Synchronization Issues in MEIC Andrew Hutton, Slava Derbenev and Yuhong Zhang MEIC Ion Complex Design Mini-Workshop Jan. 27 & 28, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of MEIC Ion Complex and Ion Collider Ring
Advertisements

Simulation Study For MEIC Electron Cooling He Zhang, Yuhong Zhang Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Abstract Electron cooling of the ion beams.
Note: most of the slides shown here are picked from CERN accelerator workshops. Please refer to those workshop for further understanding of the accelerator.
Ion Accelerator Complex for MEIC January 28, 2010.
1 Dejan Trbojevic EIC Collaboration Meeting, Hampton University, Virginia May 19, 2008 Dejan Trbojevic e-RHIC with non-scaling FFAG’s.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
Thomas Roser RHIC Open Planning Meeting December 3-4, 2003 RHIC II machine plans Electron cooling at RHIC Luminosity upgrade parameters.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Issues.
Storage Ring : Status, Issues and Plans C Johnstone, FNAL and G H Rees, RAL.
Toward a Test Facility for an ERL Circulator Ring Based e-Cooler MEIC Electron Cooler Test Facility Planning Retreat January 31, 2012.
MEIC Electron Cooling Simulation He Zhang 03/18/2014, EIC 14 Newport News, VA.
Ion Polarization Control in MEIC Rings Using Small Magnetic Fields Integrals. PSTP 13 V.S. Morozov et al., Ion Polarization Control in MEIC Rings Using.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
MEIC Staged Cooling Scheme and Simulation Studies He Zhang MEIC Collaboration Meeting, 10/06/2015.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
Synchronization Andrew Hutton Slava Derbenev Yuhong Zhang.
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
ERHIC design status V.Ptitsyn for the eRHIC design team.
Design Optimization of MEIC Ion Linac & Pre-Booster B. Mustapha, Z. Conway, B. Erdelyi and P. Ostroumov ANL & NIU MEIC Collaboration Meeting JLab, October.
EIC Users Meeting, SBU, 6/27/14 Polarized Electron Beams in the MEIC at JLab Fanglei Lin for MEIC Study Group EIC Users Meeting, Stony Brook University,
Polarization in ELIC Yaroslav Derbenev Center for Advanced Study of Accelerators Jefferson Laboratory EIC Collaboiration Meeting, January 10-12, 2010 Stony.
MEIC Electron Ring Injection from CEBAF
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
F. Willeke, Snowmass Luminosity Limitations of e-p Colliders Extrapolation from HERA Experience Examples for IR Layout LINAC-Ring Limitations HERA.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Harmonic.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
P OSSIBILITIES FOR MAINTAINING AA AND PP CAPABILITIES IN PARALLEL WITH E RHIC V. Ptitsyn Collider-Accelerator Department BNL RHIC and AGS Users Meeting,
ILC Damping Rings: Configuration Status and R&D Plans Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory January 19, 2006.
EC plans in connection with eRHIC Wolfram Fischer ILCDR08 – Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 10 July 2008.
Calculation of Beam Equilibrium and Luminosities for
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Electron Polarization In MEIC
Space Charge Effect Simulation Using DA Based FMM and Electron Cooling Simulation for JLab’s MEIC Project.
Synchrotron Ring Schematic
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Low Energy Electron-Ion Collision
Gap Transient Suppression using Increased Bunch Density
Update on Alternative Design of jleic ion injector Complex B
JLEIC ion fullsize booster (2256m) space charge limit (Δν=0
MEIC New Baseline: Part 10
Update on ERL Cooler Design Studies
Ion bunch formation options for 400GeV JLEIC
JLEIC 200 GeV Ion Injector Chain and Bunch Formation
Main Design Parameters RHIC Magnets for MEIC Ion Collider Ring
Synchronization in MEIC
Deuteron and Small Aperture
JLEIC 200 GeV ion beam formation options
Yu.N. Filatov, A.M. Kondratenko, M.A. Kondratenko
JLEIC Main Parameters with Strong Electron Cooling
Non-pairwise Collision
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
Conventional Synchronization Schemes
MEIC low rep-rate operation and path length
MEIC New Baseline: Performance and Accelerator R&D
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
More on MEIC Beam Synchronization
HE-JLEIC: Do We Have a Baseline?
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
Some Thoughts on the JLEIC Ion Injector
MEIC beam path change with e-ring bypass lines
Updated MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme
An Alternative Ion Complex Agenda /some preliminary estimations/
Beam Synchronization in MEIC: The Problem, Scale and Prospect
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Illustrations of Beam Synchronization Issue
Choice of harmonic number with the consideration of ion beam formation
Presentation transcript:

Synchronization Issues in MEIC Andrew Hutton, Slava Derbenev and Yuhong Zhang MEIC Ion Complex Design Mini-Workshop Jan. 27 & 28, 2011

The Problem Electrons travel at the speed of light Protons and ions are slower There are three areas that need to be addressed In collider ring  matching electron & ion beams at multiple IPs During acceleration Cooling  matching ion beam and cooling electron beam Assumptions MEIC collider ring circumference is around 1 km Large booster (LEIC) is the same circumference as MEIC Electron ring is the same circumference as MEIC Superconducting RF systems have limited frequency swing

Harmonic Numbers Assuming circumference of the MEIC collider ring is about 1 km For an RF frequency of 1497 MHz The best harmonic number is 4860 = 2x2x3x3x3x3x3x5 Corresponds to a circumference of meter For an RF Frequency of MHz The harmonic number is 2430 For an RF Frequency of 499 MHz The harmonic number is 1620

Orbit Differences in MEIC MEIC design parameters Proton energy 20 to 60 GeVBunch repetition rate MHz Deuteron energy 10 to 30 GeV/uCollider ring circumference ~1000 m Lead energy 7.9 to 23.8 GeV/u Harmonic number2500 Orbit difference from 1000 m 60 GeV proton design point proton 60 GeV design point 20 GeV  cm  2.44 bunch spacing  2 unit of HN deuteron: 30 GeV/u  cm  0.92 bunch spacing  1 unit of HN 10 GeV/u  -429 cm  10.7 bunch spacing  11 unit of HN Lead: 23.8 GeV/u  cm  1.64 bunch spacing  2 unit of HN 7.9 GeV/u  -692cm  17.3 bunch spacing  17 unit of HN MEIC Circulator Cooler Energy range 4.3 to 32.7 MeVBunch repetition rate MHz γ 8.4 to 63.9Circulator ring circumference ~ 50 m β to Harmonic number125 Orbit difference cooling GeV/u -4.9 cm  0.1 wavelength  no change of HN cooling GeV/u -35 cm  0.86 wavelength  1 unit of HN

Harmonic Number vs. Proton Energy The proton energy that corresponds to a harmonic number of 1 less than the nominal is GeV for 1497 MHz GeV for MHz GeV for 499 MHz For 750 MHz, change of harmonic numbers is not a viable solution for the 20 – 60 GeV energy range It is a viable solution at lower energies

Two Interaction Regions The two Interaction Regions are 180°apart for both beams in the present configuration Arcs are equal and straight sections are equal Offsetting the beam in the Arcs would work Putting two Interaction Regions in a single straight will not work without an additional variable chicane Chicane is complicated in this region Magnet offset ~1 meter for 2 mm path length change MEIC can have up to two interaction regions Must be equidistant in ring There can be one more interaction region in LEIC

Change Ion Ring Path Length It is possible to change the path length in the ion ring For one Interaction Point, need +/- 20 cm For two Interaction Points, need +/- 40 cm If path length is created in the arcs 20 cm corresponds to an offset of about ±25 mm 40 cm corresponds to an offset of about ±50 mm Increasing the bore of a 6 Tesla magnet by 30 mm is expensive! 60 mm may be prohibitive Need to mount all the magnets on movers Unpleasant, but possibly affordable

