Spacecraft Systems Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Israeli Universal Spacecraft Bus Characteristics and Design Trade-Offs
Advertisements

All rights reserved, 2007, Thales Alenia Space EXOMARS Industry Day Carrier Module Presentation Thales Alenia Space- Italia (Turin)
SNAP Mechanical Overview
1 Interstellar Heliopause Probe M. Leipold, Kayser-Threde GmbHISSS 2010, New York, July 19 – 22, 2010 Interstellar Heliopause Probe (IHP) System Design.
Payload Design Criteria for the Space Test Program Standard Interface Vehicle (STP-SIV) Mr. Mike Marlow STP-SIV Program Manager Payload Design Criteria.
Low Energy, Low Cost Swift A design experiment June 2010.
NEO Surveyor Thomas M. Randolph Jet Propulsion Laboratory
SATELLITES What They Do and How They Work Michael J. Mackowski Aerospace Engineer October 2013 With Updates from Shawn Shepherd.
Frank Stocklin Ron Vento Leslie Ambrose June 28,2001 SUPERNOVA/ACCELERATION PROBE (SNAP) Data Systems.
Attitude Determination and Control
The Lander is at a 25 km Lunar altitude and an orbital period of approximately 110 minutes. After separation occurs the Lander is completely self sufficient.
Project X pedition Spacecraft Senior Design – Spring 2009
Commercial Confidential 1 LIM Yoram Yaniv, October 2010 LIM Yoram Yaniv, October 2010.
Spacecraft Propulsion Dr Andrew Ketsdever Lesson 13 MAE 5595.
Icarus Student Satellite Project Hannah Goldberg Dr. Brian Gilchrist BT Cesul Student Space System Fabrication Lab (S 3 FL) University of Michigan, College.
Spacecraft Subsystem Introduction to Space Systems and Spacecraft Design Space Systems Design.
Page 1HMI Team Meeting – January 26, 2005 HMI Mission Operations Rock Bush HMI Stanford Program Manager Stanford University
Josephine San Dave Olney 18 August, July 1999NASA/GSFC/IMDC2  Appears to be Feasible  Requirements  Coarse Pointing baselined on NGST  Future.
WFIRST Instrument reference information July 1, 2015.
Final Version Bob G. Beaman May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Electrical Power System (EPS)
Level 1 - LRO Requirements ESMD-RLEP-0010
Final Version Wes Ousley Dan Nguyen May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Thermal.
Satellite Communication
Launching, Orbital Effects & Satellite Subsystems
AMSAT Fox-1 Overview AMSAT Engineering Team 2011 Space Symposium.
Bob G. Beaman June 28, 2001 Electrical Power System SuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP)
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Integration and Test Joanne Baker GSFC Code 568 August 16-17, 2005.
Attitude Determination and Control System
Enabling Technology Development: High cadence imaging spectrograph development Low mass/power instrumentation Advanced communication/DSN for future deployment.
ReVeal Passive Illumination by Radar (PAIR). Overview Payload / Mission Communication Launch Orbit Power Thermal Attitude Propulsion Finance.
Tielong Zhang On behalf of the CGS Team in the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Science Spacecraft System and Payload China Geomagnetism.
Attitude Determination and Control System (ADCS)
Satellites and Launch Vehicles. “Gee Whiz” Facts Number of satellites currently in orbit is over 900 Satellites orbit at altitudes from 100 miles (Low.
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
Mechanical SuperNova/Acceleration Probe SNAP Study Dave Peters George Roach June 28, a man who's willing to make a decision in the first place can.
Philip Luers NASA/GSFC Code 561 August 16-17, 2005
Dr. Aprille Ericsson Eric Stoneking June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Attitude Control Systems.
University of Maryland ENAE 484 Spring 2003 Critical Design Review – Page 1.
Section Number - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Communication Systems Jason A. Soloff NASA/GSFC Code 567 August 16-17, 2005.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Support structure for Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Tim Rebold STRC [Tim Rebold] [STRC] [1]
The space segment. Satellite Communication A satellite communications system can be broadly divided into two segments – space segment (Satellite) – ground.
Competition Sensitive Dennis Asato June 28, 2001 XSuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Propulsion.
1 Arizona State University Senior Design ASU/JPL Flight System Group Members: Robert Hoffman, Dusty Terrill, Adam Nikolic, Josh Ruggiero.
1 Mission Discussion & Project Reviews 祝飛鴻 10/14/93.
STARCAL Satellite Intro Prepared By: Cordell Grant Date: December 6, 2012.
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Ground System Requirements.
Competition Sensitive Gabe Karpati June 28, 2001 SuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP) System Overview.
Basic Satellite Communication (3) Components of Communications Satellite Dr. Joseph N. Pelton.
20c - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Propulsion Chuck Zakrwski NASA/GSFC Code 597 August 16-17, 2005.
Wes Ousley June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Thermal.
NMP / EO-1 NMP EO-1 LE&O HANDBOOK September 24-26, 2000 Section 1 Master Timeline (Day 1-10)
Characteristics of remote sensing satellites. Satellites generally vary in their architecture Usually remote sensing satellites are having two plateforms.
ACE Science Workshop March 10 th, 2009 Armin T. Ellis, Deborah Vane, Mark Rokey Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
ISUAL System Design H. Heetderks. PDR 31 August 2000NCKU UCB Tohoku ISUAL System Design H. Heetderks 2 ISUAL Operations Overview.
Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mechanical George Roach Dave Peters 17 May 2002 “Technological progress is like an axe in the.
CubeSat Platform for SeaHawk
Satellite Communications System
TRIO-CINEMA 1 UCB, 2/08/2010 System Design Dave Curtis UCB/SSL Space Sciences Laboratory University of California, Berkeley.
Sketch for a telecoms system
Preliminary Platform Design for KuaFu-A
Technical Resource Allocations
Telemetry system The telemetry, tracking, and command (TT&C) subsystem performs several routine functions abroad a spacecraft. The telemetry or "telemetering"
SDO Flight Dynamics Subsystem
Spacecraft Thermal System
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
Space Segment.
Main information on the «WORLD SPACE OBSERVATORY» project
THERMAL CONTROL SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Spacecraft Systems Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB

2 SNAP CD0 January, 2001 System Engineering H. Heetderks System Electrical Block Diagram

3 SNAP CD0 January, 2001 System Engineering H. Heetderks Observatory Mechanical Layout EXPLODED VIEW

4 SNAP CD0 January, 2001 System Engineering H. Heetderks Baseline Spacecraft Configuration 3-axis stabilized, 4 Reaction wheels, IRUs, no torquer bar Sun side w/ rigid body mounted solar arrays & anti-sun side w/ radiators Standard Hydrazine propulsion system, 5 N thrusters, ~150 kg total propellant required: 50 kg for attitude and station keeping, 100 kg for disposal 5.6 Tbits SSR, storage for science data. (Avg. data rate ~40 Mbps; 300Mbps downlink). Ka band 300 Mbps to Berkeley and Perth Gimbaled.5m Ka band HGA; S-band omnis; S-Band T&C thru omni antennas

5 SNAP CD0 January, 2001 System Engineering H. Heetderks Pointing Accuracy »Yaw & Pitch : 1 arc-sec (1  ) »Boresight Roll:100 arc-sec (1  ) Attitude Knowledge »Yaw & Pitch :0.02 arc-sec (1  ) »Boresight Roll:2 arc-sec (1  ) Jitter/Stability -Stellar (over 200 sec) »Yaw & Pitch :0.02 arc-sec (1  ) »Boresight Roll:2 arc-sec (1  ) Sun Avoidance Earth Avoidance Moon Avoidance ACS Driving Requirements

6 SNAP CD0 January, 2001 System Engineering H. Heetderks ACS Component Recommendation --Fine pointing is achieved by taking guide star data from the instrument telescope

7 SNAP CD0 January, 2001 System Engineering H. Heetderks Electrical Power System Selected Configuration Solar Array. Selected 2.47 M 2 solar array area using Triple Junction Gallium Arsinide (TJGaAs) solar cells to reduce solar array area and weight. MAP type PSE. This PSE can be adapted easily for the study phase. Battery. NiH2 IPV (individual Pressure Vessel) at 100 ah this is a EPT stock item SAR Note a EPT SAR may also work. The mass of either of these batteries is 81 kg and further search for NiH2 SPV’s (Single Pressure Vessel) and development of large ampere hour LiIon batteries could provide a mass savings.

8 SNAP CD0 January, 2001 System Engineering H. Heetderks Transponder & Antenna Selected Configuration Ka-Band —Gimbaled 0.5m antenna antenna movement does not overlap with science data taking Beamwidth of 1 deg is large enough to provide adequate coverage without movement during observation periods (will stay close enough to main beam so as not to degrade the link) —Ka-Band modulators(2)-modification to existing L3 X Band transmitter —Data rate = 300 Mbps continuous (includes science, Hskpg, CCSDS & R/S encoding) S-Band —Omni antennas —Transponders(2) —Command rate = 2 Kbps —Telemetry rate = 1 Kbps

9 SNAP CD0 January, 2001 System Engineering H. Heetderks Transponder Selected Configuration Observatory Control Unit S-Band XPNDR OMNI 1 OMNI 2 CMD/TLM Science HGA S-Band XPNDR Hybrid K-Band Modulator(2) Diplexer K-Band Amplifier(2) Switch

10 SNAP CD0 January, 2001 System Engineering H. Heetderks SNAP Ka-Band 10 M Downlink (300 Mbps)

11 SNAP CD0 January, 2001 System Engineering H. Heetderks SNAP Propulsion System F/D Valve N2H4 Tanks w/ AFE-332 or PMD Pressure Transduc er P Filt er Latching Isolation Valve LVLV LVLV Primary & Redundant 22 N Thrusters with Dual Seat Valves SNAP N2H4 PROPULSION SYSTEM N2H4 Propulsion System Design N2H4 mass (10% contingency) = 130 kg “Dry” mass (4 Tank Design) = 34.1 kg Three 48.3 cm dia tanks with AFE- 332 elastomer diaphragm Primary & Redundant set of 22N thrusters mounted on –X axis & canted 15 o off X-axis Orbit Ave Power D.C.) = 23 W Catalyst Bed + Thruster Power (During Firing) = 10.2 W per thruster 15 o XY ZZ

12 SNAP CD0 January, 2001 System Engineering H. Heetderks SNAP Propulsion System

13 SNAP CD0 January, 2001 System Engineering H. Heetderks Preliminary Bus Subsystems Mass [kg] Bus Structure (Custom to accommodate instrument) Payload Mount 9.0 Antenna support30.0 ACS50.0 S/C Processor12.0 Power Electronics15.0 Battery81.2 Solar Arrays10.5 Thermal Hardware67.0 RF Communications53.0 Bus Harness 8.0 Separation System, spacecraft side 8.0 Bus Subsystems Total 486.7