1 Draft Final Safe Fill Regulations Major Changes/Revisions Presented to the CSSAB November 8, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LEGISLATIVE UPDATE Robert A. Tardif, P.E., Administrator Subsurface Systems Bureau New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services.
Advertisements

Department of Environmental Protection CLEAN FILL POLICY
Technical Requirements for Site Remediation Backbone of New Jerseys Site Remediation Program.
SW101 The NPDES Industrial Storm Water Program. What Does the Industrial Program Cover? F Storm Water Discharges Associated with Industrial Activity l.
A TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE NAS FINAL REPORT ON CCB PLACEMENT AT COAL MINES KIMERY C VORIES OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING.
Role of Activity & Use Limitations in Clean Energy Development at Disposal Sites Elizabeth Callahan Acting Division Director, Policy and Program Planning,
Chapter F.A.C. Updates F. Thomas Lubozynski, P.E. Waste Program Administrator.
The Proposed Part 115 Rules and Waste Utilization East and West Michigan Chapters of the Air and Waste Management Association & The Environmental Law Section.
1 Midland Community Meeting Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Steven Chester, Director Jim Sygo, Deputy Director.
Clean Water Act SAFE 210. History/Amendments Recent major amendments were enacted in 1972, 1977, and – Established the National Pollutant Discharge.
Basic Economic Development Course in Pennsylvania Environmental and Commercial Real Estate Legal Issues Surrounding Economic Development Act 2 Issues Scott.
Remediation Programs Update MSECA Quarterly Meeting March 13, 2012.
S-1925 Subsection t Stakeholder Meeting November 9, :30-2:30pm NJDEP Public Hearing Room 1 st Floor, 401 East State Street Trenton, NJ.
BCC PUBLIC HEARING Concrete & Asphalt Plants Ordinance Adoption Hearing ZONING DIVISION January 27, 2015.
CCDD Rules and Regulations Salvaging Chad Broege – Thelen Sand & Gravel.
BCC Public Hearing Concrete & Asphalt Plants Ordinance ZONING DIVISION December 2, 2014.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System -NPDES Permit Process-
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Looking Ahead.
PUBLIC INFORMATION SESSION: Old Fall River Road Landfill Dartmouth, MA Massachusetts Unlined Landfill Closure Policy March 28, 2013 Mark Dakers, Acting.
How to Build a Groundwater Model Activity Source Created by the USA Groundwater Foundation; modified from the Science Olympiad event, Awesome Aquifers.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
Colorado School of Mines Research Institute Site DRAFT REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY AND PROPOSED PLAN.
Connecticut Department of Public Works -- Rebecca Cutler – Environmental Analyst.
Appendix 8.1 – Waste Management Plan Oil Spill Contingency Plan – Land Document Number: KOC.SA.020 Incident Name: Incident Date/Time: Incident Location:
New Ag Waiver for the San Diego Region (including Temecula Valley) Water Quality Workshop Rancho California Water District November 6, 2008 Presented by.
Chapter F.A.C. Updates Solid Waste Program.
OSM CCB Placement in Coal Mines - Proposed Rulemaking John R. Craynon, P.E. Chief, Division of Regulatory Support Office of Surface Mining Reclamation.
Final Rule Setting Federal Standards for Conducting All Appropriate Inquiries U.S. EPA Brownfields Program.
Public Hearing August 30, 2014 Drive-Way Ordinance Please Sign in…
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Overview of Regulatory Changes, Policy and Implementation Colleen Brisnehan Colorado Department of Public Health And Environment Hazardous Materials and.
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management, and to Chapter 38, Zoning Orange County Code Presented by the Orange County Environmental.
TRB: Waste Management and Resource Efficiency Workshop July 2011 Tom Roick, Senior Policy Analyst Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Oregon DEQ’s.
Mine Reclamation and Enforcement Director Billy A. Ratliff Office Cell
Department of Public Works Non-Exclusive Solid Waste Collection Franchise System – Review September 29, 2014.
Overview of the Land Recycling Program (Voluntary Cleanup Program)
October Mary Louise Hendrickson Solid Waste Section – Technical Lead
Module 6: Alternatives. 2  Module 6 contains three sections: – 6.1 Development and Screening of Alternatives – 6.2 Detailed Analysis of Alternatives.
Maryland Department of the Environment Harbor Point – Regulatory Overview Horacio Tablada, Director Land Management Administration November 14, 2013.
Review of Current Conditions Report and Work Plan for Area 1 Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical Outreach Services for Communities.
Request to Downzone from R-36 To RU-2 Zoning District Applicant: Marshall Miles of GM Propane Docket Z Request for a Rezoning Board of Supervisors.
Cumberland Park CCB Project Virginia Department of Environmental Quality October 9, 2007.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
1 Draft Final Safe Fill Regulations. 2 W hat’s new in Safe Fill Definition? Definition is short as a result of: – Due diligence procedures moved to existing.
ADOPTION PUBLIC HEARING DONATION BIN ORDINANCE Zoning Division June 24, 2014.
FIRST PUBLIC HEARING DONATION BIN ORDINANCE Zoning Division June 3, 2014.
1 Permit Implementation Regulations Defines the phrase “significant change in the design or operation of a solid waste facility that is not authorized.
Water Right Transfers OAR Chapter 690 Divisions 380, 382, 385, 77 CWRE Workshops – October, 2012 Susan Douthit District Analyst.
Think safe. Act safe. Be safe. LEHR Site Annual Soil Management Plan Training Sue Fields, Environmental Health & Safety Sept,
Community Development Department Special Exception Vehicle Rental and Leasing St. Joe Plaza.
Division of Water Quality Coal Ash Storage, Use, & Disposal: Update Ted L. Bush, Chief Aquifer Protection Section Division of Water Quality “To protect.
1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.
Siemon & Larsen Outline of New Zoning Code. Siemon & Larsen Goals Eliminating redundant and conflicting provisions An overall update Address concerns.
MIAMI-DADE COUNTY REGULATORY AND ECONOMIC RESOURCE DEPT. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (DERM) “THE PERMITTING PROCESS TO DISPOSE OF STORMWATER.
Copyright © 2009 Holland & Knight LLP All Rights Reserved Uniform Environmental Covenants Act November 18, 2009 Amy L. Edwards, Esq. (202) Brownfields.
 Clean Water Act 404 permit  Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water 401 water quality certification  Ohio Revised Code 6111 – Placement of dredged materials.
GEORGIA PACIFIC WEST PROPOSED INTERIM ACTION Public Meeting & Open House – July 12, 2011.
Slide 1 California Implementation Water Board Policies.
Institutional Controls in Pennsylvania’s Brownfields Program Presented by: Jill Gaito Director, Brownfields Action Team Office of Community Revitalization.
Asphalt Paving Technical Committee (APT) Proposed revisions to the Asphalt Concrete Sections of the MAG Specifications.
30 Texas Administrative Code Chapter 210, Subchapter E Presented by Kara Denney September 23, 2015.
Urban Runoff Pollution Ordinance 2017 Proposed Update
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
2017 Environmental Trade Fair Shannon Gibson
Solid Waste Handling Standards
Factsheet: Proper Permanent Well Abandonment for Virginia Coastal Plain Wells VDH DEQ What is.
Ohio EPA Beneficial Use Program
City Council Meeting August 27, 2018
2018 Environmental Trade Fair Shannon Gibson
TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair Water Quality Division
Presentation transcript:

1 Draft Final Safe Fill Regulations Major Changes/Revisions Presented to the CSSAB November 8, 2002

2 What’s new in Safe Fill Definition? Definition is short as a result of: – Due diligence procedures moved to § (b) – Exceptions transformed into a new section, § Definition is limited to the following uncontaminated materials: – soil containing stone and rock – dredged material – used asphalt – brick, block, concrete (segregated or mixed) from C/D activities

3 Safe Fill Definition (continued) Safe fill materials meet the following: – Not affected by a spill or release – No visible staining, odor or sensory nuisance from chemical contaminants associated with the material – Meet numeric standards of §287.11(b) --- lower of residential GV or DC (SHS), based on due diligence – Determination that material is safe fill based on § – Burden of proof on user to demonstrate material is safe fill – Safe fill not regulated as waste when used as fill

4 Safe Fill Due Diligence and Safe fill Numeric Standards – § Due diligence requirements now in (a) – 2 options instead of proposed three options; field screening allowed Numeric standards moved from §287.11(a) to §287.11(b) – No change from proposed except following: PQL added to §287.1(b)(1)(C) to demonstrate compliance with SF numeric standards if std. lower than PQL

5 Safe Fill Due Diligence and Safe fill Numeric Standards – § No changes to proposed composite and discrete sampling procedures in (now subsections c, d & e) except added subsection (f) as follows: – Statistical analysis requirements added to §287.11(f) 95% UCL of the arithmetic mean to demonstrate material meets SF numeric standards Overall, draft final regulations will allow for field and laboratory screening of material including composite, discrete and statistical sampling and analyses

6 New § Determination that a material is safe fill §287.12(a)(1): Material not affected by a spill or release: – Applies to soil or dredged material only – No visible staining, no odor or nuisance – Num. standards may be above SF but must be below nonresidential SHS (cap) Use limited to: – Right-of-way – Offsite of residential property – Within a property

