EE5359 Multimedia Processing Final Presentation SPRING 2015 ADVISOR: Dr. K.R.Rao EE5359 Multimedia Processing1 BY: BHARGAV VELLALAM SRIKANTESWAR

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to H.264 / AVC Video Coding Standard Multimedia Systems Sharif University of Technology November 2008.
Advertisements

Time Optimization of HEVC Encoder over X86 Processors using SIMD
MULTIMEDIA PROCESSING STUDY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF POPULAR PARALLELING TECHNIQUES APPLIED TO HEVC Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao By: Karthik Suresh.
-1/20- MPEG 4, H.264 Compression Standards Presented by Dukhyun Chang
MULTIMEDIA PROCESSING
1 Video Coding Concept Kai-Chao Yang. 2 Video Sequence and Picture Video sequence Large amount of temporal redundancy Intra Picture/VOP/Slice (I-Picture)
Implementation and Study of Unified Loop Filter in H.264 EE 5359 Multimedia Processing Spring 2012 Guidance : Prof K R Rao Pavan Kumar Reddy Gajjala
Fast Block Based Motion Estimation Algorithms in HEVC
Efficient Bit Allocation and CTU level Rate Control for HEVC Picture Coding Symposium, 2013, IEEE Junjun Si, Siwei Ma, Wen Gao Insitute of Digital Media,
Final Report – Spring 2014 Course: EE5359 – Multimedia Processing
BY AMRUTA KULKARNI STUDENT ID : UNDER SUPERVISION OF DR. K.R. RAO Complexity Reduction Algorithm for Intra Mode Selection in H.264/AVC Video.
Topics in Signal Processing Project Proposal
PERFORMANCE COMAPRISON OF HEVC,H.264 and VP9
An Introduction to H.264/AVC and 3D Video Coding.
HARDEEPSINH JADEJA UTA ID: What is Transcoding The operation of converting video in one format to another format. It is the ability to take.
Topic: Advanced Video Coding Standard (Comparison of HEVC with H.264 and H.264 with MPEG-2) A PROJECT UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF DR. K. R. RAO COURSE: EE5359.
3D EXTENSION of HEVC: Multi-View plus Depth Parashar Nayana Karunakar Student Id: Department of Electrical Engineering.
Liquan Shen Zhi Liu Xinpeng Zhang Wenqiang Zhao Zhaoyang Zhang An Effective CU Size Decision Method for HEVC Encoders IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA,
PROJECT PROPOSAL HEVC DEBLOCKING FILTER AND ITS IMPLIMENTATION RAKESH SAI SRIRAMBHATLA UTA ID: EE 5359 Under the guidance of DR. K. R. RAO.
PROJECT INTERIM REPORT HEVC DEBLOCKING FILTER AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION RAKESH SAI SRIRAMBHATLA UTA ID:
PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF HEVC AND H
A project proposal on Residual DPCM for improving Inter Prediction in HEVC for Lossless Screen Content Coding Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao   For.
A final project report on
Reducing/Eliminating visual artifacts in HEVC by Deblocking filter By: Harshal Shah Under the guidance of: Dr. K. R. Rao.
By Abhishek Hassan Thungaraj Supervisor- Dr. K. R. Rao.
EE 5359 PROJECT PROPOSAL FAST INTER AND INTRA MODE DECISION ALGORITHM BASED ON THREAD-LEVEL PARALLELISM IN H.264 VIDEO CODING Project Guide – Dr. K. R.
PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF HEVC AND H.264 DECODER FINAL PRESENTATION SPRING 2014 ADVISOR: Dr. K.R.Rao VASAVEE VIJAYARAGHAVAN
- By Naveen Siddaraju - Under the guidance of Dr K R Rao Study and comparison of H.264/MPEG4.
EE 5359 TOPICS IN SIGNAL PROCESSING PROJECT ANALYSIS OF AVS-M FOR LOW PICTURE RESOLUTION MOBILE APPLICATIONS Under Guidance of: Dr. K. R. Rao Dept. of.
Comparative study of Intra Frame Coding efficiency in HEVC and VP9
PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF HEVC AND H.264 DECODER INTERIM PRESENTATION SPRING 2014 ADVISOR: Dr. K.R.Rao VASAVEE VIJAYARAGHAVAN
Rate-GOP Based Rate Control for HEVC SHANSHE WANG, SIWEI MA, SHIQI WANG, DEBIN ZHAO, AND WEN GAO IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN SIGNAL PROCESSING,
FAST MODE DECISION ALGORITHM FOR INTRA PREDICTION IN HEVC FINAL REPORT Lanka Naga Venkata Sai Surya Teja Student ID Mail ID
