Study of Belle Silicon Vertex Detector Intrinsic Resolution Saša Fratina, Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia for Belle SVD group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Belle Silicon Vertex Detector T. Tsuboyama (KEK) 6 Dec Workshop New Hadrons with Various Flavors 6-7 Dec Nagoya Univ.
Advertisements

B. Golob, University of Ljubljana 4 Seas Conference 2004, Istanbul Overview of (selected) Belle and BaBar results B. Golob, Belle Collaboration University.
Belle SVD status & upgrade plans O. Tajima (KEK) Belle SVD group.
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
May 14, 2015Pavel Řezníček, IPNP Charles University, Prague1 Tests of ATLAS strip detector modules: beam, source, G4 simulations.
Simulation Studies of a (DEPFET) Vertex Detector for SuperBelle Ariane Frey, Max-Planck-Institut für Physik München Contents: Software framework Simulation.
Baryon Spectroscopy and The   Program at Jlab/CLAS The Advantages of  * Experiments Complimentary to N* program For every N* and , there is a  * Narrow.
A Silicon Disk Tracker in forward direction for STAR News since November 2000 Physics Capabilities capabilities Requirements / Potential Technologies Possible.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Striplet option of Super Belle Silicon Vertex Detector Talk at Joint Super B factory workshop, Honolulu 20 April 2005 T.Tsuboyama.
Jianchun Wang Marina Artuso Syracuse University 11/06/00 MC Simulation of Silicon Pixel Detector.
June 2000Status of BELLE1 Beyond e + e - Workshop The Homestead Glen Arbor, MI Daniel Marlow BELLE Princeton University June 17, 2000.
Semiconductor detectors
Charge collection studies on heavily diodes from RD50 multiplication run (update) G. Kramberger, V. Cindro, I. Mandić, M. Mikuž Ϯ, M. Milovanović, M. Zavrtanik.
11 th RD50 Workshop, CERN Nov Results with thin and standard p-type detectors after heavy neutron irradiation G. Casse.
Jeroen van Hunen The LHCb Tracking System. May 22, 2006 Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics, Elba, Jeroen van Huenen 2 The LHCb Experiment LHCb.
Observation of W decay in 500GeV p+p collisions at RHIC Kensuke Okada for the PHENIX collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute February 20, /20/20101.
Yosuke Watanabe….. University of Tokyo, RIKEN A, KEK C, Development of a GEM tracker for E16 J-PARC 1 Thanks to ???????????
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
FNAL beam test G4 simulation update Aiwu Zhang
Super-Belle Vertexing Talk at Super B Factory Workshop Jan T. Tsuboyama (KEK) Super B factory Vertex group Please visit
Design and development of micro-strip stacked module prototypes for tracking at S-LHC Motivations Tracking detectors at future hadron colliders will operate.
August 26, 2003P. Nilsson, SPD Group Meeting1 Paul Nilsson, SPD Group Meeting, August 26, 2003 Test Beam 2002 Analysis Techniques for Estimating Intrinsic.
Summary of  2 measurements at Super KEKB Hirokazu Ishino Tokyo Institute of Technology 19 Dec., 2006.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.
Performance simulations with a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon tracking for CBM Number of integration components Ladders106.
Secondary Vertex reconstruction for the D + Elena Bruna University of Torino ALICE Physics Week Erice, Dec. 6 th 2005.
STS simulations: Layout, digitizers, performance Radoslaw Karabowicz GSI.
Jyly 8, 2009, 3rd open meeting of Belle II collaboration, KEK1 Charles University Prague Zdeněk Doležal for the DEPFET beam test group 3rd Open Meeting.
Digitization and hit reconstruction for Silicon Tracker in MarlinReco Sergey Shulga, Tatiana Ilicheva JINR, Dubna, Russia GSU, Gomel, Belarus LCWS07 30.
Jonathan BouchetBerkeley School on Collective Dynamics 1 Performance of the Silicon Strip Detector of the STAR Experiment Jonathan Bouchet Subatech STAR.
Preliminary Slice Test Track Fitting S. Durkin Sept. 8, 2005 Analyze RunNum1007Evs0to49999.bin using /AnalysisUtilities look for tracks in two separate.
1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.:
1 Nick Sinev, ALCPG March 2011, Eugene, Oregon Investigation into Vertex Detector Resolution N. B. Sinev University of Oregon, Eugene.
JC and Marina 12/18/00 Pixel Detector Simulation with Magnetic Field  Effects with magnetic Field o Deflection o Effective mobility o Non-constant Hall.
FIRST RESULTS OF THE SILICON STRIP DETECTOR at STAR Jörg Reinnarth, Jonathan Bouchet, Lilian Martin, Jerome Baudot and the SSD teams in Nantes and Strasbourg.
INSTR L.Shekhtman 1 Triple-GEM detectors for KEDR tagging system V.M.Aulchenko, A.V.Bobrov,A.E.Bondar, L.I.Shekhtman, E.V.Usov, V.N.Zhilich,
Mu-pair Ozaki san. Kibayashi san circle: muons which do not go through DSSD #3 red triangle: muons going through the DSSD #3 the IP resolution is worse.
Radia Sia Syracuse Univ. 1 RICH 2004 Outline:  The CLEO-III RICH Detector  Physics Requirements  CLEO-III RICH at work… Performance of the CLEO-III.
Tests of a proximity focusing RICH with aerogel as radiator and flat panel PMT (Hamamatsu H8500) as photon detector Rok Pestotnik Jožef Stefan Institute,
A High Statistics Study of the Decay M. Fujikawa for the Belle Collaboration Outline 1.Introduction 2.Experiment Belle detector 3.Analysis Event selection.
1 PP Minimum Bias Triggering Simulations Alan Dion Stony Brook University.
Villa Olmo, Como October 2001F.Giordano1 SiTRD R & D The Silicon-TRD: Beam Test Results M.Brigida a, C.Favuzzi a, P.Fusco a, F.Gargano a, N.Giglietto.
1 HBD Update Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, May 7, 2008 May7, 2008.
Irradiated 3D sensor testbeam results Alex Krzywda On behalf of CMS 3D collaboration Purdue University March 15, 2012.
Measurements of low mass e + e - pairs in p+p and Au+Au collisions with the HBD upgrade of the PHENIX detector Mihael Makek Weizmann Institute of Science.
10/25/2007Nick Sinev, ALCPG07, FNAL, October Simulation of charge collection in chronopixel device Nick Sinev, University of Oregon.
Upgrade with Silicon Vertex Tracker Rachid Nouicer Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) For the PHENIX Collaboration Stripixel VTX Review October 1, 2008.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Semi-Leptonic B s Mixing at DØ Meghan Anzelc Northwestern University On Behalf of the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006.
Anna Kotynia.  8 stations  fully based on micro-strip detectors Tracking detector: -low-mass detector -full azimuthal angle coverage -polar angle coverage:from.
TOF detector in PHENIX experiment PHENIX time-of-flight counter The PHENIX time-of-flight (TOF) counter serves as a particle identification device for.
Annealing effects in irradiated HPK strip detectors measured with SCT128 chip Igor Mandić 1, Vladimir Cindro 1, Andrej Gorišek 1,Gregor Kramberger 1, Marko.
Annealing effects in irradiated HPK strip detectors measured with SCT128 chip Igor Mandić 1, Vladimir Cindro 1, Gregor Kramberger 1, Marko Zavrtanik 1,
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Hit Reconstruction for the Luminosity Monitor March 3 rd 2009 | T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns.
E-TCT measurements with laser beam directed parallel to strips Igor Mandić 1, Vladimir Cindro 1, Andrej Gorišek 1, Gregor Kramberger 1, Marko Mikuž 1,2,
L. Bosisio - SVT TDR Meeting SuperB SVT Update on Strip Parameters and Layer 3 Readout Options Irina Rashevskaya, Lorenzo Vitale, Livio Lanceri,
Operation, performance and upgrade of the CMS Resistive Plate Chamber system at LHC Marcello Abbrescia Physics Department - University of Bari & INFN,
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data
SuperB SVT Update on Sensor and Fanout Design in Trieste/Como
Outline Analysis of some real data taken with the GLAST minitower (cosmic rays only). Offline analysis software used. Full Monte Carlo simulation using.
Simulation of signal in irradiated silicon detectors
The KL reconstruction for the Belle experiment at KEK B-factory
ZHH: Linear collider Benchmark
Beam Test Results for the CMS Forward Pixel Detector
Turn to Page S.89 Challenging Question
Presentation transcript:

Study of Belle Silicon Vertex Detector Intrinsic Resolution Saša Fratina, Jožef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia for Belle SVD group

Outline of the talk Belle experiment Silicon vertex detector (SVD) Intrinsic resolution: study and results

Main goal of Belle experiment: study of CP violation in B-meson system Mt. Tsukuba KEKB Belle  (4s) e+e+ e-e- p(e + )= 3.5 GeV/c p(e - )= 8.0 GeV/c  (4s) B B  z ~ 200  m

detector silicon vertex (SVD) 50 cm 20 cm 4

4 layers covering polar angle from 17 to 150 degrees basic unit e-e- e+e+ z rr

basic SVD unit: Double Sided Strip Detector (DSSD) separate measurement of r  and z coordinate strip pitch: 50 and 75  m for r  and z coordinate, respectively pitch

SVD intrinsic resolution Error on the track position measurement Track position is determined from the SVD hits on other layers DSSD track residual SVD hit

Typical residual distributions Intrinsic resolution is determined from the width of the residual distribution:   i = 10  m, RMS =  m for r  and   i = 25  m, RMS = 30  m for z coordinate residual [cm] r  coordinate z coordinate

Incident angle dependence Simple estimate for the perpendicular tracks: signal collected by single strip → resolution ≈ strip pitch /  12 Small incident angle: signal collected by few strips → resolution improved Large incident angle: signal collected by many strips → resolution gets worse due to smaller signal to noise ratio track x strips x y angle

Perpendicular incidence Relative number of tracks with cluster size 1 strip (red), 2 strips (blue) and 3 strips (green) local position read-out strip r  coordinate Due to charge diffusion, only about 30% of the SVD hits at perpendicular incidence have cluster size 1 strip 50  m same for z coordinate read-out floating strip 150  m

Incident angle dependence: result RMS [  m] Incident angle [degrees] Incident angle [degrees] r  coordinate z coordinate Innermost layer

Incident angle dependence: result RMS [  m] Incident angle [degrees] Incident angle [degrees] r  coordinate z coordinate Different colors show the result for all four layers: black, red, green and blue for the innermost, second, third and outermost layer

Magnetic Field Effect Intrinsic resolution is not symmetric with respect to perpendicular incident angle Reason: magnetic field, confirmed by the plot of hit cluster size next SVD: Distribution of hits with cluster size 1 strip, 2 strips, 3 strips, … incident angle [ o ] -12 o

 t(ps) J/  K s N B (  t) N B (  t) B B Conclusions Best resolution (RMS) at small track incident angle is found to be 20 and 30  m for r  and z coordinate, respectively. Intrinsic resolution is worse for larger incident angles and approximately constant for angles smaller than 20 degrees Intrinsic resolution of 30  m enables measurement of B meson vertex with the accuracy of ~ 100  m, which allows to measure CP violation in B meson system (differences between the decays of B and B mesons)

Back up slides

Interpretation of results Intrinsic resolution is the width of residual distribution if position of track is exactly known layer scale factor used to determine intrinsic resolution from the width of residual distribution (  r ~ 1.8  i for innermost and outermost layer and  r ~ 1.4  i for the other two layers)

Magnetic field effect n side p side E B. FeFe FmFm e - direction x y track n side p side track E B. angle FmFm FmFm x y Negative angle: smaller cluster size Positive angle: bigger cluster size

Assembly of the detector