Hitzler ● OWL1.1 Rules ● DedSys Saarbrücken ● March 2008 AIFB ReaSem Slide 1 OWL 1.1 Rules Markus Krötzsch Sebastian Rudolph Pascal Hitzler AIFB, University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Semantic Web Approach to Digital Rights Management Roberto García González.
Advertisements

Charting the Potential of Description Logic for the Generation of Referring Expression SELLC, Guangzhou, Dec Yuan Ren, Kees van Deemter and Jeff.
Description Logic Based Ontology Languages Ian Horrocks Information Systems Group Oxford University Computing Laboratory.
Query Answering based on Standard and Extended Modal Logic Evgeny Zolin The University of Manchester
CH-4 Ontologies, Querying and Data Integration. Introduction to RDF(S) RDF stands for Resource Description Framework. RDF is a standard for describing.
Query Answering for OWL-DL with Rules Boris Motik Ulrike Sattler Rudi Studer.
A rule language for the semantic web Dieter Fensel, Lausanne, June 14, 2004 SDK cluster meeting on WSMO.
OWL 2 The Next Generation Ian Horrocks Information Systems Group Oxford University Computing Laboratory.
An Introduction to Description Logics
Chronos: A Tool for Handling Temporal Ontologies in Protégé
1 Ontology Language Comparisons doug foxvog 16 September 2004.
DL-LITE: TRACTABLE DESCRIPTION LOGICS FOR ONTOLOGIES AUTHORS: DIEGO CALVANESE, GIUSEPPE DE GIACOMO, DOMENICO LEMBO, MAURIZIO LENZERINI, RICCARDO ROSATI.
1 Paraconsistent Resolution for Four-valued Description Logics Yue Ma 1,2, Pascal Hitzler 1, Zuoquan Lin 2 1 AIFB Institute, Universität Karlsruhe, Germany.
Fuzzy DL, Fuzzy SWRL, Fuzzy Carin (report from visit to Athens) M.Vacura VŠE Praha (used materials by G.Stoilos, NTU Athens)
Analyzing Minerva1 AUTORI: Antonello Ercoli Alessandro Pezzullo CORSO: Seminari di Ingegneria del SW DOCENTE: Prof. Giuseppe De Giacomo.
Combining the strengths of UMIST and The Victoria University of Manchester A Tableaux Decision Procedure for SHOIQ Ian Horrocks and Ulrike Sattler University.
A Probabilistic Framework for Information Integration and Retrieval on the Semantic Web by Livia Predoiu, Heiner Stuckenschmidt Institute of Computer Science,
Ontology and Ontology-Based Applications C. Farkas Some of the slides were obtained from presentations of Ian Horrocks.
Description Logics. Outline Knowledge Representation Knowledge Representation Ontology Language Ontology Language Description Logics Description Logics.
Semantic Web The Story So Far Ian Horrocks Oxford University Computing Laboratory.
From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The Making of a Web Ontology Language
Reducing OWL Entailment to Description Logic Satisfiability Ian Horrocks and Patel Schneider Presented by: Muhammed Al-Muhammed.
Part 6: Description Logics. Languages for Ontologies In early days of Artificial Intelligence, ontologies were represented resorting to non-logic-based.
Some Thoughts to Consider 6 What is the difference between Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science? What is the difference between Artificial Intelligence.
Role of the Computer System Current Proposed Ontology Evolution Using Belief Change and the AGM Theory Giorgos Flouris, Dimitris Plexousakis, Grigoris.
WonderWeb. Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web. IST Project Review Meeting, 11 th March, WP1: Language Architecture Sean Bechhofer.
An Introduction to Description Logics. What Are Description Logics? A family of logic based Knowledge Representation formalisms –Descendants of semantic.
Applying Belief Change to Ontology Evolution PhD Student Computer Science Department University of Crete Giorgos Flouris Research Assistant.
A Logic for Decidable Reasoning about Services Yilan Gu Dept. of Computer Science University of Toronto Mikhail Soutchanski Dept. of Computer Science Ryerson.
Ming Fang 6/12/2009. Outlines  Classical logics  Introduction to DL  Syntax of DL  Semantics of DL  KR in DL  Reasoning in DL  Applications.