Implementation and comparison study of H.264 and AVS China EE 5359 Multimedia Processing Spring 2012 Guidance : Prof K R Rao Pavan Kumar Reddy Gajjala.
- By Naveen Siddaraju - Under the guidance of Dr K R Rao Study and comparison between H.264.
EE5359 Multimedia Processing Interim Presentation SPRING 2015 ADVISOR: Dr. K.R.Rao EE5359 Multimedia Processing1 BY: BHARGAV VELLALAM SRIKANTESWAR
Figure 1.a AVS China encoder [3] Video Bit stream.
Srikanth Vasireddy Multimedia Processing Lab,UTA1.
INTERIM Presentation on Topic: Advanced Video Coding (Comparison of HEVC with H.264 and H.264 with MPEG-2) A PROJECT UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF DR. K. R. RAO.
IMPLEMENTATION OF H.264/AVC, AVS China Part 7 and Dirac VIDEO CODING STANDARDS Under the guidance of Dr. K R. Rao Electrical Engineering Department The.
-BY KUSHAL KUNIGAL UNDER GUIDANCE OF DR. K.R.RAO. SPRING 2011, ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON FPGA Implementation.
Reducing the Complexity of inter-prediction mode decision for High Efficiency Video Codec Kushal Shah Department of Electrical Engineering University of.
Study and Optimization of the Deblocking Filter in H.265 and its Advantages over H.264 By: Valay Shah Under the guidance of: Dr. K. R. Rao.
High-efficiency video coding: tools and complexity Oct
EE 5359 Multimedia Project -Shreyanka Subbarayappa
A HIGH PERFORMANCE DEBLOCKING FILTER IMPLEMENTAION FOR HEVC
Reducing/Eliminating visual artifacts in HEVC by Deblocking filter Submitted By: Harshal Shah Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao.
Porting of Fast Intra Prediction in HM7.0 to HM9.2
Transcoding from H.264/AVC to HEVC
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HEVC and H.264 INTRA FRAME CODING AND JPEG2000 BY Under the Guidance of Harshdeep Brahmasury Jain Dr. K. R. RAO ID MS Electrical.
Time Optimization of HEVC Encoder over X86 Processors using SIMD
Time Optimization of HEVC Encoder over X86 Processors using SIMD Kushal Shah Advisor: Dr. K. R. Rao Spring 2013 Multimedia.
FAST MODE DECISION ALGORITHM FOR INTRA PREDICTION IN HEVC Lanka Naga Venkata Sai Surya Teja Student ID Mail ID
By: Santosh Kumar Muniyappa ( ) Guided by: Dr. K. R. Rao Final Report Multimedia Processing (EE 5359)
PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF DAALA AND HEVC By Rohith Reddy Etikala
PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF DAALA AND HEVC By Rohith Reddy Etikala
Interim Report – Spring 2014 Course: EE5359 – Multimedia Processing Performance Comparison of HEVC & H.264 using various test sequences Under the guidance.
Implementation and comparison study of H.264 and AVS china EE 5359 Multimedia Processing Spring 2012 Guidance : Prof K R Rao Pavan Kumar Reddy Gajjala.
PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF DAALA AND HEVC By Rohith Reddy Etikala
EE 5359 MULTIMEDIA PROCESSING PROJECT PROPOSAL SPRING 2016 STUDY AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF HEVC, H.264/AVC AND DIRAC By ASHRITA MANDALAPU
E ARLY TERMINATION FOR TZ SEARCH IN HEVC MOTION ESTIMATION PRESENTED BY: Rajath Shivananda ( ) 1 EE 5359 Multimedia Processing Individual Project.
Objective Video quality assessment of Dirac and H.265 SPRING 2016 INSTRUCTOR: Dr.K.R Rao. Satya sai krishna kumar Avasarala
EE 5359 MULTIMEDIA PROCESSING INTERIM PRESENTATION SPRING 2016 STUDY AND PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF HEVC, H.264/AVC AND DIRAC By ASHRITA MANDALAPU
Introduction to H.264 / AVC Video Coding Standard Multimedia Systems Sharif University of Technology November 2008.
Early termination for tz search in hevc motion estimation
Porting of Fast Intra Prediction in HM7.0 to HM9.2
Submitted By: Harshal Shah Under the guidance of Dr. K. R. Rao
Research Topic Error Concealment Techniques in H.264/AVC for Wireless Video Transmission Vineeth Shetty Kolkeri EE Graduate,UTA.
Study and Optimization of the Deblocking Filter in H
PROJECT PROPOSAL HEVC DEBLOCKING FILTER AND ITS IMPLIMENTATION RAKESH SAI SRIRAMBHATLA UTA ID: EE 5359 Under the guidance of DR. K. R. RAO.
Presentation transcript:

EE5359 Multimedia Processing Final Presentation SPRING 2015 ADVISOR: Dr. K.R.Rao EE5359 Multimedia Processing1 BY: BHARGAV VELLALAM SRIKANTESWAR UTA ID – Submission date – 11th May 2015

 3D - Three Dimension  AVC - Advanced Video Coding  AMVP - Advanced motion vector prediction  CTU - Coding Tree  CU - Coding Unit  CABAC - Context Adaptive Binary Arithmetic Coding  DCT- Discrete Cosine Transform  FPS – Frames Per Second  GOP - Group Of Pictures  HD - High Definition EE5359 Multimedia Processing2

 HEVC - High Efficiency Video Coding  ISO - International Organization for Standardization  MCTF - Motion Compensated Temporal Filtering  MPEG - Moving Pictures Experts Group  MSE - Mean Square Error  MV - Motion Vector  POC - Phase-Only Correlation  PB – Prediction Block  PU - Prediction Unit  QP - Quantization Parameter EE5359 Multimedia Processing3

 RD – Rate Distortion  SAO - Sample Adaptive Offset  SSIM – Structural Similarity Index Metrics  TB - Transform Block  TU- Transform Unit  VCEG - Video Coding Experts Group EE5359 Multimedia Processing4

1. Introduction to HEVC 2. About Block Artifacts 3. Implementation 4. Comparison metrics 5. Deblocking Parameters used in the Project 6. Profile used and testing platform 7. Configuration of HM Test sequences 9. Results 10. Conclusion and Future work 11. References EE5359 Multimedia Processing5

 HEVC is the latest video coding standard jointly presented by ITU-T Video Coding Experts Group and the ISO/IEC Moving Picture Experts Group[1].  The best performance improvement of HEVC over H.264 is ~50% bit rate reduction for equal perceptual video quality[1].  The growing popularity of HD video, and the emergence of beyond-HD formats (e.g.4kx2k or 8kx4k resolution) are creating even stronger needs for coding efficiency superior to H.264/MPEG-4 [4] AVC's capabilities[4]. EE5359 Multimedia Processing6

7 Figure 1: Block diagram of HEVC Encoder[9]

 Partitioning each picture into multiple units  Predicting each unit using inter or intra prediction, and subtracting the prediction from the unit  Transforming and quantizing the residual (the difference between the original picture unit and the prediction)  Entropy encoding transform output, prediction information, mode information and headers[17] EE5359 Multimedia Processing8

9 Figure 2: HEVC Decoder[10]

 Entropy decoding and extracting the elements of the coded sequence  Rescaling and inverting the transform stage  Predicting each unit and adding the prediction to the output of the inverse transform  Reconstructing a decoded video image [17] EE5359 Multimedia Processing10

 A distortion that appears in compressed video material as abnormally large pixel blocks[6].  Occurs when the encoder cannot keep up with the allocated bandwidth[6].  Visible with fast motion sequences or quick scene changes[6]. EE5359 Multimedia Processing11

