Status of high gradient experiments at Nextef Kazue Yokoyama, Toshiyasu Higo, Yasuo Higashi, Shuji Matsumoto, Shigeki Fukuda Accelerator Laboratory, KEK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Single-Cell Standing Wave Structures: Design
Advertisements

Single cell standing wave tests data analysis Jiaru Shi Sep 27, 2011 LCWS11, Granada, Spain.
CERN-KEK X-band collaboration 3 Dec T. Higo on behalf of X-band group of KEK.
High gradient test results from X-BOX1 Ben Woolley XBOX Team CERN, Switzerland February 2014.
Report from KEK High gradient study results from Nextef (+ other related activities) LCWS2011, Granada Sep. 27, 2011 T. Higo.
Status of KEK production July 11, 2008 at SLAC KEK T. Higo et al., Accelerator div. T. Takatomi et al., Mech. Eng. Center.
X-band Structures Test Results at NLCTA Faya Wang Chris Adolphsen, Christopher Nantista 9-Feb-11.
High gradient features from Nextef on recent CLIC prototype structures US-HG workshop, SLAC 9 February 2011 T. Higo representing X-band group of KEK.
Dark current measurement at KEK M. Gerbaux, S. Döbert, T. Higo, S. Matsumoto, K. Yokoyama.
Injector RF Design Review November 3, 2004 John Schmerge, SLAC LCLS RF Gun Thermal Analysis John Schmerge, SLAC November 3,
1 X-band Single Cell and T18_SLAC_2 Test Results at NLCTA Faya Wang Chris Adolphsen Jul
Report from Nextef IWLC10, Genève, Oct. 20 T. Higo (KEK)
Design of Standing-Wave Accelerator Structure
High-gradient Experiments with Narrow Waveguides Kazue Yokoyama, Toshiyasu Higo, Yasuo Higashi, Noboru Kudo, Shuji Matsumoto, Shigeki Fukuda, Mitsuo Akemoto,
Different mechanisms and scenarios for the local RF
Alessandro Cappelletti for CTF3 collaboration 5 th May 2010 RESULTS OF BEAM BASED RF POWER PRODUCTION IN CTF3.
HIGH RF POWER TESTING FOR THE CLIC PETS International Workshop on Linear Colliders 20 th October 2010 Alessandro Cappelletti for the CLIC team with.
Results from Nextef Observations in high gradient tests of CLIC Prototype Structures and associated study activities CLIC2013, CERN 29 January, 2013 T.
Update of KEK X-band Research Activity March 3, 2009 Shuji Matsumoto Accelerator Laboratory, KEK 2009/3/31US High Gradient Workshop.
J. Haimson and B. Mecklenburg Haimson Research Corporation FG02-05ER84362 Work performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy SBIR Grant.
Test Facilities and Component Developments Sami Tantawi SLAC May 15, 2008.
1 C-Band Linac Development Satoshi Ohsawa 2004.Feb.19LCPAC.
Statistical analysis of RF conditioning and breakdowns Jorge GINER NAVARRO CLIC Workshop /01/2015 J. Giner Navarro - CLIC WS20151.
June 2007, CERN. HDS 60 (cells) copper was processed from both sides Low Vg a/λ=0.16 High Vg a/λ=0.19 HDS 11 titanium Very often we do observe, that after.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
X-band high gradient activities at KEK May 13-15, nd Collaboration meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program T. Higo, KEK.
Recent High-gradient test result at KEK Linear Collider Workshop 2012 Arlington, Texas (WebEx) 25 October, 2012 Toshi Higo and X-band group of KEK.
L-band (1.3 GHz) 5-Cell SW Cavity High Power Test Results Faya Wang, Chris Adolphsen SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Performance of CLIC prototype accelerator structures tested at Nextef CLIC February 2014 Toshiyasu Higo (KEK)
Recent high-gradient results, rf testing, places and plans Steffen Döbert, CLIC Workshop, Test facilities High gradient results Future testing.
J.L. Navarro (CERN), for the CLIC/CTF3 collaboration.
A Study of RF breakdown of Narrow Wave Guide Shuji Matsumoto Kazue Yokoyama Toshi Higo Accelerator Lab., KEK 2016/1/41SLAC Workshop 8-10 July 2009.
KEK workshopWalter Wuensch18 April 2012 Status and objectives of the CLIC X-band and high- gradient activity.
1 Al Moretti, APC, Fermilab MAP- Winter Meeting February 28 - March 4, 2011 TJNAF Newport News, VA.
High gradient study at KEK CLIC08, Oct , 2008 T. Higo.
Status report from KEK Feb. 26, 2010 T. Higo, S. Matsumoto T. Takatomi, Y. Higashi and X-band group.
Nextef results CLIC09, Oct T. Higo (KEK). Contents Quadrant high gradient test status – Initial processing and power limit – VAC characteristics.
TD18 High Power Test Results Faya Wang Chris Adolphsen May 3, 2010.
W. Wuensch CLIC project meeting High-power rf structure testing.
Nextef results & status International Workshop on Breakdown Science and High Gradient Technology KEK, Japan 18 April 2012 Toshi Higo.
KCS Main Waveguide Testing Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista and Faya Wang LCWS12 Arlington, Texas October 25, 2012.
1 CTF3 CLEX day July 2006 CLEX day 2006 Introduction G.Geschonke CERN.
Narrow waveguide experiments Kazue Yokoyama, Toshiyasu Higo, Yasuo Higashi, Noboru Kudo, Shuji Matsumoto, Shigeki Fukuda, Mitsuo Akemoto, Mitsuhiro Yoshida,
Detuning of T18 after high power test Jiaru Shi
Discussion on critical issues for testing: breakdown identification, preparation for test, processing protocol, etc. 4 th Annual X-band Structure Collaboration.
Some information from Nextef For poster session in IWLC T. Higo.
High gradient test results from X-BOX1 Ben Woolley XBOX Team CERN, Switzerland December 2013.
Accelerating structure prototypes for 2011 (proposal) A.Grudiev 6/07/11.
Nextef status and expansion plans Shuji Matsumoto for KEK Nextef Group /5/51 4th X-band Structure Collaboration Meeting, CERN.
High Power Crab Cavity Testing Ben Woolley HG2016 Argonne National Lab. 8 th June 2016.
KEK test area plans Shuji Matsumoto Accelerator Lab., KEK.
Advancements on RF systems D. Alesini (LNF-INFN) Quinto Meeting Generale Collaborazione LI2FE, Frascati 15-16/03/2011.
Test Accelerating Structures Designs, Objectives and Critical Issues
High power test results of X-band deflecting cavity
KEK Status and plans of structure production and testing
Development of X-band 50MW klystron in BVERI
Review of rf structure test results
SPARC RF gun status by P. Musumeci Review committee
12 GHz High Power RF components requirements for CEA activities
Testing Infrastructure, Program and Milestones
Shuji Matsumoto Accelerator Lab., KEK
CEPC injector high field S-band accelerating structure design and R&D
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
High Gradient tests at the KEK Nextef Facility
A Study of RF breakdown of Narrow Wave Guide
Status of KEK X-band Test Facility and its future plans
RF Pulse Shaping.
5th X-Band Structure Collaboration Meeting
T18_VG2.4_Disk_#2 processing summary
Field-Emission mapping measurement on Copper Surface
Presentation transcript:

Status of high gradient experiments at Nextef Kazue Yokoyama, Toshiyasu Higo, Yasuo Higashi, Shuji Matsumoto, Shigeki Fukuda Accelerator Laboratory, KEK  T18_VG2.4_Disk #2 at Nextef  TD18_VG2.4_Quad_#5 at KEK  Narrow waveguide at KT-1

2/27 T18_VG2.4_Disk #2 Disk-damp cell

3/27 T18_VG2.4_Disk #2 T18_VG2.4_Disk #2 was installed and the processing has started in October last year.

4/27 Nextef: RF Monitors along waveguide

5/27 Nextef: Monitors along beam axis Steady state dark currents were evaluated at the Faraday cups (FC) at upstream and downstream of the beam line. Downstream dark current can be energy analyzed. RF

T18 trend 6/27

T18_VG2.4_Disk_#2 in 2008 Power trend recorded by control program November December 80MV/m (35MW) steady run 7/27

Power at BD’s and BDR during 27 days at 80MV/m (35MW) level BDR ~17 str. BD / 566 hr ~0.030 BD/hr/str ~0.75 x10 -6 BD/Pulse/m Finished at 9:00 on Dec. 25 Started at 10:00 on Nov hrs run / 643 hrs = 88% ON 8/27 ~10 -5 ~10 -6