Three Ring Collider Proposal The MEIC ring should be used to cover the higher energies RF frequency will be fixed Electron ring and ion ring will use SRF cavities Ion ring magnets will be on movers to accommodate velocity change The LEIC ring will be used to cover lower energies The LEIC ring will need variable RF frequency Ion ring will require RF cavities that can span a wide frequency range Could be a sub-harmonic of MEIC ring Injected bunch trains would be interleaved using an RF separator

Alternate Solution: Change of Electron Path & RF Frequency The scheme does not require change of the ion orbit which is considered far more difficult to realize for SC magnets. It rather varies RF frequency (less than ±10 -3 ) Ion ring harmonic number Electron orbit (less than half wavelength for one IP and one wavelength for two IPs) Circulator cooler ring circumference (less than half bunch spacing) Nominal SchemeAlternate Scheme Ion OrbitVaryingFixed Electron orbitFixedVarying e-cooler orbitVarying Ion ring harmonic numberVarying Electron ring harmonic numberFixed Bunch frequencyFixedVarying

EnergyCollider RingCirculator Cooler ProtonDeut.LeadγβHarmonicfδf/f 0 δLeδLe δReδRe HarmonicδLcδLc δRcδRc GeV/uNumberMHz10 -4 cm Numbercm MEIC with One IP Change of ring radius

EnergyCollider RingCirculator Cooler ProtonDeut.LeadγβHarmonicfδf/f 0 δLeδLe δReδRe HarmonicδLcδLc δRcδRc GeV/uNumberMHz10 -4 cm Numbercm MEIC with 2 IPs (Half Ring Apart) Harmonic number has to be changed by unit of 2

Change of Collision Frequency & Electron Ring One IP Two IPs

Electron Cooling Electron cooling requires exact matching of the electron and ion velocities The time between adjacent buckets is 1/frequency Therefore RF frequencies must also be matched In the MEIC ring, if the RF frequency is constant (749.5 MHz) so the same electron cooling system will work at all energies Fixed frequency SRF cavities will work for energy recovery of the electron beam used for cooling

Circulator Ring Circumference The length of the circulator ring will need to be changed to accommodate different electron velocities The maximum change will be 1/h ion The circumference change in the circulator ring is h e λ/h ion Numerical example MEIC is ~900 metres long, h ion = 4500 Circulator ring is ~20 meters long, h e = 100 Circulator ring must change circumference by 4.5 mm for a one wavelength change in MEIC circumference This is a radius change of ~0.7 mm This is a small number so it can easily be accommodated within the circulator ring magnet bore

LEIC Electron Cooling The RF frequency in the LEIC ion ring has to change The circumference change in the circulator ring can be accommodated within the magnet bore The RF frequency in the electron cooling system has to change The RF frequency of the electron linac must change SRF cavities will not work Electron energy is low Propose no energy recovery for the electron beam Extend the number of turns that the electron beam is in the circulator ring Electron cooling would then be available throughout the acceleration cycle

Circulator Ring Assume racetrack layout as proposed in the ZDR Electron cooling occurs on one straight section Electron beam injected/extracted on opposite straight section Straight sections must have zero dispersion If injected beam is on axis, it will be on axis for cooling Injection orbit is independent of beam energy However, correct longitudinal position is not guaranteed by good injection orbit Requires Arcs to be achromatic, but not isochronous Arc energy setting must lead beam energy during ramp so path length shortens to maintain correct timing

Clearing Gaps Colliders usually have one (or more) gaps in the bunch train Ion clearing in electron beams Electron cloud clearing in proton or positive ion beams Required for aborting high power beams MEIC will have gaps, probably ~10% of the circumference Will reduce MEIC luminosity by ~10% RF frequencies are the same so gaps are synchronous LEIC will have gaps, also about 10% of the circumference Will reduce LEIC luminosity by at least 20% Gaps are asynchronous Could increase beam-beam effects Needs study

Impact of Clearing Gaps The clearing gaps impact the RF systems Stored energy in the cavities changes along the bunch train Bunch energy changes along the bunch train Transverse position in regions of non-zero dispersion changes along the bunch train Polarization precession changes along the bunch train Effect minimized with RF systems with high stored energy SRF cavities Copper cavities with storage cavities It is difficult to vary the frequency of both types of cavity