Ethical issues with the regulatory use of gene expression data Benjamin S Wilfond MD Medical Genetics Branch National Human Genome Research Institute Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Ethical standards in biomedical research: the acquis and projects of the Council of Europe Laurence Lwoff Bioethics Division Council of Europe
Managing Compliance Related to Human Subjects Research Review Joseph Sherwin, Ph.D. Office of Regulatory Affairs University of Pennsylvania Fourth Annual.
Susan Burner Bankowski, M.S., J.D. Chair, OHSU IRB
Post Research Benefits Mandika Wijeyaratne MS, MD, FRCS Dept. of Surgery, Colombo.
1 WORKSHOP 4: KEY COMMENTS FROM THE PANEL DISCUSSION The 3rd Kitasato University - Harvard School of Public Health Symposium Wednesday October 2nd - Thursday.
Regulatory Clinical Trials Clinical Trials. Clinical Trials Definition: research studies to find ways to improve health Definition: research studies to.
Single-Patient Use of Investigational Drugs and Biologic Products for Treating Cancer Grant Williams, M.D. Medical Team Leader DODP/CDER/FDA.
Many Important Issues Covered Current status of ICH E5 and implementation in individual Asian countries Implementation at a regional level (EU) and practical.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
Recently Issued OHRP Documents: Guidance on Subject Withdrawal and Draft Revised FWA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections October.
GCP compliance for GenISIS  This presentation is intended for clinical staff involved in recruiting patients to the GenISIS (Genetics of Influenza Susceptibility.
Subject Selection and Recruitment David Wendler Department of Clinical Bioethics NIH, USA.
The Pursuit of Better Medicines through Genetic Research Terri Arledge, DVM US Department Head Drug Development Genetics.
The ICH E5 Question and Answer Document Status and Content Robert T. O’Neill, Ph.D. Director, Office of Biostatistics, CDER, FDA Presented at the 4th Kitasato-Harvard.
Ethical Issues in Pediatric Research: Antimuscarinics to control the medical and psychosocial complications of drooling Benjamin Wilfond MD Medical Genetics.
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
Research Bioethics Consultation: More potential than sequencing genomes Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Seattle Children’s Hospital Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric.
Good Clinical Practice GCP
Central IRBs: Ceding IRB Oversight
Ethical Issues in Pediatric Research: Placebo controlled trials for gastoesophogeal reflux Benjamin Wilfond MD Medical Genetics Branch National Human Genome.
IRB and the Community Member How You Can Get Involved Mary Lou Smith Elda Railey Conference Call Series on IRBs and Ethical Issues in Research Co-sponsored.
Integrating Scientific Advances into Regulation: Pharmacogenomics and Pharmacogenetics Janet Woodcock, M.D. Director, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research August 2005 Electroretinography: The FDA’s Viewpoint Wiley A. Chambers, MD Deputy Director Division of Anti-Infective.
Glenn Rivard, Department of Justice 02/XI/22 Research Involving Humans Federal Governance.
THE ROLE OF DSMB’s in CLINICAL RESEARCH Data and Safety Monitoring Monitoring.
CHALLENGES FOR PRAGMATIC TRIALS IN EUROPE Donna A. Messner, PhD.
Drug Submissions: Review Process Agnes V. Klein, MD Biologics and Genetic Therapies Directorate February, 2003 www/hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut.
FDA Science Board Drug Safety Initiative April 15, 2005 Rockville, MD RADM Steven Galson, MD, MPH Acting Director, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
Is Your Research Ethical? The application of Research Ethics Guidelines to Regional Health Authority Research Dr Alan Katz Need to Know: June 9, 2003.
Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Subjects Protections (SACHRP) Summary of Responses on: Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) on Holding.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST ARE HERE TO STAY: PROTECTING SCIENCE FROM BIAS Susan S. Ellenberg, Ph.D. Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA Boston,
SAHPRA proposals Nov 2009 A GLIMPSE OF WHAT SAHPRA IS INTENDED TO BECOME KEY PROPOSALS FOR SAHPRA NOVEMBER 2009 DR NICHOLAS CRISP.
Humanitarian Use Devices September 23, 2011 Theodore Stevens, MS, RAC Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies Center for Biologics Evaluation and.
Supporting Informed Formulary Decision Making: CADTH’s Common Drug Review Denis Bélanger, Director, CADTH New Brunswick Stroke Summit November 27, 2010,
TERRENCE F. ACKERMAN, PH.D. PROFESSOR OF BIOETHICS CHAIR, UTHSC IRB.
THE ROLE OF DSMB’s in CLINICAL RESEARCH Data and Safety Monitoring Monitoring.
Proposal for End-of-Phase 2A (EOP2A) Meetings Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Sciences Clinical Pharmacology Subcommittee November 17-18, 2003 Lawrence.
The Pharmaceutical Industry and International Clinical Research: One Company’s Approach Michael Clayman, M.D. Vice President, Lilly Research Laboratories.
AAHRPP ACCREDITATION (Association for the Accreditation of Human Protection Programs)
FDAAA – Report on DTC Advertising Kristin Davis, J.D. Deputy Director, Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications Office of Medical Policy,
$100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 $100 $200 $400 $500 $300 Terms Clinical Trial Facts.
Research in the Office of Vaccines Research and Review: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.
Lessons from pediatric gene transfer research: Implications for novel mitochondrial techniques Benjamin S. Wilfond MD Seattle Children’s Hospital Treuman.
Research in the Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation.
Consumer Advocate Perspective Clinical Trials Registration Sharon F. Terry, JAM Sharon F. Terry, JAM President and CEO, Genetic Alliance, Inc. Founding.
21 CFR Toby A. Silverman, M.D. Branch Chief, Clinical Review Branch Division of Hematology, Office of Blood December 14, 2006.
Overcoming challenges in pediatric oncology product development: Regulatory oversight of multi-national clinical studies Ursula Kern, Advisory Committees.
AssessPlanDo Review QuestionYesNo? Do I know what I want to evaluate and why? Consider drivers and audience Do I already know the answer to my evaluation.
Evidence in the Coverage Process: An Evolving Paradigm Kevin Schulman, M.D. Director, Center for Clinical and Genetic Economics Duke University Medical.
Compassionate use programs and the European regulatory system Filip Josephson M.D., Ph.D. Clinical Assessor.
FDA’s Role in the Risk Management of Opiate Analgesics Steven Galson, M.D., M.P.H. Deputy Center Director, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Food.
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation Challenges in Personalised Medicine.
Introduction Review and proper registration of Human Gene Transfer protocols is very complex. A protocol goes through rigorous review by multiple Committees.
Modified by Georgia Agricultural Education Curriculum Office
Week 5: Ethical, Legal & Social Issues in Applied Genomics
IIASA Governance Review
FDA’s IDE Decisions and Communications
How to Apply for and Receive Industry Funding for Investigator Sponsored Research Chuck Simonton MD, FACC, FSCAI Chief Medical Officer Abbott Vascular.
On Human Gene Editing: International Summit Statement
Within Trial Decisions: Unblinding and Termination
Data Managers’ Forum What’s in it for us?
THE ROLE OF DSMB’s in CLINICAL RESEARCH
NHLBI Perspective Yves Rosenberg, M.D, M.P.H.
Ethical Principles of Research
Regulatory perspective
Ethical Decision Making in Health Care
Challenges to the Therapeutic Pipeline for Irritable Bowel Syndrome: End Points and Regulatory Hurdles  Michael Camilleri, Lin Chang  Gastroenterology 
Presenter : Wayne Chen 陳旭瑋
Presentation transcript:

Ethical issues with the regulatory use of gene expression data Benjamin S Wilfond MD Medical Genetics Branch National Human Genome Research Institute Department of Clinical Bioethics Warren G Magnuson Clinical Center

The Regulatory Challenge Pharmacogenomic research Clinical applications  When is it appropriate to use this data for  Drug approval process  Clinical decision making

FDA proposal  Regulatory Use  When sponsor intends to use the data to  Demonstrate safety or efficacy (clinical trials)  Recommend clinical applications (clinical testing)  “Research Use”  Unique genes  Gene expression profiles

“Develop thresholds and policies using public and transparent process with advisory committee oversight”  Thresholds for biological validity and clinical relevance  But what process will be used to determine if the threshold is reached in a particular case?

Decision categories  Policy Decisions  Categories of studies (ie types of data)  Thresholds for inclusion of data  Application Specific Decisions  Data requests  Data evaluations  Both decision categories would benefit from review of research data

Interdisciplinary Pharmacogenomic Review Group (IPGRG)  Primarily focused on policy  Could also consider specific drug application decisions  Could refer specific drug application decisions to another group

Procedural Options  Confidentiality: Public vs private  Independence: Internal vs external  Authority: Advisory vs determinative

Examples ConfidentialityIndependenceAuthority IRBPublicInternalDeterminative DMCPrivateExternalDeterminative FDA Advisory Committee PublicExternalAdvisory

Procedural choices depend on underlying objectives  Confidentiality  Public - greater accountability and transparency  Private- greater willingness to share data  Independence  Internal - greater familiarity  External - greater objectivity  Authority  Recommendation - greater acceptability to skeptics ( still requires determination of decisional authority)  Determinative - greater enthusiasm for participation

Next steps  The choice between procedural options includes ethical consideration of the tradeoffs between different options  Decide if IPGRG would decide about specific applications or refer to second group  Decide about confidentiality, independence, and authority of either or both groups