Dark current trend during 35MW run 75cm 195cm FC- DN FC- UP FC- Mid AM 9/27

Dark Current F-N plot 10/27

Typical breakdown rate: on Feb. 17 Normal pulse ACC BD Normal p BD? Normal Normal pulse BD? Normal pulse BD? ACC BD 65MW = 109MV/m run 2~3 BD? Include ACC-BD + all BD?  8 BD / 14hr < 0.6BD/hr ~ 3x10 -6 /pulse ~ 1.5x10 -5 /pulse/m Need to analyze whether BD or not.  Now on the way to evaluate the breakdown rate carefully. 11/27

12/27 Summary of T18_VG2.4_Disk #2  Breakdown rates at steady-stare operation of 80 MV/m is approximately 0.75 x10 -6 BD/Pulse/m.  We are going to do the high gradient experiments until the end of March.  The total run time will reach up to about 3000 h.  We are trying to estimate the BDR from the dark currant measurements.

13/27 TD18_VG2.4_Quad_#5 Quadrant

Measurement of TD18_VG2.4_Quad_#5 Measurements at CERN for TD18_quad made in CERN give dB. Comparing to this, KEK quad gives 2.56dB measured in transmission mode. About 0.33dB more attenuation due to some reason dB = t=0.295  Q/Q~83% is all attributed to t~1/Q 14/27

The result of the first measurement by Bead pull Input Output reflection amplitude Measurement N5230A F_IF=1kHz, 3pts Freq=11424MHz Tcavity=20.9C Pulse motor step ~ 0.2mm RF Input from input coupler side 15/27

Meas. At 11416MHz, 20.3degC Average phase advance = deg/cell dF ~ (1.9/120)*11424*0.0138~ ( ) ~ MHz Average phase advance per cell degrees / cell /27

Summary of TD18_VG2.4_Quad_#5  The frequency of the present quad #5 at operation becomes MHz.  Freq. = MHz with120deg/cell at operation should be tuned up by 3.4MHz.  Test tuning has started last week.  We do tuning accurately at the operation frequency after EBW of cooling connection.  High-gradient experiments will start in April. v=c Drive freque ncy Actu al 17/27

18/27 Narrow waveguide Parts before bonding

Rectangular Waveguide: WR90 Wavelength converter: Width 22.86( g  mm) → 14mm ( g  mm) Cosine taper (  1 g ) : Height mm → 1 mm Calculated to get a low VSWR by an HFSS. Narrow Waveguide Design field gradient of 200 MV/m at an RF power of 100 MW group velocity of around 0.3c 19/27

CU004 Setup for High-Power Nextef  We are on going high power testing of coupper(CU004) at Klystron Test Stand. PPM GHz 50 MW, 50 pps, 400ns Narrow waveguide in 5mm lead shield High power Dummy Load (Load Tree)  Cu002 tested at XTF (06.11 ~ 07.01) Moving to Nextef ( ~ 07.04) Using for system checking ( ~ 07.05)  SUS003 Tested at KT-1 ( ~ 08.10)  Cu004 Testing at KT-1 (09.01 ~ ) 20/27 PMT 1, 2, 3, 4 Acoustic sensors

Processing history (Accumulated No. breakdown events vs. power  RF pulse ranged 50ns to 400ns with 50MW at repetition rate of 50pps.  SUS003 had less breakdown events than CU002.  SUS003 attained higher electric field 21/27

22/ [MV/m] Breakdown rate as a function of pulse width of #SUS003 waveguide

#CU002 and #SUS003 after high-gradient experiments  Many breakdown damages were seen on the E-plane surface.  The surface is intensively damaged, and it could also melt due to breakdown. Observation area 23/27

#CU002 Surface observation by SEM Laser microscope RF 24/27

#SUS003 Surface observation by SEM Laser microscope RF 25/27

Summary of narrow waveguide We’re conducting the high-gradient experiments of Cu004 to confirm the previous data of Cu002 and to measure BDR of copper type. - Prototype Cu002 and SUS003 had been tested under different system conditions (at XTF and Nextef). - Number of break down events for SUS003 is less than that for Cu002 which may be a result of different systems. We’re planning to test other materials. We’re trying to make a new narrow waveguide; one side is made of copper and the other side is made of stainless-steel. We might know the surface damage of different materials at the same RF power. 26/27

Thank you for your attention ! 27/27