EE5359 Multimedia Processing12 Figure 3 : example showing macro blocks in a image[15]

 In a coding scheme that uses block-based prediction and transform coding, discontinuities can occur in the reconstructed signal at the block boundaries [17].  Visible discontinuities at the block boundaries are blocking artifacts [17]. EE5359 Multimedia Processing13

EE5359 Multimedia Processing14 Figure 4 : Block boundary with blocking artifact[17]

 The HEVC de-blocking filter significantly improves the subjective quality of coded video sequences at lower bitrates[6].  Reference software encoder may produce visible block artifacts on some sequences with content that shows chaotic motion, such as water or fire[6]. EE5359 Multimedia Processing15

 Analyzed the reasons for blocking artifacts in various sequences  Two simple encoder-side methods are implemented that improve the subjective quality.  0 to 1% increase in bit rate. EE5359 Multimedia Processing16

In order to attenuate block artifacts in a picture with higher depth, HEVC can be configured to signal the deblocking filter offsets at the slice/picture level. Higher offsets are sent for the frames, which are at higher depth in the coding hierarchy. The proposed approach relaxes the deblocking decisions thresholds and clipping values for the pictures at higher depth [6]. EE5359 Multimedia Processing17

 When the rate-distortion optimization chooses 32 × 32 intra-predicted CUs at higher depth, the prediction is often coarse.  It might be difficult to conceal a blocking artifact by just applying the deblocking filtering.  By limiting the maximum TU size to 16 × 16 samples for coding of intra CUs in inter-predicted slices.  This will restrict the maximum intra-predicted block size and will increase the bit rate [6]. EE5359 Multimedia Processing18

 PSNR – Peak Signal to Noise Ratio  Computational time  BD- Bit rate  BD - PSNR EE5359 Multimedia Processing19

 tc_offset_div 2 In-loop deblocking filter parameter tc_Offset_Div2 is added to the base parameter LoopFilterTcOffset div2 to set the final tc_offset_div2 parameter for this picture signalled in the slice segment header. The final value of tc_offset_div2 shall be an integer number in the range - 6 to +6 [8]. EE5359 Multimedia Processing20

 beta_offset_div2 In-loop deblocking filter parameter beta_Offset_Div2 is added to the base parameter LoopFilterBetaOffset div2 to set the final beta_offset_div2 parameter for this picture signalled in the slice segment header. The final value of beta_offset_div2 shall be an integer number in the range-6 to +6 [8]. EE5359 Multimedia Processing21

 Rate Distortion (RD) penalty RD-penalty for 32x32 TU for intra in non-intra slices. Enabling this parameter can reduce the visibility of CU boundaries in the coded picture [8].  0 No RD-penalty  1 RD-penalty  2 Maximum RD-penalty (no 32x32 TU). EE5359 Multimedia Processing22

 The HM 16.4 main profile [8], This profile allows for a bit depth of 8-bits per sample with 4:2:0 chroma sampling, which is the most common type of video used with consumer devices.  TESTING PLATFORM Processor : Intel(R) core(TM) i5-4200,2.30 GHz Memory : 6 GB Operating system : 64 bit windows 8 EE5359 Multimedia Processing23

 The project is implemented in Random Access configuration of HM 16.4  Profile : main  IntraPeriod : 1 # Period of I-Frame ( -1 = only first)  GOPSize : 8 # GOP Size (number of B slice = GOPSize-1)  QP : 32 # Quantization parameter(0-51)  FastSearch 1 # 0:Full search 1:TZ search  SearchRange : 64 # (0: Search range is a Full frame) EE5359 Multimedia Processing24

EE5359 Multimedia Processing25 Figure 5: Hierarchical-B coding structure with GOP8 illustrating different depths of the picture in the coding structure [6]

EE5359 Multimedia Processing26 The following test sequences are used for analyzing the project [11]

EE5359 Multimedia Processing27 Figure 6: RaceHorses_416x240_30.yuv [11] Figure 7: ParkScene_1920x1080_24.yuv [11] Figure 8: Kimono_1920x1080_24.yuv [11]

EE5359 Multimedia Processing28 Figure 9: football30_cif_90.yuv [11]Figure 10: BasketballDrill_832x480_50.yuv [11

EE5359 Multimedia Processing29 Figure 11: ParkScene_1920x1080_24.yuv Without reduction of block artifacts Figure 12: ParkScene_1920x1080_24.yuv with reduction of block artifacts Figure 11 and Figure 12 are encoded sequences for a QP of 42 without and with reduction of block artifacts respectively.

