Richard Anderson University of Washington 2/18/20091CIS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teacher training in Hull – past and present A potted history to chart the growth and improvement in trainee provision across the city and beyond. This.
Advertisements

Research and Impact The WaterBotics ® evaluation and research studies include two synergistic, but distinct, domains: educational impact and scale-up/sustainability.
Unified Education Strategy Grant Program. UES Participants Anderson Valley Unified School District Belmont-Redwood Shores School District Beverly Hills.
The Anatomy of Systemic Support for Immersion Programs.
ELL Reading Committee 1 School House Road Reading, PA x321 Improving Reading Performance for ABC School District Presented to: ABC.
South Asia Conference on Policies and Practices to Improve Nutrition Security July 2014, New Delhi YouthLIFE: Nutrition Education through New Technology.
Internship Seminar What will be covered: The internship context
Constructing the Foundations of Capacity Building An Activity Theory Analysis of the English in Action Baseline Studies Jan Rae and Adrian Kirkwood.
Year 1 Progress AN EVALUATION OF OUR 9 TH GRADE IPAD INITIATIVE.
Information Campaigns to Strengthen Participation & Improve Public Schools: Experimental Evidence from Two Studies in Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals: Fellowship Track Washington, DC January 9, 2014.
Center of Excellence in Mathematics and Science Education Cooperative Partners College of Arts and Sciences College of Education Dr. Jack Rhoton East Tennessee.
Center for Collaborative Technologies Richard Anderson Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Washington 7/30/20091I-Tech.
A New Vision of Academic Support Tutorial Program By Danny Byrnes.
Center for Collaborative Technologies Richard Anderson Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Washington 7/30/20091I-Tech.
March 26, 2007Microsoft Research India1 Tutored Video Instruction and Course Export Richard Anderson University of Washington.
Coordinating Cooperative Education Programs CTE 4923.
The Digital StudyHall Richard Anderson University of Washington Seattle USA.
From Digital StudyHall to Digital PublicHealth Richard Anderson Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Washington, Seattle, USA January.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Teacher Professional Development Programs in Grades 3-8: Promoting Teachers’ and Students’ Content Knowledge in Science and Engineering Beth McGrath &
Why a foundation curriculum at Manchester Academy? Ease transfer and transition (pupils arrive from 35 different primary schools) Many students arrive.
What Works students, from over 50 nationalities A non-selective all-through school: Foundation, Primary, Secondary and Post 16 British Curriculum:
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
From June 2011 to Dec Obejectives:  Present Status of Pre Primary Education  Teaching Methodology  Carry out the Data Collection from Government.
Slide 1 of 19 Lessons from the Foundation Learning provision for the new 16 to 19 Study Programmes Discussion materials Issue 1: Attendance, retention,
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT ASER 2014: HARYANA.
Developing Teaching Assistant Self-Efficacy through a Pre-Semester Teaching Assistant Orientation K. Andrew R. Richards & Chantal Levesque-Bristol Purdue.
Boston Public Schools Elementary Math Plan: District-Wide Reform in Math Teaching and Learning Presented by: Linda Ruiz Davenport, Director of Elementary.
A Professional Development Model for Teachers in Child- Care Centers CEC National Conference April 2, 2009 Seattle, WA Madelyn James UIC PhD student in.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Building a Successful Professional Development Model Presented by: Howard Landman Project Director “Eastern Connecticut Elementary Science Coaching Consortium”
1 Eureka Child An AID INDIA Education Initiative A project to improve learning quality of 10 million children in Tamilnadu.
Extended Scope of Practice Projects Request For Proposal Information Session Tuesday 28 February 2012, pm Extended Scope of Practice – Nurses.
Joint Infant and Toddler Steering Committee/Early Learning Regional Coalition Statewide Meeting “Using our Data for Continuous Improvement” Organizational.
EQUIP Project. Problems addressed 50% children in 5th standard cannot read a paragraph in Tamil. 10% cannot even identify letters. 50% children in 5th.
K-12 Mathematics in Rapid City Longitudinal Findings from Project PRIME Ben Sayler & Susie Roth November 5, 2009.
1 Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership Program Evaluation Year 6 Results Carl Hanssen Hanssen Consulting, LLC Cindy Walker University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
Observation technique and assessment measurements 1.
Year 1 First Placement University of Hull BA Primary Teaching Year 1 Mentors’ Meeting June 2014.
TIES E2T2 Grant Project Technology Integrationist Community of Learning (TICL)
Leadership Team July 24, Learning Targets 1. Familiarize and use The Framework of Teaching in the areas of engagement and questioning to observe.
Making a Difference in Heidi A. Ramírez, PhD Chief Academic Officer Milwaukee Public Schools.
ASHA FOR EDUCATION SILICON VALLEY 14 MAR 2012 P SACHDEV.
Can first grade students’ interest levels and skills in mathematics increase when they are exposed to engaging real world mathematical tasks? By: Valerie.
GRSV Sevakendra 6-month Report Primary Steward: Koussalya.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
Effective Teaching Each person will take a piece of string when it is their turn 2. Once you have your piece of string you will describe the.
Practice of INSET in Mathematics and Science Teachers and its Impact on Quality of Basic Education in Kenya By ADEA-WGMSE.
Lincoln Community Learning Centers A system of partnerships that work together to support children, youth, families and neighborhoods. CLC.
Research Designs. Types of Research Quantitative - Quantitative - Uses data Uses data numbers– statistics numbers– statistics Can be descriptive Can be.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
Family Homework Night Establishing Routines to Support Parent Involvement Kaitlyn Nykwest Homeless Children’s Education Fund 1.
Monroe Clark Middle School
Past, Present, & Key to our Future. * In 1995 a survey was conducted across DE and it was found that the predominant form of Science Education was textbook.
Richard Anderson University of Washington 4/2/20081ATLAS.
Balochistan Education Foundation: Quality Improvement Measures in Our Programs Balochistan Education Support Project (BESP)
What is Impact Evaluation … and How Do We Use It? Deon Filmer Development Research Group, The World Bank Evidence-Based Decision-Making in Education Workshop.
The Whole School Development & The School Grant The case of The Gambia Prepared by the World Bank Impact Evaluation Team Contacts for questions about these.
Ayoub Kafyulilo DUCE Challenges and Opportunities of Integrating ICT in Education.
One to One Laptop Initiative Laura Nelson. Changing Learners Creative Creative Mobile Mobile Multitasking Multitasking Collaborative Collaborative Producers.
Enhancing R. Emmanuel-Cooke, Principal March 14, 2016 PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE A Framework For Teaching.
SNRPDP Self Evaluation
Effectiveness of interactive distance instruction
The Mentoring Process Martha Majors.
EARLY GRADE READING STUDY
Who We Are For more than 20 years, we have believed the key to preparing student for a successful future is providing rigorous and relevant instruction.
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
Presentation transcript:

Richard Anderson University of Washington 2/18/20091CIS

 Overview of Digital StudyHall  Description of an evaluation study that is just beginning 2/18/2009CIS2

2/18/20093CIS

 Lack of qualified teachers  Poor infrastructure  Teacher absenteeism  Poor teaching techniques  Few books or supplies 2/18/2009CIS4

SEWA, UP CHINHAT, UP 2/18/20095CIS

RECORD LESSONS AT CENTRAL SCHOOL 2/18/20096CIS

FACILITATORS PLAY A KEY ROLE 2/18/20097CIS

 DSH Partners with Educational Centers of Excellence  Radiate their excellence to surrounding slum and village schools  First DSH Partner: StudyHall Private School in Lucknow  Employs many excellent teachers  Afternoon school program for neighboring slum children ? 2/18/20098CIS

 Project started by former Princeton Professor Randy Wang  Initially established at StudyHall Private School in Lucknow, India  Hindi content for local schools  Hubs established in other cities 2/18/20099CIS

 How do we distribute excellent teachers?  Typically centralized at private schools  Build a database of excellent teachers  Deliver sequences of classes from the government curriculum 5 th Std. Math 2/18/200910CIS

2/18/2009CIS11

 Based on state government textbooks  Carefully planned coherent sequences 2/18/200912CIS

 Highly interactive, with lots of:  Questions and answers  Role playing  Activities 2/18/200913CIS

 StudyHall morning sessions  StudyHall after school program for slum girls  Madantoosi (village) school (public) 2/18/200914CIS

 The teacher and the digital lesson form a team  The teacher is the most important part  Digital lesson provides the framework  Teacher engages the class, conducts activities 2/18/200915CIS

2/18/200916CIS

 Motivated teacher took own initiative  Used the system to train/teach self  Abandoned crutch during live lessons  “Graduating” teachers: the ultimate success Madantoosi Kannar Lucknow 2/18/200917CIS

