Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU - 2011, version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurements of adiabatic dual rf capture in the SIS 18 O. Chorniy.
Advertisements

1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
Note: most of the slides shown here are picked from CERN accelerator workshops. Please refer to those workshop for further understanding of the accelerator.
Synchrotron Radiation What is it ? Rate of energy loss Longitudinal damping Transverse damping Quantum fluctuations Wigglers Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
M. LindroosNUFACT06 School Accelerator Physics Transverse motion Mats Lindroos.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
Longitudinal instabilities: Single bunch longitudinal instabilities Multi bunch longitudinal instabilities Different modes Bunch lengthening Rende Steerenberg.
Lattice calculations: Lattices Tune Calculations Dispersion Momentum Compaction Chromaticity Sextupoles Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
LONGITUDINAL DYNAMICS
CAS Chios, September LONGITUDINAL DYNAMICS Frank Tecker based on the course by Joël Le Duff Many Thanks! CAS on Intermediate Level Accelerator.
Chapter 11 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU –Version E2.2 RF cavities for particle accelerators.
Introduction to Particle Accelerators Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis CERN & University of Oxford October 2010 Chulalongkorn University Bangkok, Thailand.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  As you’ll show in homework, the synchrotron tune (longitudinal oscillations/turn) is generally
Introduction to particle accelerators Walter Scandale CERN - AT department Roma, marzo 2006.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
22/03/1999A.Blas1 Hollow bunches A. Blas, S. Hancock, S. Koscielniak, M. Lindroos, F. Pedersen, H. Schonauer  Why: to improve space charge related problems.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
Preliminary design of SPPC RF system Jianping DAI 2015/09/11 The CEPC-SppC Study Group Meeting, Sept. 11~12, IHEP.
First measurements of longitudinal impedance and single-bunch effects in LHC E. Shaposhnikova for BE/RF Thanks: P. Baudrenghien, A. Butterworth, T. Bohl,
Accelerator Physics with Relativity By Mark, Jack and Frances (Designing the LHC in an hour and a half)
Alessandra Lombardi BE/ ABP CERN
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Synchronization Andrew Hutton Slava Derbenev Yuhong Zhang.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Operated by the Jefferson Science Associates for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz, Dogbone RLA – Design.
Part III Commissioning. Proof of Principle FFAG (POP) study The world first proton FFAG –Commissioned in March –From 50 keV to 500 keV in 1ms. –Proof.
Module 6Aberration and Doppler Shift of Light1 Module 6 Aberration and Doppler Shift of Light The term aberration used here means deviation. If a light.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Lecture 5 Damping Ring Basics Susanna Guiducci (INFN-LNF) May 21, 2006 ILC Accelerator school.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
1 Experience at CERN with luminosity monitoring and calibration, ISR, SPS proton antiproton collider, LEP, and comments for LHC… Werner Herr and Rüdiger.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
Lecture 7 - E. Wilson - 2/16/ Slide 1 Lecture 7 - Circulating Beams and Imperfections ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
LER Workshop, Oct 11, 2006Intensity Increase in the LER – T. Sen1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac  Motivation  Slip stacking in the.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
ELENA RF Manipulations S. Hancock. Apart from debunching before and rebunching after cooling, the principal role of the rf is to decelerate the beam and.
Professor Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University ACAS School for Accelerator Physics January 2014 Longitudinal Dynamics.
6 July 2010 | TU Darmstadt | Fachbereich 18 | Institut Theorie Elektromagnetischer Felder | Sabrina Appel | 1 Micro bunch evolution and „turbulent beams“
RF manipulations in SIS 18 and SIS 100 O. Chorniy.
Collective Effect II Giuliano Franchetti, GSI CERN Accelerator – School Prague 11/9/14G. Franchetti1.
Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
Longitudinal Dynamics of Charged Particle
Lecture 2 Live Feed – CERN Control Centre
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Synchrotron Ring Schematic
Lecture 3 - Magnets and Transverse Dynamics I
Lecture 6 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2011 E. J. N. Wilson.
Longitudinal Dynamics & RF Capture
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 8
Collective effects in the SPS and LHC (longitudinal plane)
G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 3
AXEL-2011 Introduction to Particle Accelerators
Accelerator Physics G. A. Krafft, A. Bogacz, and H. Sayed
Accelerator Physics Coupling Control
Physics 696 Topics in Advanced Accelerator Design I
G. A. Krafft Jefferson Lab Old Dominion University Lecture 7
Physics 417/517 Introduction to Particle Accelerator Physics
PSB magnetic cycle 900 ms MeV to 2 GeV
Longitudinal Focusing & The Gamma Transition
Lecture 9 - Radiofrequency Cavities I
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space

2 Beam optics essentials.... Description for particle dynamics with transfer matrices Differential equation for particle dynamics Description of particle movement with the betatron function Betatron oscillation Beam size: Working points: Q values Closed Orbit Dispersion

3 Overview Acceleration with RF fields Bunches Phase focusing in a Linear Accelerator Phase focusing in a Circular Accelerator Equation of motion for the longitudinal plane Synchrotron frequency

4 Kreisbeschleuniger: Beschleunigung durch vielfaches Durchlaufen durch (wenige) Beschleunigungstrecken  Principal machine components of an accelerator

5 2a Acceleration in a Cavity for T=0 (accelerating phase) z z E0E0 E(z) g (100 MHz)

6 2a Acceleration in a Cavity for T=5ns (de-cellerating phase) z z -E 0 E(z) g (100 MHz)

