WSPP Webinar Proposed Service Schedules Operating Reserve Service (D) Intra-Hour Supplemental Power (E) February 4, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NAESB Coordinate Interchange Version 1 Standard Revision 1, Draft 5 August, 2005.
Advertisements

NAESB Coordinate Interchange
Definition of Firm Energy and Interruptible Transmission Two Issues Causing Problems for Business in the Western Interconnection.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange Standard, Version 1 / 0
Operating Reserves --- Again A Discussion Primer
WECC BAL-STD-002 Workshop February 6, 2008
BAL-002-WECC-1 Contingency Reserves
Intra Hour Tagging/Oasis During System Contingencies The transmission tagging process was initially developed to solve an after the fact accounting issue.
Presented to the WECC MIC June 15, 2007
Reaching Agreement: The Process of Contract Formation C. LIMITING THE OFFERORS POWER TO REVOKE: THE EFFECT OF PRE-ACCEPTANCE RELIANCE 1.Under the common.
ISTISNA’.
FEBRUARY 14, 2013 RELIABILITY COMMITTEE MEETING Steve Weaver SYSTEM OPERATIONS In-Day Reserves & Supplemental Procurement.
CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS--COMMERCIAL ITEMS ( ) (FEB 2007)
SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS The Technical Contract Within the Master Agreement.
Ninth Replenishment of IFAD’s Resources Draft Resolution: Revisions made since the 2 nd Session of Consultation October 2011.
Business Law and the Regulation of Business Chapter 23: Remedies By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts.
Energy Storage Definitions/Definitions ETWG 18 Feb 2013.
WELCOME Western Area Power Administration1. Where did the journey begin? Western Area Power Administration2.
OVERSIGHT & COMPLIANCE BRANCH (OCB) INVOICE PAYMENTS February 16,
Time for a new standard - AS General Conditions of Contract
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 1 Network Operating Committee (NOC) June 12 th, 2014.
BPA FY 2003 Financial Condition Update: Liquidity Tools to Bridge the Gap Confidential – Sensitive Information BPA has a number of liquidity tools to bridge.
MCWG Update to WMS Loretta Martin LCRA, Chair Josephine Wan AE, Vice Chair 03/05/
WSPP REC Webinar Discussion Outline September 7, 2011 Arnold Podgorsky WSPP Legal Counsel
WSPP REC Training A Walk Through The REC Schedule WSPP Webinar August 24, 2011 Arnold Podgorsky WSPP Legal Counsel
Reserves Issue For years there has been disagreement over reserves issues and what constitutes firm power. We’ve been able to function as a market, despite.
Arnold Podgorsky Wright & Talisman PC February 3, 2011.
Center of Islamic Finance COMSATS Institute of Information Technology Lahore Campus 1 Adopted from open source lecture of Meezan Bank. Customized for best.
WSPP Operating Committee Spring 2008 LEGAL UPDATE Arnie Podgorsky Wright & Talisman, PC This educational presentation states no legal opinion of WSPP or.
WSPP REC Training A Walk Through The REC Schedule WSPP Webinar August 24, 2011 Updated (corrected) Version 9/5/2011 Arnold Podgorsky WSPP Legal Counsel.
S10 CONS5Q25 Lara Tookey. Review of estimators workings Decision on what margin to apply Bid submission details Submit your Tender.
Richard E. Thompson II, Esq.
PACIFIC NORTHWEST & ALASKA RISK MANAGEMENT EDUCATION REGIONAL CONFERENCE March Spokane, Washington.
Page 1 Schedule Experimental Energy Reduction (EER) updated 2005 Note: This program is available to qualified participants within the EntergyArkansas,
Crucial Clauses in Complex Supply Agreements AIJA Half Year Conference 2015 – Antwerp Moritz Maurer.
WSPP Contract Subcommittee February 3, 2011 Meeting Notes These notes are to facilitate discussions of a WSPP REC Service Schedule, are subject to revision,
1 Derivatives, Contingencies, Business Segments, and Interim Reports.
1 Bilateral Interconnection Agreement Model Presented to HAPUA Working Group 5 (ESI Services), Project 6 By Power Purchase Agreement Division Electricity.
Reserves…Where are we??? Service Schedule C Service Schedule C C-3.10 Seller shall be responsible for ensuring that Service Schedule C transactions are.
RPRS ERCOT System Wide Insufficiency Charge Presented at the Technical Advisory Committee June 1, 2006.
Explanation of Latest Changes to Draft Reserves Schedule, Service Schedule D Contact: Arnie Podgorsky Mike Thompson Wright & Talisman PC
S PIEGEL & M C D IARMID APPA EEI Contract Project Update APPA Legal Seminar Cambridge, Massachusetts October 10, 2006 Robert C. McDiarmid.
CONTRACT PRICING ALTERNATIVES Presented by: Fahad H. Al-Anazi CEM 520 February 27,1999.
Explanation of Changes to Draft “Firming” Schedule, Service Schedule E Contact: Arnie Podgorsky Mike Thompson Wright & Talisman PC
Service Quality Innovation Trust Safety The Samet Way “Managing the Company Cash Position” Accounts Payable (AP) should always be less than Accounts Receivable.
1 Protocol Revision Subcommittee Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee January 12, 2006.
1 WSPP EC SLIDES FOR AGENDA ITEMS 3 AND 4 WSPP SERVICE SCHEDULE C WSPP Service Schedule C includes a provision allowing interruption “to meet Seller’s.
WEQ Executive Committee Contract Path Task Force Additional Issues Related To Contract Path Management ( WEQ and WEQ )
Proposed Schedules: Reserves (D) and Intra-Hour Firming (E) October 13, 2009.
Demand Side Working Group March 5, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. and the Legal Environment, 10 th edition by Richard.
Explanation of Revised Draft Reserves Schedule, Service Schedule D Contact: Arnie Podgorsky Mike Thompson Wright & Talisman PC
CMTF Tariff Language Clarification 1. Parking Lot Question Is the Planning Reserve Margin requirement meant to be maintained throughout the whole calendar.
Four Ways Suppliers Limit Their Risk Contractually
Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder
Exceptional Fuel Costs in LMP
Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder
DRAFT- April 3, 2001 Restructuring Proposal to Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. April 6, 2001 This Information is CONFIDENTIAL Per Section 5 of.
Fuel Cost Components in the Fuel Adder
EPA CONTRACT TEMPLATE Overview
INTERCONNECTION GUIDELINES
EPA SUBCONTRACT TEMPLATE Overview September 2017
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Indemnity and Guarantee
BCOM 1ST YEAR - B 2ND SEMESTER MAITRI CHHABRA 2205 ARPITA 2347 CHHAYA 2355 SHUBHANGI.
Principles of contractual liability
Proposed Transitional Gas Exit Arrangements
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Presentation transcript:

WSPP Webinar Proposed Service Schedules Operating Reserve Service (D) Intra-Hour Supplemental Power (E) February 4, 2010

2 Proposed Service Schedule D Operating Reserve Service

3 Recap for Schedule D (Reserves)  Discussion and drafting revisions have focused on three areas: Product definition Avoidance of Technical Impediments Damages  Purpose of Webinar is to review the 1/20/10 draft with focus on these areas and hear remaining concerns ahead of March OC meeting

4 Operating Reserve Service: Product  The product definition is left to the parties, but with reference to “Applicable Standards” (reliability standards and criteria of NERC and Designated Authority), as defined in D  Terms of Service D-3.1 specifies information required for Confirm (DA, quantity, price, term, types of Reserves, Contract Path and transmission terms, communications protocols, other requirements for Confirm to be effective (e.g. agreement with DA); Damages Multiplier; performance assurance under NERC INTs)

5 Operating Reserve Service: Product D-3.2 Defines product, restricts use by DA of capacity to satisfy DA’s Operating Reserve obligation under Applicable Standards; D requires Purchaser to assure DA’s compliance D-3.3 requires Seller to deliver energy associated with Reserves upon DA request in accordance with D-3.3.2, which allows call “in good faith discretion reasonably exercised in accordance with Good Utility Practice” to respond to Contingency or other event for which Reserves may be called upon under Applicable Standards (or as otherwise stated in Confirm)

6 Operating Reserve Service: Product D-3.4 allows Purchaser to audit to assure that Seller’s provision of Reserves conforms to Applicable Standards D-3.5 pertains to Contract Price and incorporates price cap language D-3.6 refers to FERC filing requirement for jurisdictional entities for transactions exceeding one year

7 Operating Reserve Service: Technical Impediments  Given the product terms, are there any technical concerns? Note that the Schedule anticipates that if Purchaser is not the Designated Authority, the parties may need a separate agreement that includes the DA to address communications and other requirements

8 Operating Reserve Service: Damages  Issue discussed extensively in prior Webinar and OC meeting. Concern was need for remedy with teeth: Considering the reliability significance and potential penalties, remedy should assure that Seller would deliver energy upon call Likewise, remedy should assure that DA would call only with good cause, and not use the capacity for its own commercial purposes Therefore, more stringent remedies were needed than exist for existing firm product On other hand, passing on penalties via damages was unacceptable. The associated facts would likely be ambiguous and disputed. Exposure in such circumstances would be too harsh for Seller to market the product