EE5359 Multimedia Processing30 Table 1: Results for RaceHorses_416x240_30.yuv sequence in Random Access Configuration

EE5359 Multimedia Processing31 Figure 13 : RD- Plot for RaceHorses_416x240_30.yuv

EE5359 Multimedia Processing32 Figure 14 : QP vs PSNR comparison plot for RaceHorses_416x240_30.yuv

EE5359 Multimedia Processing33 Figure 15 : QP vs Encoding time comparison Plot for RaceHorses_416x240_30.yuv

EE5359 Multimedia Processing34 Table 2: Results for ParkScene_1920x1080_24.yuv sequence in Random Access Configuration

EE5359 Multimedia Processing35 Figure 16 : RD- Plot for ParkScene_1920x1080_24.yuv

EE5359 Multimedia Processing36 Figure 17: QP vs PSNR comparison Plot for ParkScene_1920x1080_24.yuv

EE5359 Multimedia Processing37 Figure 18: QP vs Encoding time comparison Plot for ParkScene_1920x1080_24.yuv

EE5359 Multimedia Processing38 Table 3: Results for Kimono_1920x1080_24.yuv sequence in Random Access Configuration

EE5359 Multimedia Processing39 Figure 19: RD-Plot for Kimono_1920x1080_24.yuv

EE5359 Multimedia Processing40 Figure 20: QP vs PSNR comparison plot for Kimono_1920x1080_24.yuv

EE5359 Multimedia Processing41 Figure 21: QP vs Encoding time comparison plot for Kimono_1920x1080_24.yuv

EE5359 Multimedia Processing42 Table 4: Results for football30_cif_90.yuv sequence in Random Access Configuration

EE5359 Multimedia Processing43 Figure 22: RD-Plot for football30_cif_90.yuv

EE5359 Multimedia Processing44 Figure 23: QP vs PSNR comparison plot for football30_cif_90.yuv

EE5359 Multimedia Processing45 Figure 24: QP vs Encoding time comparison Plot for football30_cif_90.yuv

EE5359 Multimedia Processing46 Table 5: Results for BasketballDrill_832x480_50.yuv sequence in Random Access Configuration

EE5359 Multimedia Processing47 Figure 25: RD-Plot for BasketballDrill_832x480_50.yuv

EE5359 Multimedia Processing48 Figure 26: QP vs PSNR comparison plot for BasketballDrill_832x480_50.yuv

EE5359 Multimedia Processing49 Figure 27: QP vs Encoding time comparison Plot for BasketballDrill_832x480_50.yuv

EE5359 Multimedia Processing50

EE5359 Multimedia Processing51 Figure 28: BD-PSNR Comparison with and without blocking artifacts for QP=32

EE5359 Multimedia Processing52 Figure 29: %BD-Bit rate comparison with and without blocking artifacts for QP=32

 RD plots infer that after the blocking artifacts are reduced in a sequence, PSNR increases where as Bit rate also increases. This is a drawback.  As the Quantization Parameter is increased the encoding time decreases and PSNR also decreases.  BD-Bit rate plot indicates that there is 0.578% increase in average BD-bit rate with reduction of blocking artifacts.  BD-PSNR indicates that there is an average of 1.67dB increase in BD-PSNR with reduction of blocking artifacts.  Future work has to be done to decrease the bit rate and encoding time. EE5359 Multimedia Processing53

