Dx) &  x(Bx  ~Dx) 7Every self-respecting polar bear is a good swimmer

1Everyone that Michael likes likes either Henry or Sue  x(Lmx  Lxs  Lxh) 2Michael likes everyone that both Sue and Rita like  x(Lsx&Lrx  Lmx) 3Michael likes everyone that either Sue or Rita like  x(Lsx  Lrx  Lmx) 4Rita doesn’t like Michael but she likes everyone that Michael likes ~Lrm &  x(Lmx  Lrx) 5Grizzly bears are dangerous but black bears are not  x(Gx  Dx) &  x(Bx  ~Dx) 6Grizzly bears and polar bears are dangerous but black bears are not  x(Gx  Px  Dx) &  x(Bx  ~Dx) 7Every self-respecting polar bear is a good swimmer  x(Px & Rxx  Sx)

UD = people 9Anyone who likes Sue likes Rita  x(Lxs  Lxr) 10Everyone who likes Sue likes Rita 11If anyone likes Sue, Michael does 12If everyone likes Sue, Michael does 13If anyone likes Sue, he or she likes Rita 14Michael doesn’t like everyone 15Michael doesn’t like anyone 16If someone likes Sue, then s/he likes Rita 17If someone likes Sue, then someone likes Rita

UD = people 9Anyone who likes Sue likes Rita  x(Lxs  Lxr) 10Everyone who likes Sue likes Rita the same as 9 11If anyone likes Sue, Michael does 12If everyone likes Sue, Michael does 13If anyone likes Sue, he or she likes Rita 14Michael doesn’t like everyone 15Michael doesn’t like anyone 16If someone likes Sue, then s/he likes Rita 17If someone likes Sue, then someone likes Rita

UD = people 9Anyone who likes Sue likes Rita  x(Lxs  Lxr) 10Everyone who likes Sue likes Rita the same as 9 11If anyone likes Sue, Michael does  xLxs  Lms 12If everyone likes Sue, Michael does 13If anyone likes Sue, he or she likes Rita 14Michael doesn’t like everyone 15Michael doesn’t like anyone 16If someone likes Sue, then s/he likes Rita 17If someone likes Sue, then someone likes Rita

UD = people 9Anyone who likes Sue likes Rita  x(Lxs  Lxr) 10Everyone who likes Sue likes Rita the same as 9 11If anyone likes Sue, Michael does  xLxs  Lms 12If everyone likes Sue, Michael does  xLxs  Lms 13If anyone likes Sue, he or she likes Rita 14Michael doesn’t like everyone 15Michael doesn’t like anyone 16If someone likes Sue, then s/he likes Rita 17If someone likes Sue, then someone likes Rita

UD = people 9Anyone who likes Sue likes Rita  x(Lxs  Lxr) 10Everyone who likes Sue likes Rita the same as 9 11If anyone likes Sue, Michael does  xLxs  Lms 12If everyone likes Sue, Michael does  xLxs  Lms 13If anyone likes Sue, he or she likes Rita  x(Lxs  Lxr) 14Michael doesn’t like everyone 15Michael doesn’t like anyone 16If someone likes Sue, then s/he likes Rita 17If someone likes Sue, then someone likes Rita

UD = people 9Anyone who likes Sue likes Rita  x(Lxs  Lxr) 10Everyone who likes Sue likes Rita the same as 9 11If anyone likes Sue, Michael does  xLxs  Lms 12If everyone likes Sue, Michael does  xLxs  Lms 13If anyone likes Sue, he or she likes Rita  x(Lxs  Lxr) 14Michael doesn’t like everyone~  xLmx 15Michael doesn’t like anyone 16If someone likes Sue, then s/he likes Rita 17If someone likes Sue, then someone likes Rita

UD = people 9Anyone who likes Sue likes Rita  x(Lxs  Lxr) 10Everyone who likes Sue likes Rita the same as 9 11If anyone likes Sue, Michael does  xLxs  Lms 12If everyone likes Sue, Michael does  xLxs  Lms 13If anyone likes Sue, he or she likes Rita  x(Lxs  Lxr) 14Michael doesn’t like everyone~  xLmx 15Michael doesn’t like anyone~  xLmx 16If someone likes Sue, then s/he likes Rita 17If someone likes Sue, then someone likes Rita

UD = people 9Anyone who likes Sue likes Rita  x(Lxs  Lxr) 10Everyone who likes Sue likes Rita the same as 9 11If anyone likes Sue, Michael does  xLxs  Lms 12If everyone likes Sue, Michael does  xLxs  Lms 13If anyone likes Sue, he or she likes Rita  x(Lxs  Lxr) 14Michael doesn’t like everyone~  xLmx 15Michael doesn’t like anyone~  xLmx 16If someone likes Sue, then s/he likes Rita  x(Lxs  Lxr) 17If someone likes Sue, then someone likes Rita

UD = people 9Anyone who likes Sue likes Rita  x(Lxs  Lxr) 10Everyone who likes Sue likes Rita the same as 9 11If anyone likes Sue, Michael does  xLxs  Lms 12If everyone likes Sue, Michael does  xLxs  Lms 13If anyone likes Sue, he or she likes Rita  x(Lxs  Lxr) 14Michael doesn’t like everyone~  xLmx 15Michael doesn’t like anyone~  xLmx 16If someone likes Sue, then s/he likes Rita  x(Lxs  Lxr) 17If someone likes Sue, then someone likes Rita  xLxs   xLxr