9 Operating Reserve Service: Damages  Damages paid by Seller for Seller’s Non-Performance D-4.3, damages for Seller’s non-performance, sum of:  Capacity charge for 30 days x Damages Multiplier (if peak and off-peak are priced, higher price is used), plus  Quantity of undelivered energy x price, x Damages Multiplier, plus  Transmission charge incurred by Purchaser D-4.4, Seller failure 3 times is Event of Default under WSPP Sec. 22. Termination payment is pv of amount remaining to be paid less pv of Replacement Cost, but Purchaser shall not owe Seller

10 Operating Reserve Service: Damages  Damages paid by Purchaser for Purchaser’s non- performance D-4.5 damages for DA’s unauthorized call  Capacity charge for 30 days x Damages Multiplier (if peak and off-peak are priced, higher price is used), plus  Quantity of energy Seller was required to deliver x energy price, x Damages Multiplier D-4.6, Purchaser (DA) non-performance 3 times is Event of Default under WSPP Sec. 22. Termination payment is pv of capacity charges and transmission charges remaining to be paid less pv of replacement capacity Cost, but Purchaser shall not owe Seller

11 Proposed Service Schedule E Intra-Hour Supplemental Power

12 Recap for Schedule E (Intra-Hour)  No significant issues have arisen regarding this Schedule  Again, focus is on: Product definition Avoidance of Technical Impediments Damages  Again, Webinar is to review the 1/20/10 draft with focus on these areas and hear remaining concerns ahead of March OC meeting

13 Intra-Hour Supplemental Power (“I-HSP”): Product  The product: Variable energy on call within the hour, in increments the parties set or dynamic, up to Maximum Capacity in whatever shape Scheduling can be manual and dynamic Dynamic can be immediate, as load following

14 I-HSP: Product  Terms of Service E Manually Scheduled Product  Energy request for each Interval, to be communicated by electronic communication to Seller and BA  In whole megawatts up to Maximum Capacity; quantity can vary from Interval to Interval within any parameters the parties may set, including variation limits and ramp rates  Quantity for an Interval will prevail until a request to cease or for a different quantity

15 I-HSP: Product (Dynamic) E Dynamically Scheduled Product  Requests need not be in whole megawatts; variation can be subject to parameters  Communications by “dynamic electronic communication” to Seller and BA.  Response subject to equipment capability and other restraints stated in Confirm  Quantity for an Interval will prevail until a request to cease or for a different quantity

16 I-HSP: Product (Dynamic) E-2.2 Purchaser bears transmission cost and risk of unavailability E-2.3 Purchaser has an energy return right but not obligation within 168 hours after receipt, with flow not exceeding Maximum Capacity.  Parties can agree to exchange periodicity, but if they do not specify the Schedule does not require it. Is this a good approach?  Purchaser bears transmission cost and risk for return energy

17 I-HSP: Product (Dynamic) E-2.4 Warranties  Seller warrants sufficiency of communications and automated control facilities to enable timely and accurate response  Purchaser warrants sufficiency of communications and automated control facilities to convey requests and adjust for receipt of energy.  Are these drafted appropriately?

18 I-HSP: Product (Manual and Dynamic) E-2.5 Pricing  Flexible, may include capacity/energy charges and transmission charge.  On/off peak pricing is presumed, which can vary seasonally (or otherwise)  Invoice shall identify each charge separately  Price cap language is incorporated

19 I-HSP: Technical Issues  Given the product terms, are there any technical concerns?

20 I-HSP: Damages  E-3 Damages: General agreement that because of the reliability aspect of the product (to firm a variable energy resource) and possibility of related penalties, this Schedule should use a Damages Multiplier to establish LDs (E-3.2)

21 I-HSP: Damages  Damages paid by Seller for Seller Non- Performance E3.3, damages for Seller’s non-performance, sum of: Capacity charge for 30 days x Damages Multiplier (if peak and off-peak are priced, higher price is used), plus Quantity of undelivered energy x price x Damages Multiplier plus Transmission charge incurred by Purchaser

22 I-HSP: Damages  Review and confirm: No damages to be paid by Purchaser for failure to receive (none are specified)  What about return energy? (We could state that if it is provided per the schedule but not received a credit must be given Other issues?

23 Status of Proposed Schedules  Sense of the group about voting on these at the OC  Any other discussion points? Questions  Thank you for your comments and focus