Coordinated Planning Concept (For Discussion Only) revised 11/30/04 07/01/04.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Briefing on California ISO Dynamic Transfers Stakeholder Process For WECC Seams Issues Subcommittee Meeting May 4, 2010 Jim Price, Lead Engineering Specialist.
Advertisements

Operating Reserves --- Again A Discussion Primer
1 MSRATF Update to TSS (Modeling SPS and RAS Ad Hoc Task Force) Scope of Work Approval January 25, 2013 Joe Seabrook Puget Sound Energy.
Cleco Transmission Planning Summit Attachment K November 15, 2007 Terry Whitmore.
Al McBride MANAGER, AREA TRANSMISSION PLANNING Existing Import Interfaces: Transmission Transfer Capabilities and The Calculation of Tie Benefits DECEMBER.
March 26, 2014 Transmission Coordination and Planning Committee 2014 Q1 Stakeholder Meeting.
Project Definition of Bulk Electric System & Bulk Electric System Rules of Procedure Development Presenter: Peter Heidrich, FRCC – BES Drafting.
SPP’s 2013 Energy Consumption and Capacity 2 12% annual capacity margin requirement CapacityConsumption Total Capacity 66 GW Total Peak Demand 49 GW.
1 The Midwest ISO At the Crossroads of America International Meeting of Very Large Power Grid Operators October 24 & 25, 2005 Beijing, China.
Economic Criteria for Transmission Planning in the ERCOT Region Public Utility Law Seminar DeAnn Walker August 3, 2012.
Chubaka Producciones Presenta :.
January 5, 2012 TAC Cross Valley 345 kV Project Jeff Billo Manager, Mid-Term Planning.
WECC PCC Meeting Salt Lake City, UT July 16, 2014.
2012 JANUARY Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Transmission planning in Vermont Past, present and future Docket 7081 workshop By Dean LaForest 9/19/05.
111 TAG Meeting June 8, 2015 Teleconference / Webinar FINAL.
Determine Facility Ratings, SOLs and Transfer Capabilities Paul Johnson Chair of the Determine Facility Ratings Standard Drafting Team An Overview of the.
George Bartlett Director, Transmission Operations Economic Transmission Projects Entergy Transmission Planning Summit New Orleans, LA July 8, 2004.
Houston Area Dynamic Reactive Project March 11,
Report on the NCTPC 2006 Collaborative Transmission Plan Mark Byrd, Manager – Transmission Planning Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc January 25, 2007.
2006 Reliability Study Scope Name Date. DRAFT 2 Purpose of Study Assess the PEC and Duke transmission systems’ reliability Develop a single reliability.
Peak RCCo Performance Metrics Draft –November 2013.
1 Transmission Advisory Group Meeting January 25, 2007 Raleigh, NC.
April 23 rd OWG UFLS Survey & Power Factor Review.
Network Customer Meeting Access Metric Update November 16, 2006.
Black Sea Regional Transmission Planning Project By Predrag Mikša EKC - Electricity Coordinating Center Istanbul, March 2011.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
LAREDO PLANT RMR EXIT STRATEGY Presentation to Board of Directors March 16, 2004 Transmission Services Operations.
Project System Protection Coordination Requirement revisions to PRC (ii) Texas Reliability Entity NERC Standards Reliability Subcommittee.
ISO Outlook Summer 2005 and Beyond Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee February 22, 2005 Jim Detmers Vice President of Grid Operations.
Icfi.com © 2006 ICF International. All rights reserved. Wyoming Collector and Transmission System Project – Status Report Presented to: Wyoming Infrastructure.
October 6, 2006 Public Stakeholder Review Portland, Oregon Conditional Firm.
Current Export Initiatives Jerry Mossing Exports Workshop February, 16,2006, Metropolitan Center, Calgary.
DATE POWER 2 INCOME JANUARY 100member X 25.00P2, FEBRUARY 200member X 25.00P5, MARCH 400member X 25.00P10, APRIL 800member.
1 Model Data Collection Meeting Announcement Entergy Transmission Planning Summit New Orleans, LA July 8, 2004.
2006 SPP RTO Expansion Plan Carl A. Monroe July 30, 2006.
SPP.org 1. Status Update for Reliability and Economic Assessments Stakeholder Meeting September 16, 2008 Austin, TX.
2011 Calendar Important Dates/Events/Homework. SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January
1 TAG Meeting May 9, 2008 NCEMC Office Raleigh, NC.
Joint BPS and ESS/ITS ATC/AFC Subcommittee Update November 2007 – January 2008 February 5, 2008.
October 29, 2012 RARF Workshop 2 Introduction to ERCOT Modeling Process Jay Teixeira Manager, Model Administration.
ESI Alternate Economic Study Process E-RSC Meeting October 21, 2010.
Update on the North Carolina Transmission Planning Collaborative January 30, 2007 For the North Carolina Utilities Commission and the North Carolina Public.
National Grid Local System Plan Needs Assessment/Potential Solutions PAC Meeting September 21, 2010.
ERCOT Transmission Planning Process Overview and Recommendations November 6, 2002.
TEMPORAL VISUALIZATION OF DATA FROM THE FRENCH SENTINEL NETWORK.
July 2007 SundayMondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFridaySaturday
2006 Reliability Study James Manning Bryan Guy May 12, 2006.
Transmission Advisory Group NCTPC Process Update Rich Wodyka September 7, 2006.
SPP.org 1. Regional and Inter-Regional Planning Update Entergy Transmission Summit July 29, 2008 Astor Crown Plaza New Orleans, Louisiana.
Planning the Networked Grid Transmission Planning J.E.(Jeff) Billinton Manager, Regional Transmission - North Building the Networked Electricity Grid –
2006 Preliminary Reliability Study Results Bryan Guy September 7, 2006.
DATA COLLECTION William McCarty Chairman Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission September 9-10 Riga, Latvia.
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY © 2013 New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. EIPC Roll-Up Powerflow Model Zach Smith Director,
4/16/2010 Regional Planning Group Meeting Long-Term Planning Study of the ERCOT Interconnection Warren Lasher Manager, System Assessment.
Compare and Contrast Reliability Assumptions Bob Pierce May 12, 2006.
1 North Carolina Transmission Planning Collaborative Overview Clay Norris, Chair OSC October 5, 2005.
Reliability Must Run Workshop RMR Study Process May 24, 2016.
Study Plan Development & Approach May 5, 2010 Conference Call & Webinar “To ensure efficient, effective, coordinated use & expansion of the members’
Status of the Planning Working Group’s (PWG) Efforts
Updates to the Path Rating Process for Approval by the PCC
SEARUC Conference Little Rock, AR June 4, 2007
Rates & Regulatory Updates
Presenter: Peter Heidrich, FRCC – BES Drafting Team Chair
Reliability Standards Development Plan
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
2018 RTEP Report Key Maps, Tables & Figures
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
2015 January February March April May June July August September
Presentation transcript:

Coordinated Planning Concept (For Discussion Only) revised 11/30/04 07/01/04

2 Coordinated Planning Reliability Expansion Plan Determine Expansion Options Driven by Reliability Objective: Provide reliable transmission service for network loads Oversight by OSC Market Access Plan Determine Expansion Options Driven by Market Access Objective: Develop transmission options for obtaining resources from the market with appropriate balance between costs, benefits and risk. Oversight by OSC

3 Coordinated Planning Process Reliability and Market Access Expansion Plan OSC Provides Direction PWG Develops Models Inputs PWG Identifies Reliability Problems PWG develops solutions that best balance cost and risk Reliability Plan Outputs Market Access Plan Outputs Complete Regional Plan Develop Market Access Expansion Options Integration Of Reliability And Market Access Planning Process Determine Transfer Capability Analyze Market Access Requests Inputs LSE Resource Plans OATT

4 Coordinated Planning Process Reliability Expansion Plan Inputs:Identify Reliability Problems:Outputs: Load forecasts* Normal/Contingency studies:* Reliability Expansion plan with Resource projections - Voltage cost estimate for years 1-3 and New deliveries - Thermal expansion plans for projects New projects - Stability requiring long lead times for Load transfers years 4-10 VST/MMWG models* Alternatives for years 4-10 Past summer peak model Inputs shared electronically (September – October?) The OSC and PWG will meet as needed to: 1. Discuss data and modeling issues; review 2005 plan, if desired (November?) 2. Share problems identified from reliability studies (February?) 3. Share consolidated expansion plans for years 1-3 and projects requiring long lead times (June?) 4. Share proposed alternatives for years 4-10 (August?)

5 Coordinated Planning Process Market Access Plan Inputs:Determine TransferCapabilities: Outputs: LSEs identify resources * Share import/export capabilities * Expansion options with they wish to have * Share the “limiting elements” cost estimates and lead access to, both inside and * Determine interaction between times outside the control areas reliability and market access options. LSEs identify the years and interfaces and internal flow gates needed to access the resources -Expansion options do not necessarily become part of the reliability expansion plan. Each LSE determines whether its project should be incorporated in the future reliability expansion plan by making an OASIS request through the existing OASIS process.

6 PWG Responsibility: September - December Data Collection - from all control area LSE’s, provide updated data for the models representing the next 10 years Load data update New projects & deliveries update Resource projections Model Development – incorporate new LSE data, and the transmission provider’s planned projects and upgrades into the system models

7 PWG Responsibility: January Each Transmission Provider with PWG oversight screens the updated internal models versus NERC Planning Standards/Planning Criteria and OSC approved criteria; including appropriate dispatch and transmission contingencies from neighboring control areas. Results of screening studies (problems) will be shared with OSC

8 PWG Responsibility: February - May PWG develops best transmission solutions and shares proposals with OSC. * Joint meetings are expected to be required with OSC

9 PWG Responsibility: June - August PWG formalizes detailed expansion/upgrade plans and cost estimates for next 3 years Evaluate/study proposed alternatives for years 4 – 10 (e.g. resource alternatives, generation siting, load shifts between delivery points, substation siting, transmission projects,…) * Joint meetings may be required with OSC.

10 Coordinated Planning Process Market Access Analysis The OSC and PWG are expected to meet as follows:: 1. September PWG shares the import capabilities on each interface and internal flow gates. Duke/Progress Energy describe the facilities that limit the imports in respective control areas and internal flow gates. The LSEs identify the locations of the resources (both internal and external) they wish to have access to, the desired MW levels, and the year in which the increased MW level needs to be available 2. November PWG reviews options for increasing the import/export capability Note: VST models become available around the middle of June. During July and August, VST does a joint study which will provide the models we need to perform these studies. Therefore, we propose the first meeting each year be held in September. The model(s) will be made available to all members of the PWG.

11 Assumptions Confidentiality and Standards of Conduct issues can be resolved This process will address long-term expansion plans for the bulk transmission system. Future year plans are always subject to change. Rollover or LSE resource projections assumptions used for base plan. Undesignated resources assumed to be built on system. Planning policy and criteria determined in accordance with the coordinated planning process.. PWG develops model(s) based on planning criteria established in accordance with the coordinated planning process.