CAPRICORN Adverse CV Events (Frequency ≥ 1.5%) in Either Treatment Group (Uptitration Phase)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 CAMELOT: Study Design A Morbidity and Mortality Study Patients with documented CAD on standard-of-care therapies* (n=1997) Clinical events (morbidity.
Advertisements

THE ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES STUDY (ACCORD)
1. 2 The primary Objective of IDEAL LDL-C Simvastatin mg/d Atorvastatin 80 mg/d risk CHD In stable CHD patients IDEAL: The Incremental Decrease.
Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation Results
Effects of losartan compared with captopril on mortality in patients with symptomatic heart failure: randomized trial -- the Losartan Heart Failure Survival.
CONSENSUS: Cooperative North Scandinavian Enalapril Survival Study Purpose To determine whether the ACE inhibitor enalapril reduces mortality in patients.
Trial profile Fox K et al. Lancet 2008;372:
TNT: Study Design Treating to New Targets 2 5 years 10,001 Patients Clinically evident CHD LDL-C 130  250 mg/dL following up to 8-week washout and 8-week.
The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) The LIPID Study Group N Engl J Med 1998;339:
A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study
Type 2 diabetes and high blood pressure How explosive is the cocktail?
Introduction Clare Kahn, Ph.D. Vice President, US Regulatory Affairs Cardiovascular, Urogenital & Metabolic Products, GlaxoSmithKline.
Clinical Trial Results. org Pexelizumab for Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
COURAGE: Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation Purpose To compare the efficacy of optimal medical therapy (OMT)
CHARM-Alternative: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Alternative Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
CHARM-Preserved: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Preserved Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial ALLHAT study overview Double-blind, randomized trial to determine whether.
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
PPAR  activation Clinical evidence. Evolution of clinical evidence supporting PPAR  activation and beyond Surrogate outcomes studies Large.
S ystolic H eart failure treatment with the I f inhibitor ivabradine T rial Main results Swedberg K, et al. Lancet. 2010;376(9744):
Laura Mucci, Pharm.D. Candidate Mercer University 2012 Preceptor: Dr. Rahimi February 2012.
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides HYVET Trial The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
RALES: Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Purpose To determine whether the aldosterone antagonist spironolactone reduces mortality in patients with.
The Prospective Pravastatin Pooling Project L I P I D CARECARE PPP Project Investigators Am J Cardiol 1995; 76:899–905.
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
WOSCOPS: West Of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Purpose To determine whether pravastatin reduces combined incidence of nonfatal MI and death due to.
AIRE: Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy study Purpose To determine whether the ACE inhibitor ramipril reduces mortality in patients with evidence of heart.
BEST: Beta-blocker Evaluation Survival Trial Purpose To determine whether the β-blocker bucindolol reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with advanced.
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study Purpose To evaluate whether the long-acting ACE inhibitor ramipril and/or vitamin E reduce the incidence.
CIBIS II Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study
P Sever (Co-chair), B Dahlöf (Co-chair), N Poulter (Secretary), H Wedel (Statistician), G Beevers, M Caulfield, R Collins, SE Kjeldsen, A Kristinsson,
COMET: Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial Purpose To compare the effects of carvedilol (a β 1 -, β 2 - and α 1 -receptor blocker) and short-acting.
Baseline characteristics. Patient flow Completed Completed Perindopril Placebo Randomised Not randomised Registered.
Heart rate in heart failure: Heart rate in heart failure: risk marker or risk factor? A subanalysis of the SHIFT trial on behalf of the Investigators M.
The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) 2 Investigators. N Engl J Med 2006; available at: End pointActive therapy PlaceboRelative.
ELITE - II Study Design  60 yrs; NYHA II - IV; EF  40 % ACEI naive or  7 days in 3 months prior to entry Standard Rx ( ± Dig / Diuretics ), ß - blocker.
4S: Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents FDA-Mandated CV Safety Trials 1.
OVERTURE FDA Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting July 19, 2002 Milton Packer, M.D., FACC Columbia University College of Physicians.
CR-1 Candesartan in HF Benefit/Risk James B. Young, MD Cleveland Clinic Foundation.
Rosuvastatin 10 mg n=2514 Placebo n= to 4 weeks Randomization 6weeks3 monthly Closing date 20 May 2007 Eligibility Optimal HF treatment instituted.
COPERNICUS: Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival trial Purpose To assess the effect of carvedilol, a β 1 -, β 2 - and α 1 -receptor blocker,
The JUPITER Trial Reference Ridker PM. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195–2207.
Ten Year Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Medical Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Results of the Surgical Treatment.
Angela Aziz Donnelly April 5, 2016
The SPRINT Research Group
Reducing Adverse Outcomes after ACS in Patients with Diabetes Goals
Flow of Individuals Through the Vitamin E and Vitamin C Components of the Physicians’ Health Study II Howard D. Sesso et al. JAMA 2008;300:
Trial profile SAS denotes the Simvastatin in Aortic Stenosis Study
LEADER trial: Primary Outcome
NYHA III* or IV heart failure ACE-I + loop diuretic ± digoxn
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study
Clinical need for determination of vulnerable plaques
Copyright © 2007 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial Investigators
Baseline characteristics of patients
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Insights from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT)
CIBIS II: Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II
P2Y12 blockade versus placebo; risk ratio with 95% CIs for the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and.
FOURIER Trial design: Patients with established cardiovascular disease on statin therapy were randomized to evolocumab 140 mg subcutaneous every 2 weeks.
(p for noninferiority < 0.001)
ARISE Trial Aggressive Reduction of Inflammation Stops Events
Systolic Heart failure treatment with the If inhibitor ivabradine Trial Effect of ivabradine on recurrent hospitalization for worsening heart failure:
Flow diagram for exclusions of trials identified RCT indicates randomized controlled trial Hulten E, et al. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:
Age-Standardized Rates of Death from Any Cause According to the Estimated GFR among 1,120,295 Ambulatory Adults Alan S.Go et al. N Engl J Med 2004; 351:
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
EMPA-REG OUTCOME: Cumulative incidence of the primary outcome
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
The benefit of evolocumab treatment is consistent regardless of inflammation level HR %CI ARR 1.6% 1.8%
Presentation transcript:

CAPRICORN Adverse CV Events (Frequency ≥ 1.5%) in Either Treatment Group (Uptitration Phase)

COPERNICUS All-Cause Mortality % Survival Carvedilol Placebo Months Packer M., et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1651– %  in risk P= (unadjusted) P=.0014 (adjusted)

CAPRICORN Effect of Study Drug on Duration of Index Hospitalization

Closed Section “The best option was thought to be a change of the primary endpoint to Death or cardiovascular hospitalization, keeping the target number of events for the primary endpoint unchanged. This would substantially increase the event rate and would allow the study to be completed in good order. Professor Julian was asked to write to the Steering Committee with this proposal.” Despite change in primary endpoint, stopping rules were still to be based on all-cause mortality. CAPRICORN DSMB Meeting #5 (March 10, 1999)

Original protocol paid little attention to definition of CV hospitalization because it was a secondary endpoint. Steering Committee assigned responsibility for defining CV hospitalization to Endpoint Committee. Endpoint Committee defined CV hospitalization as hospitalizations for which there was no clear non-CV cause. Committee did not target reasons that might be favorably influenced by  -blockade. Steering Committee was reluctant to make too many changes. When it changed the primary endpoint (by simply elevating a secondary endpoint), it was reluctant to change the definition of the endpoint. Why Was Cardiovascular Hospitalization Defined To Include All Such Events?

Reasons for Other CV Hospitalization CAPRICORN

Effect of Carvedilol on Primary Endpoints According to Prior Use of b-Blockers CAPRICORN Number in brackets under each hazard ratio denotes number of events

CAPRICORN Hospitalizations with more than one cause were counted only once and attributed to the worst event listed as a reason for the admission (myocardial infarction > heart failure > unstable angina > stroke > TIA > other angina or chest pain > nonclassified or other > cardiovascular procedure > noncardiovascular). Total Number of Hospitalizations for Specified Reasons

Carvedilol Placebo Years Proportion Event Free The CAPRICORN Investigators, Lancet 2001 P=0.031 All-Cause Mortality CAPRICORN

Effect on Cardiovascular Endpoints CAPRICORN

Age < 70 (n=1341) Age ≥ 70 (n=618) Men (n=1440) Women (n=519) Russia (n=600) Ex-Russia (n=1359) Prior MI (n=589) No prior MI (n=1370) Anterior MI (n=1108) Inferior MI (n=410) Other MI (n=441) Thrombolytic (n=718) No thrombolytic (n=1241) PTCA for MI (n=243) No PTCA for MI (n=1716) Hazard Ratio Current/prior CHF (n=936) No current/prior CHF (n=1023) Diuretics during MI (n=658) No diuretics during MI (n=1301) Angina (n=1090) No angina (n=869) Hypertension (n=1055) No hypertension (n=904) Diabetes (n=437) No diabetes (n=1522) Heart rate < 70 (n=590) Heart rate > 70 (n=1365) Hazard Ratio All-Cause Mortality Subgroups CAPRICORN

Killip class I (n=1289) Killip class II (n=593) Killip class III (n=65)  Cardiac enzymes (n=1650) No  cardiac enzymes (n=309) Systolic BP > 130 (n=464) Systolic BP (n=1039) Systolic BP < 110 (n=453) Systolic BP ≤ 100 (n=252) Protocol-specified Post hoc CAPRICORN Subgroups Hazard Ratio All Cause Mortality 21 events

Effect on Recurrent Infarction CAPRICORN Among first events leading to death or CV hospitalization (co-primary endpoint), 45 of such events on placebo and 27 such events on carvedilol were due to a recurrent infarction. Total number of hospitalizations for myocardial infarction (including first and recurrent) was 60 in the placebo group and 37 in the carvedilol group.