A.Yu. Chirkov1), S.V. Ryzhkov1), P.A. Bagryansky2), A.V. Anikeev2)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Physics of fusion power
Advertisements

Introduction to Plasma-Surface Interactions Lecture 6 Divertors.
Plasma-induced Sputtering & Heating of Titan’s Atmosphere R. E. Johnson & O.J. Tucker Goal Understand role of the plasma in the evolution of Titan’s atmosphere.
NUCLEAR REACTION MODELS FOR SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS OF FAST NEUTRON INDUCED (n,p) REACTION CROSS SECTIONS M.Odsuren, J.Badamsambuu, G.Khuukhenkhuu Nuclear.
The Plasma Effect on the Rate of Nuclear Reactions The connection with relaxation processes, Diffusion, scattering etc.
Physics of Fusion Lecture 1: The basics Lecturer: A.G. Peeters.
Bremsstrahlung Rybicki & Lightman Chapter 5. Bremsstrahlung “Free-free Emission” “Braking” Radiation Radiation due to acceleration of charged particle.
Neutral Particles. Neutrons Neutrons are like neutral protons. –Mass is 1% larger –Interacts strongly Neutral charge complicates detection Neutron lifetime.
Prof. Reinisch, EEAS / Simple Collision Parameters (1) There are many different types of collisions taking place in a gas. They can be grouped.
Counting Cosmic Rays through the passage of matter By Edwin Antillon.
Acceleration of a mass limited target by ultra-high intensity laser pulse A.A.Andreev 1, J.Limpouch 2, K.Yu.Platonov 1 J.Psikal 2, Yu.Stolyarov 1 1. ILPh.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 14: Collisions / Transport.
Particle Interactions
Tony WeidbergNuclear Physics Lectures1 Applications of Nuclear Physics Fusion –(How the sun works covered in Astro lectures) –Fusion reactor Radioactive.
The 511 keV Annihilation Emission From The Galactic Center Department of Physics National Tsing Hua University G.T. Chen 2007/1/2.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 2: Lawson criterion / some plasma physics.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 2: Lawson criterion / Approaches to fusion.
Physics of fusion power Lecture 7: particle motion.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
A Materials Evaluation Neutron Source Based on the Gas Dynamic Trap (DTNS) One Element in an Urgently Needed Comprehensive Fusion Materials Program Based.
Chapter 5 Diffusion and resistivity
NON-EQUILIBRIUM HEAVY GASES PLASMA MHD-STABILIZATION IN AXISYMMETRIC MIRROR MAGNETIC TRAP A.V. Sidorov 2, P.A. Bagryansky 1, A.D. Beklemishev 1, I.V. Izotov.
Centre de Toulouse Radiation interaction with matter 1.
Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering A Few Comments About Fusion.
Wave induced supersonic rotation in mirrors Abraham Fetterman and Nathaniel Fisch Princeton University.
Profile Measurement of HSX Plasma Using Thomson Scattering K. Zhai, F.S.B. Anderson, J. Canik, K. Likin, K. J. Willis, D.T. Anderson, HSX Plasma Laboratory,
Future of Antiproton Triggered Fusion Propulsion Brice Cassenti & Terry Kammash University of Connecticut & University of Michigan.
PIC simulations of the propagation of type-1 ELM-produced energetic particles on the SOL of JET D. Tskhakaya 1, *, A. Loarte 2, S. Kuhn 1, and W. Fundamenski.
1 Simulation of energetic-particle behavior in Spherical Tokamak Mou Maolin Supervisor : Z.T. Wang, C.J.Tang The Second A3 Foresight Workshop on Spherical.
Report from A+M Data Centre, RRC “Kurchatov Institute” Yu.V.Martynenko 18th Meeting of the Atomic and Molecular Data Centers and ALADDIN Network Vienna,
Particle Distribution Modification by TAE mode and Resonant Particle Orbits POSTECH 1, NFRI 1,2 M.H.Woo 1, C.M.Ryu 1, T.N.Rhee 1,,2.
Department of Physics University of Oslo
Negative Ions in IEC Devices David R. Boris 2009 US-Japan IEC Workshop 12 th October, 2009 This work performed at The University of Wisconsin Fusion Technology.
Extrapolation of GDT Results to a DT Fusion Neutron Source for Fusion Materials Testing e Tom Simonen, U. Calif., Berkeley 8 th International Conference.
PLASMA HEATING AND HOT ION SUSTAINING IN MIRROR BASED HYBRIDS
Numerical model of the fusion-fission hybrid system based on gas dynamic trap for transmutation of radioactive wastes Andrey Anikeev Institute for Neutron.
SPACE PROPULSION BASED ON HIGH-BETA MAGNETIC FUSION ROCKET I. V. Romadanov, S. V. Ryzhkov Bauman Moscow State Technical University
Transport of deuterium - tritium neutrals in ITER divertor M. Z. Tokar and V.Kotov Plasma and neutral gas in ITER divertor will be mixed of deuterium and.
Russian Research Center” Kurchatov Institute” Theoretical Modeling of Track Formation in Materials under Heavy Ion Irradiation Alexander Ryazanov “Basic.
Pellet Charge Exchange Measurement in LHD & ITER ITPA Tohoku Univ. Tetsuo Ozaki, P.Goncharov, E.Veschev 1), N.Tamura, K.Sato, D.Kalinina and.
Radiation damage calculation in PHITS
What temperature would provide a mean kinetic energy of 0.5 MeV? By comparison, the temperature of the surface of the sun  6000 K.
A Fission-Fusion Hybrid Reactor in Steady-State L-Mode Tokamak Configuration with Natural Uranium Mark Reed FUNFI Varenna, Italy September 13 th, 2011.
Chapter 5 Interactions of Ionizing Radiation. Ionization The process by which a neutral atom acquires a positive or a negative charge Directly ionizing.
Effect of Helical Magnetic Field Ripples on Energetic Particle Confinement in LHD Plasmas T.Saida, M.Sasao, M.Isobe 1, M.Nishiura 1, S.Murakami 2, K.Matsuoka.
Applications of Nuclear Physics
1 SIMULATION OF ANOMALOUS PINCH EFFECT ON IMPURITY ACCUMULATION IN ITER.
Review of Fundamentals
Frictional Cooling A.Caldwell MPI f. Physik, Munich FNAL
ZHENG Guo-yao, FENG Kai-ming, SHENG Guang-zhao 1) Southwestern Institute of Physics, Chengdu Simulation of plasma parameters for HCSB-DEMO by 1.5D plasma.
Microwave emission from the trapped and precipitated electrons in solar bursts J. E. R. Costa and A. C. Rosal1 2005, A&A, 436, 347.
The mass of the nuclei produced is less than the mass of the original two nuclei The mass deficit is changed into energy We can calculate the energy released.
NEEP 541 – Neutron Damage Fall 2002 Jake Blanchard.
Estimates of Intra-Beam Scattering in ABS M. Stancari, S. Atutov, L. Barion, M. Capiluppi, M. Contalbrigo, G. Ciullo, P.F. Dalpiaz, F.Giordano, P. Lenisa,
Systematical Analysis of Fast Neutron Induced Alpha Particle Emission Reaction Cross Sections Jigmeddorj Badamsambuu, Nuclear Research Center, National.
Gas Detectors and Neutron Detection
Introduction to Plasma Physics and Plasma-based Acceleration
Chapter 2 Radiation Interactions with Matter East China Institute of Technology School of Nuclear Engineering and Technology LIU Yi-Bao Wang Ling.
Physics of fusion power
Conceptual Study for the Dynamic Control of Fusion Power Plant
Gamma-ray bursts from magnetized collisionally heated jets
Nuclear Power.
Outside the nucleus, the beta decay {image} will not occur because the neutron and electron have more total mass than the proton. This process can occur.
Meeting on Solar Wind Turbulence, Kennebunkport, June 4-7, 2013
Physics of fusion power
The Gas Dynamic Trap (GDT) Neutron Source
LECTURE II: ELEMENTARY PROCESSES IN IONIZED GASES
The GDT device at the Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics is an experimental facility for studies on the main issues of development of fusion systems based.
A.V.Burdakov at al. Plasma transport in linear and helical multiple-mirror systems (EX/P5-26) Budker INP ( Novosibirsk, Russia) developed Gas-Dynamic Multiple-mirror.
Presentation transcript:

A.Yu. Chirkov1), S.V. Ryzhkov1), P.A. Bagryansky2), A.V. Anikeev2) PLASMA KINETICS MODELS FOR FUSION SYSTEMS BASED ON THE AXIALLY-SYMMETRIC MIRROR DEVICES A.Yu. Chirkov1), S.V. Ryzhkov1), P.A. Bagryansky2), A.V. Anikeev2) 1) Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, Russia 2) Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia

Neutron generator concept: Simple mirror geometry with long central solenoid Injection of energetic neutrals Neutron generator concept: T ~ 10..20 keV, n ~ 1019 m–3, a ~ 1 m, L ~ 10 m, B ~ 1..2 T in center solenoid, ~ 20 T in mirrors, fast particle energy ~ 100..250 keV, Pn  Pinj

The power balance scheme Local balance Plasma amplification factor

Radiation losses Electron – ion bremsstrahlung mec2 = 511 keV Electron energy losses during slowing down on ions 1 10 100 103 104 105 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2 3 Te, eV g ––––– fit – - – - Elwert - - - - - Gould CE = 0.5772... Pei – correction to the Born approximation – for Te ~ 1 keV [Gould] Integral Gaunt factor: Approximation taking into account Gaunt factor for low temperatures: Gaunt factors for low temperatures. Approximations of B: 1 – formula corresponds g  1 at Te  0; 2 – g  gElwert at Te  0; 3 – by Gould