 Original schools in Lucknow  Kannar, Madantoosi  Expansion in Lucknow  Independent Hubs  Pune, Bangalore, Dhaka, Calcutta  Spinoff projects  Digital Green  Digital PolyClinic 2/18/2009CIS18

 NSF Funded Study  University of Washington  StudyHall Educational Foundation 2/18/2009CIS19

 Success stories  Sustained use in partner schools in Lucknow  Enthusiastic response from teachers  Observed student performance gains  Observed improvement in teaching skills  Failures  Lack of sustained use in sites external to Lucknow 2/18/2009CIS20

 Study of four DSH schools  Testing of students in DSH classes  Significant improvement in test performance  Detailed observational study of classroom  Tracked change in use of DSH by teachers  Critique  Lack of control condition  Working in schools with established DSH relationships 2/18/2009CIS21

 Evaluate new deployments of DSH  Moderate scale  Potential for statistically significant results  Variety of schools  Use current DSH technology and content  Limit technological innovation  Target setting where DSH has potential for massive use 2/18/2009CIS22

 Student performance  Grades  Standardized tests  Custom tests, pre and post  Student attitudes  Usage and adoption  Sustainability  Impact on school  Attendance  Retention  Impact on teachers  Attitude  Attendance  Teaching ability 2/18/2009CIS23

 Chinhat Development Block  Periurban district of Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh  Schools surveyed in 2005 Unesco study by Urvashi Sahni  18 primary schools evaluated ▪Grades 1 to 5 ▪Government schools ▪Town and rural schools ▪Deficiencies identified in initial study ▪Lack of teachers ▪Poor quality facilities 2/18/2009CIS24

 Select 12 schools from Chinhat Development Block  Each school will have one class for control, one class for treatment  3 rd grade English, 5 th grade Math  Regular tests for students  Pre-test, Post-test, Monthly quizzes  Regular classroom observations  Regular teacher interviews  Two academic years 2/18/2009CIS25

 Visit all schools and complete school selection 2/18/2009CIS26

 S1  School closed due to lunar eclipse  N1  Teacher interested, low attendance  S2  Teachers interested, “why us, we are not a good school”  U1 and U2  Teachers and principle missing  G1  Well run, high attendance 2/18/2009CIS27

 S1  Return visit, school open  U1  Teacher interested in DSH for professional development  U2  Staged activities  D1  Well run, teacher had child in StudyHall  D2  School dropped from study, inadequate facilities 2/18/2009CIS28

 A1  Had not given data earlier  Strongest school in study  R1  Teachers expressed frustrations about not being able to teach  S3  Principal on election duty  Excluded from study  P1  Low attendance  Students leading classes  P2  Very few students  Cancelled midday meal program 2/18/2009CIS29

SchoolTeachersShiksha Mitra StudentsRoomsSetting S122874Village N122913Rural S232893Village U Town U Town G Town D Village D (1 usable)Village A (+ veranda)Village R Rural P Village P Rural 2/18/2009CIS30

 Electricity situation better than expected 2/18/2009CIS31

 Student and Teacher Attendance low 2/18/2009CIS32

 Generally positive Principal/Teacher response 2/18/2009CIS33

 Adequate physical facilities 2/18/2009CIS34

 Efforts to promote school attendance 2/18/2009CIS35

 What contributes to success or failure of DSH deployments 2/18/2009CIS36

 Does the use of DSH produce measurable gains in student performance 2/18/2009CIS37

 Are the teachers successful in adopting the DSH teaching model?  Does this transfer skills/knowledge to the teachers? 2/18/2009CIS38

 Assuming that we get improved results and pedagogy is adopted, what is contributing to student learning? 2/18/2009CIS39

 Schools drop out  Schools fail to use DSH  Student attendance too low  Absence, drop out, school disruption  Mixed grade teaching  Teacher selection bias  Control class not a true control  Compromised testing  Different populations in control / treatment 2/18/2009CIS40

 Dec 08, School survey  Feb 09, School visits  Mar 09, Principal meeting  Apr 09, Teacher orientation  Jun 09, DSH deployment  Jun 09, Teacher workshop  Jul 09, Pre-test  Jul 09, DSH use in school  July – April, Observations, Interviews, Quizzes  Apr 10, Post-test 2/18/2009CIS41

2/18/2009CIS42

2/18/2009CIS   Richard Anderson, The Digital StudyHall 905 W. Middlefield Road, #988 Mountain View, CA