Doc.: IEEE 802.19-05/0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 1 Au Update on Estimating Packet Error Rate Caused by Interference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /90r0 Submission Nov., 2012 NICTSlide b NICT Proposal IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0930r0 Submission July 2006 Nancy Cam-Winget, Cisco Slide 1 Editor Updates since Jacksonville Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission May 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Discussion of Coexistence Scenarios Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0094r0 Submission November 2009 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Comments on PAR Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0179r0 Submission April 2007 Wu Yu-Chun, Huawei HisiSlide 1 CRC_Length_and_FEC_gain_of_PSDU for the IEEE P Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE /0022r0 Submission May 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 May 2006 Opening Report Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /0125r0 Submission July 2006 Slide 1 Huawei Interference Detection for Sensing IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /2237r0 Submission July 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D1.0 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /860r0 Submission June 2006 Bjorn A. Bjerke, Qualcomm, Inc.Slide 1 LB84 Resolution of Selected Comments Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /1212r0 Submission TGT and MEF Liaison Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for.
Doc.: IEEE /1528r0 Submission 22 September 2006 Naveen Kakani, Nokia, IncSlide 1 TGn PSMP adhoc Group September Closing Report Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0652r1 Submission May 2007 Emily Qi, Intel CorporationSlide 1 TGv Redline D0.12 Insert and Deletion Notice: This document has been.
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
March 2013 Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2013
IEEE White Space Radio Contribution Title
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
SG CUB Tentative Timeline
Waveform Generator Source Code
March 2014 Election Results
TV White Space Coexistence Plan
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Effect of FCH repetition on the detection of FCH and MAP
November Opening Report
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
November 2013 Opening Report
[place presentation subject title text here]
September 2006 Opening Report
March Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2010
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
Contribution on Location Privacy
IEEE P Project Status Date: Authors: July 2013
November Opening Report
July Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2009
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
Experimental DTV Sensor
July 2014 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2014
July 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2012
Binary Preamble Sequence Set
Binary Preamble Sequence Set
Spectrum Sensing Tiger Team
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
Decision on SG Formation
September Opening Report
November 2005 Liaison Report to P1900.2
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
EC Summary of PAR Development
March 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2012
Addressing White Spaces Across all of IEEE 802
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
November Opening Report
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
March Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2011
November 2012 Opening Report
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
September 2012 Opening Report
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
January Opening Report
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
STC with CSI feedback IEEE P Wireless LANs Date:
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
WNG SC Closing Report Date: Authors: November 2005
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
November 2014 Opening Report
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
July 2013 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2013
May 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: May 2012
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 1 Au Update on Estimating Packet Error Rate Caused by Interference Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the TAG of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE TAG. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at. Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 2 Presentation Outline Background Review of Temporal Collision Model Extension to Model to use BER instead of SER Simplification of Probability Calculations Conclusions

doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 3 Background At the September meeting I gave a presentation on estimating PER using analytic techniques –Presentation /0029r0 –Document /0028r0 The probability techniques utilized the symbol error rate (SER) functions However, as was pointed out in the discussion, one often has bit error rate (BER) and not SER This presentation is an update of how to extend the work of the previous presentation to using BER formula instead of SER formula The word document has be revised incorporating these enhancements –Document /0028r2

doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 4 Review of Temporal Collision Model

doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 5 Packet Structure General packet structure Typically the preamble is short compared to the data Typically the preamble is sent at a more robust modulation and coding rate than the data Generally, the data portion breaks before the preamble breaks Thus under most cases the packet error rate is based predominantly on symbol errors in the data portion

doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 6 Packet Structure Typically the data portion consists of a sequence of symbols –The symbols may encode a single bit or multiple bits –Each symbol is of duration T seconds –This can represent the data portion of the packet –If the preamble is sent at a similar modulation and code rate then this could represent both the data and preamble

doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 7 Notation A symbol error is signified by the event SE The symbol error rate is the probability of a symbol error. –Since this is used frequently we will call this probability p This SER is a function of the signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) –Will assume high signal to noise ratio (SNR) since we are interested in the effect of interference not the effect of noise

doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 8 Temporal Model This model converts from symbol error rate to packet error rate (PER) It models the temporal aspects of both the packets sent over the affected wireless network and the pulses sent by the interfering wireless network

doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 9 Temporal Collision A packet sent over the affected wireless network may or may not collide in time with one or more of the pulses sent by the interfering wireless network When a collision occurs part or all of the packet may collide with the interference pulse

doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 10 Temporal Collision The following figure illustrates a typical collision In this example four of the symbols collided with an interference pulse The number of symbol collisions is actually a random variable.

doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 11 Probability Calculations Introduce some more notation A packet error event is called PE The packet error rate is the probability of a packet error The number of symbol collisions is a discrete random variable, which we will call M This random variable has a probability mass function,

doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 12 Probability Calculations To assist in calculating the PER we use a Total Probability formula Probability of a packet error conditioned on m symbol collisions Probability mass function of the number of symbol collisions

doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 13 Probability Calculations The probability of a packet error is one minus the probability of no symbol errors Assuming the symbol error rate is p, then the probability of no symbol errors is (1-p) m So the probability of a packet error if there are m symbol collisions is,

doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 14 Probability Calculations Therefore the PER formula is, Given the probability mass function of the number of symbol collisions we can calculate the PER Several examples we given in September

doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 15 Extension of Temporal Collision Model to use BER instead of SER

doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 16 Probability Calculations Total Probability Formula still applies Where M is the number of symbol collisions Find probability mass function for M just as before Formula for conditional PER is needs to change

doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 17 Notation We will assume that forward error correction (FEC) is used in the affected wireless network –If this is not the case then the code rate is one We assume the post-FEC bit error rate is know through a simulation The number of coded bits per symbol is N CBPS The number of information bits per symbol is N BPS The two are related by the code rate The post-FEC bit error rate is,

doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 18 Probability Calculations The number of information bit in m symbol is m N BPS The probability of no packet error conditioned on m symbol collisions is the probability that all the information bits in those symbols are correct. Hence, The resulting PER formula is then,

doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 19 Simplification of Probability Calculations

doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 20 Simplification of Probability Calculations As was done for the case when the SER was used we can simplify the PER calculations in specific cases. Given fixed pulse duration and spacing the probability mass function for the number of symbol collisions is of the form

doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 21 Simplification of Probability Calculations Which simplifies to, Then the PER is given by, This is not as simple as the case when we use the SER but still not too difficult to calculate

doc.: IEEE /0044r0 Submission November 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Qualcomm Inc.Slide 22 Conclusions The process described in September has been extended to the case when we have the post- FEC BER and not the SER Like in the pervious case the PER formula can be simplified for fixed pulse durations and spacing. However, the simplification is not quite a simple as the case of using SER This extension is significant since in many cases we will have simulation results that supply post-FEC BER and those results can be utilized to estimate the PER