Approximations of numerical results Electron – electron bremsstrahlung CF = (5/9)(44–32)  8 CE = 0.5772... Approximations of numerical results

Synchrotron radiation losses 1 Ps/Ps0 10–3 Te, keV 10–2 . –––– Trubnikov – – – Trubnikov + relativistic corr. - - - - Tamor, Te < 100 keV – - – - Tamor, Te = 100–1000 keV – - - – Kukushkin, et al. Emission in unity volume of the plasma: Losses from plasma volume (Trubnikov): Output factor: – Trubnikov Output factors at a = 2 m, Rw = 0.7, Bext = 7 T, 0 = 0.1 (upper curves) and 0 = 0.5 (down) – relativistic correction [Tamor] 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 Trrel 0 2 3 4 1 – Te = Ti = 30 keV 2 – 50 keV 3 – 70 keV 4 – 90 keV a = 2 m, Rw = 0.7, Bext = 7 T Generalized Trubnikov’s formula for non-uniform plasma [Kukushkin et al., 2008]: Output factor vs 0 at a = 2 m, Rw = 0.7, Bext = 7 T, Te = Ti = 30 keV (1), 50 (2), 70 (3), and 90 keV (4)

Fast particle kinetics b Proton slow-down rate (a) and cross section (b) for interaction with electrons (- - - - -), deuterium ions (–––––) and helium-3 ions (– - – - –): 1, 2 – Coulomb collisions, 3 – nuclear elastic scattering D–T reaction and slow-down cross sections ratio for tritium ions in the deuterium plasma with Ti = Te = T

Optimal parameters: T  10 keV, Einj  100 keV, Pn  Pinj ~ 4 MW/m3 Some estimations High-energy approximation: MW/m3 m3/s keV keV keV Optimal parameters: T  10 keV, Einj  100 keV, Pn  Pinj ~ 4 MW/m3

The Fokker – Planck equation Boundary conditions: In the loss region Quasi isotropic velocity distribution function:

Numerical scheme Scales and dimensionless variables: Dimensionless equation (symbols “~” are not shown):

Finite difference equations: Numerical scheme Greed: Finite difference equations: Matrix form:

Solution:

Examples of numerical calculations Velocity distribution function of tritium ions and its contours at time moments after injection swich on t = 0.1s (а), 0.3s (b) и 10s (c). Deuterium density nD = 3.31019 м–3, energy of injected particles 250 keV, injection angle 455, injection power 2 MW/m3, Ti = Te = 20 keV,  = 10 keV, slow-down time s = 4.5 s, transversal loss time  = s

Relative pressure and density of alphas in D–T plasma (D:T = 1:1): Role of  particles in D–T fusion mirror systems 5 1 2 . 4 8 T, keV 3 n /n0 p /p0 5 1 2 . 6 4 8 3 T, keV  /s WL /W0 Relative pressure and density of alphas in D–T plasma (D:T = 1:1): –––––– isotropic plasma (no loss cone) – – – – mirror plasma with loss cone n0 = nD + nT = 2nD p0 = pD = pT Energy losses (WL) due to the scattering into the loss cone and corresponding energy loss time () of alphas in D–T mirror plasma W0 is total initial energy of alphas (3.5 MeV/particle) s is slowdown time

Parameters of mirror fusion systems: Neutron generator and reactors with D–T and D–3He fuels Parameter Neutron generator regimes Tandem mirror reactors Ver. # 1 Ver. # 2 Ver. # 3 Ver. # 4 D–T fuel D–3He fuel Plasma radius a, m 1 Plasma length L, m 10 44 Magnetic field of the central solenoid B0, T 1.5 2 3.3 5.4 Magnetic field in plugs (mirrors) Bm, T 11 14 14.8 Averaged  0.5 0.2 0.7 Deuterium density nD, 1020 m–3 0.26 0.22 0.21 0.415 0.82 1.35 Ion temperature Ti, keV 22 15 65 Electron temperature Te, keV 10.5 8.5 18 19 Ion electrostatic barrier , keV 16.5 33 60 260 Injection power Pinj, MW 74 55 – ECRH power PRH, MW Neutron power Pn, MW 24 30 43 59 Plasma amplification factor Qpl = Pfus/(Pinj + PRH) 0.38 0.9 1.34 Total neutron output N, 1018 neutrons/s 13 26.5 Neutron energy flux out of plasma Jn, MW/m2 0.4 0.04 Heat flux out of plasma JH, MW/m2 1.2 1.8 2.0 2.4 0.94

Thank you!