1. G.J. Sullivan et al, “Overview of the high efficiency video coding (HEVC) standard”, IEEE Transactions on CSVT, vol. 22, pp , Dec P. Hanhart et al, “Subjective quality evaluation of the upcoming HEVC video compression standard” SPIE Applications of digital image processing XXXV, vol.8499, pp , Aug G J. Sullivan et al, “Standardized Extensions of HEVC”, IEEE Journal of Selected topics in Signal Processing, Vol.7, no.6, pp , Dec F. Bossen et al, “HEVC Complexity and Implementation Analysis”, IEEE Transactions on CSVT, vol.22, pp , Dec HEVC white paper-Ateme: 6. A. Norkin et al, "Two HEVC encoder methods for block artifact reduction ", IEEE International Conference on Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP) article no , pp.1-6,Nov EE5359 Multimedia Processing54

7. L. Zhao et al, “Fast mode decision algorithm for intra prediction in HEVC”, IEEE International Conference on Visual Communications and Image Processing Conference (VCIP) article no , pp. 6-9 Nov HEVC Reference Software HM D. Marpe,T.Weigand and G.J.Sullivan, “The H.264/MPEG4 advanced video coding standard and its applications”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Vol. 44, pp , Aug C. Fogg, “Suggested figures for the HEVC specification”, ITU-T / ISO-IEC Document: JCTVC J0292r1, July Required test sequences V. Sze and M. Budagavi, ”High Throughput CABAC Entropy Coding in HEVC”, IEEE Transactions on CSVT, Vol.22, pp, , Dec T.Nguyen et al, "Transform Coding Techniques in HEVC" IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing,Vol.7, pp. 978–989, Dec EE5359 Multimedia Processing55

14. W.Y.Wei, "Deblocking Algorithms in Video and Image Compression Coding" Graduate Institute of Communication Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC. 15. A. Norkin et al, “HEVC Deblocking Filter”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Vol. 22, No. 12, pp , Dec W.Shen et al, “A high-throughput VLSI architecture for deblocking filter in HEVC” IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), pp , May Access to HEVC tutorial by I.E.G. Richardson: I. E.G. Richardson, “The H.264 Advanced Video Compression Standard”, 2nd Edition, Wiley N.Ahmed, T.Natarajan and K.R.Rao, " Discrete Cosine Transform ", IEEE Transactions on Computers, Vol 23, PP , Jan EE5359 Multimedia Processing56

20. Access to HM 16.4 software manual: manual.pdfhttp://hevc.kw.bbc.co.uk/svn/jctvc-a124/tags/HM-16.4/doc/software- manual.pdf 21. V.Sze, M,Budagavi and G.J.Sullivan, "High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC): Algorithms and Architectures", Springer I.E.G. Richardson, “Video Codec Design: Developing Image and Video Compression Systems”, Wiley, M.Wein, "High Efficiency Video Coding, Coding Tools and Specification”, Springer X. Li et al, “Rate-complexity-distortion evaluation for hybrid video coding”, IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), pp , July G. Bjontegaard, “Calculation of Average PSNR Differences between RD Curves”, document VCEGM33, ITU-T SG 16/Q 6, Austin, TX, Apr I.E.G. Richardson, "Coding Video: A Practical Guide to HEVC and Beyond" Wiley, May EE5359 Multimedia Processing57

27. J. Vanne et al, “Comparative Rate-Distortion-Complexity Analysis of HEVC and AVC Video Codecs”, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Vol. 22, No. 12, pp , Dec HM Encoder Description: coding/n14703-high-efficiency-video-coding-hevc-encoderhttp://mpeg.chiariglione.org/standards/mpeg-h/high-efficiency-video- coding/n14703-high-efficiency-video-coding-hevc-encoder 29. White paper on PSNR-NI: HEVC Tutorial by V.Sze and M.Budagavi, ”Design and Implementation of Next Generation video coding systems”, IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Melbourne, Australia, June Available on : A.Hore and D.Ziou, "Image Quality Metrics : PSNR vs SSIM", IEEE International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), pp , Aug G. Correa et al, “Fast HEVC encoding decisions using data mining”, IEEE Transactions on CSVT, vol.25, pp , Apr EE5359 Multimedia Processing58

33. Intel VTune Amplifier XE Software profiler website : H.Schwarz, D.Marpe and T.Weigand," Analysis of Hierarchical B pictures and MCTF", IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), pp. 9-12, July EE5359 Multimedia Processing59

Thank You. EE5359 Multimedia Processing60