Query Answering Based on the Modal Correspondence Theory Evgeny Zolin University of Manchester Manchester, UK
The Bernays-Schönfinkel Fragment of First-Order Autoepistemic Logic Peter Baumgartner MPI Informatik, Saarbrücken.
DRAGO: Distributed Reasoning Architecture for the Semantic Web Andrei Tamilin and Luciano Serafini Work is supported by 1 June 2005 Second European Semantic.
An Introduction to Description Logics (chapter 2 of DLHB)
Semantic web course – Computer Engineering Department – Sharif Univ. of Technology – Fall Description Logics: Logic foundation of Semantic Web Semantic.
1 How to decide Query Containment under Constraints using a Description Logic Ian Horrocks, Ulrike Sattler, Sergio Tessaris, and Stephan Tobies presented.
Rules, RIF and RuleML.
More on Description Logic(s) Frederick Maier. Note Added 10/27/03 So, there are a few errors that will be obvious to some: So, there are a few errors.
1 Artificial Intelligence Applications Institute Centre for Intelligent Systems and their Applications Stuart Aitken Artificial Intelligence Applications.
OWLED 2008 DC Use of OWL and SWRL for Semantic Relational Database Translation Matthew Fisher, Mike Dean, Greg Joiner {mdean, April 1.
DL Overview Second Pass Ming Fang 06/19/2009. Outlines  Description Languages  Knowledge Representation in DL  Logical Inference in DL.
KR A Principled Framework for Modular Web Rule Bases and its Semantics Anastasia Analyti Institute of Computer Science, FORTH-ICS, Greece Grigoris.
The Semantic Web Riccardo Rosati Dottorato in Ingegneria Informatica Sapienza Università di Roma a.a. 2006/07.
ece 627 intelligent web: ontology and beyond
Dr. Alexandra I. Cristea CS 414: Semantic Web.
1 Nov. 2, 2005 Design and Application of Rule Based Access Control Policies Huiying Li, Xiang Zhang, Honghan Wu & Yuzhong Qu Dept. Computer.
Of 35 lecture 17: semantic web rules. of 35 ece 627, winter ‘132 logic importance - high-level language for expressing knowledge - high expressive power.
Charting the Potential of Description Logic for the Generation of Referring Expression SELLC, Guangzhou, Dec Yuan Ren, Kees van Deemter and Jeff.
WonderWeb. Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web. IST Project Review Meeting, 11 th March, WP2: Tools Raphael Volz Universität.
Modeling Life Science Knowledge with OWL 1.1 Michel Dumontier & Natalia Villanueva-Rosales Department of Biology, Institute of Biochemistry, School of.
Web Ontology Language (OWL). OWL The W3C Web Ontology Language (OWL) is a Semantic Web language designed to represent rich and complex knowledge about.
Presented by Kyumars Sheykh Esmaili Description Logics for Data Bases (DLHB,Chapter 16) Semantic Web Seminar.
WonderWeb. Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web. IST WP4: Ontology Engineering Heiner Stuckenschmidt, Michel Klein Vrije Universiteit.
1 Representing and Reasoning on XML Documents: A Description Logic Approach D. Calvanese, G. D. Giacomo, M. Lenzerini Presented by Daisy Yutao Guo University.
n-ary relations OWL modeling problem when n≥3
Lecture 17 Description Logics
Knowledge Representation Part II Description Logic & Introduction to Protégé Jan Pettersen Nytun.
Using Rules with Ontologies in the Semantic Web
ece 720 intelligent web: ontology and beyond
Web Ontology Language for Service (OWL-S)
Rules, RIF and RuleML.
Ontology.
Updating TBoxes in DL-Lite
Scalable and Efficient Reasoning for Enforcing Role-Based Access Control
Ontology.
First-order (predicate) Logic
Scalable and Efficient Reasoning for Enforcing Role-Based Access Control
Scalable and Efficient Reasoning for Enforcing Role-Based Access Control
A Tutorial Summary of Description Logic and Hybrid Rules
CIS Monthly Seminar – Software Engineering and Knowledge Management IS Enterprise Modeling Ontologies Presenter : Dr. S. Vasanthapriyan Senior Lecturer.
Presentation transcript:

Hitzler ● OWL1.1 Rules ● DedSys Saarbrücken ● March 2008 AIFB ReaSem Slide 1 OWL 1.1 Rules Markus Krötzsch Sebastian Rudolph Pascal Hitzler AIFB, University of Karlsruhe, Germany logic.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de Deduktionstreffen, Saarbrücken, March 2008

Hitzler ● OWL1.1 Rules ● DedSys Saarbrücken ● March 2008 AIFB ReaSem Slide 2 Neuerscheinung Hitzler, Krötzsch, Rudolph, Sure Semantic Web – Grundlagen. Springer, ,95 € Erstes deutsches Lehrbuch zu Grundlagen des Semantic Web. Behandelt u.a. Syntax, Semantik und Deduktionsverfahren von OWL ( SHOIN (D)).

Hitzler ● OWL1.1 Rules ● DedSys Saarbrücken ● March 2008 AIFB ReaSem Slide 3 Web Ontology Language OWL Semantic Web Knowledge Representation Language W3C recommendation April OWL DL: Fragment of 1 st order predicate logic. OWL DL: –Description Logic SHOIN (D). –decidable. –NExpTime

Hitzler ● OWL1.1 Rules ● DedSys Saarbrücken ● March 2008 AIFB ReaSem Slide 4 OWL1.1 Description Logic SROIQ in standardisation process (W3C) decidable, NExpTime-hard extends SHOIN with –role inclusion axioms R ± S v T –qualified number restrictions –punning –further role properties identified tractable fragments EL ++, DL-Lite, DLP, Horn- SHIQ,...

Hitzler ● OWL1.1 Rules ● DedSys Saarbrücken ● March 2008 AIFB ReaSem Slide 5 DL Rules Rules over some description logic L B, H sets of concept or role atoms in L, x the variables in B and H Rules of the form ( 8 x) B ! H with –for any non-initial individual u in B, there is a path from exactly one initial t to u in B –for any t,u there is at most one path in B from t to u –if H contains an atom C(t) or R(t,u), then t is initial in B V V

Hitzler ● OWL1.1 Rules ● DedSys Saarbrücken ● March 2008 AIFB ReaSem Slide 6 SROIQ Rules can be internalised into SROIQ internalisation is polynomial however, it is not an obvious transformation decidable fragment of SWRL within SROIQ

Hitzler ● OWL1.1 Rules ● DedSys Saarbrücken ● March 2008 AIFB ReaSem Slide 7 EL ++ Rules substantially extends EL ++ EL ++ together with EL ++ Rules are tractable (in P) EL ++ can be reduced to EL ++ Rules reduction is polynomial This allows to apply rule-based reasoning techniques for reasoning with EL ++ and EL ++ Rules!

Hitzler ● OWL1.1 Rules ● DedSys Saarbrücken ● March 2008 AIFB ReaSem Slide 8 DLP1.1 = DLP + DLP Rules Reducible to function-free first-order Horn rules with at most five variables per formula. Reduction can be done in polynomial time. DLP1.1 is tractable (in P)

Hitzler ● OWL1.1 Rules ● DedSys Saarbrücken ● March 2008 AIFB ReaSem Slide 9 Conclusions OWL1.1 Rules as expressive rules fragment of OWL1.1. Automatically supported by OWL1.1 reasoners. EL ++ Rules as new tractable fragment – includes EL ++. DLP1.1: new tractable rules fragment extending DLP.

Hitzler ● OWL1.1 Rules ● DedSys Saarbrücken ● March 2008 AIFB ReaSem Slide 10 More Details at the Poster! THANKS!