7 Super conducting cavities (Cornell) Cavity 200 MHz Cavity 500 MHz Cavity 1300 MHz

8 Super conducting cavity with 9 cells (XFEL, DESY)

9 Normal conducting cavity for LEP

10 Illustration for the electrical field in a cavity

11 Acceleration in time dependent field Cavity

12 Acceleration with Cavities A particle enters the cavity from the left. For acceleration, it needs to have the correct phase in the electric field. Assume that particle 1 travels at time t 0 = 0 ns through cavity 1 – it will be accelerated by 1 MV. A particle that travels through the cavity at another time will be accelerated less, or decelerated. z Cavity 1 Cavity 2 t 0 = 0 „decelleration"

13 Bunches It is not possible to accelerate continuous beam in an RF field – acceleration is always in bunches The bunch length depends on several parameters, such as frequency and voltage, and ranges from mm to m (in modern linacs possibly less than mm, and micro bunching can happen) Phase focusing is an essential mechanism to keep the particles in a bunch

14 Phase focusing in a Linac– increasing field z Cavity 1

15 Phase focusing in a Linac z Cavity 1 Cavity 2 We assume three particles, the velocity is much less than the speed of light. A particle with nominal momentum A particle with more energy, and therefore higher velocity (blue) A particle with less energy, and therefore smaller velocity (green) The red particle enters the cavity at t = 1.25 ns. It is assumed that the electrical field increases (rising part of the RF field) The green particle enters the cavity later at t = 1.55 ns and experiences a higher field The blue particle enters the cavity earlier at t = 0.95 ns, and experiences a lower field

16 Phase focusing in a Linac Assume that the difference in energy is large enough and the velocity is below the speed of light. Before entering cavity 1: v blue > v red > v green After exiting entering cavity 1: v green > v red > v blue The velocity of the green particle is largest and it will take over the other two particles after a certain distance.

Phase focusing in a Linac– Synchrotron oscillations z Cavity 1 Cavity 2 17

18 Phase de-focusing – decreasing field z Cavity 1 The particle with less energy and less velocity (green) arrives late at t = 1.55 ns. It is accelerated less than the other particles. The velocity difference between the particles increases, and the particles are de-bunching.

19 Phase de-focussing in a Linac z Cavity 1 Cavity 2

20 Phase focusing in a circular accelerator Cavity The particles with different momenta are circulating on different orbits, here shown simplified as a circle. p0p0 p 0 - dp p 0 + dp

21 RF-frequency and revolution frequency Here: h = 8

22 Momentum Compaction Factor A particle with different momentum travels on a different orbit with respect to the orbit of a particle with nominal momentum. The momentum compaction factor is the relative difference of the orbit length: It can be shown that the momentum compaction factor is given by: The relative change of the length of the orbit for a particle with different momentum is: From beam optics

23 Momentum of a particle and orbit length Particles with larger energy with respect to the nominal energy: …travel further outside => larger path length => take more time for a turn …the speed is higher => take less time for a turn Both effects need to be considered in order to calculate the revolution time

24 Phase focusing in a circular accelerator z First turn We assume three particles, the velocity is close to the speed of light A particle with nominal momentum A particle with more energy, and therefore higher velocity (blue) A particle with less energy, and therefore smaller velocity (green) We assume that the three particles enter into the cavity at the same time The red particle travels on the ideal orbit The green particle has less energy, and travels on a shorter orbit The blue particle has more energy, and travels on a longer orbit z

25 Phase focusing in a circular accelerator– decreasing field z Cavity Next turn The particle with less energy (green) enters earlier into the cavity and is accelerated more than the red particle The particle with larger energy (blue) enters later and is accelerated less. It loses energy in respect to the red particle

26 Phase shift as a function of the energy deviation

27 Acceleration in a cavity: particle with nominal energy It is assumed that the magnetic field increases. To keep a particle with nominal energy on the nominal orbit the particle is accelerated, per turn by an energy of: The energy is provided by the electrical field in the cavity:

28 Acceleration in a cavity: particle with a momentum different from the particle with nominal momentum A particle with differing energy enters at a different time (phase) into the cavity, with an energy increase by: The difference of energies is given by: The change of energy for many turns (revolution T 0 ):

29 Acceleration in a cavity If the difference with respect to the nominal phase is small: and therefore: differentiation yields:

30 Equation of motion We get: Change of phase due to the change of energy Change of energy when travelling with a different phase through a cavity

31 Solution of the equation of motion The equation describes an harmonic oscillator: with the synchrotron frequency: The energy difference between the nominal particle and particles with different momentum is:

32 Synchrotron frequency For ultra relativistic particles  >> 1 : For particles with: Synchrotron frequency

33 Example

35 Synchrotron frequency of the model accelerator

36 Phase space and Separatrix From K.Wille Synchrotron oscillations are for particles with small energy deviation. If the energy deviation becomes too large, particle leave the bucket.

37 Courtesy E. Ciapala single turn about 1000 turns RF off, de-bunching in ~ 250 turns, roughly 25 ms LHC 2008

38 Courtesy E. Ciapala Attempt to capture, at exactly the wrong injection phase… LHC 2008

39 Courtesy E. Ciapala Capture with corrected injection phasing LHC 2008

40 Courtesy E. Ciapala Capture with optimum injection phasing, correct frequency LHC 2008

41 RF buckets and bunches at LHC EE time RF Voltage time LHC bunch spacing = 25 ns = 10 buckets  7.5 m 2.5 ns The particles are trapped in the RF voltage: this gives the bunch structure RMS bunch length 11.2 cm 7.6 cm RMS energy spread 0.031%0.011% 450 GeV 7 TeV The particles oscillate back and forth in time/energy RF bucket 2.5 ns

42 Longitudinal bunch profile in SPS Instabilities at low energy (26 GeV) a) Single bunches Quadrupole mode developing slowly along flat bottom. NB injection plateau ~11 s Bunch profile oscillations on the flat bottom – at 26 GeV Bunch profile during a coast at 26 GeV stable beam Pictures provided by T.Linnecar