7 New §287.12(a)(1) (continued) For dredged material, additional uses limited to: – As beach nourishment on adjacent land (sand and gravel) – As soil additive/soil substitute for commercial or industrial purposes – As fill for residential purposes except blending required with clean soil/dredge and blend must meet safe fill numeric standards

8 New §287.12(a)(1) (continued) Determination requires: – Appropriate level of due diligence to demonstrate material not subject to a spill/release and below nonresidential numeric standards – Maintain documentation in support of determination – Submit Notice of Determination to Department

9 New §287.12(a)(2) (continued) §287.12(a)(2): Material affected by a spill or release: – Applies to soil, dredged material or historic fill only – Visible staining acceptable but no odor or nuisance – Num. standards may be above SF but < nonresidential SHS Use limited to: – Right-of-way – For historic fill, can be moved offsite in amounts < 500 cy/excavation location; used as fill or as construction material – Within a property

10 New §287.12(a)(2) (continued) Determination requires following: – Must conduct sampling /analysis to demonstrate material is below nonresidential num. standards (cap) – Maintain documentation to support determination – Submit Notice of Determination to Department – Submit proof of recorded, amended deed to Department that includes following: Deed includes exact location of the fill placed on the property Deed to be part of all future conveyances or transfers of subject property

11 New §287.12(c)(7) (continued) Deed notice not required for: – Material is not affected by a spill or release, is above safe fill but below nonresidential standards and no visible staining, odor, nuisance – Material is affected by a spill or release, is above safe fill numeric standards but at or below background level at the property

12 New § Relationship of Safe Fill to surface Waters For placement of safe fill (meets definition and SF numeric standards) into or along surface waters, following required: – Approval under Chapter 105 – May not produce leachate in excess of residential GWMSC for used aquifer and TDS<2500 mg/L by SPLP – Comply with water quality standards in Chapters 93 & 16 If safe fill determination based on §287.12, cannot be placed into waters of the Commonwealth

13 New § (continued) For placement into waters in active/abandoned mine or abandoned quarry as reclamation: – Approved sampling/analysis plan – Comply with water quality standards in Chs.93 and 16 – 10% of safe fill numeric standards – For metals, in lieu of 10%, SPLP analysis to show material will not produce leachate in excess of residential GWMSC for used aquifer/TDS<2500 mg/L. Applies only if GW monitoring is conducted where material is placed

14 Permit by Rule – (i) For placement of contaminated and segregated or mixed brick, block and concrete from C/D activities – No distinction made between waste from industrial properties or from residential/commercial properties Proposed numeric standards retained – lower of residential generic value or residential direct contact in aquifers used or planned for use with TDS<2500 mg/L Requirements to be met for placement of waste into or along waters or into waters in active/abandoned mines or abandoned quarries for reclamation, same as in the new §287.13

15 Permit by Rule - § (j) Three proposed PBRs (j,k &l) consolidated into one PBR (j) Applies to contaminated soils, dredged material, used asphalt and historic fill Nonresidential SHS are required for regulated substances in the material as opposed to proposed residential SHS Materials to meet lower of the nonresidential generic value or nonresidential direct contact value

16 Permit by Rule - § (j) Material may be beneficially used: – To bring an area to grade – As construction material – For control of fire and subsidence events or – In reclamation of active/abandoned mines or abandoned quarries if approved by the Department All conditions proposed for the 3 PBRs are retained and new ones added, as listed: – Document longitude and latitude of location where materials are placed for use

17 Permit by Rule - § (j) (continued) New conditions: – Eliminate direct contact pathways promptly & permanently – Submit copies of records of analytical evaluations along with written notice to Department as opposed to the proposed “when requested by the Department” – Above records to also include the following: A recorded, amended deed that includes exact location where material is placed at the property, description of contamination from sampling and analysis Deed to be part of all future conveyances or transfers of subject property

18 Permit by Rule - § (k) Proposed PBR (m) for placement of contaminated soil at a site undergoing remediation is retained without change except it is now subsection (k) instead of (m)

19 Minor Changes Historic fill definition will be amended to reflect volume increase §287.2 (relating to Scope) expanded to include following activities as not regulated under the residual waste regulations: – §287.2(e)(3): noncoal materials excavated from active mines and quarries in compliance with Chapter 77. – §287.2 (e)(4): Commercial dredging operations where mainly sand and gravel are dredged in compliance with Department-issued Chapter 105 permit, 401 certification, and consistency determination under the Coastal Zone Management Program

20 Changes to Appendix A Proposed Table 4 deleted due to consolidation of 3 PBRs into one in (j) Proposed Table 5 is now Table 4 – lists numeric stds. for organics for PBRs ( (j) & (i)) Proposed Table 6 is now Table 5 – lists numeric stds. for metals and inorganics for PBRs ( (j) & (i)) Numeric values in all 5 Tables are corrected to be in compliance with the amended Act 2 regulations